{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,23]],"date-time":"2025-12-23T11:04:22Z","timestamp":1766487862669,"version":"3.48.0"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,23]],"date-time":"2025-12-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1766448000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000001","name":"National Science Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["DMR# 1906383"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["DMR# 1906383"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000001","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Entropy"],"abstract":"<jats:p>An extensive literature on decision theory has been developed by both subjective Bayesians and Neyman\u2013Pearson (NP) theorists, with more recent contributions to it from evidential decision theorists. The last-mentioned, however, have often been framed from a Bayesian perspective and therefore retain a subjectivist orientation. By contrast, we advance a comparative evidence-based model choice (CEMC) account of epistemic utility, which is explicitly non-subjective. On this account, competing models are assessed by the degree to which they are supported by the data and relevant background information, and evaluated comparatively in terms of their relative distances. CEMC thus provides a philosophical framework for inference that integrates the complementary epistemic goals of prediction and explanation. Our approach proceeds in two stages. First, we articulate a framework for non-subjective, non-NP-style, comparative, evidence-based model choice grounded in epistemic utility. Second, we identify statistical tools appropriate for measuring epistemic utility within this framework. We then contrast CEMC with non-comparative evidential decision-theoretic approaches, such as interval-based probability, pioneered by Henry Kyburg, which do not necessarily share the dual aims of explanation and prediction. We conclude by considering the interrelations between prediction, explanation, and model selection criteria, and by showing how these are closely connected with the central commitments of CEMC.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/e28010013","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,23]],"date-time":"2025-12-23T10:57:18Z","timestamp":1766487438000},"page":"13","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparative Evidence-Based Model Choice: A Sketch of a Theory"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"Prasanta S.","family":"Bandyopadhyay","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of History and Philosophy, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6910-0291","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Samidha","family":"Shetty","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Mathematical Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0004-3233-8775","authenticated-orcid":false,"suffix":"Jr.","given":"Gordon","family":"Brittan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of History and Philosophy, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Savage, L.J. (1962). The Foundations of Statistical Inference, Dover.","DOI":"10.2307\/2281641"},{"key":"ref_2","unstructured":"Jeffrey, R. (1990). The Logic of Decision, University of Chicago Press. [2nd ed.]."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ahmed, A. (2014). Evidence, Decision, and Causality, Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139107990"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pettigrew, R. (2016). Accuracy, and the Laws of Credence, Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780198732716.001.0001"},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Weirich, P. (2021). Rational Choice Using Imprecise Probabilities, and Utilities, Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/9781108582209"},{"key":"ref_6","first-page":"263","article-title":"On The Use And Interpretation Of Certain Test Criteria For Purposes Of Statistical Inference","volume":"20A","author":"Neyman","year":"1928","journal-title":"Biometrika"},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1098\/rsta.1933.0009","article-title":"On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses","volume":"231","author":"Neyman","year":"1933","journal-title":"Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A"},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kyburg, H.E. (1974). The Logical Foundations of Statistical Inference, Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-010-2175-3"},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kyburg, H.E., and Teng, C.M. (2001). Uncertain Inference, Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511612947"},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lele, S.R. (2004). Evidence Functions and the Optimality of the Law of Likelihood. The Nature of Scientific Evidence: Statistical, Philosophical, and Empirical Considerations, The University of Chicago Press.","DOI":"10.7208\/chicago\/9780226789583.003.0007"},{"key":"ref_11","unstructured":"Bandyopadhyay, P.S., and Forster, M.R. (2011). Evidence, Evidence Functions, and Error Probabilities, Handbook of Philosophy of Statistics, Elsevier."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jerde, C.L., Kraskura, K., Eliason, E.J., Csik, S.R., Stier, A.C., and Taper, M.L. (2019). Strong Evidence for an Intraspecific Metabolic Scaling Coefficient Near 0.89 in Fish. Front. Physiol., 10.","DOI":"10.3389\/fphys.2019.01166"},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Taper, M.L., Ponciano, J.M., and Dennis, B. (2022). Editorial: Entropy, Statistical Evidence, and Scientific Inference: Evidence Functions in Theory and Applications. Entropy, 24.","DOI":"10.3390\/e24091273"},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02480194","article-title":"A Bayesian Analysis of the Minimum AIC Procedure, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics","volume":"30","author":"Akaike","year":"1978","journal-title":"Ann. Inst. Statist. Math."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"461","DOI":"10.1214\/aos\/1176344136","article-title":"Estimating the Dimension of a Model","volume":"6","author":"Schwarz","year":"1978","journal-title":"Ann. Stat."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02294361","article-title":"Model selection and Akaike\u2019s information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions","volume":"52","author":"Bozdogan","year":"1987","journal-title":"Psychometrika"},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2517-6161.1979.tb01072.x","article-title":"The Determination of the Order of an Autoregression","volume":"41","author":"Hannan","year":"1979","journal-title":"J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.)"},{"key":"ref_18","unstructured":"Burnham, K.P., and Anderson, D.R. (2002). Model Selection and Mutli-Model Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, Springer. [2nd ed.]."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Taper, M.L., and Lele, S.R. (2004). Model identification from many candidates. The Nature of Scientific Evidence: Statistical, Philosophical, and Empirical Considerations, University of Chicago Press.","DOI":"10.7208\/chicago\/9780226789583.003.0015"},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/76.2.297","article-title":"Regression and time series model selection in small samples","volume":"76","author":"Hurvich","year":"1989","journal-title":"Biometrika"},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"631","DOI":"10.1890\/13-1452.1","article-title":"Model selection for ecologists: The worldviews of AIC and BIC","volume":"95","author":"Aho","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ecology"},{"key":"ref_22","unstructured":"Wood, J., and Hepburn, H.B. (2001). Logical consequence and beyond: A look at model selection in statistics. Logical Consequence, Hermes Science."},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S264","DOI":"10.1086\/289960","article-title":"The Curve Fitting Problem: A Bayesian Approach","volume":"63","author":"Bandyopadhyay","year":"1996","journal-title":"Philos. Sci."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1093\/bjps\/45.1.1","article-title":"How to Tell when Simple, More Unified, or Less Ad Hoc Theories will Provide More Accurate Predictions","volume":"45","author":"Forster","year":"1994","journal-title":"Br. J. Philos. Sci."},{"key":"ref_25","unstructured":"Stephenson, B. (2012). Kepler\u2019s Physical Astronomy, Springer."},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/62.3.547","article-title":"Goodness of Prediction Fit","volume":"62","author":"Aitchison","year":"1975","journal-title":"Biometrika"},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2517-6161.1984.tb01302.x","article-title":"A Predictive Model Selection Criterion","volume":"46","author":"Spezzaferri","year":"1984","journal-title":"J. R. Stat. Soc."},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.1080\/03610929608831716","article-title":"Prediction with Vague Knowledge","volume":"25","author":"Reschenhofer","year":"1996","journal-title":"Commun. Stat.-Theory Methods"},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1093\/bjps\/50.1.83","article-title":"Model selection in science: The problem of language variance","volume":"50","author":"Forster","year":"1999","journal-title":"Br. J. Philos. Sci."},{"key":"ref_30","unstructured":"Bandyopadhyay, P. (2026). Pragmatic Bayesianism: Belief, Evidence, Prediction, Decision, MIT Press. forthcoming."},{"key":"ref_31","unstructured":"Bandyopadhyay, P.S. (1995). Constructive Empiricism: From a Theory of Empirical Adequacy to a Theory of Acceptance. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Rochester]."}],"container-title":["Entropy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1099-4300\/28\/1\/13\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,23]],"date-time":"2025-12-23T11:01:08Z","timestamp":1766487668000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1099-4300\/28\/1\/13"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,23]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]}},"alternative-id":["e28010013"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/e28010013","relation":{},"ISSN":["1099-4300"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1099-4300","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,23]]}}}