{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,30]],"date-time":"2025-10-30T07:01:06Z","timestamp":1761807666438,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,16]],"date-time":"2011-03-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1300233600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/3.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Games"],"abstract":"<jats:p>This paper presents a case of parsimony and generalization in model comparisons. We submitted two versions of the same cognitive model to the Market Entry Competition (MEC), which involved four-person and two-alternative (enter or stay out) games. Our model was designed according to the Instance-Based Learning Theory (IBLT). The two versions of the model assumed the same cognitive principles of decision making and learning in the MEC. The only difference between the two models was the assumption of homogeneity among the four participants: one model assumed homogeneous participants (IBL-same) while the other model assumed heterogeneous participants (IBL-different). The IBL-same model involved three free parameters in total while the IBL-different involved 12 free parameters, i.e., three free parameters for each of the four participants. The IBL-different model outperformed the IBL-same model in the competition, but after exposing the models to a more challenging generalization test (the Technion Prediction Tournament), the IBL-same model outperformed the IBL-different model. Thus, a loser can be a winner depending on the generalization conditions used to compare models. We describe the models and the process by which we reach these conclusions.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/g2010136","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,16]],"date-time":"2011-03-16T07:24:32Z","timestamp":1300260272000},"page":"136-162","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["A Loser Can Be a Winner: Comparison of Two Instance-based Learning Models in a Market Entry Competition"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"2","author":[{"given":"Cleotilde","family":"Gonzalez","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Dynamic Decision Making Laboratory, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Varun","family":"Dutt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Dynamic Decision Making Laboratory, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tom\u00e1s","family":"Lejarraga","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Dynamic Decision Making Laboratory, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.3390\/g1020117","article-title":"A choice prediction competition for market entry games: An introduction","volume":"1","author":"Erev","year":"2010","journal-title":"Games"},{"key":"ref_2","first-page":"591","article-title":"Instance-based learning in dynamic decision making","volume":"27","author":"Gonzalez","year":"2003","journal-title":"Cogn. Sci."},{"key":"ref_3","unstructured":"Anderson, J.R., and Lebiere, C. (1998). The Atomic Components of Thought, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates."},{"key":"ref_4","unstructured":"Zizzo, D., and Courakis, A. (2005). Transfer of Knowledge in Economic Decision-making, Macmillan (Palgrave Macmillan)."},{"key":"ref_5","unstructured":"Lovett, M.C., Schunn, C.D., Lebiere, C., and Munro, P. (,  2004). Learning to make decisions in dynamic environments: Act-r plays the beer game. Pittsburgh, PA, USA."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gonzalez, C., and Dutt, V. (,  2010). Instance-based learning models of training. San Francisco, CA, USA.","DOI":"10.1037\/e578882012-021"},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cogsys.2010.06.004","article-title":"A cognitive modeling account of simultaneous learning and fatigue effects","volume":"12","author":"Gonzalez","year":"2010","journal-title":"J. Cogn. Syst. Res."},{"key":"ref_8","unstructured":"Howes, A., Peebles, D., and Cooper, R. (,  2009). An instance-based learning model of stimulus-response compatibility effects in mixed location-relevant and location-irrelevant tasks. Manchester, UK."},{"key":"ref_9","unstructured":"Lewis, R.L., Polk, T.A., and Laird, J.E. (,  2007). Instance-based decision making model of repeated binary choice. Ann Arbor, MI, USA."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lejarraga, T., Dutt, V., and Gonzalez, C. (2010). Instance-based learning: A general model of repeated binary choice. J. Behav. Decis. Mak., (in press).","DOI":"10.1002\/bdm.722"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmp.2008.05.006","article-title":"Learning, risk attitude and hot stoves in restless bandit problems","volume":"53","author":"Biele","year":"2009","journal-title":"J. Math. Psychol."},{"key":"ref_12","unstructured":"Nevo, I., and Erev, I. (2010). On surprise, change, and the effect of recent outcomes. (in preparation)."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"912","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-295X.112.4.912","article-title":"On adaptation, maximization, and reinforcement learning among cognitive strategies","volume":"112","author":"Erev","year":"2005","journal-title":"Psychol. Rev."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1006\/obhd.1996.2670","article-title":"Randomization and adaptive learning in a simplified poker game","volume":"69","author":"Rapoport","year":"1997","journal-title":"Organ.Behav.Hum.Decis.Process."},{"key":"ref_15","unstructured":"Gonzalez, C., and Dutt, V. (2010). Integrating sampling and repeated choice paradigms of decision from experience. (submitted)."},{"key":"ref_16","unstructured":"Lebiere, C. (,  1999). Blending: An ACT-R mechanism for aggregate retrievals. Fairfax, VA, USA."},{"key":"ref_17","unstructured":"Wong, T.J., Cokely, E.T., and Schooler, L.J. An Online database of ACT-R parameters: Toward a transparent community-based approach to model development. Philadelphia, PA, USA."},{"key":"ref_18","unstructured":"Busemeyer, J.R., and Diederich, A. (2010). Cognitive Modeling, Sage."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1006\/jmps.1999.1282","article-title":"Model comparison and model selections based on generalization criterion methodology","volume":"44","author":"Busemeyer","year":"2000","journal-title":"J. Math. Psychol."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1002\/bdm.683","article-title":"A choice prediction competition for choices from experience and from description","volume":"23","author":"Erev","year":"2010","journal-title":"J. Behav. Decis. Mak."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.3758\/BF03196467","article-title":"Flexibility versus generalizability in model selection","volume":"10","author":"Pitt","year":"2003","journal-title":"Psychon. Bull. Rev."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"421","DOI":"10.1016\/S1364-6613(02)01964-2","article-title":"When a good fit can be bad","volume":"6","author":"Pitt","year":"2002","journal-title":"Trends. Cogn. Sci."},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cogpsych.2003.11.001","article-title":"Assessing the distinguishability of models and the informativeness of data","volume":"49","author":"Navarro","year":"2004","journal-title":"Cogn. Psychol."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1006\/jmps.1999.1279","article-title":"Cross-validation methods","volume":"44","author":"Browne","year":"2000","journal-title":"J. Math. Psychol."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1002\/bdm.443","article-title":"Small feedback-based decisions and their limited correspondence to description-based decisions","volume":"16","author":"Barron","year":"2003","journal-title":"J. Behav. Decis. Mak."},{"key":"ref_26","unstructured":"Newell, A. (1990). Unified Theories of Cognition, Harvard University Press."}],"container-title":["Games"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2073-4336\/2\/1\/136\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T21:55:33Z","timestamp":1760219733000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2073-4336\/2\/1\/136"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,16]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,3]]}},"alternative-id":["g2010136"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/g2010136","relation":{},"ISSN":["2073-4336"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2073-4336"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,16]]}}}