{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,19]],"date-time":"2026-06-19T14:44:55Z","timestamp":1781880295723,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":70,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,27]],"date-time":"2018-07-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1532649600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"Specialty wood products partnership, New Zealand","award":["N\/A"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["N\/A"]}]},{"name":"The Agricultural and Marketing Research and Development Trust (AGMARDT)","award":["N\/A"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["N\/A"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["IJGI"],"abstract":"<jats:p>It is common to generate digital elevation models (DEMs) from aerial laser scanning (ALS) data. However, cost and lack of knowledge may preclude its use. In contrast, global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) are seldom used to collect and generate DEMs. These receivers have the potential to be considered as data sources for DEM interpolation, as they can be inexpensive, easy to use, and mobile. The data interpolation method and spatial resolution from this method needs to be optimised to create accurate DEMs. Moreover, the density of GNSS data is likely to affect DEM accuracy. This study investigates three different deterministic approaches, in combination with spatial resolution and data thinning, to determine their combined effects on DEM accuracy. Digital elevation models were interpolated, with resolutions ranging from 0.5 m to 10 m using natural neighbour (NaN), topo to raster (ANUDEM), and inverse distance weighted (IDW) methods. The GNSS data were thinned by 25% (0.389 points m\u22122), 50% (0.259 points m\u22122), and 75% (0.129 points m\u22122) and resulting DEMs were contrast against a DEM interpolated from unthinned data (0.519 points m\u22122). Digital elevation model accuracy was measured by root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). It was found that the highest resolution, 0.5 m, produced the lowest errors in resulting DEMs (RMSE = 0.428 m, MAE = 0.274 m). The ANUDEM method yielded the greatest DEM accuracy from a quantitative perspective (RMSE = 0.305 m and MAE = 0.197 m); however, NaN produced a more visually appealing surface. In all the assessments, IDW showed the lowest accuracy. Thinning the input data by 25% and even 50% had relatively little impact on DEM quality; however, accuracy decreased markedly at 75% thinning (0.129 points m\u22122). This study showed that, in a time where ALS is commonly used to generate DEMs, GNSS-surveyed data can be used to create accurate DEMs. This study confirmed the need for optimization to choose the appropriate interpolation method and spatial resolution in order to produce a reliable DEM.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/ijgi7080300","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,27]],"date-time":"2018-07-27T12:20:03Z","timestamp":1532694003000},"page":"300","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":49,"title":["A Comparative Study of Three Non-Geostatistical Methods for Optimising Digital Elevation Model Interpolation"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"7","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3037-1721","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Serajis","family":"Salekin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"New Zealand School of Forestry, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jack H.","family":"Burgess","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"New Zealand School of Forestry, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2747-7349","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Justin","family":"Morgenroth","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"New Zealand School of Forestry, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9024-9106","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Euan G.","family":"Mason","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"New Zealand School of Forestry, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dean F.","family":"Meason","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Scion, 49 Sala Street, Private Bag 3020, Rotorua 3010, New Zealand"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","unstructured":"Peralvo, M., and Maidment, D. (2004). Influence of DEM interpolation methods in drainage analysis. Gis Hydro, 4."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1177\/0309133308089496","article-title":"Airborne lidar for DEM generation: Some critical issues","volume":"32","author":"Liu","year":"2008","journal-title":"Prog. Phys. Geogr. Earth Environ."},{"key":"ref_3","unstructured":"Vaze, J., and Teng, J. (2007). High resolution lidar DEM\u2014How good is it?. Model. Simul., 692\u2013698."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Koci, J., Jarihani, B., Leon, J.X., Sidle, R., Wilkinson, S., and Bartley, R. (2017). Assessment of uav and ground-based structure from motion with multi-view stereo photogrammetry in a gullied savanna catchment. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 6.","DOI":"10.20944\/preprints201707.0030.v1"},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Traganos, D., Poursanidis, D., Aggarwal, B., Chrysoulakis, N., and Reinartz, P. (2018). Estimating satellite-derived bathymetry (SDB) with the google earth engine and sentinel-2. Remote Sens., 10.","DOI":"10.3390\/rs10060859"},{"key":"ref_6","first-page":"362","article-title":"Point distribution as true quality of lidar point cloud","volume":"5","author":"Kodors","year":"2017","journal-title":"Balt. J. Mod. Comput."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1186\/1179-5395-43-16","article-title":"Uptake and barriers to the use of geospatial technologies in forest management","volume":"43","author":"Morgenroth","year":"2013","journal-title":"N. Z. J. For. Sci."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kurz, T.H., Buckley, S.J., Howell, J.A., and Schneider, D. (2009, January 26\u201328). In close range hyperspectral and lidar data integration for geological outcrop analysis. Proceedings of the 2009 First Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing, Grenoble, France.","DOI":"10.1109\/WHISPERS.2009.5288998"},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"334","DOI":"10.1007\/s11119-017-9519-4","article-title":"Evaluation of the use of lidar laser scanner to map pruning wood in vineyards and its potential for management zones delineation","volume":"19","author":"Tagarakis","year":"2018","journal-title":"Precis. Agric."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1016\/j.landurbplan.2010.08.004","article-title":"Automated derivation of urban building density information using airborne lidar data and object-based method","volume":"98","author":"Yu","year":"2010","journal-title":"Landsc. Urban Plan."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Parkinson, B.W., Enge, P., Axelrad, P., and Spilker, J.J. (1996). Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications, Volume II, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.","DOI":"10.2514\/4.866395"},{"key":"ref_12","unstructured":"Pick, J. (2006, January 4\u20136). A case-study analysis of costs and benefits of geographic information systems: Relationships to firm size and strategy. Proceedings of the 12th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2006), Acapulco, Mexico."},{"key":"ref_13","unstructured":"Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., Lichtenegger, H., and Collins, J. (2012). Global Positioning System: Theory and Practice, Springer Science & Business Media."},{"key":"ref_14","unstructured":"Groves, P.D. (2013). Principles of Gnss, Inertial, and Multisensor Integrated Navigation Systems, Artech House."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/S0168-1699(03)00010-3","article-title":"The role of GIS and GPS in precision farming","volume":"40","author":"Pecze","year":"2003","journal-title":"Comput. Electron. Agric."},{"key":"ref_16","first-page":"15","article-title":"Automatic GNSS-enabled harvester data collection as a tool to evaluate factors affecting harvester productivity in a Eucalyptus spp. Harvesting operation in Uruguay","volume":"27","author":"Olivera","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int. J. For. Eng."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"591","DOI":"10.1177\/0309133307087084","article-title":"Towards accurate determination of surface height using modern geoinformatic methods: Possibilities and limitations","volume":"31","author":"Gao","year":"2007","journal-title":"Prog. Phys. Geogr. Earth Environ."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1011429815226","article-title":"Evaluation of sub-meter and 2 to 5 meter accuracy GPS receivers to develop digital elevation models","volume":"2","author":"Yao","year":"2000","journal-title":"Precis. Agric."},{"key":"ref_19","first-page":"1113","article-title":"Effects of various factors on the accuracy of dems: An intensive experimental investigation","volume":"66","author":"Gong","year":"2000","journal-title":"Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1016\/j.geomorph.2005.12.010","article-title":"Accuracy of interpolation techniques for the derivation of digital elevation models in relation to landform types and data density","volume":"77","author":"Chaplot","year":"2006","journal-title":"Geomorphology"},{"key":"ref_21","unstructured":"Li, J., and Heap, A.D. (2008). A Review of Spatial Interpolation Methods for Environmental Scientists, Geosciene Australia."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"366","DOI":"10.1002\/esp.1731","article-title":"A comparision of interpolation methods for producing digital elevation models at the field scale","volume":"34","author":"Erdogan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Earth Surf. Process. Landf."},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ecoinf.2010.12.003","article-title":"A review of comparative studies of spatial interpolation methods in environmental sciences: Performance and impact factors","volume":"6","author":"Li","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ecol. Inform."},{"key":"ref_24","first-page":"481","article-title":"Spatial interpolation","volume":"Volume 1","author":"Mitas","year":"1999","journal-title":"Geographical Information Systems: Principles, Techniques, Management and Applications"},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compag.2005.07.003","article-title":"Testing the performance of spatial interpolation techniques for mapping soil properties","volume":"50","author":"Robinson","year":"2006","journal-title":"Comput. Electron. Agric."},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1007586507433","article-title":"An experimental comparison of ordinary and universal kriging and inverse distance weighting","volume":"31","author":"Zimmerman","year":"1999","journal-title":"Math. Geol."},{"key":"ref_27","first-page":"109","article-title":"Impact of DEM resolution and accuracy on remote sensing and topographic dem derived topographic attributes and drainage pattern","volume":"49","author":"Amjad","year":"2016","journal-title":"J. Himal. Earth Sci."},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4870","DOI":"10.1002\/hyp.10967","article-title":"How does DEM resolution affect microtopographic characteristics, hydrologic connectivity, and modelling of hydrologic processes?","volume":"30","author":"Habtezion","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hydrol. Process."},{"key":"ref_29","unstructured":"NIWA (2015, August 26). Overview of New Zealand Climate. Available online: https:\/\/www.niwa.co.nz\/education-and-training\/schools\/resources\/climate\/overview."},{"key":"ref_30","unstructured":"Trimble (2018, June 13). Available online: https:\/\/geospatial.trimble.com\/products-and-solutions."},{"key":"ref_31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0033-0124.2005.00470.x","article-title":"Incorporating spatial dependence in predictive vegetation models: Residual interpolation methods","volume":"57","author":"Miller","year":"2005","journal-title":"Prof. Geogr."},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2981","DOI":"10.1080\/0143116031000086835","article-title":"Higher-order interpolation of regular grid digital elevation models","volume":"24","author":"Kidner","year":"2003","journal-title":"Int. J. Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/0031-8663(86)90002-5","article-title":"A comparative test of photogrammetrically sampled digital elevation models","volume":"41","author":"Lindgren","year":"1986","journal-title":"Photogrammetria"},{"key":"ref_34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1559\/152304083783914958","article-title":"Spatial interpolation methods: A review","volume":"10","author":"Lam","year":"1983","journal-title":"Am. Cartogr."},{"key":"ref_35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1080\/13658810500286943","article-title":"A hybrid interpolation method for the refinement of a regular grid digital elevation model","volume":"20","author":"Shi","year":"2006","journal-title":"Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci."},{"key":"ref_36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"587","DOI":"10.1002\/esp.1053","article-title":"Sensitivity of a physically based method for terrain interpolation to initial conditions and its conditioning on stream location","volume":"29","author":"Grimaldi","year":"2004","journal-title":"Earth Surf. Process. Landf."},{"key":"ref_37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Niemann, J.D., Bras, R.L., and Veneziano, D. (2003). A physically based interpolation method for fluvially eroded topography. Water Resour. Res., 39.","DOI":"10.1029\/2001WR001050"},{"key":"ref_38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1016\/j.advwatres.2004.11.014","article-title":"Preserving first and second moments of the slope area relationship during the interpolation of digital elevation models","volume":"28","author":"Grimaldi","year":"2005","journal-title":"Adv. Water Resour."},{"key":"ref_39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"708","DOI":"10.1109\/36.581991","article-title":"A physically-based model to correct atmospheric and illumination effects in optical satellite data of rugged terrain","volume":"35","author":"Sandmeier","year":"1997","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1016\/j.envsoft.2013.12.008","article-title":"Spatial interpolation methods applied in the environmental sciences: A review","volume":"53","author":"Li","year":"2014","journal-title":"Environ. Model. Softw."},{"key":"ref_41","unstructured":"ESRI (ArcGIS Release 10.1., 2012). ArcGIS Release 10.1."},{"key":"ref_42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1071\/AJ81016","article-title":"A precise method for determining contoured surfaces","volume":"22","author":"Philip","year":"1982","journal-title":"APPEA J"},{"key":"ref_43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9272.2007.00593.x","article-title":"Mapping paleo-fire boundaries from binary point data: Comparing interpolation methods","volume":"59","author":"Hessl","year":"2007","journal-title":"Prof. Geogr."},{"key":"ref_44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Garnero, G., and Godone, D. (2013, January 27\u201328). Comparisons between different interpolation techniques. Proceedings of the International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XL-5 W, Padua, Italy.","DOI":"10.5194\/isprsarchives-XL-5-W3-139-2013"},{"key":"ref_45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-1694(89)90073-5","article-title":"A new procedure for gridding elevation and stream line data with automatic removal of spurious pits","volume":"106","author":"Hutchinson","year":"1989","journal-title":"J. Hydrol."},{"key":"ref_46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1080\/10106049.2015.1047411","article-title":"Gis-based approach for flood analysis: Case study of ke\u00e7idere flash flood event (Turkey)","volume":"31","author":"Curebal","year":"2016","journal-title":"Geocarto Int."},{"key":"ref_47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"565","DOI":"10.1007\/s13157-014-0524-3","article-title":"Quantifying tropical wetlands using field surveys, spatial statistics and remote sensing","volume":"34","author":"Salari","year":"2014","journal-title":"Wetlands"},{"key":"ref_48","unstructured":"Sibson, R. (1981). A brief description of natural neighbor interpolation. Interpreting Multivariate Data, John Wiley & Sons."},{"key":"ref_49","unstructured":"Webster, R., and Oliver, M. (2001). Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists (Statistics in Practice), Wiley."},{"key":"ref_50","unstructured":"Ledoux, H., and Gold, C. (2005). An Efficient Natural Neighbour Interpolation Algorithm for Geoscientific Modelling, Springer."},{"key":"ref_51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1080\/02723646.1981.10642213","article-title":"On the validation of models","volume":"2","author":"Willmott","year":"1981","journal-title":"Phys. Geogr."},{"key":"ref_52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.3354\/cr024161","article-title":"Comparative analysis of interpolation methods in the middle Ebro Valley (Spain): Application to annual precipitation and temperature","volume":"24","author":"Cuadrat","year":"2003","journal-title":"Clim. Res."},{"key":"ref_53","unstructured":"R Core Team (2014). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Core Team. Available online: http:\/\/www.R-project.org."},{"key":"ref_54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1309","DOI":"10.1175\/1520-0477(1982)063<1309:SCOTEO>2.0.CO;2","article-title":"Some comments on the evaluation of model performance","volume":"63","author":"Willmott","year":"1982","journal-title":"Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc."},{"key":"ref_55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02139623","article-title":"Response of potatoes to n fertilizer: Dynamic model","volume":"85","author":"Greenwood","year":"1985","journal-title":"Plant Soil"},{"key":"ref_56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.3354\/cr022099","article-title":"A knowledge-based approach to the statistical mapping of climate","volume":"22","author":"Daly","year":"2002","journal-title":"Clim. Res."},{"key":"ref_57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"406","DOI":"10.1016\/j.geoderma.2005.06.004","article-title":"Horizontal resolution and data density effects on remotely sensed lidar-based DEM","volume":"132","author":"Anderson","year":"2006","journal-title":"Geoderma"},{"key":"ref_58","unstructured":"Liu, X., Zhang, Z., Peterson, J., and Chandra, S. (2017, January 10\u201313). The effect of lidar data density on DEM accuracy. Proceedings of the International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM07), Christchurch, New Zealand."},{"key":"ref_59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9671.2004.00169.x","article-title":"The effect of DEM raster resolution on first order, second order and compound terrain derivatives","volume":"8","author":"Kienzle","year":"2004","journal-title":"Trans. GIS"},{"key":"ref_60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ouma, Y. (2016). Evaluation of multiresolution digital elevation model (DEM) from real-time kinematic GPS and ancillary data for reservoir storage capacity estimation. Hydrology, 3.","DOI":"10.3390\/hydrology3020016"},{"key":"ref_61","first-page":"38","article-title":"Defining optimal DEM resolutions and point densities for modelling hydrologically sensitive areas in agricultural catchments dominated by microtopography","volume":"54","author":"Thomas","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf."},{"key":"ref_62","first-page":"133","article-title":"A comparative analysis of different DEM interpolation methods","volume":"16","author":"Arun","year":"2013","journal-title":"Egypt. J. Remote Sens. Space Sci."},{"key":"ref_63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.14358\/PERS.76.6.701","article-title":"Effects of topographic variability and lidar sampling density on several dem interpolation methods","volume":"76","author":"Guo","year":"2010","journal-title":"Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"577","DOI":"10.1080\/13658810410001701987","article-title":"The choice of window size in approximating topographic surfaces from digital elevation models","volume":"18","author":"Albani","year":"2004","journal-title":"Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci."},{"key":"ref_65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.1080\/13658810210129139","article-title":"Errors of signal processing in digital terrain modelling","volume":"16","author":"Florinsky","year":"2002","journal-title":"Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci."},{"key":"ref_66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1177\/030913339802200102","article-title":"Combined analysis of digital terrain models and remotely sensed data in landscape investigations","volume":"22","author":"Florinsky","year":"1998","journal-title":"Prog. Phys. Geogr. Earth Environ."},{"key":"ref_67","first-page":"155","article-title":"Comparative analysis of spatial interpolation methods: An experimental study","volume":"165","author":"Tan","year":"2014","journal-title":"Sens. Transducers"},{"key":"ref_68","unstructured":"Bobach, T., and Umlauf, G. (2008). Natural neighbor concepts in scattered data interpolation and discrete function approx-imation. Visualization of Large and Unstructured Data Sets, GI Digital Library."},{"key":"ref_69","first-page":"3","article-title":"Comparison of spatial interpolation methods","volume":"3","author":"Li","year":"2000","journal-title":"Adv. Earth Sci."},{"key":"ref_70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.14358\/PERS.70.3.331","article-title":"Accuracy of airborne lidar-derived elevation","volume":"70","author":"Hodgson","year":"2004","journal-title":"Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens."}],"container-title":["ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2220-9964\/7\/8\/300\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T15:14:48Z","timestamp":1760195688000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2220-9964\/7\/8\/300"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,27]]},"references-count":70,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,8]]}},"alternative-id":["ijgi7080300"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ijgi7080300","relation":{},"ISSN":["2220-9964"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2220-9964","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,27]]}}}