{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,4]],"date-time":"2026-06-04T00:50:51Z","timestamp":1780534251158,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":73,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,3]],"date-time":"2019-04-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1554249600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004006","name":"Bilimsel Ara\u015ftirma Projeleri Birimi, Istanbul \u00dcniversitesi","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["FBA-2016-3743"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["FBA-2016-3743"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004006","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["IJGI"],"abstract":"<jats:p>In this study, different in-situ and close-range sensing surveying techniques were compared based on the spatial differences of the resultant datasets. In this context, the DJI Phantom 3 Advanced and Trimble UX5 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) platforms, Zoller + Fr\u00f6hlich 5010C phase comparison for continuous wave-based Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) system and Network Real Time Kinematic (NRTK) Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver were used to obtain the horizontal and vertical information about the study area. All data were collected in a gently (mean slope angle 4%) inclined, flat vegetation-free, bare-earth valley bottom near Istanbul, Turkey (the size is approximately 0.7 ha). UAV data acquisitions were performed at 25-, 50-, 120-m (with DJI Phantom 3 Advanced) and 350-m (with Trimble UX5) flight altitudes (above ground level, AGL). The imagery was processed with the state-of-the-art SfM (Structure-from-Motion) photogrammetry software. The ortho-mosaics and digital elevation models were generated from UAV-based photogrammetric and TLS-based data. GNSS- and TLS-based data were used as reference to calculate the accuracy of the UAV-based geodata. The UAV-results were assessed in 1D (points), 2D (areas) and 3D (volumes) based on the horizontal (X- and Y-directions) and vertical (Z-direction) differences. Various error measures, including the RMSE (Root Mean Square Error), ME (Mean Error) or MAE (Mean Average Error), and simple descriptive statistics were used to calculate the residuals. The comparison of the results is simplified by applying a normalization procedure commonly used in multi-criteria-decision-making analysis or visualizing offset. According to the results, low-altitude (25 and 50 m AGL) flights feature higher accuracy in the horizontal dimension (e.g., mean errors of 0.085 and 0.064 m, respectively) but lower accuracy in the Z-dimension (e.g., false positive volumes of 2402 and 1160 m3, respectively) compared to the higher-altitude flights (i.e., 120 and 350 m AGL). The accuracy difference with regard to the observed terrain heights are particularly striking, depending on the compared error measure, up to a factor of 40 (i.e., false positive values for 120 vs. 50 m AGL). This error is attributed to the \u201cdoming-effect\u201d\u2014a broad-scale systematic deformation of the reconstructed terrain surface, which is commonly known in SfM photogrammetry and results from inaccuracies in modeling the radial distortion of the camera lens. Within the scope of the study, the \u201cdoming-effect\u201d was modeled as a functional surface by using the spatial differences and the results were indicated that the \u201cdoming-effect\u201d increases inversely proportional to the flight altitude.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/ijgi8040175","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,4]],"date-time":"2019-04-04T03:13:42Z","timestamp":1554347622000},"page":"175","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":26,"title":["Comparison of GNSS-, TLS- and Different Altitude UAV-Generated Datasets on the Basis of Spatial Differences"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"8","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2469-9365","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Huseyin","family":"Yurtseven","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Surveying and Cadastre, Faculty of Forestry, Istanbul University\u2014Cerrahpasa, Istanbul 34473, Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","unstructured":"Ghilani, C.D., and Wolf, P.R. (2011). Elementary Surveying: An Introduction to Geomatics, Pearson Education. [13th ed.]."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Li, Z., Zhu, Q., and Gold, C. (2005). Digital Terrain Modeling: Principles and Methodology, CRC Press.","DOI":"10.1201\/9780203357132"},{"key":"ref_3","unstructured":"Lillesand, T., Kiefer, R.W., and Chipman, J. (2014). Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation, Wiley. [7th ed.]."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1016\/j.geomorph.2014.02.016","article-title":"The evaluation of unmanned aerial system-based photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning to generate DEMs of agricultural watersheds","volume":"214","author":"Debouche","year":"2014","journal-title":"Geomorphology"},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"514","DOI":"10.1016\/j.isprsjprs.2010.08.002","article-title":"A low-cost multi-sensoral mobile mapping system and its feasibility for tree measurements","volume":"65","author":"Jaakkola","year":"2010","journal-title":"ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_6","unstructured":"Mechelke, K., Kersten, T.P., and Lindstaedt, M. (2007, January 9\u201312). Comparative investigations into the accuracy behaviour of the new generation of terrestrial laser scanning systems. Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Optical 3-D Measurement Techniques, Z\u00fcrich, Germany."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1127\/1432-8364\/2009\/0023","article-title":"Methods for Geometric Accuracy Investigations of Terrestrial Laser Scanning Systems","volume":"2009","author":"Kersten","year":"2009","journal-title":"Photogramm. Fernerkund. Geoinf."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sanz-Ablanedo, E., Chandler, J.H., Rodr\u00edguez-P\u00e9rez, J.R., and Ord\u00f3\u00f1ez, C. (2018). Accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and SfM Photogrammetry Survey as a Function of the Number and Location of Ground Control Points Used. Remote Sens., 10.","DOI":"10.3390\/rs10101606"},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1016\/j.geomorph.2015.05.011","article-title":"Reproducibility of UAV-based earth topography reconstructions based on Structure-from-Motion algorithms","volume":"260","author":"Clapuyt","year":"2016","journal-title":"Geomorphology"},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yang, G., Li, C., Wang, Y., Yuan, H., Feng, H., Xu, B., and Yang, X. (2017). The DOM Generation and Precise Radiometric Calibration of a UAV-Mounted Miniature Snapshot Hyperspectral Imager. Remote Sens., 9.","DOI":"10.3390\/rs9070642"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1002\/navi.140","article-title":"Autonomous Vehicle Dynamic Model-Based Navigation for Small UAVs","volume":"63","author":"Khaghani","year":"2016","journal-title":"J. Inst. Navig."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vetrella, A., Fasano, G., Accardo, D., and Moccia, A. (2016). Differential GNSS and Vision-Based Tracking to Improve Navigation Performance in Cooperative Multi-UAV Systems. Sensors, 16.","DOI":"10.3390\/s16122164"},{"key":"ref_13","first-page":"355","article-title":"Quality assessment of combined IMU\/GNSS data for direct georeferencing in the context of UAV-based mapping","volume":"XLII-2\/W6","author":"Nex","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int. Arch. Photogramm."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1127\/pfg\/2016\/0284","article-title":"Accuracy Analysis of Photogrammetric UAV Image Blocks: Influence of Onboard RTK-GNSS and Cross Flight Patterns","volume":"2016","author":"Gerke","year":"2016","journal-title":"Photogramm. Fernerkund. Geoinf."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1637","DOI":"10.5194\/hess-20-1637-2016","article-title":"Assessing the quality of digital elevation models obtained from mini unmanned aerial vehicles for overland flow modelling in urban areas","volume":"20","author":"Scheidegger","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci."},{"key":"ref_16","unstructured":"Rock, G., Ries, J., and Udelhoven, T. (2011, January 14\u201316). Sensitivity analysis of UAV-photogrammetry for creating digital elevation models (DEM). Proceedings of the Conference on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle in Geomatics, Zurich, Switzerland."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mesas-Carrascosa, F.-J., Notario Garc\u00eda, M., Mero\u00f1o de Larriva, J., and Garc\u00eda-Ferrer, A. (2016). An Analysis of the Influence of Flight Parameters in the Generation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Orthomosaicks to Survey Archaeological Areas. Sensors, 16.","DOI":"10.3390\/s16111838"},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jiang, S., and Jiang, W. (2017). On-Board GNSS\/IMU Assisted Feature Extraction and Matching for Oblique UAV Images. Remote Sens., 9.","DOI":"10.3390\/rs9080813"},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1041","DOI":"10.5194\/tc-8-1041-2014","article-title":"Surface kinematics of periglacial sorted circles using structure-from-motion technology","volume":"8","author":"Girod","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cryosphere"},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1016\/j.geomorph.2012.08.021","article-title":"Structure-from-Motion\u2019 photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications","volume":"179","author":"Westoby","year":"2012","journal-title":"Geomorphology"},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1177\/0309133315615805","article-title":"Structure from motion photogrammetry in physical geography","volume":"40","author":"Smith","year":"2015","journal-title":"Prog. Phys. Geogr. Earth Environ."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kraus, K. (2007). Photogrammetry: Geometry from Images and Laser Scans, Walter de Gruyter. [2nd ed.].","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110892871"},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yan, L., Fei, L., Chen, C., Ye, Z., and Zhu, R. (2016). A Multi-View Dense Image Matching Method for High-Resolution Aerial Imagery Based on a Graph Network. Remote Sens., 8.","DOI":"10.3390\/rs8100799"},{"key":"ref_24","first-page":"147","article-title":"Performance evaluation of 3D modeling software for UAV photogrammetry","volume":"XLI-B5","author":"Yanagi","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int. Arch. Photogramm."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1016\/j.measurement.2015.06.010","article-title":"DEM generation with UAV Photogrammetry and accuracy analysis in Sahitler hill","volume":"73","author":"Uysal","year":"2015","journal-title":"Measurement"},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1135","DOI":"10.1007\/s12524-018-0760-8","article-title":"An Experimental Analysis of Digital Elevation Models Generated with Lidar Data and UAV Photogrammetry","volume":"46","author":"Polat","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1016\/j.measurement.2016.05.028","article-title":"Use of low-cost UAV photogrammetry to analyze the accuracy of a digital elevation model in a case study","volume":"91","year":"2016","journal-title":"Measurement"},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mlambo, R., Woodhouse, I.H., Gerard, F., and Anderson, K. (2017). Structure from Motion (SfM) photogrammetry with drone data: A low cost method for monitoring greenhouse gas emissions from forests in developing countries. Forests, 8.","DOI":"10.3390\/f8030068"},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1016\/j.geomorph.2016.11.021","article-title":"Optimising UAV topographic surveys processed with structure-from-motion: Ground control quality, quantity and bundle adjustment","volume":"280","author":"James","year":"2017","journal-title":"Geomorphology"},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wallace, L., Lucieer, A., Malenovsk\u00fd, Z., Turner, D., and Vop\u011bnka, P. (2016). Assessment of Forest Structure Using Two UAV Techniques: A Comparison of Airborne Laser Scanning and Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds. Forests, 7.","DOI":"10.3390\/f7030062"},{"key":"ref_31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1123","DOI":"10.14358\/PERS.76.10.1123","article-title":"Point Clouds: Lidar versus 3D Vision","volume":"76","author":"Leberl","year":"2010","journal-title":"Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1007\/s11263-007-0107-3","article-title":"Modeling the world from internet photo collections","volume":"80","author":"Snavely","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int. J. Comput. Vis."},{"key":"ref_33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1413","DOI":"10.1002\/esp.3609","article-title":"Mitigating systematic error in topographic models derived from UAV and ground-based image networks","volume":"39","author":"James","year":"2014","journal-title":"Earth Surf. Process. Landf."},{"key":"ref_34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1656","DOI":"10.1002\/esp.3747","article-title":"From experimental plots to experimental landscapes: Topography, erosion and deposition in sub-humid badlands from Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry","volume":"40","author":"Vericat","year":"2015","journal-title":"Earth Surf. Process. Landf."},{"key":"ref_35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tonkin, T., and Midgley, N. (2016). Ground-Control Networks for Image Based Surface Reconstruction: An Investigation of Optimum Survey Designs Using UAV Derived Imagery and Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry. Remote Sens., 8.","DOI":"10.3390\/rs8090786"},{"key":"ref_36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1477-9730.2011.00623.x","article-title":"Minimising systematic error surfaces in digital elevation models using oblique convergent imagery","volume":"26","author":"Wackrow","year":"2011","journal-title":"Photogramm. Rec."},{"key":"ref_37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1477-9730.2008.00467.x","article-title":"A convergent image configuration for DEM extraction that minimises the systematic effects caused by an inaccurate lens model","volume":"23","author":"Wackrow","year":"2008","journal-title":"Photogramm. Rec."},{"key":"ref_38","first-page":"235","article-title":"Bending the doming effect in structure from motion reconstructions through bundle adjustment","volume":"XLII-2\/W6","author":"Magri","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int. Arch. Photogramm."},{"key":"ref_39","unstructured":"Turkish Directorate General of Civil Aviation (2017). Unmanned Aerial Systems Directive."},{"key":"ref_40","unstructured":"Federal Aviation Administration (2016). Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems."},{"key":"ref_41","unstructured":"Civil Aviation Administration of China (2016). Civil Drone Driver Management Regulations."},{"key":"ref_42","unstructured":"Civil Aviation Authority (2018). Air Navigation (Amendment) Order 2018\u2014Guidance for Small Unmanned Aircraft Users."},{"key":"ref_43","unstructured":"Civil Aviation Safety Authority (2018). Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems\u2014Operation of Excluded RPA."},{"key":"ref_44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhou, Q., Lees, B., and Tang, G. (2008). Advances in Digital Terrain Analysis, Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-77800-4"},{"key":"ref_45","unstructured":"Wilson, J.P., and Gallant, J.C. (2000). Terrain Analysis: Principles and Applications, Wiley."},{"key":"ref_46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wilson, J.P., and Fotheringham, A.S. (2008). The Handbook of Geographic Information Science, Blackwell Pub.","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470690819"},{"key":"ref_47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1145\/355780.355786","article-title":"A Method of Bivariate Interpolation and Smooth Surface Fitting for Irregularly Distributed Data Points","volume":"4","author":"Akima","year":"1978","journal-title":"ACM Trans. Math. Softw."},{"key":"ref_48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1283","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cageo.2005.11.008","article-title":"Finding the right pixel size","volume":"32","author":"Hengl","year":"2006","journal-title":"Comput. Geosci."},{"key":"ref_49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cageo.2008.09.001","article-title":"Evaluating error associated with lidar-derived DEM interpolation","volume":"35","author":"Bater","year":"2009","journal-title":"Comput. Geosci."},{"key":"ref_50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1190\/1.1440410","article-title":"Machine contouring using minimum curvature","volume":"39","author":"Briggs","year":"1974","journal-title":"Geophysics"},{"key":"ref_51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01840357","article-title":"A sweepline algorithm for Voronoi diagrams","volume":"2","author":"Fortune","year":"1987","journal-title":"Algorithmica"},{"key":"ref_52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1905","DOI":"10.1029\/JB076i008p01905","article-title":"Multiquadric equations of topography and other irregular surfaces","volume":"76","author":"Hardy","year":"1971","journal-title":"J. Geophys. Res."},{"key":"ref_53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-1694(89)90073-5","article-title":"A new procedure for gridding elevation and stream line data with automatic removal of spurious pits","volume":"106","author":"Hutchinson","year":"1989","journal-title":"J. Hydrol."},{"key":"ref_54","first-page":"179","article-title":"A new method for estimating the spatial distribution of mean seasonal and annual rainfall applied to the Hunter Valley, New South Wales","volume":"31","author":"Hutchinson","year":"1983","journal-title":"Aust. Meteorol. Mag."},{"key":"ref_55","unstructured":"Makarovic, B. (1977, January 18\u201321). Regressive rejection\u2014A digital data compression technique. Proceedings of the ASP\/ACSM Fall Technical Meeting, Little Rock, AR, USA."},{"key":"ref_56","first-page":"285","article-title":"Structures for geo-information and their application in selective sampling for digital terrain models","volume":"4","author":"Makarovic","year":"1984","journal-title":"ITC J."},{"key":"ref_57","first-page":"481","article-title":"Spatial interpolation","volume":"Volume 1","author":"Longley","year":"1999","journal-title":"Geographical Information Systems: Principles, Techniques, Management and Applications"},{"key":"ref_58","unstructured":"Watson, D.F. (1992). Contouring: A Guide to the Analysis and Display of Spatial Data, Pergamon Press."},{"key":"ref_59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1007586507433","article-title":"An Experimental Comparison of Ordinary and Universal Kriging and Inverse Distance Weighting","volume":"31","author":"Zimmerman","year":"1999","journal-title":"Math. Geol."},{"key":"ref_60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1016\/S0898-1221(98)00101-1","article-title":"Interpolation methods comparison","volume":"35","author":"Caruso","year":"1998","journal-title":"Comput. Math. Appl."},{"key":"ref_61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"O\u2019Sullivan, D., and Unwin, D. (2010). Geographic Information Analysis, Wiley.","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470549094"},{"key":"ref_62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.2307\/143141","article-title":"A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region","volume":"46","author":"Tobler","year":"1970","journal-title":"Econ. Geogr."},{"key":"ref_63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1108\/02644400410519703","article-title":"Contributions to the experimental validation of the discrete element method applied to tumbling mills","volume":"21","author":"Andrew","year":"2004","journal-title":"Eng. Comput."},{"key":"ref_64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1013","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mineng.2006.03.009","article-title":"What is required from DEM simulations to model breakage in mills?","volume":"19","author":"Powell","year":"2006","journal-title":"Miner. Eng."},{"key":"ref_65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"398","DOI":"10.1016\/j.isprsjprs.2009.02.003","article-title":"Accuracy assessment of digital elevation models by means of robust statistical methods","volume":"64","year":"2009","journal-title":"ISPRS J. Photogramm."},{"key":"ref_66","unstructured":"Senseman, G.M., Bagley, C.F., and Tweddale, S.A. (1995). Accuracy Assessment of the Discrete Classification of Remotely-Sensed Digital Data for Landcover Mapping, Construction Engineering Research Laboratories (Army)."},{"key":"ref_67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jaud, M., Passot, S., Le Bivic, R., Delacourt, C., Grandjean, P., and Le Dantec, N. (2016). Assessing the Accuracy of High Resolution Digital Surface Models Computed by PhotoScan\u00ae and MicMac\u00ae in Sub-Optimal Survey Conditions. Remote Sens., 8.","DOI":"10.3390\/rs8060465"},{"key":"ref_68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1051\/e3sconf\/20182600012","article-title":"The analysis of the accuracy of spatial models using photogrammetric software: Agisoft Photoscan and Pix4D","volume":"26","author":"Barbasiewicz","year":"2018","journal-title":"E3S Web Conf."},{"key":"ref_69","first-page":"405","article-title":"The interpretation of structure from motion","volume":"203","author":"Ullman","year":"1979","journal-title":"Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci."},{"key":"ref_70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Weng, J., Huang, T.S., and Ahuja, N. (1993). Motion and Structure from Image Sequences, Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-77643-4"},{"key":"ref_71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1007\/s11119-013-9335-4","article-title":"Assessing the accuracy of mosaics from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery for precision agriculture purposes in wheat","volume":"15","year":"2014","journal-title":"Precis. Agric."},{"key":"ref_72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.14358\/PERS.76.6.701","article-title":"Effects of topographic variability and lidar sampling density on several DEM interpolation methods","volume":"76","author":"Guo","year":"2010","journal-title":"Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kim, S., Rhee, S., and Kim, T. (2018). Digital Surface Model Interpolation Based on 3D Mesh Models. Remote Sens., 11.","DOI":"10.3390\/rs11010024"}],"container-title":["ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2220-9964\/8\/4\/175\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T12:42:47Z","timestamp":1760186567000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2220-9964\/8\/4\/175"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,3]]},"references-count":73,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,4]]}},"alternative-id":["ijgi8040175"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ijgi8040175","relation":{},"ISSN":["2220-9964"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2220-9964","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,3]]}}}