{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,2]],"date-time":"2026-02-02T20:18:17Z","timestamp":1770063497954,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":45,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,1]],"date-time":"2026-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769904000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Information"],"abstract":"<jats:p>This study investigates the evolution of public sentiment and discourse surrounding artificial intelligence through a comprehensive multi-method analysis of 28,819 Reddit comments spanning March 2015 to May 2024. Addressing three research questions\u2014(1) what dominant topics characterize AI discourse, (2) how has sentiment changed over time, particularly following ChatGPT 5.2\u2019s release, and (3) what linguistic patterns distinguish positive from negative discourse\u2014we employ 28 distinct analytical techniques to provide validated insights into public AI perception. Methodologically, the study integrates VADER sentiment analysis, Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) analysis with regression validation, dual topic modeling using Latent Dirichlet Allocation and Non-negative Matrix Factorization for cross-validation, four-dimensional tone analysis, named entity recognition, emotion detection, and advanced NLP techniques including sarcasm detection, stance classification, and toxicity analysis. A key methodological contribution is the validation of LIWC categories through linear regression (R2 = 0.049, p &lt; 0.001) and logistic regression (61% accuracy), moving beyond the descriptive statistics typical of prior linguistic analyses. Results reveal a pronounced decline in positive sentiment from +0.320 in 2015 to +0.053 in 2024. Contrary to expectations, sentiment decreased following ChatGPT\u2019s November 2022 release, with negative comments increasing from 31.9% to 35.1%\u2014suggesting that direct exposure to powerful AI capabilities intensifies rather than alleviates public concerns. LIWC regression analysis identified negative emotion words (\u03b2 = \u22120.083) and positive emotion words (\u03b2 = +0.063) as the strongest sentiment predictors, confirming that affective rather than technical engagement drives public AI attitudes. Topic modeling revealed nine coherent themes, with facial recognition, algorithmic bias, AI ethics, and social media misinformation emerging as dominant concerns across both LDA and NMF analyses. Network analysis identified regulation as a central hub (degree centrality = 0.929) connecting all major AI concerns, indicating strong public appetite for governance frameworks. These findings contribute to theoretical understandings of technology risk perception, provide practical guidance for AI developers and policymakers, and demonstrate validated computational methods for tracking public opinion toward emerging technologies.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/info17020134","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,2]],"date-time":"2026-02-02T09:00:33Z","timestamp":1770022833000},"page":"134","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Exploring the Topics and Sentiments of AI-Related Public Opinions: An Advanced Machine Learning Text Analysis"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"17","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9927-5343","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Wullianallur","family":"Raghupathi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Gabelli School of Business, Fordham University, New York, NY 10023, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jie","family":"Ren","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Gabelli School of Business, Fordham University, New York, NY 10023, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-4200-2186","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tanush","family":"Kulkarni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Gabelli School of Business, Fordham University, New York, NY 10023, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.1038\/s41586-019-1138-y","article-title":"Machine behaviour","volume":"568","author":"Rahwan","year":"2019","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"681","DOI":"10.1007\/s11023-020-09548-1","article-title":"GPT-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences","volume":"30","author":"Floridi","year":"2020","journal-title":"Minds Mach."},{"key":"ref_3","unstructured":"CNBC (2025, December 22). ChatGPT\u2019s One-Year Anniversary\u2014How the Viral AI Chatbot Has Changed. Available online: https:\/\/www.cnbc.com\/2023\/11\/30\/chatgpts-one-year-anniversary-how-the-viral-ai-chatbot-has-changed.html."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1038\/s42256-019-0088-2","article-title":"The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines","volume":"1","author":"Jobin","year":"2019","journal-title":"Nat. Mach. Intell."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1007\/s11023-018-9482-5","article-title":"AI4People\u2014An ethical framework for a good AI society","volume":"28","author":"Floridi","year":"2018","journal-title":"Minds Mach."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1038\/s42256-019-0020-9","article-title":"Hopes and fears for intelligent machines in fiction and reality","volume":"1","author":"Cave","year":"2019","journal-title":"Nat. Mach. Intell."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.2753\/MIS0742-1222290408","article-title":"Emotions and information diffusion in social media","volume":"29","author":"Stieglitz","year":"2013","journal-title":"J. Manag. Inf. Syst."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1080\/19331681.2015.1132401","article-title":"Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review","volume":"13","author":"Jungherr","year":"2016","journal-title":"J. Inf. Technol. Politics"},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"438","DOI":"10.1016\/j.techfore.2018.09.009","article-title":"Polarization and acculturation in US Election 2016 outcomes","volume":"145","author":"Grover","year":"2019","journal-title":"Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change"},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Liu, B. (2012). Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining, Springer. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-02145-9"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pang, B., and Lee, L. (2008). Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis; Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, Now Publishers Inc.","DOI":"10.1561\/1500000011"},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hutto, C.J., and Gilbert, E. (2014, January 1\u20134). VADER: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.","DOI":"10.1609\/icwsm.v8i1.14550"},{"key":"ref_13","first-page":"993","article-title":"Latent Dirichlet allocation","volume":"3","author":"Blei","year":"2003","journal-title":"J. Mach. Learn. Res."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"788","DOI":"10.1038\/44565","article-title":"Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization","volume":"401","author":"Lee","year":"1999","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"ref_15","unstructured":"Pennebaker, J.W., Boyd, R.L., Jordan, K., and Blackburn, K. (2015). The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015, University of Texas at Austin."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1177\/0261927X09351676","article-title":"The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods","volume":"29","author":"Tausczik","year":"2010","journal-title":"J. Lang. Soc. Psychol."},{"key":"ref_17","unstructured":"Buolamwini, J., and Gebru, T. (2018, January 23\u201324). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, New York, NY, USA."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1177\/2053951716679679","article-title":"The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate","volume":"3","author":"Mittelstadt","year":"2016","journal-title":"Big Data Soc."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Raji, I.D., and Buolamwini, J. (2019, January 27\u201328). Actionable auditing: Investigating the impact of publicly naming biased performance results of commercial AI products. Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI\/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, Honolulu, HI, USA.","DOI":"10.1145\/3306618.3314244"},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cave, S., Coughlan, K., and Dihal, K. (2019, January 27\u201328). \u201cScary robots\u201d: Examining public responses to AI. Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI\/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, Honolulu, HI, USA.","DOI":"10.1145\/3306618.3314232"},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhang, B., and Dafoe, A. (2019). Artificial Intelligence: American Attitudes and Trends, Center for the Governance of AI, University of Oxford.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3312874"},{"key":"ref_22","unstructured":"Eurobarometer (2017). Attitudes Towards the Impact of Digitisation and Automation on Daily Life, European Commission. Special Eurobarometer 460."},{"key":"ref_23","unstructured":"Funk, C., Tyson, A., Kennedy, B., and Johnson, C. (2020). Science and Scientists Held in High Esteem Across Global Publics, Pew Research Center."},{"key":"ref_24","unstructured":"O\u2019Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy, Crown Publishing Group."},{"key":"ref_25","unstructured":"West, S.M., Whittaker, M., and Crawford, K. (2019). Discriminating Systems: Gender, Race and Power in AI, AI Now Institute."},{"key":"ref_26","first-page":"1","article-title":"Artificial intelligence ethics by design","volume":"9","author":"Kieslich","year":"2022","journal-title":"Big Data Soc."},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.30658\/hmc.1.5","article-title":"Building a stronger CASA: Extending the computers are social actors paradigm","volume":"1","author":"Gambino","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hum.-Mach. Commun."},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1439","DOI":"10.1007\/s00146-021-01259-0","article-title":"Speeding up to keep up: Exploring the use of AI in the research process","volume":"37","author":"Chubb","year":"2022","journal-title":"AI Soc."},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1016\/0306-4573(88)90021-0","article-title":"Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval","volume":"24","author":"Salton","year":"1988","journal-title":"Inf. Process. Manag."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-018-05707-8","article-title":"AI can be sexist and racist\u2014It\u2019s time to make it fair","volume":"559","author":"Zou","year":"2018","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"ref_31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gillespie, T., Boczkowski, P.J., and Foot, K.A. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. Media Technologies, MIT Press.","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/9780262525374.001.0001"},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1126\/science.3563507","article-title":"Perception of risk","volume":"236","author":"Slovic","year":"1987","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"ref_33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1333","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2005.04.006","article-title":"The affect heuristic","volume":"177","author":"Slovic","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur. J. Oper. Res."},{"key":"ref_34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jsis.2015.02.001","article-title":"Strategic opportunities (and challenges) of algorithmic decision-making","volume":"24","author":"Newell","year":"2015","journal-title":"J. Strateg. Inf. Syst."},{"key":"ref_35","first-page":"22","article-title":"Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach","volume":"17","author":"Cadwalladr","year":"2018","journal-title":"Guardian"},{"key":"ref_36","first-page":"173","article-title":"Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion","volume":"12","author":"Slater","year":"2002","journal-title":"Commun. Theory"},{"key":"ref_37","unstructured":"Heylighen, F., and Dewaele, J.-M. (1999). Formality of Language: Definition, Measurement and Behavioral Determinants, Internal Report, Center Leo Apostel, Free University of Brussels."},{"key":"ref_38","unstructured":"Edelman (2020). Edelman Trust Barometer 2020, Edelman Trust Institute."},{"key":"ref_39","unstructured":"Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, PublicAffairs."},{"key":"ref_40","first-page":"12","article-title":"Measuring deliberation\u2019s content: A coding scheme","volume":"3","year":"2007","journal-title":"J. Public Delib."},{"key":"ref_41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2013.11.005","article-title":"Crowdsourcing civility: A natural experiment examining the effects of distributed moderation in online forums","volume":"31","author":"Lampe","year":"2014","journal-title":"Gov. Inf. Q."},{"key":"ref_42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"658","DOI":"10.1111\/jcom.12104","article-title":"Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments","volume":"64","author":"Coe","year":"2014","journal-title":"J. Commun."},{"key":"ref_43","first-page":"1","article-title":"The civic labor of volunteer moderators online","volume":"5","author":"Matias","year":"2019","journal-title":"Soc. Media Soc."},{"key":"ref_44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ferguson, A.G. (2017). The Rise of Big Data Policing: Surveillance, Race, and the Future of Law Enforcement, New York University Press.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3959202"},{"key":"ref_45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"977","DOI":"10.1177\/0003122417725865","article-title":"Big data surveillance: The case of policing","volume":"82","author":"Brayne","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am. Sociol. Rev."}],"container-title":["Information"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2078-2489\/17\/2\/134\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,2]],"date-time":"2026-02-02T09:20:35Z","timestamp":1770024035000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2078-2489\/17\/2\/134"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,1]]},"references-count":45,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]}},"alternative-id":["info17020134"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/info17020134","relation":{},"ISSN":["2078-2489"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2078-2489","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,1]]}}}