{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,24]],"date-time":"2026-03-24T10:50:16Z","timestamp":1774349416127,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,24]],"date-time":"2026-03-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1774310400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Information"],"abstract":"<jats:p>This study addresses a critical gap in the operationalization of sustainability frameworks at the project level by developing and validating an empirically grounded measurement instrument for assessing Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) compliance in manufacturing industry projects. While the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) articulate sustainability aspirations at the national and global level, and ESG frameworks capture organizational-level sustainability performance, no validated instrument exists for measuring ESG integration at the project level where sustainability commitments are ultimately operationalized. Drawing on the theoretical foundations of sustainable project management, stakeholder theory, and the ESG governance literature, the authors developed a 30-item survey instrument capturing six conceptual dimensions of ESG-aligned project performance. Data were collected from 2231 project sponsors and decision-makers in North American goods manufacturing firms classified under NAICS codes 31\u201333, which collectively encompass the entire manufacturing sector in North America. Through a sequential analytical approach employing principal component analysis (PCA) for initial item reduction, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) for dimensionality assessment, and structural equation modelling (SEM) for confirmatory validation, a parsimonious two-factor model emerged with excellent fit indices (CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.052, SRMR &lt; 0.035). The first factor captures ESG planning activities undertaken during project initiation and planning phases, while the second factor represents ESG monitoring and controlling functions during project execution. The reduction from six theoretical dimensions to two empirical factors reflects lifecycle governance theory, where planning-phase governance and execution-phase control emerge as functionally distinct but correlated constructs. The validated instrument offers practical utility for project managers, organizational sustainability officers, and policy-makers seeking standardized benchmarks for ESG compliance at the operational project level. The validated instrument and complete survey are shared for replication and testing across different industries and countries.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/info17040311","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,24]],"date-time":"2026-03-24T08:02:49Z","timestamp":1774339369000},"page":"311","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Verifying SDG ESG Compliance in Manufacturing Industry Projects by Surveying Sponsors"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"17","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4333-4399","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kenneth David","family":"Strang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Business, University of the Cumberlands, 6984 College Station Drive, Williamsburg, KY 40769, USA"},{"name":"W3-Research, Saint Thomas, VI 00802, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8260-2392","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Narasimha Rao","family":"Vajjhala","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Computer Science Department, American University in Bulgaria, 2700 Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1108\/AAAJ-05-2017-2929","article-title":"Achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: An enabling role for accounting research","volume":"31","author":"Bebbington","year":"2018","journal-title":"Account. Audit. Account. J."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1080\/20430795.2015.1118917","article-title":"ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies","volume":"5","author":"Friede","year":"2015","journal-title":"J. Sustain. Financ. Investig."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1177\/23409444221140919","article-title":"Connecting the Sustainable Development Goals to firm-level sustainability and ESG factors: The need for double materiality","volume":"26","author":"Montiel","year":"2023","journal-title":"BRQ Bus. Res. Q."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1120","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijproman.2017.02.018","article-title":"Can project sustainability management impact project success? An empirical study applying a contingent approach","volume":"35","author":"Carvalho","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int. J. Proj. Manag."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1362\/204440814X13948909253866","article-title":"Sustainability in project management: A literature review and impact analysis","volume":"4","author":"Silvius","year":"2014","journal-title":"Soc. Bus."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"820","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijproman.2019.05.002","article-title":"25 years of \u2018sustainable projects\u2019. What we know and what the literature says","volume":"37","author":"Sabini","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int. J. Proj. Manag."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"134951","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2022.134951","article-title":"Impacts on the ESG and financial performances of companies in the manufacturing industry based on the climate change related risks","volume":"380","author":"Chen","year":"2022","journal-title":"J. Clean. Prod."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1108\/IJOPM-04-2015-0223","article-title":"The impact of sustainable manufacturing practices on sustainability performance: Empirical evidence from Malaysia","volume":"37","author":"Sakundarini","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1108\/17538371311291017","article-title":"Sustainable development and project stakeholder management: What standards say","volume":"6","author":"Eskerod","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1167","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijproman.2017.02.009","article-title":"Sustainable project management through project control in infrastructure projects","volume":"35","author":"Kivila","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int. J. Proj. Manag."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Anelli, D., Morano, P., Fariello, F., and Sabatelli, E. (2026). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Assessment with a Two-Phase Goal-Programming-Based Optimization Model: A Comparative Study of Envipark and Kalundborg Eco-Industrial Parks. Front. Built Environ., 12.","DOI":"10.3389\/fbuil.2026.1731282"},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1084","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijproman.2016.04.004","article-title":"Key factors of sustainability in project management context: A survey exploring the project managers\u2019 perspective","volume":"35","author":"Martens","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int. J. Proj. Manag."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.1057\/s42214-018-0008-x","article-title":"Multinational enterprises and the Sustainable Development Goals: An institutional approach to corporate engagement","volume":"1","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Int. Bus. Policy"},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2396","DOI":"10.1002\/bse.2753","article-title":"Analyzing companies\u2019 interactions with the Sustainable Development Goals through network analysis: Four corporate sustainability imperatives","volume":"30","year":"2021","journal-title":"Bus. Strategy Environ."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2835","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.2014.1984","article-title":"The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance","volume":"60","author":"Eccles","year":"2014","journal-title":"Manag. Sci."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"605","DOI":"10.1108\/JOCM-12-2023-0548","article-title":"A quadratic goal programming for portfolio selection based on ESG factors","volume":"38","author":"Messaoudi","year":"2025","journal-title":"J. Organ. Change Manag."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"879","DOI":"10.1037\/0021-9010.88.5.879","article-title":"Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies","volume":"88","author":"Podsakoff","year":"2003","journal-title":"J. Appl. Psychol."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2015.03.020","article-title":"Using project management as a way to sustainability. From a comprehensive review to a framework definition","volume":"99","year":"2015","journal-title":"J. Clean. Prod."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2013.12.087","article-title":"Integrating sustainability issues into project management","volume":"96","author":"Sanchez","year":"2015","journal-title":"J. Clean. Prod."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Christensen, H.B., Hail, L., and Leuz, C. (2019). Mandatory CSR and Sustainability Reporting: Economic Analysis and Literature Review, ECGI.","DOI":"10.3386\/w26169"},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1315","DOI":"10.1093\/rof\/rfac033","article-title":"Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings","volume":"26","author":"Berg","year":"2022","journal-title":"Rev. Financ."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1697","DOI":"10.2308\/accr-51383","article-title":"Corporate Sustainability: First Evidence on Materiality","volume":"91","author":"Khan","year":"2016","journal-title":"Account. Rev."},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123086","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2020.123086","article-title":"A literature review on circular economy adoption in the manufacturing sector","volume":"273","author":"Acerbi","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Clean. Prod."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2015.12.042","article-title":"Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry","volume":"115","author":"Lieder","year":"2016","journal-title":"J. Clean. Prod."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.3846\/1392-3730.2009.15.337-348","article-title":"Exploring critical success factors for stakeholder management in construction projects","volume":"15","author":"Yang","year":"2009","journal-title":"J. Civ. Eng. Manag."},{"key":"ref_26","first-page":"196","article-title":"Assessing the impact of infrastructure projects on global sustainable development goals","volume":"173","author":"Mansell","year":"2019","journal-title":"Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Eng. Sustain."},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1002\/pmj.21555","article-title":"Project Stakeholder Management-Past and Present","volume":"46","author":"Eskerod","year":"2015","journal-title":"Proj. Manag. J."},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21582440231204158","DOI":"10.1177\/21582440231204158","article-title":"Digital Transformation Empowers ESG Performance in the Manufacturing Industry: From ESG to DESG","volume":"13","author":"Wang","year":"2023","journal-title":"Sage Open"},{"key":"ref_29","first-page":"7","article-title":"Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis","volume":"10","author":"Costello","year":"2005","journal-title":"Pract. Assess. Res. Eval."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/10705519909540118","article-title":"Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives","volume":"6","author":"Hu","year":"1999","journal-title":"Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J."}],"container-title":["Information"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2078-2489\/17\/4\/311\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,24]],"date-time":"2026-03-24T08:20:29Z","timestamp":1774340429000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2078-2489\/17\/4\/311"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,24]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4]]}},"alternative-id":["info17040311"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/info17040311","relation":{},"ISSN":["2078-2489"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2078-2489","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,24]]}}}