{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]],"date-time":"2026-04-13T15:33:02Z","timestamp":1776094382565,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":139,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,4]],"date-time":"2025-09-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1756944000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100010650","name":"Huanggang Normal University","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["202422504"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["202422504"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100010650","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100010650","name":"Huanggang Normal University","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["202409904"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["202409904"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100010650","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100010650","name":"Think Tank Initiative","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["202422504"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["202422504"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100010650","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100010650","name":"Think Tank Initiative","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["202409904"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["202409904"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100010650","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Publications"],"abstract":"<jats:p>China\u2019s retraction crisis has raised concerns about research integrity and accountability within its scientific community and beyond. To address this issue, we proposed in an earlier publication that Chinese research funders incorporate retraction records into the evaluation of research funding applications by establishing a retraction-based review system. This review system would debar researchers with retraction records from applying for funding for a specified period. However, our earlier proposal lacked practical guidance on how to operationalize such a review system. In this article, we expand on our proposal by fleshing out the proposed ten debarment determinants and offering a framework for quantifying the duration of funding ineligibility. Additionally, we outline the critical steps for implementing the retraction-based review system, address the major challenges to its effective and sustainable adoption, and propose viable solutions to these challenges. Finally, we discuss the benefits of implementing the review system, emphasizing its potential to strengthen research integrity and foster a culture of accountability in the Chinese academic community.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/publications13030041","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,4]],"date-time":"2025-09-04T15:31:21Z","timestamp":1756999881000},"page":"41","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Reckoning with Retractions in Research Funding Reviews: The Case of China"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"13","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8230-8970","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Shaoxiong Brian","family":"Xu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Foreign Studies, Huanggang Normal University, Huanggang 438000, China"},{"name":"Department of English and Communication, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2297-4784","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Guangwei","family":"Hu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of English and Communication, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2021.1973894","article-title":"What criteria are used in the investigation of alleged cases of research misconduct?","volume":"30","author":"Abdi","year":"2023","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"key":"ref_2","unstructured":"Abell, P. (1991). Rational choice theory, Edward Elgar."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"942","DOI":"10.1177\/0306312719872008","article-title":"Detecting errors that result in retractions","volume":"49","author":"Andersen","year":"2019","journal-title":"Social Studies of Science"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1552","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2017.07.003","article-title":"The career effects of scandal: Evidence from scientific retractions","volume":"46","author":"Azoulay","year":"2017","journal-title":"Research Policy"},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1118","DOI":"10.1162\/REST_a_00469","article-title":"Retractions","volume":"97","author":"Azoulay","year":"2015","journal-title":"Review of Economics and Statistics"},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111427","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2024.111427","article-title":"Identification of retracted publications and completeness of retraction notices in public health","volume":"173","author":"Bakker","year":"2024","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology"},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1225","DOI":"10.1007\/s11434-015-0846-4","article-title":"Perverse incentives and perverse publishing practices","volume":"60","author":"Barbour","year":"2015","journal-title":"Science Bulletin"},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1960","DOI":"10.12688\/f1000research.13060.1","article-title":"Amending published articles: Time to rethink retractions and corrections?","volume":"6","author":"Barbour","year":"2017","journal-title":"F1000Research"},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1212\/WNL.0000000000004106","article-title":"Correcting honest pervasive errors in the scientific literature: Retractions without stigma","volume":"89","author":"Baskin","year":"2017","journal-title":"Neurology"},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ben-Yehuda, N., and Oliver-Lumerman, A. (2017). Fraud and misconduct in research: Detection, investigation, and organizational response, University of Michigan Press.","DOI":"10.3998\/mpub.9717920"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"686","DOI":"10.1038\/452686a","article-title":"Collaborations: Investigating international misconduct","volume":"452","author":"Boesz","year":"2008","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"ref_12","unstructured":"Bolland, M., Avenell, A., and Grey, A. (2022a). How many ducks do you need to line up to get a publication retracted?, Retraction Watch. Available online: https:\/\/retractionwatch.com\/2022\/11\/04\/how-many-ducks-do-you-need-to-line-up-to-get-a-publication-retracted\/."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2021.1886933","article-title":"Citation of retracted publications: A challenging problem","volume":"29","author":"Bolland","year":"2022b","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2014.950253","article-title":"Commentary: Perverse incentives or rotten apples?","volume":"22","author":"Bouter","year":"2015","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2017.12.016","article-title":"Fostering responsible research practices is a shared responsibility of multiple stakeholders","volume":"96","author":"Bouter","year":"2018a","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology"},{"key":"ref_16","unstructured":"Bouter, L. M. (2018b). From punish to empower: A blame-free approach to research misconduct, Nature Index. Available online: https:\/\/www.nature.com\/nature-index\/news-blog\/from-punish-to-empower-a-blame-free-approach-to-research-misconduct."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"390","DOI":"10.1126\/science.362.6413.390","article-title":"Rethinking retractions","volume":"362","author":"Brainard","year":"2018","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111403","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2024.111403","article-title":"Promoting responsible scientific research: Integrating retractions into the ORCID profile","volume":"172","author":"Provencio","year":"2024","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology"},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1653","DOI":"10.3174\/ajnr.A3835","article-title":"The fraud and retraction epidemic","volume":"35","author":"Castillo","year":"2014","journal-title":"American Journal of Neuroradiology"},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1080\/0361526X.2019.1645793","article-title":"High monetary rewards and high academic article outputs: Are China\u2019s research publications policy driven?","volume":"77","author":"Chen","year":"2019","journal-title":"The Serials Librarian"},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1016\/S0144-8188(00)00024-7","article-title":"Punishing repeat offenders more severely","volume":"20","author":"Chu","year":"2000","journal-title":"International Review of Law and Economics"},{"key":"ref_22","unstructured":"Committee on Publication Ethics Council (2023, December 16). Retraction guidelines, Available online: https:\/\/publicationethics.org\/retraction-guidelines."},{"key":"ref_23","unstructured":"Committee on Publication Ethics Council (2021, March 01). Flowcharts, Available online: https:\/\/publicationethics.org\/guidance\/Flowcharts."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3593","DOI":"10.1021\/acs.chemmater.9b00897","article-title":"Correcting the scientific record: Retraction practices in chemistry and materials science","volume":"31","author":"Coudert","year":"2019","journal-title":"Chemistry of Materials"},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"312","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-018-07740-z","article-title":"China introduces \u2018social\u2019 punishments for scientific misconduct","volume":"564","author":"Cyranoski","year":"2018","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"ref_26","first-page":"1","article-title":"Should research misconduct be criminalized?","volume":"16","author":"Bouter","year":"2020","journal-title":"Research Ethics"},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Davis, M. S., and Berry, B. (2018). Scholarly crimes and misdemeanors: Violations of fairness and trust in the academic world, Routledge.","DOI":"10.4324\/9781315145822"},{"key":"ref_28","first-page":"1345","article-title":"Research on the punishment intensity of scientific research misconduct in academic institutions [\u79d1\u7814\u4e0d\u7aef\u884c\u4e3a\u7684\u60e9\u7f5a\u5f3a\u5ea6\u7814\u7a76]","volume":"39","author":"Ding","year":"2021","journal-title":"Studies in Science of Science [\u79d1\u5b66\u5b66\u7814\u7a76]"},{"key":"ref_29","unstructured":"Edwards, J. (2025, September 01). Theories of criminal law (E. N. Zalta, Ed. Fall 2021 ed.), Available online: https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/archives\/fall2021\/entries\/criminal-law\/."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Enserink, M. (Science, 2017). How to avoid the stigma of a retracted paper? Don\u2019t call it a retraction, Science.","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aan6937"},{"key":"ref_31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE, 4, (5).","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0005738"},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1038\/531415a","article-title":"Set up a \u2018self-retraction\u2019 system for honest errors","volume":"531","author":"Fanelli","year":"2016","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"ref_33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"442","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2021.1947810","article-title":"What difference might retractions make? An estimate of the potential epistemic cost of retractions on meta-analyses","volume":"29","author":"Fanelli","year":"2022","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"key":"ref_34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Faria, R. (2018). Research misconduct as white-collar crime, Palgrave Macmillan.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-73435-4"},{"key":"ref_35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2013.848799","article-title":"Analysis and implications of retraction period and coauthorship of fraudulent publications","volume":"21","author":"Foo","year":"2014","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"key":"ref_36","unstructured":"Fraser, C., Nienaltowski, M.-H., Goff, K. P., Firth, C., Sharman, B., Bright, M., and Dias, S. M. (2025, September 01). Responsible research assessment: Global Research Council (GRC) conference report 2021, Available online: https:\/\/globalresearchcouncil.org\/fileadmin\/documents\/GRC_Publications\/GRC_RRA_Conference_Summary_Report.pdf."},{"key":"ref_37","first-page":"75","article-title":"Research misconduct oversight: Defining case costs","volume":"40","author":"Gammon","year":"2013","journal-title":"Journal of Health Care Finance"},{"key":"ref_38","first-page":"335","article-title":"Research on the influence of value orientation of responsible research on scientific research misconduct [\u8d44\u52a9\u673a\u6784\u8d1f\u8d23\u4efb\u7814\u7a76\u7684\u4ef7\u503c\u5bfc\u5411\u5bf9\u79d1\u7814\u4e0d\u7aef\u884c\u4e3a\u7684\u5f71\u54cd\u7814\u7a76]","volume":"38","author":"Gao","year":"2024","journal-title":"China Science Foundation [\u4e2d\u56fd\u79d1\u5b66\u57fa\u91d1]"},{"key":"ref_39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"d7284","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d7284","article-title":"Institutional research misconduct","volume":"343","author":"Godlee","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref_40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2021.1920409","article-title":"Timeliness and content of retraction notices for publications by a single research group","volume":"29","author":"Grey","year":"2022","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"key":"ref_41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-024-02449-8","article-title":"How to improve assessments of publication integrity","volume":"632","author":"Grey","year":"2024","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"ref_42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1186\/s41073-019-0062-x","article-title":"Quality of reports of investigations of research integrity by academic institutions","volume":"4","author":"Grey","year":"2019","journal-title":"Research Integrity and Peer Review"},{"key":"ref_43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grieneisen, M. L., and Zhang, M. (2012). A comprehensive survey of retracted articles from the scholarly literature. PLoS ONE, 7, (10).","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0044118"},{"key":"ref_44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-019-01728-z","article-title":"Make reports of research misconduct public","volume":"570","author":"Gunsalus","year":"2019","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"ref_45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1315","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2018.0358","article-title":"Institutional research misconduct reports need more credibility","volume":"319","author":"Gunsalus","year":"2018","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"ref_46","first-page":"23","article-title":"Scientific misconduct: How best to punish those who consciously violate our profession\u2019s integrity?","volume":"24","author":"Hadjiargyrou","year":"2015","journal-title":"Journal of Information Ethics"},{"key":"ref_47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Haghshenas, A. (2025). Self-retraction as redemption: Forgiveness for repentant authors. Accountability in Research, 1\u201314.","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2025.2471513"},{"key":"ref_48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"414","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2018.03.006","article-title":"Towards a taxonomy of research misconduct: The case of business school research","volume":"48","author":"Hall","year":"2019","journal-title":"Research Policy"},{"key":"ref_49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"814","DOI":"10.1177\/0011392116663807","article-title":"The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles","volume":"65","author":"Hesselmann","year":"2017","journal-title":"Current Sociology"},{"key":"ref_50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"414","DOI":"10.1177\/0306312720975201","article-title":"Cycles of invisibility: The limits of transparency in dealing with scientific misconduct","volume":"51","author":"Hesselmann","year":"2021","journal-title":"Social Studies of Science"},{"key":"ref_51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-017-9894-2","article-title":"Doing the right thing: A qualitative investigation of retractions due to unintentional error","volume":"24","author":"Hosseini","year":"2018","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"ref_52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-016-1940-3","article-title":"The consequences of competition: Simulating the effects of research grant allocation strategies","volume":"108","author":"Bartneck","year":"2016","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"ref_53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e3002999","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pbio.3002999","article-title":"Linking citation and retraction data reveals the demographics of scientific retractions among highly cited authors","volume":"23","author":"Ioannidis","year":"2025","journal-title":"PLoS Biology"},{"key":"ref_54","first-page":"668","article-title":"Analysis of the discovery mechanism of papers retracted for scientific misconducts in Chinese universities [\u6211\u56fd\u9ad8\u6821\u79d1\u7814\u4e0d\u7aef\u64a4\u7a3f\u8bba\u6587\u53d1\u73b0\u673a\u5236\u5206\u6790]","volume":"34","author":"Jin","year":"2023","journal-title":"Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals [\u4e2d\u56fd\u79d1\u6280\u671f\u520a\u7814\u7a76]"},{"key":"ref_55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1038\/548031a","article-title":"Ethics: More research won\u2019t crack misconduct","volume":"548","author":"Kornfeld","year":"2017","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"ref_56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1017\/S0021223700000984","article-title":"Human dignity and the principle of culpability","volume":"44","author":"Kremnitzer","year":"2013","journal-title":"Israel Law Review"},{"key":"ref_57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2018.1449651","article-title":"Repeating probability of authors with retracted scientific publications","volume":"25","author":"Kuroki","year":"2018","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"key":"ref_58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1409","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-017-9962-7","article-title":"Lack of improvement in scientific integrity: An analysis of WoS retractions by Chinese researchers (1997\u20132016)","volume":"24","author":"Lei","year":"2018","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"ref_59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100593","DOI":"10.1016\/j.xinn.2024.100593","article-title":"Science map of academic misconduct","volume":"5","author":"Li","year":"2024","journal-title":"The Innovation"},{"key":"ref_60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2194","DOI":"10.1002\/anie.200481033","article-title":"Article leads to withdrawal of doctorate\/most-read articles in 2003","volume":"43","author":"Lieb","year":"2004","journal-title":"Angewandte Chemie International Edition"},{"key":"ref_61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2023.2287046","article-title":"Factors related to the severity of research misconduct administrative actions: An analysis of office of research integrity case summaries from 1993 to 2023","volume":"32","author":"Long","year":"2023","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"key":"ref_62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3146","DOI":"10.1038\/srep03146","article-title":"The retraction penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science","volume":"3","author":"Lu","year":"2013","journal-title":"Scientific Reports"},{"key":"ref_63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jamieson, K. H., Kahan, D., and Scambler, G. (2017). Is there a retraction problem? And, if so, what can we do about it?. The Oxford handbook of the science of science communication, Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordhb\/9780190497620.001.0001"},{"key":"ref_64","unstructured":"McCook, A. (2025, September 01). Macchiarini may be dismissed from Karolinska; dean of research resigns. Retraction Watch, Available online: https:\/\/retractionwatch.com\/2016\/02\/22\/macchiarini-may-be-dismissed-from-karolinska-dean-of-research-resigns\/."},{"key":"ref_65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Meho, L. I. (2025, September 01). Gaming the metrics? Bibliometric anomalies and the integrity crisis in global research, Available online: https:\/\/sites.aub.edu.lb\/lmeho\/ri2\/.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.5249082"},{"key":"ref_66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1000318","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000318","article-title":"The costs and underappreciated consequences of research misconduct: A case study","volume":"7","author":"Michalek","year":"2010","journal-title":"PLoS Medicine"},{"key":"ref_67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23421","article-title":"Costly collaborations: The impact of scientific fraud on co-authors\u2019 careers","volume":"67","author":"Mongeon","year":"2016","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"key":"ref_68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1016\/j.irle.2009.11.002","article-title":"Repeat offenders: If they learn, we punish them more severely","volume":"30","author":"Mungan","year":"2010","journal-title":"International Review of Law and Economics"},{"key":"ref_69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1016\/j.irle.2013.10.002","article-title":"A behavioral justification for escalating punishment schemes","volume":"37","author":"Mungan","year":"2014","journal-title":"International Review of Law and Economics"},{"key":"ref_70","unstructured":"National Information Standards Organization, Bakker, C., Choma, M., Conaway, A., Czerepowicz, J., Edmunds, T., Flanagin, A., Flockton, S., Griffin, J., Hargitt, P., Hazzard, E., Hunter, S., Kean, E., Kwakkelaar, R., Lammey, R., Longobardi, L., McVeigh, M., Oransky, I., Renaville, F., and Zalm, M. (2025, September 01). Communication of retractions, removals, and expressions of concern (CREC) recommended practice (978-1-950980-26-0), Available online: https:\/\/www.niso.org\/standards-committees\/crec."},{"key":"ref_71","unstructured":"National Science Foundation (2023, December 16). Proposal and award policies and procedures guide, Available online: https:\/\/www.nsf.gov\/pubs\/policydocs\/pappg22_1\/nsf22_1.pdf."},{"key":"ref_72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nature (2025). Why retractions data could be a powerful tool for cleaning up science. Nature, 638, (8051), 581.","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-025-00509-1"},{"key":"ref_73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Normile, D. (Science, 2021). High-profile Chinese scientist cleared of fraud and plagiarism charges involving more than 60 papers, Science.","DOI":"10.1126\/science.abg7078"},{"key":"ref_74","unstructured":"Oransky, I. (2025, September 01). Happy 12th birthday, Retraction Watch: And what a year it was. Retraction Watch, Available online: https:\/\/retractionwatch.com\/2022\/08\/03\/happy-12th-birthday-retraction-watch-and-what-a-year-it-was\/."},{"key":"ref_75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-022-02071-6","article-title":"Retractions are increasing, but not enough","volume":"608","author":"Oransky","year":"2022b","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"ref_76","unstructured":"Oransky, I. (2025, September 01). Why misconduct could keep scientists from earning highly cited researcher designations, and how our database plays a part. Retraction Watch, Available online: https:\/\/retractionwatch.com\/2022\/11\/15\/why-misconduct-could-keep-scientists-from-earning-highly-cited-researcher-designations-and-how-our-database-plays-a-part\/."},{"key":"ref_77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1017\/jme.2025.39","article-title":"Why universities should make misconduct reports public","volume":"53","author":"Oransky","year":"2025","journal-title":"The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics"},{"key":"ref_78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3597","DOI":"10.2217\/fon-2019-0233","article-title":"Journal retractions in oncology: A bibliometric study","volume":"15","author":"Pantziarka","year":"2019","journal-title":"Future Oncology"},{"key":"ref_79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-017-9886-2","article-title":"Questionable, objectionable or criminal? Public opinion on data fraud and selective reporting in science","volume":"24","author":"Pickett","year":"2018","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"ref_80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Qiu, J. (2014). China sees dip in research-grant misconduct. Nature.","DOI":"10.1038\/nature.2014.16645"},{"key":"ref_81","unstructured":"Quaderi, N. (2025, September 01). Journal Citation Reports 2025: Addressing retractions and strengthening research integrity. Clarivate, Available online: https:\/\/clarivate.com\/academia-government\/blog\/journal-citation-reports-2025-addressing-retractions-and-strengthening-research-integrity\/."},{"key":"ref_82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.1108\/AJIM-01-2017-0014","article-title":"Publish or impoverish: An investigation of the monetary reward system of science in China (1999\u20132016)","volume":"69","author":"Quan","year":"2017","journal-title":"Aslib Journal of Information Management"},{"key":"ref_83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"813","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-014-9570-8","article-title":"No one likes a snitch","volume":"21","author":"Redman","year":"2015","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"ref_84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1080\/08989620903190299","article-title":"Research misconduct policies of scientific journals","volume":"16","author":"Resnik","year":"2009","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"key":"ref_85","unstructured":"Retraction Watch (n.d.-a). Retraction Watch database user guide, Retraction Watch. Available online: https:\/\/retractionwatch.com\/retraction-watch-database-user-guide\/."},{"key":"ref_86","unstructured":"Retraction Watch (n.d.-b). Retraction Watch database user guide appendix A: Fields, Retraction Watch. Available online: https:\/\/retractionwatch.com\/retraction-watch-database-user-guide\/retraction-watch-database-user-guide-appendix-a-fields\/."},{"key":"ref_87","unstructured":"Retraction Watch (n.d.-c). The Retraction Watch leaderboard, Available online: https:\/\/retractionwatch.com\/the-retraction-watch-leaderboard\/."},{"key":"ref_88","unstructured":"Retraction Watch (n.d.-d). The Retraction Watch transparency index, Retraction Watch. Available online: https:\/\/retractionwatch.com\/the-retraction-watch-faq\/transparencyindex\/."},{"key":"ref_89","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Reverman, E. (2025). The justified limits of transparency in research misconduct reports. Accountability in Research, 1\u201320.","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2025.2495790"},{"key":"ref_90","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"472","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-022-01415-6","article-title":"Scientists should get credit for correcting the literature","volume":"7","author":"Ribeiro","year":"2023a","journal-title":"Nature Human Behaviour"},{"key":"ref_91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-023-00446-0","article-title":"Retractions and rewards in science: An open question for reviewers and funders","volume":"29","author":"Ribeiro","year":"2023b","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"ref_92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e2420092122","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.2420092122","article-title":"The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly","volume":"122","author":"Richardson","year":"2025","journal-title":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA"},{"key":"ref_93","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"468","DOI":"10.1093\/bjc\/azn017","article-title":"Punishing persistence: Explaining the enduring appeal of the recidivist sentencing premium","volume":"48","author":"Roberts","year":"2008","journal-title":"British Journal of Criminology"},{"key":"ref_94","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"685","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2016.02.003","article-title":"Sanctions for research misconduct in cardiothoracic surgery journals","volume":"102","author":"Sade","year":"2016","journal-title":"The Annals of Thoracic Surgery"},{"key":"ref_95","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7535","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-024-05147-4","article-title":"Why do some retracted articles continue to get cited?","volume":"129","author":"Schmidt","year":"2024","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"ref_96","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1017\/jme.2025.38","article-title":"Academic research integrity investigations must be independent, fair, and timely","volume":"53","author":"Schrag","year":"2025","journal-title":"The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics"},{"key":"ref_97","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1093\/reseval\/rvs011","article-title":"Research assessment and monetary rewards: The overemphasized impact factor in China","volume":"21","author":"Shao","year":"2012","journal-title":"Research Evaluation"},{"key":"ref_98","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1015","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2024.2366281","article-title":"Taking it back: A pilot study of a rubric measuring retraction notice quality","volume":"32","author":"Shi","year":"2024","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"key":"ref_99","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"329","DOI":"10.1007\/s11024-022-09468-7","article-title":"China\u2019s research evaluation reform: What are the consequences for global science?","volume":"60","author":"Shu","year":"2022","journal-title":"Minerva"},{"key":"ref_100","unstructured":"Springer (n.d.). Publishing ethics for journals, Springer. Available online: https:\/\/www.springer.com\/gp\/authors-editors\/editors\/publishing-ethics-for-journals\/4176."},{"key":"ref_101","first-page":"1209","article-title":"Proportionality and punishment","volume":"100","author":"Staihar","year":"2015","journal-title":"Iowa Law Review"},{"key":"ref_102","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e02956","DOI":"10.7554\/eLife.02956","article-title":"Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications","volume":"3","author":"Stern","year":"2014","journal-title":"eLife"},{"key":"ref_103","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-024-00468-2","article-title":"Potential issues in mandating a disclosure of institutional investigation in retraction notices","volume":"30","author":"Tang","year":"2024","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"ref_104","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tang, B. L. (2025). Seniority, authorship order, and severity of punishment in research misconduct\u2014Shared\/honorary authorships as explanations for an apparent paradox. Accountability in Research, 1\u20133.","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2025.2453851"},{"key":"ref_105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"979","DOI":"10.1126\/science.abm7992","article-title":"A role for funders in fostering China\u2019s research integrity","volume":"375","author":"Tang","year":"2022","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"ref_106","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-023-00459-9","article-title":"Research misconduct investigations in China\u2019s science funding system","volume":"29","author":"Tang","year":"2023","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"ref_107","first-page":"44","article-title":"Silent or stealth retractions, the dangerous voices of the unknown, deleted literature","volume":"32","year":"2015","journal-title":"Publishing Research Quarterly"},{"key":"ref_108","first-page":"251","article-title":"Ending the retraction stigma: Encouraging the reporting of errors in the biomedical record","volume":"17","year":"2019","journal-title":"Research Ethics"},{"key":"ref_109","first-page":"365","article-title":"Why do some retracted papers continue to be cited?","volume":"110","year":"2016","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"ref_110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.17646\/KOME.75672.52","article-title":"Curriculum vitae: Challenges and potential solutions","volume":"8","author":"Tsigaris","year":"2020","journal-title":"Kome"},{"key":"ref_111","first-page":"292","article-title":"Fortification of retraction notices to improve their transparency and usefulness","volume":"35","author":"Vuong","year":"2021","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"key":"ref_112","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"793","DOI":"10.1126\/science.ade3742","article-title":"Rethinking the retraction process","volume":"377","author":"Thorp","year":"2022","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"ref_113","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e008681","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2015-008681","article-title":"How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers","volume":"6","author":"Tijdink","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"ref_114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"980","DOI":"10.1038\/453980a","article-title":"Repairing research integrity","volume":"453","author":"Titus","year":"2008","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"ref_115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"479","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-023-03974-8","article-title":"More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023\u2014A new record","volume":"624","year":"2023","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"ref_116","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"596","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-025-00455-y","article-title":"Exclusive: These universities have the most retracted scientific articles","volume":"638","year":"2025","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"ref_117","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-024-02719-5","article-title":"Exclusive: The papers that most heavily cite retracted studies","volume":"633","author":"Naddaf","year":"2024","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"ref_118","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4941","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-021-03944-9","article-title":"The citation impact of articles from which authors gained monetary rewards based on journal metrics","volume":"126","year":"2021","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"ref_119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01096160","article-title":"Proportionality in the philosophy of punishment: From \u201cwhy punish?\u201d to \u201chow much?\u201d","volume":"1","year":"1990","journal-title":"Criminal Law Forum"},{"key":"ref_120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-020-01694-x","article-title":"Reform retractions to make them more transparent","volume":"582","author":"Vuong","year":"2020a","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"ref_121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1282","article-title":"The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019","volume":"33","author":"Vuong","year":"2020b","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"key":"ref_122","first-page":"535","article-title":"What do journal editors do when they suspect research misconduct?","volume":"26","author":"Wager","year":"2007","journal-title":"Medicine and Law"},{"key":"ref_123","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1186\/s41073-021-00109-3","article-title":"Cooperation & Liaison between Universities & Editors (CLUE): Recommendations on best practice","volume":"6","author":"Wager","year":"2021","journal-title":"Research Integrity and Peer Review"},{"key":"ref_124","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-021-00314-9","article-title":"Prevalence of research misconduct and questionable research practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"27","author":"Xie","year":"2021","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"ref_125","first-page":"1554","article-title":"Misconduct performances and suggestions for processing retracted papers of Chinese journal databases [\u4e2d\u6587\u5b66\u672f\u671f\u520a\u6570\u636e\u5e93\u64a4\u9500\u8bba\u6587\u5904\u7406\u5931\u8303\u8868\u73b0\u53ca\u5efa\u8bae]","volume":"34","author":"Xu","year":"2023","journal-title":"Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals [\u4e2d\u56fd\u79d1\u6280\u671f\u520a\u7814\u7a76]"},{"key":"ref_126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"512","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2021.1952870","article-title":"A cross-disciplinary and severity-based study of author-related reasons for retraction","volume":"29","author":"Xu","year":"2022a","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"key":"ref_127","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1445","article-title":"Non-author entities accountable for retractions: A diachronic and cross-disciplinary exploration of reasons for retraction","volume":"35","author":"Xu","year":"2022b","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"key":"ref_128","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1548","article-title":"What to communicate in retraction notices?","volume":"36","author":"Xu","year":"2023","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"key":"ref_129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16030","DOI":"10.1007\/s12144-022-03738-z","article-title":"Construction and management of retraction stigma in retraction notices: An authorship-based investigation","volume":"43","author":"Xu","year":"2024","journal-title":"Current Psychology"},{"key":"ref_130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"631","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-024-02099-w","article-title":"Combating China\u2019s retraction crisis","volume":"9","author":"Xu","year":"2025a","journal-title":"Nature Human Behaviour"},{"key":"ref_131","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Xu, S. B., and Hu, G. (2025b). Ranking-based sanctions for retraction-afflicted elite researchers. Accountability in Research, 1\u201325.","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2025.2549008"},{"key":"ref_132","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2024.2349115","article-title":"Rethinking the author name ambiguity problem and beyond: The case of the Chinese context","volume":"32","author":"Xu","year":"2025c","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"key":"ref_133","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1007\/s10734-019-00470-9","article-title":"China \u2018goes out\u2019 in a centre\u2013periphery world: Incentivizing international publications in the humanities and social sciences","volume":"80","author":"Xu","year":"2020","journal-title":"Higher Education"},{"key":"ref_134","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1132","DOI":"10.1080\/03075079.2019.1672646","article-title":"Incentivising international publications: Institutional policymaking in Chinese higher education","volume":"46","author":"Xu","year":"2021","journal-title":"Studies in Higher Education"},{"key":"ref_135","first-page":"89","article-title":"Characteristics and evolution of research integrity policy in China","volume":"37","author":"Yang","year":"2020","journal-title":"Science & Technology Progress and Policy"},{"key":"ref_136","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yeo-Teh, N. S. L., and Tang, B. L. (2024). On \u201cintent\u201d in research misconduct. Accountability in Research, 1\u201319.","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2024.2374577"},{"key":"ref_137","first-page":"369","article-title":"An empirical study on the authenticity of retraction reasons: A comparative analysis of the cases notified by the National Health Commission and the contents of the retraction statement [\u64a4\u7a3f\u58f0\u660e\u5bf9\u6bd4\u7ed3\u679c\u5206\u6790\u53ca\u64a4\u7a3f\u539f\u56e0\u8868\u8ff0\u771f\u5b9e\u6027\u63a2\u7a76\u2014\u4ee5\u56fd\u5bb6\u536b\u751f\u5065\u5eb7\u59d4\u5458\u4f1a\u901a\u62a5\u6848\u4f8b\u4e3a\u4f8b]","volume":"36","author":"Yuan","year":"2024","journal-title":"Acta Editologica [\u7f16\u8f91\u5b66\u62a5]"},{"key":"ref_138","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1177\/17470161241247720","article-title":"Research misconduct in china: Towards an institutional analysis","volume":"21","author":"Zhang","year":"2024","journal-title":"Research Ethics Review"},{"key":"ref_139","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.1080\/03050068.2024.2376986","article-title":"The politics of higher education in China: The signal\u2013response mechanism, downward tiered pressure escalation, and the Double First-Class University Initiative","volume":"61","author":"Zhang","year":"2025","journal-title":"Comparative Education"}],"container-title":["Publications"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2304-6775\/13\/3\/41\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,9]],"date-time":"2025-10-09T18:39:35Z","timestamp":1760035175000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2304-6775\/13\/3\/41"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,4]]},"references-count":139,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,9]]}},"alternative-id":["publications13030041"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/publications13030041","relation":{},"ISSN":["2304-6775"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2304-6775","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,4]]}}}