{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,12]],"date-time":"2025-10-12T04:12:51Z","timestamp":1760242371385,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":63,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,6]],"date-time":"2017-06-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1496707200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Publications"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Beginning with an historical reminiscence, this paper examines the peer review process as experienced by authors currently seeking publication of their research in a highly controversial area. A case study of research into the events of 9\/11 (11 September 2001) illustrates some of the problems in peer review arising from undue influences based on financial and political considerations. The paper suggests that ethical failures, rather than flaws in the process itself, are mainly responsible for perceived problems. The way forward lies in improved ethics and a more open process. In addition, editorial review boards and peer review strategies would help to improve the ethics of peer review in general.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/publications5020016","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,6]],"date-time":"2017-06-06T10:53:09Z","timestamp":1496746389000},"page":"16","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Peer Review in Controversial Topics\u2014A Case Study of 9\/11"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"5","author":[{"given":"John","family":"Wyndham","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Scientists for 9\/11 Truth, 36 Union Street, Peterborough, NH 03458, USA"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","unstructured":"Wyndham, J.D. (2017, February 15). Other Scientific Works. Available online: http:\/\/www.scientistsfor911truth.org\/docs\/JDWyndham_Other_Scientific_Works.pdf."},{"key":"ref_2","unstructured":"Famous Scientists (2017, February 15). The Art of Genius. Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar. Available online: https:\/\/www.famousscientists.org\/subrahmanyan-chandrasekhar\/."},{"key":"ref_3","unstructured":"The California State University (2017, February 15). History of Peer Review. Available online: http:\/\/teachingcommons.cdl.edu\/cdip\/facultyresearch\/Historyofpeerreview.html."},{"key":"ref_4","unstructured":"(2017, February 15). History of the Journal Nature, Timeline. Available online: http:\/\/www.nature.com\/nature\/history\/timeline_1960s.html."},{"key":"ref_5","unstructured":"(2017, February 15). The Athen\u00e6um, Pall Mall, London. Available online: http:\/\/www.athenaeumclub.co.uk\/."},{"key":"ref_6","unstructured":"Roach, J. (National Geographic News, 2003). Astrophysicist Recognized for Discovery of Solar Wind, National Geographic News."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.1093\/mnras\/126.5.469","article-title":"The solar corona in interplanetary space","volume":"126","author":"Hewish","year":"1963","journal-title":"Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc."},{"key":"ref_8","unstructured":"(2017, February 15). Luna 1, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Available online: http:\/\/nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov\/nmc\/masterCatalog.do?sc=1959-012A."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1087\/20110109","article-title":"The ethics of scholarly peer review: A review of the literature","volume":"24","author":"Souder","year":"2001","journal-title":"Learn. Publ."},{"key":"ref_10","unstructured":"Scientists for 9\/11 Truth (2017, February 15). Introduction to the Science of 9\/11, See Table 1. Available online: http:\/\/www.scientistsfor911truth.org\/introduction.html#i911scit_WTC_evidence_summary."},{"key":"ref_11","unstructured":"(2017, February 14). Definition of \u201cControlled Demolition\u201d as Found in Urban Dictionary. Available online: http:\/\/www.urbandictionary.com\/define.php?term=Controlled%20demolition."},{"key":"ref_12","unstructured":"(2017, February 15). Scientists for 9\/11 Truth. Available online: http:\/\/www.scientistsfor911truth.org\/index.html."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wyndham, J.D., Coste, W.H., and Smith, M.R. (2014, January 23\u201324). Ethics and the Official Reports about the Destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers (WTC1 and WTC2) on 9\/11: A Case Study. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science and Technology, Chicago, IL, USA.","DOI":"10.1109\/ETHICS.2014.6893463"},{"key":"ref_14","unstructured":"(2017, February 15). Final Reports from the NIST World Trade Center Disaster Investigation, Available online: http:\/\/www.nist.gov\/el\/disasterstudies\/wtc\/wtc_finalreports.cfm."},{"key":"ref_15","unstructured":"Willers, W.B. (2017, February 15). Scientists\u2019 Members Open Up Dialog. Available online: http:\/\/www.scientistsfor911truth.org\/news.html#news_members_dialog."},{"key":"ref_16","unstructured":"Quintiere, J.G. (1970, January 01). Questions on the WTC Investigation. Available online: http:\/\/www.enfp.umd.edu\/sites\/default\/files\/documents\/quintiere-nato.pdf."},{"key":"ref_17","unstructured":"Griffin, D.R. (2005). The 9\/11 Commission Report\u2014Omissions and Distortions, Olive Branch Press (Interlink Publishing)."},{"key":"ref_18","unstructured":"9\/11 Commission (2004). The 9\/11 Commission Report."},{"key":"ref_19","unstructured":"(2017, February 15). Architects & Engineers for 9\/11 Truth. Available online: http:\/\/www.ae911truth.org\/."},{"key":"ref_20","unstructured":"National Fire Protection Association (2008). NFPA 921: Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations, National Fire Protection Association."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jones, S., Korol, R., Szamboti, A., and Walter, T. (2016). 15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-rise Building Collapses. Europhysics News.","DOI":"10.1051\/epn\/2016402"},{"key":"ref_22","unstructured":"Jones, S., Farrer, J., Jenkins, G., Legge, F., Gourley, J., Ryan, K., Farnsworth, D., and Grabbe, C. (2017, June 05). Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction. Available online: http:\/\/www.journalof911studies.com\/articles\/WTCHighTemp2.pdf."},{"key":"ref_23","unstructured":"(2017, February 15). NIST Technical Briefing on its Final Draft Report on WTC 7 for Public Comment. Available online: http:\/\/911speakout.org\/NIST_Tech_Briefing_Transcript.pdf."},{"key":"ref_24","unstructured":"Chandler, D. (2017, February 15). Freefall and Building 7 on 9\/11. Available online: http:\/\/911speakout.org\/Freefall.pdf."},{"key":"ref_25","unstructured":"NIST Engineering Laboratory (2017, February 15). FAQs\u2014NIST WTC 7 Investigation, Available online: https:\/\/www.nist.gov\/el\/faqs-nist-wtc-7-investigation."},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ba\u017eant, Z.P, and Zhou, Y. (2002). Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse?\u2014Simple Analysis. J. Eng. Mech., 128, Available online: http:\/\/www.civil.northwestern.edu\/people\/bazant\/PDFs\/Papers\/405.pdf.","DOI":"10.1061\/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:1(2)"},{"key":"ref_27","unstructured":"(2017, February 15). NIST NCSTAR 1-6, Available online: http:\/\/ws680.nist.gov\/publication\/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=101279."},{"key":"ref_28","unstructured":"(2017, February 15). FEMA Report, Available online: https:\/\/www.fema.gov\/pdf\/library\/fema403_ch1.pdf."},{"key":"ref_29","unstructured":"Gourley, J. (2017, February 15). James Gourley Published in \u2018The Journal of Engineering Mechanics. Available online: http:\/\/911blogger.com\/node\/18196."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1061\/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000198","article-title":"Why the Observed Motion History of World Trade Center Towers Is Smooth","volume":"137","author":"Le","year":"2011","journal-title":"J. Eng. Mech."},{"key":"ref_31","unstructured":"MacQueen, G, and Szamboti, T. (2009). The Missing Jolt: A Simple Refutation of the NIST- Ba\u017eant Collapse Hypothesis. J. 9\/11 Stud., Available online: http:\/\/www.journalof911studies.com\/volume\/2008\/TheMissingJolt7.pdf."},{"key":"ref_32","unstructured":"Szamboti, T, and Johns, R. (2014). ASCE Journals refuse to correct fraudulent paper they published on WTC collapses. J. 9\/11 Stud., Available online: http:\/\/www.journalof911studies.com\/resources\/2014SepLetterSzambotiJohns.pdf."},{"key":"ref_33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.2174\/1874412500902010007","article-title":"Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9\/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe","volume":"2","author":"Harrit","year":"2009","journal-title":"Open Chem. Phys. J."},{"key":"ref_34","unstructured":"Harrit, N.H. (2017, February 15). Professor Pileni\u2019s Resignation as Editor-in-Chief of the Open Chemical Physics Journal. Available online: http:\/\/911blogger.com\/node\/20614."},{"key":"ref_35","unstructured":"(2017, April 14). See the Articles and Letters in the Journal of 9\/11 Studies. Available online: http:\/\/www.journalof911studies.com\/."},{"key":"ref_36","unstructured":"(2017, February 15). Editorial and Letters to the Editor. Available online: http:\/\/www.europhysicsnews.org\/articles\/epn\/pdf\/2016\/05\/epn2016-47-5-6.pdf."},{"key":"ref_37","unstructured":"(2017, February 15). University of Cambridge BP Institute. Available online: http:\/\/www.bpi.cam.ac.uk\/."},{"key":"ref_38","unstructured":"Juhasz, A. (Special to CNN, 2013). Why the war in Iraq was fought for Big Oil, Special to CNN."},{"key":"ref_39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1061\/(ASCE)0733-9399(2008)134:2(125)","article-title":"Progressive Collapse of the World Trade Center: Simple Analysis","volume":"134","author":"Seffen","year":"2008","journal-title":"J. Eng. Mech."},{"key":"ref_40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"538","DOI":"10.1061\/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000025","article-title":"Discussion of \u201cProgressive Collapse of the World Trade Center: A Simple Analysis\u201d by K. A. Seffen","volume":"136","author":"Grabbe","year":"2010","journal-title":"J. Eng. Mech."},{"key":"ref_41","unstructured":"(2017, February 15). CRASSH (Centre for Research in the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities). Available online: http:\/\/www.crassh.cam.ac.uk\/programmes\/conspiracy-democracy."},{"key":"ref_42","unstructured":"deHaven-Smith, L. (2014). Conspiracy Theory in America, University of Texas Academic Press. Available online: https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Conspiracy-Theory-America-Discovering\/dp\/0292757697."},{"key":"ref_43","unstructured":"(2017, February 15). WTC 7 Evaluation. Available online: http:\/\/www.wtc7evaluation.org\/."},{"key":"ref_44","unstructured":"Broze, D. (Mint Press News, 2016). 9\/11 Truth Movement Still Peeling Back Layers of The US Government\u2019s 9\/11 Narrative, Mint Press News."},{"key":"ref_45","unstructured":"Gallagher, P. (2017, February 15). Finding Regarding Public safety information. Available online: http:\/\/cryptome.org\/nist070709.pdf."},{"key":"ref_46","unstructured":"Whoriskey, P. (The Washington Post, 2012). As drug industry\u2019s influence over research grows, so does the potential for bias, The Washington Post."},{"key":"ref_47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1177\/014107680609900414","article-title":"Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals","volume":"99","author":"Smith","year":"2006","journal-title":"J. R. Soc. Med."},{"key":"ref_48","unstructured":"(2017, February 15). The BMJ, formerly the British Medical Journal. Available online: https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_BMJ."},{"key":"ref_49","unstructured":"Garcia, J.A., Rodriguez-Sanchez, R., and Fdez-Valdivia, J. (2017, April 14). A peer review strategy for quality assurance. Available online: https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/314394759_A_peer_review_strategy_for_quality_assurance."},{"key":"ref_50","unstructured":"(2017, February 15). COPE Committee on Publication Ethics Guidelines. Available online: http:\/\/publicationethics.org\/resources\/guidelines."},{"key":"ref_51","unstructured":"(2017, February 15). COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers, March. Available online: http:\/\/publicationethics.org\/files\/Ethical_guidelines_for_peer_reviewers_0.pdf."},{"key":"ref_52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gough, N.R. (2009). Training for peer review. Sci. Signal., 2, Available online: http:\/\/stke.sciencemag.org\/content\/2\/85\/tr2.full.","DOI":"10.1126\/scisignal.285tr2"},{"key":"ref_53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1177\/1075547098019003002","article-title":"Peer review for journals as it stands today\u2014Part 1","volume":"19","author":"Campanario","year":"1998","journal-title":"Sci. Commun."},{"key":"ref_54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1177\/1075547098019004002","article-title":"Peer review for journals as it stands today\u2014Part 2","volume":"19","author":"Campanario","year":"1998","journal-title":"Sci. Commun."},{"key":"ref_55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2020","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23307","article-title":"Bias and effort in peer review","volume":"66","year":"2015","journal-title":"J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol."},{"key":"ref_56","first-page":"1252","article-title":"Adverse selection of reviewers","volume":"66","year":"2014","journal-title":"J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol."},{"key":"ref_57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"DeCoursey, T. (2006). The pros and cons of open peer review. Should authors be told who their reviewers are?. Nature.","DOI":"10.1038\/nature04991"},{"key":"ref_58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.318.7175.23","article-title":"Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers\u2019 recommendations: A randomized trial","volume":"318","author":"Rooyen","year":"1999","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref_59","unstructured":"Wyndham, J.D. (2017, February 15). Bringing Closure to the 9\/11 Pentagon Debate. Available online: http:\/\/www.foreignpolicyjournal.com\/2016\/10\/07\/bringing-closure-to-the-911-pentagon-debate\/."},{"key":"ref_60","unstructured":"(2017, February 15). Scientific Method 9\/11. Available online: http:\/\/www.scientificmethod911.org\/."},{"key":"ref_61","unstructured":"(2017, April 14). Jerry Russell Pentagon Comment and Discussion. Available online: http:\/\/www.scientificmethod911.org\/reviewpages\/wyndham_reply_fe.html."},{"key":"ref_62","unstructured":"(2017, April 16). Robin Hordon Pentagon Comment and Discussion. Available online: http:\/\/www.scientificmethod911.org\/reviewpages\/wyndham_debate.html."},{"key":"ref_63","unstructured":"(2017, April 14). David Cole Pentagon Question and Discussion. Available online: http:\/\/www.scientificmethod911.org\/reviewpages\/legge_refutation.html."}],"container-title":["Publications"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2304-6775\/5\/2\/16\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T18:38:07Z","timestamp":1760207887000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2304-6775\/5\/2\/16"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,6]]},"references-count":63,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,6]]}},"alternative-id":["publications5020016"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/publications5020016","relation":{},"ISSN":["2304-6775"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2304-6775"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,6]]}}}