{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,27]],"date-time":"2026-06-27T00:47:55Z","timestamp":1782521275102,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,2]],"date-time":"2019-07-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1562025600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Publications"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Participation in the writing or revising of a manuscript is, according to many journal guidelines, necessary to be listed as an author of the resulting article. This is the traditional concept of authorship. But there are good reasons to shift to a contributorship model, under which it is not necessary to contribute to the writing or revision of a manuscript, and all those who make substantial contributions to a project are credited. Many journals and publishers have already taken steps in this direction, and further adoption will have several benefits. This article makes the case for continuing to move down that path. Use of a contributorship model should improve the ability of universities and funders to identify effective individual researchers and improving their ability to identify the right mix of researchers needed to advance modern science. Other benefits should include facilitating the formation of productive collaborations and the creation of important scientific tools and software. The CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) taxonomy is a machine-readable standard already incorporated into some journal management systems and it allows incremental transition toward contributorship.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/publications7030048","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,2]],"date-time":"2019-07-02T12:11:17Z","timestamp":1562069477000},"page":"48","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":99,"title":["Contributorship, Not Authorship: Use CRediT to Indicate Who Did What"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"7","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2869-0085","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alex O.","family":"Holcombe","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","unstructured":"International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2019, June 20). Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. Updated December 2018. Available online: http:\/\/www.icmje.org\/icmje-recommendations.pdf."},{"key":"ref_2","unstructured":"American Psychological Association (2019, June 11). Publication Practices & Responsible Authorship. Available online: https:\/\/www.apa.org\/research\/responsible\/publication\/."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1997.03550070071041","article-title":"When authorship fails: A proposal to make contributors accountable","volume":"278","author":"Rennie","year":"1997","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Patience, G.S., Galli, F., Patience, P.A., and Boffito, D.C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS ONE, 14.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0198117"},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-997-0023-5","article-title":"A proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science","volume":"3","author":"Resnik","year":"1997","journal-title":"Sci. Eng. Ethics"},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2557","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1715374115","article-title":"Transparency in authors\u2019 contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication","volume":"115","author":"McNutt","year":"2018","journal-title":"Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA"},{"key":"ref_7","unstructured":"Nature Publishing Group (2019, June 11). Nature Research Journals\u2019 Authorship Policy. Available online: https:\/\/www.nature.com\/authors\/policies\/authorship.html."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2015-103171","article-title":"Authorship policies of scientific journals","volume":"42","author":"Resnik","year":"2016","journal-title":"J. Med. Ethics"},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"(2009). Authorship policies. Nature, 458, 1078.","DOI":"10.1038\/4581078a"},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1019","DOI":"10.1126\/science.1224988","article-title":"Ending Honorary Authorship","volume":"337","author":"Greenland","year":"2012","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kumar, S. (2018). Ethical Concerns in the Rise of Co-Authorship and Its Role as a Proxy of Research Collaborations. Publications, 6.","DOI":"10.3390\/publications6030037"},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1315","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-014-9606-0","article-title":"Writers blocked: On the wrongs of research co-authorship and some possible strategies for improvement","volume":"21","author":"Cutas","year":"2015","journal-title":"Sci. Eng. Ethics"},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"660","DOI":"10.1177\/0162243915622265","article-title":"Negotiating authorship in Chinese universities: How organizations shape cycles of credit in science","volume":"41","author":"Shen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Sci. Technol. Hum. Values"},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1038\/nrg1318","article-title":"The Bayesian revolution in genetics","volume":"5","author":"Beaumont","year":"2004","journal-title":"Nat. Rev. Genet."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1038\/525313a","article-title":"Grant giving: Global funders to focus on interdisciplinarity","volume":"525","author":"Rylance","year":"2015","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1093\/scipol\/scs121","article-title":"The role of funding agencies in creating interdisciplinary knowledge","volume":"40","author":"Lyall","year":"2013","journal-title":"Sci. Public Policy"},{"key":"ref_17","unstructured":"ADAlthousePhD (2019, March 08). [Twitter Post]. It\u2019s Kind of Up to Individual Institutions to Police Their Faculty, but Complaining about This Can Make You a Pariah or Get You a Reputation as Being \u201cDifficult\u201d (for the Outrageous Demand of Wanting Credit for Your Work\u2026). Available online: https:\/\/twitter.com\/ADAlthousePhD\/status\/1104003152964132865."},{"key":"ref_18","unstructured":"Ridley, A. (2019, May 11). Now Is the Time for a Team-Based Approach to Team Science. The Academy of Medical Sciences Website. Available online: https:\/\/acmedsci.ac.uk\/more\/news\/now-is-the-time-for-a-team-based-approach-to-team-science."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"312","DOI":"10.1038\/508312a","article-title":"Publishing: Credit where credit is due","volume":"508","author":"Allen","year":"2014","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1087\/20150211","article-title":"Beyond authorship: Attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit","volume":"28","author":"Brand","year":"2015","journal-title":"Learn. Publ."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1210","article-title":"How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship","volume":"32","author":"Allen","year":"2019","journal-title":"Learn. Publ."},{"key":"ref_22","unstructured":"(2019, March 13). PLoS. Available online: https:\/\/journals.plos.org\/plosone\/s\/authorship."},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Holcombe, A.O., Vazire, S., and Chartier, C.R. (2019, January 7\u20139). Replace Journals\u2019 Writing-Based Authorship Guidelines with a Contributorship Model. Proceedings of the the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.","DOI":"10.3390\/publications7030048"}],"container-title":["Publications"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2304-6775\/7\/3\/48\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T13:01:47Z","timestamp":1760187707000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2304-6775\/7\/3\/48"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,2]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,9]]}},"alternative-id":["publications7030048"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/publications7030048","relation":{"has-preprint":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.31234\/osf.io\/dt6e8","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["2304-6775"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2304-6775","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,2]]}}}