{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,2]],"date-time":"2026-04-02T04:10:27Z","timestamp":1775103027810,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,23]],"date-time":"2024-03-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1711152000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"Efort-Europe s.r.l"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Robotics"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Industrial robots are complex systems, as they require the integration of several sub-assemblies to perform accurate operations. Moreover, they may experience remarkable dynamic actions due to high kinematic requirements, which are necessary to obtain reduced cycle times. The dynamic design of industrial robots can therefore be demanding, since the single structural component can induce an impact both in the design phase (development strategy and computational time) and at the machine level (global stiffness and natural frequencies). To this end, the present paper proposes first a topology optimization procedure based on the Equivalent Static Loads (ESL) method that integrates flexible multibody simulation outputs. The same procedure also foresees an intermediate static reduction to reduce and to precisely define the application points of the ESL. Secondly, an optimization procedure based on the Quasi-Static Loads (QSL) method integrating flexible multibody simulation outputs is proposed as well. The objective is to carry out a comparison between the two methods and consequently evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of the two. In the end, practical guidelines regarding the selection and application of the two methods are also provided to the reader.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/robotics13040055","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,25]],"date-time":"2024-03-25T12:50:49Z","timestamp":1711371049000},"page":"55","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Practical Design Guidelines for Topology Optimization of Flexible Mechanisms: A Comparison between Weakly Coupled Methods"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"13","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4804-3416","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Simone","family":"D\u2019Imperio","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy"}]},{"given":"Teresa Maria","family":"Berruti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6863-6724","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Chiara","family":"Gastaldi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy"}]},{"given":"Pietro","family":"Soccio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Efort Europe S.r.l., Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi 2, 10128 Torino, Italy"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1007\/s11831-017-9215-6","article-title":"System-Based Approaches for Structural Optimization of Flexible Mechanisms","volume":"25","author":"Tromme","year":"2018","journal-title":"Arch. Comput. Methods Eng."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Min, S., Kikuchi, N., Park, Y.C., Kim, S., and Chang, S. (1999). Optimal Topology Design of Structures under Dynamic Loads, Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/s001580050052"},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1006\/jsvi.1999.2874","article-title":"Topology optimization of structures under dynamic response constraints","volume":"234","author":"Rong","year":"2000","journal-title":"J. Sound Vib."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"166","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cma.2014.11.012","article-title":"Topology optimization of viscoelastic structures using a time-dependent adjoint method","volume":"285","author":"James","year":"2015","journal-title":"Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105344","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mechmachtheory.2023.105344","article-title":"Topology optimization for dynamic flexible multibody systems using the Flexible Natural Coordinates Formulation","volume":"185","author":"Vanpaemel","year":"2023","journal-title":"Mech. Mach. Theory"},{"key":"ref_6","unstructured":"Albers, A. (2023, June 18). Automated Topology Optimization of Flexible Components in Hybrid Finite Element Multibody Systems Using ADAMS\/Flex and MSC. Construct. Available online: https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/36452967."},{"key":"ref_7","unstructured":"Albers, A., Ottnad, J., H\u00e4u\u00dfler, P., and Minx, J. (2023, June 18). Structural Optimization of Components in Controlled Mechanical Systems. Available online: http:\/\/www.asme.org\/about-asme\/terms-of-use."},{"key":"ref_8","unstructured":"Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and IEEE Robotics and Automation Society (2009, January 7\u201310). Humanoids \u201909: [proceedings]. Proceedings of the 9th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Paris, France."},{"key":"ref_9","unstructured":"Kang, B.S., Choi, W.S., and Park, G.J. (2023, July 04). Structural Optimization under Equivalent Static Loads Transformed from Dynamic Loads Based on Displacement. Available online: www.elsevier.com\/locate\/compstruc."},{"key":"ref_10","unstructured":"Choi, W.S., and Park, G.J. (2023, July 04). Structural Optimization Using Equivalent Static Loads at All Time Intervals. Available online: www.elsevier.com\/locate\/cma."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1024799727258","article-title":"Technical Note Validation of a Structural Optimization Algorithm Transforming Dynamic Loads into Equivalent Static Loads 1","volume":"118","author":"Park","year":"2003","journal-title":"J. Optim. Theory Appl."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"226","DOI":"10.2514\/1.J051256","article-title":"Dynamic response topology optimization in the time domain using equivalent static loads","volume":"50","author":"Jang","year":"2012","journal-title":"AIAA J."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"921","DOI":"10.1007\/s00158-014-1101-3","article-title":"On the equivalent static loads approach for dynamic response structural optimization","volume":"50","author":"Stolpe","year":"2014","journal-title":"Struct. Multidiscip. Optim."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1007\/s00158-017-1884-0","article-title":"The equivalent static loads method for structural optimization does not in general generate optimal designs","volume":"58","author":"Stolpe","year":"2018","journal-title":"Struct. Multidiscip. Optim."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1007\/s00158-018-2059-3","article-title":"Discussion on the optimality condition of the equivalent static loads method for linear dynamic response structural optimization","volume":"59","author":"Park","year":"2019","journal-title":"Struct. Multidiscip. Optim."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Olhoff, N., and Taylor, J.E. (2023, January 12). On Structural Optimization. Available online: http:\/\/asmedigitalcollection.asme.org\/appliedmechanics\/article-pdf\/50\/4b\/1139\/6362856\/1139_1.pdf.","DOI":"10.1115\/1.3167196"},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1016\/0045-7825(88)90086-2","article-title":"Generating Optimal Topologies in Structural Design Using a Homogenization Method","volume":"71","author":"Bendse","year":"1988","journal-title":"Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng."},{"key":"ref_18","unstructured":"(2023, February 15). MSC Nastran 2022.2 Design Sensitivity and Optimization User\u2019s Guide MSC Nastran Design Sensitivity and Optimization User\u2019s Guide. Available online: http:\/\/msc-documentation.questionpro.com."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1007\/s00158-007-0217-0","article-title":"A critical review of established methods of structural topology optimization","volume":"37","author":"Rozvany","year":"2009","journal-title":"Struct. Multidiscip. Optim."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rozvany, G.I.N. (2000, January 6\u20138). The Simp Method in Topology Optimization-Theoretical Background, Advantages and New Applications. Proceedings of the 8th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Long Beach, CA, USA.","DOI":"10.2514\/6.2000-4738"},{"key":"ref_21","unstructured":"Sigmund, O. (1994). Design of Material Structures using Topology Optimization. [Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Denmark (DTU)]."}],"container-title":["Robotics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2218-6581\/13\/4\/55\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]],"date-time":"2025-10-10T14:18:25Z","timestamp":1760105905000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2218-6581\/13\/4\/55"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,23]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,4]]}},"alternative-id":["robotics13040055"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/robotics13040055","relation":{},"ISSN":["2218-6581"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2218-6581","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,23]]}}}