{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,9]],"date-time":"2026-06-09T14:03:49Z","timestamp":1781013829792,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,9]],"date-time":"2020-03-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1583712000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"Romanian Ministry of Research and Innovation, CCCDI\u2014UEFISCDI","award":["PN-III-P2-2.1-CI-2017-0623"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["PN-III-P2-2.1-CI-2017-0623"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Remote Sensing"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Currently, products that are obtained by Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) image processing based on structure-from-motion photogrammetry (SfM) are being investigated for use in high precision projects. Independent of the georeferencing process being done directly or indirectly, Ground Control Points (GCPs) are needed to increase the accuracy of the obtained products. A minimum of three GCPs is required to bring the results into a desired coordinate system through the indirect georeferencing process, but it is well known that increasing the number of GCPs will lead to a higher accuracy of the final results. The aim of this study is to find the suitable number of GCPs to derive high precision results and what is the effect of GCPs systematic or stratified random distribution on the accuracy of the georeferencing process and the final products, respectively. The case study involves an urban area of about 1 ha that was photographed with a low-cost UAS, namely, the DJI Phantom 3 Standard, at 28 m above ground. The camera was oriented in a nadiral position and 300 points were measured using a total station in a local coordinate system. The UAS images were processed using the 3DF Zephyr software performing a full BBA with a variable number of GCPs i.e., from four up to 150, while the number and the spatial location of check points (ChPs) was kept constant i.e., 150 for each independent distribution. In addition, the systematic and stratified random distribution of GCPs and ChPs spatial positions was analysed. Furthermore, the point clouds and the mesh surfaces that were automatically derived were compared with a terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) point cloud while also considering three test areas: two inside the area defined by GCPs and one outside the area. The results expressed a clear overview of the number of GCPs needed for the indirect georeferencing process with minimum influence on the final results. The RMSE can be reduced down to 50% when switching from four to 20 GCPs, whereas a higher number of GCPs only slightly improves the results.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/rs12050876","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,10]],"date-time":"2020-03-10T11:59:36Z","timestamp":1583841576000},"page":"876","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":54,"title":["Determining the Suitable Number of Ground Control Points for UAS Images Georeferencing by Varying Number and Spatial Distribution"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"12","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5433-2201","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Valeria-Ersilia","family":"Oniga","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Terrestrial Measurements and Cadastre, Faculty of Hydrotechnical Engineering, Geodesy and Environmental Engineering, \u201cGheorghe Asachi\u201d Technical University of Iasi, Professor Dimitrie Mangeron Boulevard 67, 700050 Ia\u0219i, Romania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ana-Ioana","family":"Breaban","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Hydroamelioration and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Hydrotechnical Engineering, Geodesy and Environmental Engineering, \u201cGheorghe Asachi\u201d Technical University of Iasi, Professor Dimitrie Mangeron Boulevard 67, 700050 Ia\u0219i, Romania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2348-7929","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Norbert","family":"Pfeifer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation, Technische Universit\u00e4t Wien, Karlsplatz 13, 1040 Vienna, Austria"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Constantin","family":"Chirila","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Terrestrial Measurements and Cadastre, Faculty of Hydrotechnical Engineering, Geodesy and Environmental Engineering, \u201cGheorghe Asachi\u201d Technical University of Iasi, Professor Dimitrie Mangeron Boulevard 67, 700050 Ia\u0219i, Romania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","unstructured":"Micheletti, N., Chandler, J.H., Lane, S.N., Clarke, L.E., and Nieldr, J.M. (2015). Structure from Motion (SfM) Photogrammetry, Geomorphological Techniques."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1445","DOI":"10.5194\/tc-9-1445-2015","article-title":"Mapping snow depth from manned aircraft on landscape scales at centimeter resolution using structure-from-motion photogrammetry","volume":"9","author":"Nolan","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cryosphere"},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.5194\/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B7-487-2012","article-title":"Direct Georeferencing With on Board Navigation Components of Light Weight UAV Platforms","volume":"XXXIX-W7","author":"Pfeifer","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/01431161.2018.1434331","article-title":"Calibration and accuracy assessment in a direct georeferencing system for UAS photogrammetry","volume":"39","author":"Gabrlik","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int. J. Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sanz-Ablanedo, E., Chandler, J.H., Rodr\u00edguez-P\u00e9rez, J.R., and Ord\u00f3\u00f1ez, C. (2018). Accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and SfM Photogrammetry Survey as a Function of the Number and Location of Ground Control Points Used. Remote Sens., 10.","DOI":"10.3390\/rs10101606"},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2738","DOI":"10.1109\/TGRS.2013.2265295","article-title":"Direct Georeferencing of Ultra high-Resolution UAV Imagery","volume":"52","author":"Turner","year":"2014","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"380","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ifacol.2015.07.064","article-title":"The Use of Direct Georeferencing in Aerial Photogrammetry with Micro UAV","volume":"48","author":"Gabrlik","year":"2015","journal-title":"IFAC Papers Line"},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1016\/j.isprsjprs.2016.10.003","article-title":"Unmanned Aerial Systems and DSM matching for rock glacier monitoring","volume":"127","author":"Forlani","year":"2017","journal-title":"ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nrjag.2018.05.003","article-title":"Using RTK and VRS in direct geo-referencing of the UAV imagery","volume":"7","author":"Rabah","year":"2018","journal-title":"NRIAG J. Astron. Geophys."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Forlani, G., Diotri, F., Di Cella, U.M., Roncella, R., and Cella, U. (2019). Indirect UAV Strip Georeferencing by On-Board GNSS Data under Poor Satellite Coverage. Remote Sens., 11.","DOI":"10.3390\/rs11151765"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1477-9730.2008.00467.x","article-title":"A convergent image configuration for DEM extraction that minimises the systematic effects caused by an inaccurate lens model","volume":"23","author":"Wackrow","year":"2008","journal-title":"Photogramm. Rec."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1413","DOI":"10.1002\/esp.3609","article-title":"Mitigating systematic error in topographic models derived from UAV and ground-based image networks","volume":"39","author":"James","year":"2014","journal-title":"Earth Surf. Process. Landf."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oniga, V.-E., Pfeifer, N., and Loghin, A.-M. (2018). 3D Calibration Test-Field for Digital Cameras Mounted on Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS). Remote Sens., 10.","DOI":"10.3390\/rs10122017"},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11933","DOI":"10.3390\/rs70911933","article-title":"The impact of the calibration method on the accuracy of point clouds derived using unmanned aerial vehicle multi-view stereopsis","volume":"7","author":"Harwin","year":"2015","journal-title":"Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1111\/phor.12115","article-title":"Analysis of Different Methods for 3D Reconstruction of Natural Surfaces from Parallel-Axes UAV Images","volume":"30","author":"Eltner","year":"2015","journal-title":"Photogramm. Rec."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gindraux, S., Boesch, R., and Farinotti, D. (2017). Accuracy Assessment of Digital Surface Models from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles\u2019 Imagery on Glaciers. Remote Sens., 9.","DOI":"10.3390\/rs9020186"},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1016\/j.measurement.2016.12.002","article-title":"Assessment of photogrammetric mapping accuracy based on variation ground control points number using unmanned aerial vehicle","volume":"98","year":"2017","journal-title":"Measurement"},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ag\u00fcera-Vega, F., Carvajal-Ram\u00edrez, F., and Mart\u00ednez-Carricondo, P. (2016). Accuracy of digital surface models and orthophotos derived from unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry. J. Surv. Eng., 143.","DOI":"10.1061\/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000206"},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jaud, M., Passot, S., Le Bivic, R., Delacourt, C., Grandjean, P., and Le Dantec, N. (2016). Assessing the Accuracy of High Resolution Digital Surface Models Computed by PhotoScan and MicMac in Sub-Optimal Survey Conditions. Remote Sens., 8.","DOI":"10.3390\/rs8060465"},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tonkin, T.N., and Midgley, N.G. (2016). Ground-Control Networks for Image Based Surface Reconstruction: An Investigation of Optimum Survey Designs Using UAV Derived Imagery and Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry. Remote Sens., 8.","DOI":"10.3390\/rs8090786"},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.5194\/isprsarchives-XL-2-W2-93-2013","article-title":"An evaluation on different number of ground control points in unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetric block","volume":"XL-2\/W2","author":"Tahar","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7154","DOI":"10.1080\/01431161.2018.1515508","article-title":"The impact of number and spatial distribution of GCPs on the positional accuracy of geospatial products derived from low-cost UASs","volume":"39","author":"Rangel","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int. J. Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_23","first-page":"1","article-title":"Assessment on Ground Control Points in Unmanned Aerial System Image Processing for Slope Mapping Studies","volume":"3","author":"Tahar","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22394","DOI":"10.3390\/s141222394","article-title":"Positional quality assessment of orthophotos obtained from sensors on board multi-rotor UAV platforms","volume":"14","author":"Rumbao","year":"2014","journal-title":"Sensors"},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1573","DOI":"10.3390\/rs4061573","article-title":"Assessing the Accuracy of Georeferenced Point Clouds Produced via Multi-View Stereopsis from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery","volume":"4","author":"Harwin","year":"2012","journal-title":"Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Toma\u0161t\u00edk, J., Mokro\u0161, M., Salo\u0161, S., Chud\u1ef3, F., and Tun\u00e1k, D. (2017). Accuracy of photogrammetric UAV-based point clouds under conditions of partially-open forest canopy. Forests, 8.","DOI":"10.3390\/f8050151"},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1016\/j.geomorph.2012.08.021","article-title":"\u201cStructure-from-Motion\u201d photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications","volume":"179","author":"Westoby","year":"2012","journal-title":"Geomorphology"},{"key":"ref_28","first-page":"1","article-title":"Assessment of UAV-photogrammetric mapping accuracy based on variation of ground control points","volume":"72","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf."},{"key":"ref_29","unstructured":"(2018, September 21). 3DFlow 3DF Zephyr Official Web Site. Available online: https:\/\/www.3dflow.net\/."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Seier, G., Kellerer-Pirklbauer, A., Wecht, M., Hirschmann, S., Kaufmann, V., Lieb, G.K., and Sulzer, W. (2017). UAS-Based Change Detection of the Glacial and Proglacial Transition Zone at Pasterze Glacier, Austria. Remote Sens., 9.","DOI":"10.3390\/rs9060549"},{"key":"ref_31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1016\/j.geomorph.2016.11.021","article-title":"Optimising UAV topographic surveys processed with structure-from-motion: Ground control quality, quantity and bundle adjustment","volume":"280","author":"James","year":"2017","journal-title":"Geomorphology"},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oniga, E., Breaban, A.I., and Statescu, F. (2018). Determining the optimum number of ground control points for obtaining high precision results based on UAS images. Proceedings, 2.","DOI":"10.3390\/ecrs-2-05165"},{"key":"ref_33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ghilani, C.D., and Wolf, P.R. (2006). Adjustment Computations. Spatial Data Analysis, John Wiley&Sons Inc.. [4th ed.].","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470121498"},{"key":"ref_34","unstructured":"(2018, October 10). CloudCompare Official Web Site. Available online: http:\/\/www.danielgm.net\/cc\/."},{"key":"ref_35","first-page":"193","article-title":"Hausdorff distance for the differences calculation between 3D surfaces","volume":"15","author":"Oniga","year":"2013","journal-title":"RevCAD"},{"key":"ref_36","unstructured":"(2019, June 16). OPALS Official Web Site. Available online: https:\/\/opals.geo.tuwien.ac.at."},{"key":"ref_37","first-page":"55","article-title":"Orientation and processing of airborne laser scanning data (OPALS)\u2014Concept and first results of a comprehensive ALS software","volume":"38","author":"Mandlburger","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int. Arch. Photogramm.Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci."}],"container-title":["Remote Sensing"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2072-4292\/12\/5\/876\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T09:05:30Z","timestamp":1760173530000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2072-4292\/12\/5\/876"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,9]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,3]]}},"alternative-id":["rs12050876"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/rs12050876","relation":{},"ISSN":["2072-4292"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2072-4292","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,9]]}}}