{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,20]],"date-time":"2025-11-20T13:07:58Z","timestamp":1763644078128,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"23","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,22]],"date-time":"2023-11-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1700611200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000203","name":"KBR contractor","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["140G0121D0001"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["140G0121D0001"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000203","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Remote Sensing"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Surface reflectance measurement is an integral part of the vicarious calibration of satellite sensors and the validation of satellite-derived top-of-atmosphere (TOA) and surface reflectance products. A well-known practice for estimating surface reflectance is to conduct a field campaign with a spectrometer and a calibration panel, which is labor-intensive and expensive. To address this issue, the Radiometric Calibration Network, RadCalNet, has been developed, which automatically collects surface reflectance over several selected sites. Neither of these approaches can continuously track the atmosphere, which limits their ability to compensate for atmospheric transmittance change during target measurement. This paper presents the dual-spectrometer approach that uses a stationary spectrometer dedicated to continuously tracking changes in atmospheric transmittance by staring at a calibrated reference panel while the mobile spectrometer measures the target. Simultaneous measurement of the reflectance panel and target help to transfer calibration from the stationary spectrometer to the mobile spectrometer and synchronize the measurements. In this manner, atmospheric transmittance changes during target measurement can be tracked and used to reduce the variability of the target surface reflectance. This paper uses field measurement data from combined field campaigns between different calibration groups at Brookings, South Dakota, and Landsat 8 and Landsat 9 underfly efforts over Coconino National Forest, Arizona, and Guymon, Oklahoma. Preliminary results show that even in a clear sky condition, where atmospheric transmittance changes are minimal, the precision of target surface reflectance estimated using the dual-spectrometer approach is 2\u20136% better than the single-spectrometer approach. The dual-spectrometer approach shows the potential for a substantial improvement in the precision of the target spectral profile when the atmospheric transmittance is changing rapidly during field measurement. Results show that during non-optimal atmospheric conditions, the dual-spectrometer approach improved the precision of the surface reflectance by 50\u201360% compared to the single-spectrometer approach across most spectral regions. The ability to estimate surface reflectance more precisely using the dual-spectrometer approach in different atmospheric conditions improves the vicarious calibration of optical satellite sensors and the validation of both TOA and surface reflectance products.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/rs15235451","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,22]],"date-time":"2023-11-22T08:47:43Z","timestamp":1700642863000},"page":"5451","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Implementing a Dual-Spectrometer Approach for Improved Surface Reflectance Estimation"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"15","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8368-6399","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mahesh","family":"Shrestha","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Kellogg Brown and Root (KBR), Contractor to the U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science Center, Sioux Falls, SD 57030, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Joshua","family":"Mann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Kellogg Brown and Root (KBR), Contractor to the U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science Center, Sioux Falls, SD 57030, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Emily","family":"Maddox","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Kellogg Brown and Root (KBR), Contractor to the U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science Center, Sioux Falls, SD 57030, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Terry","family":"Robbins","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Kellogg Brown and Root (KBR), Contractor to the U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science Center, Sioux Falls, SD 57030, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5828-0787","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jeffrey","family":"Irwin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science Center, Sioux Falls, SD 57030, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Travis","family":"Kropuenske","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Kellogg Brown and Root (KBR), Contractor to the U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science Center, Sioux Falls, SD 57030, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dennis","family":"Helder","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Kellogg Brown and Root (KBR), Contractor to the U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science Center, Sioux Falls, SD 57030, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111214","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rse.2019.111214","article-title":"User needs for future Landsat missions","volume":"231","author":"Wu","year":"2019","journal-title":"Remote Sens. Environ."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rse.2016.04.008","article-title":"Preliminary analysis of the performance of the Landsat 8\/OLI land surface reflectance product","volume":"185","author":"Vermote","year":"2016","journal-title":"Remote Sens. Environ."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"400","DOI":"10.1109\/JSTARS.2012.2225417","article-title":"Vicarious calibration of EO-1 Hyperion","volume":"6","author":"McCorkel","year":"2012","journal-title":"IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Teixeira Pinto, C., Jing, X., and Leigh, L. (2020). Evaluation Analysis of Landsat Level-1 and Level-2 Data Products Using In Situ Measurements. Remote Sens., 12.","DOI":"10.3390\/rs12162597"},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shrestha, M., Helder, D., and Christopherson, J. (2021). DLR Earth Sensing Imaging Spectrometer (DESIS) Level 1 Product Evaluation Using RadCalNet Measurements. Remote Sens., 13.","DOI":"10.3390\/rs13122420"},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3285","DOI":"10.1109\/TGRS.2008.928730","article-title":"Vicarious calibration of ASTER via the reflectance-based approach","volume":"46","author":"Thome","year":"2008","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2777","DOI":"10.1109\/TGRS.2004.839085","article-title":"Landsat-5 TM and Landsat-7 ETM+ absolute radiometric calibration using the reflectance-based method","volume":"42","author":"Thome","year":"2004","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_8","unstructured":"Leigh, L., and Aarron, D. (2013, January 20\u201324). Absolute Radiometric Vicarious Calibration of on Orbit Imaging Satellites. Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Remote Sensing (ACRS), Bali, Indonesia."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1360","DOI":"10.1109\/TGRS.2013.2243738","article-title":"Absolute radiometric calibration of Landsat using a pseudo invariant calibration site","volume":"51","author":"Helder","year":"2013","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bouvet, M., Thome, K., Berthelot, B., Bialek, A., Czapla-Myers, J., Fox, N.P., Goryl, P., Henry, P., Ma, L., and Marcq, S. (2019). RadCalNet: A Radiometric Calibration Network for Earth Observing Imagers Operating in the Visible to Shortwave Infrared Spectral Range. Remote Sens., 11.","DOI":"10.3390\/rs11202401"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jing, X., Uprety, S., Liu, T.-C., Zhang, B., and Shao, X. (2022). Evaluation of SNPP and NOAA-20 VIIRS Datasets Using RadCalNet and Landsat 8\/OLI Data. Remote Sens., 14.","DOI":"10.3390\/rs14163913"},{"key":"ref_12","unstructured":"Irwin, J.R., Shrestha, M., Robbins, T.J., and Mann, J.J. (2023). ECCOE 2021 Surface Reflectance Validation Dataset: U.S. Geological Survey Data Release, U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kaita, E., Markham, B., Haque, M.O., Dichmann, D., Gerace, A., Leigh, L., Good, S., Schmidt, M., and Crawford, C.J. (2022). Landsat 9 Cross Calibration Under-Fly of Landsat 8: Planning, and Execution. Remote Sens., 14.","DOI":"10.3390\/rs14215414"},{"key":"ref_14","unstructured":"Hatchell, D.C. (1999). ASD Technical Guide, Analytical Spectral Devices Inc."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1016\/0034-4257(94)90145-7","article-title":"Uncertainties in the in-flight calibration of sensors with reference to measured ground sites in the 0.4\u20131.1 \u03bcm range","volume":"48","author":"Biggar","year":"1994","journal-title":"Remote Sens. Environ."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1016\/S0034-4257(01)00247-4","article-title":"Absolute radiometric calibration of Landsat 7 ETM+ using the reflectance-based method","volume":"78","author":"Thome","year":"2001","journal-title":"Remote Sens. Environ."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schott, J.R. (2007). Remote Sensing: The Image Chain Approach, Oxford University Press on Demand.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780195178173.001.0001"},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S21","DOI":"10.1088\/0026-1394\/49\/2\/S21","article-title":"Recent surface reflectance measurement campaigns with emphasis on best practices, SI traceability and uncertainty estimation","volume":"49","author":"Helder","year":"2012","journal-title":"Metrologia"},{"key":"ref_19","unstructured":"Labsphere, I. (2022, June 10). Calibration Panel. Available online: https:\/\/www.labsphere.com\/."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2188","DOI":"10.1109\/LGRS.2015.2450218","article-title":"An analysis of shadow effects on spectral vegetation indexes using a ground-based imaging spectrometer","volume":"12","author":"Zhang","year":"2015","journal-title":"IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8959","DOI":"10.1364\/OE.20.008959","article-title":"A dual-spectrometer approach to reflectance measurements under sub-optimal sky conditions","volume":"20","author":"Bachmann","year":"2012","journal-title":"Opt. Express"},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3754","DOI":"10.1364\/AO.39.003754","article-title":"Solid laboratory calibration of a nonimaging spectroradiometer","volume":"39","author":"Schaepman","year":"2000","journal-title":"Appl. Opt."},{"key":"ref_23","unstructured":"Bhattacharya, P., Fornari, R., and Kamimura, H. (2011). Comprehensive Semiconductor Science and Technology, Newnes."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Manolakis, D.G., Lockwood, R.B., and Cooley, T.W. (2016). Hyperspectral Imaging Remote Sensing: Physics, Sensors, and Algorithms, Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781316017876"}],"container-title":["Remote Sensing"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2072-4292\/15\/23\/5451\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]],"date-time":"2025-10-10T21:27:11Z","timestamp":1760131631000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2072-4292\/15\/23\/5451"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,22]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"23","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,12]]}},"alternative-id":["rs15235451"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/rs15235451","relation":{},"ISSN":["2072-4292"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2072-4292"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,22]]}}}