{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,19]],"date-time":"2026-01-19T10:01:06Z","timestamp":1768816866639,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":53,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,24]],"date-time":"2015-03-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1427155200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Remote Sensing"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Structure is a fundamental physical element of habitat, particularly in woodlands, and hence there has been considerable recent uptake of airborne lidar data in forest ecology studies. This paper investigates the significance of lidar data characteristics when modelling organism-habitat relationships, taking a single species case study in a mature woodland ecosystem. We re-investigate work on great tit (Parus major) habitat, focussing on bird breeding data from 1997 and 2001 (years with contrasting weather conditions and a demonstrated relationship between breeding success and forest structure). We use a time series of three lidar data acquisitions across a 12-year period (2000\u20132012). The lidar data characteristics assessed include time-lag with field data (up to 15 years), spatial sampling density (average post spacing in the range of 1 pulse per 0.14 m2\u201317.77 m2), approach to processing (raster or point cloud), and the complexity of derived structure metrics (with a total of 33 metrics assessed, each generated separately using all returns and only first returns). Ordinary least squares regression analysis was employed to investigate relationships between great tit mean nestling body mass, calculated per brood, and the various canopy structure measures from all lidar datasets. For the 2001 bird breeding data, the relationship between mean nestling body mass and mean canopy height for a sample area around each nest was robust to the extent that it could be detected strongly and with a high level of statistical significance, with relatively little impact of lidar data characteristics. In 1997, all relationships between lidar structure metrics and mean nestling body mass were weaker than in 2001 and more sensitive to lidar data characteristics, and in almost all cases they were opposite in trend. However, whilst the optimum habitat structure differed between the two study years, the lidar-derived metrics that best characterised this structure were consistent: canopy height percentiles and mean overstorey canopy height (calculated using all returns or only first returns) and the standard deviation of canopy height (calculated using all returns). Overall, our results suggest that for relatively stable woodland habitats, ecologists should not feel prohibited in using lidar data to explore or monitor organism\u2013habitat relationships because of perceived data quality issues, as long as the questions investigated, the scale of analysis, and the interpretation of findings are appropriate for the data available.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/rs70403446","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,24]],"date-time":"2015-03-24T13:07:25Z","timestamp":1427202445000},"page":"3446-3466","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":34,"title":["Airborne Lidar for Woodland Habitat Quality Monitoring: Exploring the Significance of Lidar Data Characteristics when Modelling Organism-Habitat Relationships"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"7","author":[{"given":"Ross","family":"Hill","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Fern Barrow, Poole, Dorset BH12 5BB, UK"}]},{"given":"Shelley","family":"Hinsley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"594","DOI":"10.2307\/1932254","article-title":"On bird species diversity","volume":"42","author":"MacArthur","year":"1961","journal-title":"Ecology"},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.1016\/S0169-5347(03)00070-3","article-title":"Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation","volume":"18","author":"Turner","year":"2003","journal-title":"Trends Ecol. Evol."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bergen, K.M., Goetz, S.J., Dubayah, R.O., Henebry, G.M., Hunsaker, C.T., Imhoff, M.L., Nelson, R.F., Parker, G.G., and Radeloff, V.C. (2009). Remote sensing of vegetation 3-D structure for biodiversity and habitat: Review and implications for lidar and radar spaceborne missions. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci., 114.","DOI":"10.1029\/2008JG000883"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"292","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rse.2005.02.012","article-title":"Locating and estimating the extent of Delmarva fox squirrel habitat using an airborne LiDAR profiler","volume":"96","author":"Nelson","year":"2005","journal-title":"Remote Sens. Environ."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.5589\/m10-029","article-title":"Assessing the utility of lidar remote sensing technology to identify mule deer winter habitat","volume":"36","author":"Coops","year":"2010","journal-title":"Can. J. Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rse.2014.01.022","article-title":"Quantitative analysis of woodpecker habitat using high-resolution airborne LiDAR estimates of forest structure and composition","volume":"145","author":"Garabedian","year":"2014","journal-title":"Remote Sens. Environ."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"614","DOI":"10.1525\/cond.2013.110082","article-title":"Lidar-derived canopy architecture predicts brown creeper occupancy of two western coniferous forests","volume":"115","author":"Vogeler","year":"2013","journal-title":"Condor"},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1016\/j.foreco.2008.08.021","article-title":"Habitat assessment for forest dwelling species using LiDAR remote sensing: Capercaillie in the Alps","volume":"257","author":"Graf","year":"2009","journal-title":"For. Ecol. Manag."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1556\/ComEc.10.2009.1.12","article-title":"Bird species distributions across woodland canopy structure gradients","volume":"10","author":"Hinsley","year":"2009","journal-title":"Community Ecol."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1080\/00063657.2014.885492","article-title":"Modelling bird richness and bird species presence in a boreal forest reserve using airborne laser-scanning and aerial images","volume":"61","author":"Eldegard","year":"2014","journal-title":"Bird Study"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Farrell, S.L., Collier, B.A., Skow, K.L., Long, A.M., Campomizzi, A.J., Morrison, M.L., Hays, K.B., and Wilkins, R.N. (2013). Using LiDAR-derived vegetation metrics for high-resolution, species distribution models for conservation planning. Ecosphere, 4.","DOI":"10.1890\/ES12-000352.1"},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1016\/j.foreco.2013.07.023","article-title":"Remotely sensed forest structural complexity predicts multi species occurrence at the landscape scale","volume":"307","author":"Zellweger","year":"2013","journal-title":"For. Ecol. Manag."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1890\/070001","article-title":"Lidar: Shedding new light on habitat characterization and modelling","volume":"6","author":"Vierling","year":"2008","journal-title":"Front. Ecol. Environ."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1080\/00063650902806914","article-title":"Willow warbler Phylloscopus trochilus habitat in woods with different structure and management in southern England","volume":"56","author":"Bellamy","year":"2009","journal-title":"Bird Study"},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2064","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rse.2007.08.023","article-title":"The use of airborne lidar to assess avian species diversity, density, and occurrence in a pine\/aspen forest","volume":"112","author":"Clawges","year":"2008","journal-title":"Remote Sens. Environ."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Swatantran, A., Dubayah, R., Goetz, S., Hofton, M., Betts, M.G., Sun, M., Simard, M., and Holmes, R. (2012). Mapping migratory bird prevalence using remote sensing data fusion. PLoS One, 7.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0028922"},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vierling, L.A., Vierling, K.T., Adam, P., and Hudak, A.T. (2013). Using satellite and airborne lidar to model woodpecker habitat occupancy at the landscape scale. PLoS One, 8.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0080988"},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rse.2012.08.014","article-title":"LiDAR measurements of canopy structure predict spatial distribution of a tropical mature forest primate","volume":"127","author":"Palminteri","year":"2012","journal-title":"Remote Sens. Environ."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.foreco.2012.06.005","article-title":"Characterizing habitats associated with fisher den structures in the Southern Sierra Nevada, California using discrete return lidar","volume":"280","author":"Zhao","year":"2012","journal-title":"For. Ecol. Manag."},{"key":"ref_20","first-page":"389","article-title":"Assessing and modeling moose (Alces alces) habitats with airborne laser scanning data","volume":"23","author":"Melin","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Flaherty, S., Lurz, P.W.W., and Patenaude, G. (2014). Use of LiDAR in the conservation management of the endangered red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris L.). J. Appl. Remote Sens., 8.","DOI":"10.1117\/1.JRS.8.083592"},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2664.2012.02116.x","article-title":"Moving in three dimensions: Effects of structural complexity on occurrence and activity of insectivorous bats in managed forest stands","volume":"49","author":"Jung","year":"2012","journal-title":"J. Appl. Ecol."},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"673","DOI":"10.1007\/s00442-011-2247-y","article-title":"Aggregative response in bats: Prey abundance versus habitat","volume":"169","author":"Mehr","year":"2012","journal-title":"Oecologia"},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0706.2013.00938.x","article-title":"Living and dying in a multi-predator landscape of fear: Roe deer are squeezed by contrasting pattern of predation risk imposed by lynx and humans","volume":"123","author":"Lone","year":"2014","journal-title":"Oikos"},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1374","DOI":"10.3390\/f5061374","article-title":"LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure and GPS telemetry data provide insights on winter habitat selection of European roe deer","volume":"5","author":"Ewald","year":"2014","journal-title":"Forests"},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1115","DOI":"10.1111\/gcb.12405","article-title":"Moose (Alces alces) reacts to high summer temperatures by utilizing thermal shelters in boreal forests\u2014An analysis based on airborne laser scanning of the canopy structure at moose locations","volume":"20","author":"Melin","year":"2014","journal-title":"Glob. Change Biol."},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2435.2002.00697.x","article-title":"Quantifying woodland structure and habitat quality for birds using airborne laser scanning","volume":"16","author":"Hinsley","year":"2002","journal-title":"Funct. Ecol."},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4851","DOI":"10.1080\/0143116031000139962","article-title":"Predicting habitat quality for Great Tits (Parus major) with airborne laser scanning data","volume":"25","author":"Hill","year":"2004","journal-title":"Int. J. Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1399","DOI":"10.14358\/PERS.72.12.1399","article-title":"The application of lidar in woodland bird ecology: Climate, canopy structure, and habitat quality","volume":"72","author":"Hinsley","year":"2006","journal-title":"Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1848","DOI":"10.1890\/08-1124.1","article-title":"Riparian bird response to vegetation structure: A multiscale analysis using LiDAR measurements of canopy height","volume":"19","author":"Seavy","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ecol. Appl."},{"key":"ref_31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1016\/j.foreco.2012.06.020","article-title":"Three-dimensional characterization of pine forest type and red-cockaded woodpecker habitat by small-footprint, discrete-return lidar","volume":"281","author":"Smart","year":"2012","journal-title":"For. Ecol. Manag."},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1569","DOI":"10.1890\/09-1670.1","article-title":"Lidar remote sensing variables predict breeding habitat of a neotropical migrant bird","volume":"91","author":"Goetz","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ecology"},{"key":"ref_33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1080\/2150704X.2014.891773","article-title":"Does the time lag between wildlife field data collection and LiDAR data acquisition matter for studies of wildlife distributions? A case study using bird communities","volume":"5","author":"Vierling","year":"2014","journal-title":"Remote Sens. Lett."},{"key":"ref_34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rse.2004.07.016","article-title":"Quantifying forest above ground carbon content using LiDAR remote sensing","volume":"93","author":"Patenaude","year":"2004","journal-title":"Remote Sens. Environ."},{"key":"ref_35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3763","DOI":"10.1080\/01431160500114706","article-title":"Mapping woodland species composition and structure using airborne spectral and LiDAR data","volume":"26","author":"Hill","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int. J. Rem. Sens."},{"key":"ref_36","unstructured":"Massey, M.E., and Welch, R.C. (1993). Monks Wood National Nature Reserve: The Experience of 40 Years 1953\u20131993, English Nature."},{"key":"ref_37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1654-109X.2009.01053.x","article-title":"Mapping tree species in temperate deciduous woodland using time-series multi-spectral data","volume":"13","author":"Hill","year":"2010","journal-title":"Appl. Veg. Sci."},{"key":"ref_38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1016\/j.isprsjprs.2008.12.004","article-title":"Mapping the understorey of deciduous woodland from leaf-on and leaf-off airborne LiDAR data: A case study in lowland Britain","volume":"64","author":"Hill","year":"2009","journal-title":"ISPRS J. Photogramm."},{"key":"ref_39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.2307\/3677353","article-title":"Influence of woodland area on breeding success in Great Tits (Parus major) and Blue Tits (Parus caeruleus)","volume":"3","author":"Hinsley","year":"1999","journal-title":"J. Avian Biol."},{"key":"ref_40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0908-8857.2001.320302.x","article-title":"Breeding success in Blue Tits: Good territories or good parents?","volume":"32","author":"Przybylo","year":"2001","journal-title":"J. Avian Biol."},{"key":"ref_41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"650","DOI":"10.5589\/m03-023","article-title":"Quantifying canopy height underestimation by laser pulse penetration in small-footprint airborne laser scanning data","volume":"29","author":"Gaveau","year":"2003","journal-title":"Can. J. Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"872","DOI":"10.1109\/TGRS.2003.810682","article-title":"A progressive morphological filter for removing non-ground measurements from airborne lidar data","volume":"41","author":"Zhang","year":"2003","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0706.2003.12010.x","article-title":"Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies","volume":"100","author":"Moran","year":"2003","journal-title":"Oikos"},{"key":"ref_44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1044","DOI":"10.1093\/beheco\/arh107","article-title":"A farewell to Bonferroni: The problems of low statistical power and publication bias","volume":"15","author":"Nakagawa","year":"2004","journal-title":"Behav. Ecol."},{"key":"ref_45","unstructured":"Lack, D. (1971). Ecological Isolation in Birds, Blackwell Scientific Publications."},{"key":"ref_46","unstructured":"Perrins, C.M. (1979). British Tits, Collins."},{"key":"ref_47","unstructured":"Gosler, A. (1993). The Great Tit, Hamlyn Limited."},{"key":"ref_48","first-page":"607","article-title":"The foraging performance of great and blue tits (Parus major and P. caeruleus) in relation to caterpillar development and its consequences for nestling growth and fledging weight","volume":"57","author":"Keller","year":"1999","journal-title":"J. Anim. Ecol."},{"key":"ref_49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.2307\/4061","article-title":"Effects of interspecific competition for food in breeding blue and great tits","volume":"50","author":"Minot","year":"1981","journal-title":"J. Anim. Ecol."},{"key":"ref_50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2486.2010.02213.x","article-title":"Multiple responses to increasing spring temperatures in the breeding cycle of blue and great tits (Cyanistes caeruleus, Parus. major)","volume":"17","author":"Matthysen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Glob. Change Biol."},{"key":"ref_51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Whitehouse, M.J., Harrison, N.M., Mackenzie, J.A., and Hinsley, S.A. (2013). Preferred habitat of breeding birds may be compromised by climate change: unexpected effects of an exceptionally cold, wet spring. PLoS One, 8.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0075536"},{"key":"ref_52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rse.2011.12.002","article-title":"Performance of habitat suitability models for the endangered black-capped vireo built with remotely-sensed data","volume":"119","author":"Wilsey","year":"2012","journal-title":"Remote Sens. Environ."},{"key":"ref_53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"812","DOI":"10.1525\/cond.2012.110171","article-title":"Describing habitat occupation by wood land birds with territory mapping and remotely sensed data: An example using the Marsh Tit (Poecile palustris)","volume":"114","author":"Broughton","year":"2012","journal-title":"Condor"}],"container-title":["Remote Sensing"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2072-4292\/7\/4\/3446\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T20:43:53Z","timestamp":1760215433000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2072-4292\/7\/4\/3446"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,24]]},"references-count":53,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,4]]}},"alternative-id":["rs70403446"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/rs70403446","relation":{},"ISSN":["2072-4292"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2072-4292","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,24]]}}}