{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T13:35:14Z","timestamp":1780493714990,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,5]],"date-time":"2012-12-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1354665600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/3.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sensors"],"abstract":"<jats:p>There has been a rising interest in wearable and implantable biomedical sensors over the last decade. However, many technologies have not been integrated into clinical care, due to a limited understanding of user-centered design issues. Little information is available about these issues and there is a need to adopt more rigorous evidence standards for design features to allow important medical sensors to progress quicker into clinical care. Current trends in patient preferences need to be incorporated at an early stage into the design process of prospective clinical sensors. The first comprehensive patient data set, discussing mobile biomedical sensor technology, is presented in this paper. The study population mainly consisted of individuals suffering from arthritis. It was found that sensor systems needed to be small, discreet, unobtrusive and preferably incorporated into everyday objects. The upper extremity was seen as the favored position on the body for placement, while invasive placement yielded high levels of acceptance. Under these conditions most users were willing to wear the body-worn sensor for more than 20 h a day. This study is a first step to generate research based user-orientated design criteria\u2019s for biomedical sensors.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/s121216695","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,5]],"date-time":"2012-12-05T12:46:59Z","timestamp":1354711619000},"page":"16695-16709","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":104,"title":["Wearable and Implantable Sensors: The Patient\u2019s Perspective"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"12","author":[{"given":"Jeroen","family":"Bergmann","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Imperial College London, Medical Engineering Solutions in Osteoarthritis Centre of Excellence, London W6 8RF, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vikesh","family":"Chandaria","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Imperial College London, Department of Bioengineering, London SW7 2AZ, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alison","family":"McGregor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Imperial College London, Department of Cancer & Surgery, London W6 8RF, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"522","DOI":"10.1377\/hlthaff.2009.1074","article-title":"Health spending projections through 2019: The recession\u2019s impact continues","volume":"29","author":"Truffer","year":"2010","journal-title":"Health Aff"},{"key":"ref_2","unstructured":"The Landscape of the Medical Technology, Medical Biotechnology and Industrial Biotechnology Sectors in the UK. Available online: http:\/\/www.bis.gov.uk\/assets\/biscore\/innovation\/docs\/s\/11-p90-strength-and-opportunity-2011-medical-technology-sectors (accessed on 4 December 2012)."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1109\/MEMB.2010.936554","article-title":"Wearable sensors and systems","volume":"29","author":"Bonato","year":"2010","journal-title":"IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"232","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1633863","article-title":"Wearable systems for health care applications","volume":"43","author":"Lukowicz","year":"2004","journal-title":"Meth. Inform. Med"},{"key":"ref_5","unstructured":"Salditt, P. (2004). Trends in Medical Device Design and Manufacturing, Plexus Technology Group."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1038\/nnano.2009.152","article-title":"Towards single-molecule nanomechanical mass spectrometry","volume":"4","author":"Naik","year":"2009","journal-title":"Nat. Nano"},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1261","DOI":"10.1038\/nbt.1504","article-title":"Transdermal drug delivery","volume":"26","author":"Prausnitz","year":"2008","journal-title":"Nat. Biotech"},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.1038\/nnano.2011.36","article-title":"A stretchable carbon nanotube strain sensor for human-motion detection","volume":"6","author":"Yamada","year":"2011","journal-title":"Nat. Nano"},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"282","DOI":"10.1038\/nbt0306-282","article-title":"Welcome to the body-wide web","volume":"24","author":"Shenk","year":"2006","journal-title":"Nat. Biotech"},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2299","DOI":"10.1007\/s10439-011-0339-9","article-title":"Body-worn sensor design: What do patients and clinicians want?","volume":"39","author":"Bergmann","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann. Biomed. Eng"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joca.2009.08.010","article-title":"Risk factors for onset of osteoarthritis of the knee in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis and cartilage\/OARS","volume":"18","author":"Blagojevic","year":"2010","journal-title":"Osteoarthr. Res. Soc"},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1093\/ortho\/30.3.245","article-title":"How to write and analyse a questionnaire","volume":"30","author":"Williams","year":"2003","journal-title":"J. Orthodontic"},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1177\/089443930101900202","article-title":"Web surveys: Perception of burden","volume":"19","author":"Crawford","year":"2001","journal-title":"Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev"},{"key":"ref_14","first-page":"157","article-title":"Examining the readability of patient-informed consent forms","volume":"2","author":"Terblanche","year":"2010","journal-title":"J. Clin. Trials"},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1093\/ijpor\/edq046","article-title":"Should I stay or should I go: The effects of progress feedback, promised task duration, and length of questionnaire on completing web surveys","volume":"23","author":"Yan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int. J. Publ. Opi. Res"}],"container-title":["Sensors"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1424-8220\/12\/12\/16695\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T21:54:03Z","timestamp":1760219643000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1424-8220\/12\/12\/16695"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,5]]},"references-count":15,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]}},"alternative-id":["s121216695"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/s121216695","relation":{},"ISSN":["1424-8220"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1424-8220","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,5]]}}}