{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,3]],"date-time":"2026-01-03T22:54:29Z","timestamp":1767480869872,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":46,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,17]],"date-time":"2021-03-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1615939200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"US Coastal Research Program (USCRP) as administered by the US Army Corps of Engineers\u00ae (USACE)","award":["N\/A"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["N\/A"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sensors"],"abstract":"<jats:p>This study provides an evaluation of multiple sensors by examining their precision and ability to capture topographic complexity. Five different small unmanned aerial systems (sUAS) were evaluated, each with a different camera, Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), and Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU). A lidar was also used on the largest sUAS and as a mobile scanning system. The quality of each of the seven platforms were compared to actual surface measurements gathered with real-time kinematic (RTK)-GNSS and terrestrial laser scanning. Rigorous field and photogrammetric assessment workflows were designed around a combination of structure-from-motion to align images, Monte Carlo simulations to calculate spatially variable error, object-based image analysis to create objects, and MC32-PM algorithm to calculate vertical differences between two dense point clouds. The precision of the sensors ranged 0.115 m (minimum of 0.11 m for MaRS with Sony A7iii camera and maximum of 0.225 m for Mavic2 Pro). In a heterogenous test location with varying slope and high terrain roughness, only three of the seven mobile platforms performed well (MaRS, Inspire 2, and Phantom 4 Pro). All mobile sensors performed better for the homogenous test location, but the sUAS lidar and mobile lidar contained the most noise. The findings presented herein provide insights into cost\u2013benefit of purchasing various sUAS and sensors and their ability to capture high-definition topography.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/s21062105","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,17]],"date-time":"2021-03-17T21:43:31Z","timestamp":1616017411000},"page":"2105","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Evaluating the Ability of Multi-Sensor Techniques to Capture Topographic Complexity"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"21","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3951-9630","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Hannah M.","family":"Cooper","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Geography, Planning, and Environment, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA"}]},{"given":"Thad","family":"Wasklewicz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Geography, Planning, and Environment, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA"}]},{"given":"Zhen","family":"Zhu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"College of Engineering and Technology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA"}]},{"given":"William","family":"Lewis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"UAV Program, Pitt Community College, Winterville, NC 28590, USA"}]},{"given":"Karley","family":"LeCompte","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Geography, Planning, and Environment, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1155-3228","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Madison","family":"Heffentrager","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Geography, Planning, and Environment, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA"}]},{"given":"Rachel","family":"Smaby","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Geography, Planning, and Environment, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA"}]},{"given":"Julian","family":"Brady","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Geography, Planning, and Environment, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA"}]},{"given":"Robert","family":"Howard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Geography, Planning, and Environment, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1002\/esp.479","article-title":"The generation of high-quality topographic data for hydrology and geomorphology: New data sources, new applications and new problems","volume":"28","author":"Lane","year":"2003","journal-title":"Earth Surf. Process. Landf. J. Br. Geomorphol. Res. Group"},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"174","DOI":"10.1016\/j.earscirev.2015.05.012","article-title":"Analyzing high resolution topography for advancing the understanding of mass and energy transfer through landscapes: A review","volume":"148","author":"Passalacqua","year":"2015","journal-title":"Earth Sci. Rev."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"452","DOI":"10.1016\/j.geomorph.2017.07.012","article-title":"Three years of morphologic changes at a bowl blowout, Cape Cod, USA","volume":"295","author":"Smith","year":"2017","journal-title":"Geomorphology"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1186\/s40645-018-0169-6","article-title":"Landslides triggered by an earthquake and heavy rainfalls at Aso volcano, Japan, detected by UAS and SfM-MVS photogrammetry","volume":"5","author":"Saito","year":"2018","journal-title":"Prog. Earth Planet. Sci."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1016\/j.geomorph.2019.01.006","article-title":"Spatial modelling of gully headcuts using UAV data and four best-first decision classifier ensembles (BFTree, Bag-BFTree, RS-BFTree, and RF-BFTree)","volume":"329","author":"Hosseinalizadeh","year":"2019","journal-title":"Geomorphology"},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1177\/0309133318825284","article-title":"From features to fingerprints: A general diagnostic framework for anthropogenic geomorphology","volume":"43","author":"Tarolli","year":"2019","journal-title":"Prog. Phys. Geogr. Earth Environ."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6880","DOI":"10.3390\/rs5126880","article-title":"Using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) for high-resolution reconstruction of topography: The structure from motion approach on coastal environments","volume":"5","author":"Mancini","year":"2013","journal-title":"Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1016\/j.geomorph.2018.12.013","article-title":"3D mapping efficacy of a drone and terrestrial laser scanner over a temperate beach-dune zone","volume":"328","author":"Jackson","year":"2019","journal-title":"Geomorphology"},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yurtseven, H. (2019). Comparison of GNSS-, TLS-and different altitude UAV-generated datasets on the basis of spatial differences. ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf., 8.","DOI":"10.3390\/ijgi8040175"},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107056","DOI":"10.1016\/j.geomorph.2020.107056","article-title":"Comparison of terrestrial lidar, SfM, and MBES resolution and accuracy for geomorphic analyses in physical systems that experience subaerial and subaqueous conditions","volume":"355","author":"Rowley","year":"2020","journal-title":"Geomorphology"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106883","DOI":"10.1016\/j.geomorph.2019.106883","article-title":"Terrestrial structure-from-motion: Spatial error analysis of roughness and morphology","volume":"350","author":"Schwendel","year":"2020","journal-title":"Geomorphology"},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1111\/phor.12115","article-title":"Analysis of different methods for 3D reconstruction of natural surfaces from parallel-axes UAV images","volume":"151","author":"Eltner","year":"2015","journal-title":"Photogramm. Rec."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1016\/j.geomorph.2015.06.033","article-title":"Development and maintenance of a telescoping debris flow fan in response to human-induced fan surface channelization, Chalk Creek Valley Natural Debris Flow Laboratory, Colorado, USA","volume":"252","author":"Wasklewicz","year":"2016","journal-title":"Geomorphology"},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1292","DOI":"10.1002\/esp.4822","article-title":"Geomorphic process signatures reshaping sub-humid Mediterranean badlands: 2. Application to 5-year dataset","volume":"45","author":"Llena","year":"2020","journal-title":"Earth Surf. Process. Landf."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.5194\/esurf-6-933-2018","article-title":"Bank erosion processes measured with UAV-SfM along complex banklines of a straight mid-sized river reach","volume":"6","author":"Crosato","year":"2018","journal-title":"Earth Surf. Dyn."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"780","DOI":"10.1016\/j.measurement.2019.07.015","article-title":"The use of TLS and UAV methods for measurement of the repose angle of granular materials in terrain conditions","volume":"146","author":"Klapa","year":"2019","journal-title":"Measurement"},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/01431161.2019.1597294","article-title":"Streambank topography: An accuracy assessment of UAV-based and traditional 3D reconstructions","volume":"41","author":"Meinen","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int. J. Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.1002\/esp.3673","article-title":"Multi-Temporal UAV Data for Automatic Measurement of Rill and Interrill Erosion on Loess Soil","volume":"40","author":"Eltner","year":"2015","journal-title":"Earth Surf. Process. Landf."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1656","DOI":"10.1002\/esp.3747","article-title":"From Experimental Plots to Experimental Landscapes: Topography, Erosion and Deposition in Sub-Humid Badlands from Structure-From-Motion Photogrammetry","volume":"40","author":"Smith","year":"2015","journal-title":"Earth Surf. Process. Landf."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1016\/j.geomorph.2014.02.009","article-title":"Morphological organization of a steep, tropical headwater stream: The aspect of channel bifurcation","volume":"214","author":"Lisenby","year":"2014","journal-title":"Geomorphology"},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.5194\/esurf-4-359-2016","article-title":"Image-based surface reconstruction in geomorphometry-merits, limits and developments","volume":"4","author":"Eltner","year":"2016","journal-title":"Earth Surf. Dyn."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oniga, V.E., Breaban, A.I., Pfeifer, N., and Chirila, C. (2020). Determining the Suitable Number of Ground Control Points for UAS Images Georeferencing by Varying Number and Spatial Distribution. Remote Sens., 12.","DOI":"10.3390\/rs12050876"},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1769","DOI":"10.1002\/esp.4125","article-title":"3-D uncertainty-based topographic change detection with structure-from-motion photogrammetry: Precision maps for ground control and directly georeferenced surveys","volume":"42","author":"James","year":"2017","journal-title":"Earth Surf. Process. Landf."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1016\/j.geomorph.2016.11.021","article-title":"Optimising UAV topographic surveys processed with structure-from-motion: Ground control quality, quantity and bundle adjustment","volume":"280","author":"James","year":"2017","journal-title":"Geomorphology"},{"key":"ref_25","first-page":"F03017","article-title":"Straightforward reconstruction of 3D surfaces and topography with a camera: Accuracy and geoscience application","volume":"117","author":"James","year":"2012","journal-title":"J. Geophys. Res."},{"key":"ref_26","unstructured":"(2021, January 05). SP80 GNSS Receiver. Available online: http:\/\/trl.trimble.com\/docushare\/dsweb\/Get\/Document-844535\/SG-SP80-Br-v2.pdf."},{"key":"ref_27","unstructured":"(2021, January 05). Leica ScanStation P30\/P40. Available online: https:\/\/w3.leica-geosystems.com\/downloads123\/hds\/hds\/general\/brochures-datasheet\/Leica_ScanStation_P30-P40_Plant_DS_en.pdf."},{"key":"ref_28","unstructured":"(2019, October 01). Sick LD-MRS 3D Lidar Sensor. Available online: https:\/\/www.sick.com\/us\/en\/detection-and-ranging-solutions\/3d-lidar-sensors\/ld-mrs\/c\/g91913."},{"key":"ref_29","unstructured":"(2019, October 01). NovAtel SPAN IMU-IGM-A1. Available online: https:\/\/www.novatel.com\/assets\/Documents\/Papers\/SPAN-IGM-A1-PS.pdf."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.isprsjprs.2013.04.009","article-title":"Accurate 3D comparison of complex topography with terrestrial laser scanner: Application to the Rangitikei canyon (N-Z)","volume":"82","author":"Lague","year":"2013","journal-title":"ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1477-9730.1980.tb00020.x","article-title":"Bundle adjustment methods in engineering photogrammetry","volume":"10","author":"Granshaw","year":"1980","journal-title":"Photogramm. Rec."},{"key":"ref_32","first-page":"21","article-title":"Automated object-based classification of topography from SRTM data","volume":"141","author":"Eisank","year":"2012","journal-title":"Geomorphology"},{"key":"ref_33","first-page":"30","article-title":"Object-oriented identification of forested landslides with derivatives of single pulse lidar data","volume":"173","author":"Kerle","year":"2012","journal-title":"Geomorphology"},{"key":"ref_34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1016\/j.geomorph.2017.03.026","article-title":"Object-based classification of global undersea topography and geomorphological features from the SRTM30_PLUS data","volume":"28","author":"Dekavalla","year":"2017","journal-title":"Geomorphology"},{"key":"ref_35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1111\/phor.12215","article-title":"Object-based classification of terrestrial laser scanning point clouds for landslide monitoring","volume":"32","author":"Mayr","year":"2017","journal-title":"Photogramm. Rec."},{"key":"ref_36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"691","DOI":"10.5194\/isprs-archives-XLII-2-691-2018","article-title":"Multitemporal analysis of objects in 3D point clouds for landslide monitoring","volume":"42","author":"Mayr","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci."},{"key":"ref_37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.envsoft.2018.11.003","article-title":"Object-based correction of lidar DEMs using RTK-GPS data and machine learning modeling in the coastal Everglades","volume":"112","author":"Cooper","year":"2019","journal-title":"Environ. Modeling Softw."},{"key":"ref_38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Meng, X., Shang, N., Zhang, X., Li, C., Zhao, K., Qiu, X., and Weeks, E. (2017). Photogrammetric UAV Mapping of Terrain under Dense Coastal Vegetation: An Object-Oriented Classification Ensemble Algorithm for Classification and Terrain Correction. Remote Sens., 9.","DOI":"10.3390\/rs9111187"},{"key":"ref_39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"865","DOI":"10.1080\/15481603.2020.1819720","article-title":"Evaluation and enhancement of unmanned aircraft system photogrammetric data quality for coastal wetlands","volume":"57","author":"Zhang","year":"2020","journal-title":"Giscience Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1016\/j.isprsjprs.2003.10.002","article-title":"Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information","volume":"58","author":"Benz","year":"2004","journal-title":"ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens."},{"key":"ref_41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Peppa, M.V., Hall, J., Goodyear, J., and Mills, J.P. (2019). Photogrammetric assessment and comparison of DJI Phantom 4 Pro and Phantom 4 RTK small unmanned aircraft systems. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci., 503\u2013509.","DOI":"10.5194\/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-503-2019"},{"key":"ref_42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2251","DOI":"10.1002\/esp.4878","article-title":"Mitigating systematic error in topographic models for geomorphic change detection: Accuracy, precision and considerations beyond off-nadir imagery","volume":"45","author":"James","year":"2020","journal-title":"Earth Syst. Process. Landf."},{"key":"ref_43","first-page":"1413","article-title":"Mitigating systematic error in topographic models derived from UAV and ground-based image networks","volume":"39","author":"James","year":"2014","journal-title":"Earth Syst. Process."},{"key":"ref_44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1177\/0309133318788964","article-title":"Comparison of pre- and self-calibrated camera calibration models for UAS-derived nadir imagery for a SfM application","volume":"43","author":"Griffiths","year":"2019","journal-title":"Prog. Phys. Geogr."},{"key":"ref_45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2937","DOI":"10.1109\/TIP.2011.2147322","article-title":"Pose-free structure from otion using depth from motion constraints","volume":"20","author":"Zhang","year":"2011","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Image Process."},{"key":"ref_46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nesbit, P.R., and Hugenholtz, C.H. (2019). Enhancing UAV-SfM 3D model accuracy in high-relief landscapes by incorporating oblique images. Remote Sens., 11.","DOI":"10.3390\/rs11030239"}],"container-title":["Sensors"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1424-8220\/21\/6\/2105\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T05:36:56Z","timestamp":1760161016000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1424-8220\/21\/6\/2105"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,17]]},"references-count":46,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,3]]}},"alternative-id":["s21062105"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/s21062105","relation":{},"ISSN":["1424-8220"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"1424-8220"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,17]]}}}