{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,27]],"date-time":"2025-11-27T10:47:00Z","timestamp":1764240420369,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":56,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,21]],"date-time":"2021-01-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1611187200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Symmetry"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Quantum-like decision theory is by now a theoretically well-developed field (see e.g., Danilov, Lambert-Mogiliansky &amp; Vergopoulos, 2018). We provide a first test of the predictions of an application of this approach to persuasion. One remarkable result entails that, in contrast to Bayesian persuasion, distraction rather than relevant information has a powerful potential to influence decision-making. We first develop a quantum decision model of choice between two uncertain alternatives. We derive the impact of persuasion by means of distractive questions and contrast them with the predictions of the Bayesian model. Next, we provide the results from a first test of the theory. We conducted an experiment where respondents choose between supporting either one of two projects to save endangered species. We tested the impact of persuasion in the form of questions related to different aspects of the uncertain value of the two projects. The experiment involved 1253 respondents divided into three groups: a control group, a first treatment group and the distraction treatment group. Our main result is that, in accordance with the predictions of quantum persuasion but in violation with the Bayesian model, distraction significantly affects decision-making. Population variables play no role. Some significant variations between subgroups are exhibited and discussed. The results of the experiment provide support for the hypothesis that the manipulability of people\u2019s decision-making can to some extent be explained by the quantum indeterminacy of their subjective representation of reality.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/sym13020162","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,21]],"date-time":"2021-01-21T09:49:21Z","timestamp":1611222561000},"page":"162","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Phishing for (Quantum-Like) Phools\u2014Theory and Experimental Evidence"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"13","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4065-2049","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ariane","family":"Lambert-Mogiliansky","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Economic Theory, Paris School of Economics, 75014 Paris, France"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2618-6646","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Adrian","family":"Calmettes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Political Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","unstructured":"(2021, January 16). P & G: Thank You, Mom|Wieden+Kennedy. Available online: https:\/\/www.wk.com\/work\/p-and-g-thank-you-mom\/."},{"key":"ref_2","unstructured":"Packard, V. (1957). The Hidden Persuaders, McKay."},{"key":"ref_3","unstructured":"Cialdini, R.B., and Cialdini, R.B. (2007). Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion, Collins."},{"key":"ref_4","unstructured":"Petty, R.E., and Cacioppo, J.T. (2012). Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change, Springer Science and Business Media."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.1037\/h0049073","article-title":"On resistance to persuasive communications","volume":"68","author":"Festinger","year":"1964","journal-title":"J. Abnorm. Soc."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"310","DOI":"10.1037\/h0034950","article-title":"The relation between distraction and persuasion","volume":"80","author":"Baron","year":"1973","journal-title":"Psychol. Bull."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"874","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.34.5.874","article-title":"Distraction can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda: Thought disruption versus effort justification","volume":"34","author":"Petty","year":"1976","journal-title":"J. Personal. Soc. Psychol."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Petty, R.E., and Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Communication and Persuasion, Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4612-4964-1"},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"643","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.economics.102308.124309","article-title":"Persuasion: Empirical evidence","volume":"2","author":"DellaVigna","year":"2010","journal-title":"Annu. Rev. Econ."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"953","DOI":"10.3758\/MC.37.7.953","article-title":"Attention during memory retrieval enhances future remembering","volume":"37","author":"Dudukovic","year":"2009","journal-title":"Mem. Cogn."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1037\/0096-3445.129.2.155","article-title":"Divided attention and memory: Evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding","volume":"129","author":"Fernandes","year":"2000","journal-title":"J. Exp. Psychol. Gen."},{"key":"ref_12","unstructured":"Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking Fast and Slow, Farrar, Straus and Giroux. [1st ed.]."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Akerlof, G., and Shiller, R. (2015). Phishing for Phools\u2014The Economics of Manipulation and Deception, Princeton University Press.","DOI":"10.2307\/j.ctvc777w8"},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.1126\/science.7455683","article-title":"The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice","volume":"211","author":"Tversky","year":"1981","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054","article-title":"Framing Theory","volume":"10","author":"Chong","year":"2007","journal-title":"Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"597","DOI":"10.1038\/26967","article-title":"Imaging unconscious semantic priming","volume":"395","author":"Dehaene","year":"1998","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (1982). The Availability Bias in Social Perception and Interaction. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511809477"},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.5465\/amd.2018.0195","article-title":"Unanswered questions and new directions for future research on priming goals in the subconscious","volume":"5","author":"Latham","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acad. Manag. Discov."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1521\/soco.2014.32.supp.209","article-title":"The historical origins of priming as the preparation of behavioral responses: Unconscious carryover and contextual influences of real-world importance","volume":"32","author":"Bargh","year":"2014","journal-title":"Soc. Cogn."},{"key":"ref_20","unstructured":"Bargh, J.A. (2017). Before You Know It: The Unconscious Reasons We Do What We Do, Simon & Schuster."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.psych.093008.100445","article-title":"Goals, attention, and (un) consciousness","volume":"61","author":"Dijksterhuis","year":"2010","journal-title":"Annu. Rev. Psychol."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1142\/9789814730617_0016","article-title":"Our (represented) world and quantum-like object","volume":"Volume 6","author":"Dzhafarov","year":"2016","journal-title":"Contextuality in Quantum Physics and Psychology"},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmateco.2018.04.005","article-title":"Targeting in Persuasion Problems","volume":"78","author":"Danilov","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Math. Econ."},{"key":"ref_24","unstructured":"Bernheim, B.D., DellaVigna, S., and Laibson, D. (2019). Errors in probabilistic reasoning and judgment biases. Handbook of Behavioral Economics\u2014Foundations and Applications 2, North-Holland. Chapter 2."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1009944326196","article-title":"Bounded rationality in individual decision making","volume":"1","author":"Camerer","year":"1998","journal-title":"Exp. Econ."},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (1982). Conservatism in human information processing. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511809477"},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/0167-2681(92)90078-P","article-title":"Testing Bayes rule and the representativeness heuristic: Some experimental evidence","volume":"17","author":"Grether","year":"1992","journal-title":"J. Econ. Behav. Organ."},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-295X.90.4.293","article-title":"Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment","volume":"90","author":"Tversky","year":"1983","journal-title":"Psychol. Rev."},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1016\/S0167-2681(99)00076-1","article-title":"A violation of the monotonicity axiom: Experimental evidence on the conjunction fallacy","volume":"41","author":"Zizzo","year":"2000","journal-title":"J. Econ. Behav. Organ."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bruza, P., and Busemeyer, J.R. (2012). Quantum Cognition and Decision-Making, Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511997716"},{"key":"ref_31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Haven, E., and Khrennikov, A. (2017). The Palgrave Handbook of Quantum Models in Social Science, Macmillan Publishers Ltd.","DOI":"10.1057\/978-1-137-49276-0"},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Khrennikov, A., Basieva, I., Dzhafarov, E.N., and Busemeyer, J.R. (2014). Quantum models for psychological measurements: An unsolved problem. PLoS ONE, 9.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0110909"},{"key":"ref_33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ozawa, M., and Khrennikov, A. (2020). Application of theory of quantum instruments to psychology: Combination of question order effect with response replicability effect. Entropy, 22.","DOI":"10.20944\/preprints202010.0358.v1"},{"key":"ref_34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmp.2017.10.002","article-title":"Quantum field inspired model of decision making: Asymptotic stabilization of belief state via interaction with surrounding mental environment","volume":"82","author":"Bagarello","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Math. Psychol."},{"key":"ref_35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1925","DOI":"10.1037\/xge0000585","article-title":"True Contextuality Beats Direct Influences in Human Decision Making","volume":"148","author":"Basieva","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Exp. Psychol. Gen."},{"key":"ref_36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1079","DOI":"10.1007\/s00199-017-1051-2","article-title":"A proposal to extend expected utility in a quantum probabilistic framework","volume":"65","author":"Aerts","year":"2018","journal-title":"Econ. Theory"},{"key":"ref_37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1007\/s11238-009-9142-6","article-title":"Expected Utility under Non-classical Uncertainty","volume":"68","author":"Danilov","year":"2010","journal-title":"Theory Decis."},{"key":"ref_38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1007\/s11238-018-9659-7","article-title":"Dynamic consistency of expected utility under non-classical (quantum) uncertainty","volume":"84","author":"Danilov","year":"2018","journal-title":"Theory Decis."},{"key":"ref_39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tcs.2018.02.017","article-title":"Preparing a (quantum) belief system","volume":"752","author":"Danilov","year":"2018","journal-title":"Theor. Comput. Sci."},{"key":"ref_40","unstructured":"Cohen-Tannoudji, C., Diu, B., and Lalo\u00eb, F. (2000). M\u00e9canique Quantique, Hermann, EDP Sciences."},{"key":"ref_41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2590","DOI":"10.1257\/aer.101.6.2590","article-title":"Bayesian Persuasion","volume":"101","author":"Kamenica","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am. Econ. Rev."},{"key":"ref_42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bloedel, A.W., and Segal, I.R. (2018, April 16). Persuasion with Rational Inattention. Available online: https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3164033.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3164033"},{"key":"ref_43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1257\/mic.20160247","article-title":"Disclosure to a psychological audience","volume":"10","author":"Lipnowski","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am. Econ. J. Microeconom."},{"key":"ref_44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"996","DOI":"10.1257\/aer.20161441","article-title":"Persuasion: The Art of Changing Worldviews","volume":"109","author":"Galperti","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am. Econ. Rev."},{"key":"ref_45","unstructured":"De Clippel, G., and Zhang, Z. (2020). Non-Bayesian Persuasion, Brown University. Working Paper."},{"key":"ref_46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101262","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cogpsych.2019.101262","article-title":"The disjunction effect in two-stage simulated gambles. An experimental study and comparison of a heuristic logistic, Markov and quantum-like model","volume":"117","author":"Broekaert","year":"2020","journal-title":"Cogn. Psychol."},{"key":"ref_47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1037\/dec0000017","article-title":"Bayesian model comparison favors quantum over standard decision theory account of dynamic inconsistency","volume":"2","author":"Busemeyer","year":"2015","journal-title":"Decision"},{"key":"ref_48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmp.2016.09.004","article-title":"A quantum-like model for complementarity of preferences and beliefs in dilemma games","volume":"78","author":"Denolf","year":"2016","journal-title":"J. Math. Psychol."},{"key":"ref_49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmp.2017.11.003","article-title":"Are quantum-like Bayesian networks more powerful than classical Bayesian networks?","volume":"82","author":"Moreira","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Math. Psychol."},{"key":"ref_50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dzhafarov, E., Scott, J., Ru, Z., and Cervantes, V. (2016). Contextuality from Quantum Physics to Psychology, World Scientific.","DOI":"10.1142\/9855"},{"key":"ref_51","unstructured":"Wang, Z., Busemeyer, J.R., and DeBuys, B. (2020). Beliefs, action and rationality in strategical decisions. Top. Cogn. Sci., in press."},{"key":"ref_52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bartneck, C., Duenser, A., Moltchanova, E., and Zawieska, K. (2015). Comparing the similarity of responses received from studies in Amazon\u2019s Mechanical Turk to studies conducted online and with direct recruitment. PLoS ONE, 10.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0121595"},{"key":"ref_53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1080\/00913367.2016.1269304","article-title":"An analysis of data quality: Professional panels, student subject pools, and Amazon\u2019s Mechanical Turk","volume":"46","author":"Kees","year":"2017","journal-title":"J. Advert."},{"key":"ref_54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Stanford University Press.","DOI":"10.1515\/9781503620766"},{"key":"ref_55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmp.2009.01.001","article-title":"Type-Indeterminacy a Model of the KT (Kahnemann and Tversky) Man","volume":"53","author":"Zamir","year":"2009","journal-title":"J. Math. Psychol."},{"key":"ref_56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.3390\/g3020097","article-title":"Quantum Type Indeterminacy in Dynamic Decision-Making: Self-Control through Identity Management","volume":"3","year":"2012","journal-title":"Games"}],"container-title":["Symmetry"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2073-8994\/13\/2\/162\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T05:13:27Z","timestamp":1760159607000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2073-8994\/13\/2\/162"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,21]]},"references-count":56,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,2]]}},"alternative-id":["sym13020162"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/sym13020162","relation":{},"ISSN":["2073-8994"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2073-8994"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,21]]}}}