{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]],"date-time":"2025-10-10T01:02:54Z","timestamp":1760058174211,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":71,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,16]],"date-time":"2025-03-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1742083200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"Research Ireland Centre for Research Training","award":["18\/CRT\/6224"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["18\/CRT\/6224"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Systems"],"abstract":"<jats:p>This research investigates the potential of computational argumentation, specifically the application of the Abstract Argumentation Framework (AAF), to enhance the evaluation of deliberative quality in public discourse. It focuses on integrating AAF and its related semantics with the Discourse Quality Index (DQI), which is a reputable indicator of deliberative quality. The motivation is to overcome the DQI\u2019s constraints using the AAF\u2019s formal and logical features by addressing dependency on hand coding and attention to specific speech acts. This is done by exploring how the AAF can identify conflicts among arguments and assess the acceptability of different viewpoints, potentially leading to a more automated and objective evaluation of deliberative quality. A pilot study is conducted on the topic of abortion to illustrate the proposed methodology. The findings of this research demonstrate that AAF methods can improve discourse analysis by automatically identifying strong arguments through conflict resolution strategies. They also emphasise the potential of the proposed procedure to mitigate the dependence on manual coding and improve deliberation processes.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/systems13030204","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,17]],"date-time":"2025-03-17T06:36:23Z","timestamp":1742193383000},"page":"204","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Advancing Deliberative Discourse Measurement: The Intersection with Computational Abstract Argumentation in Discourse Quality Evaluations"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"13","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7062-3930","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sanjay","family":"Kumar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Communications, Dublin City University, D09 V209 Dublin, Ireland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2747-8069","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jane","family":"Suiter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Communications, Dublin City University, D09 V209 Dublin, Ireland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2718-5426","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Luca","family":"Longo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Load Research Lab, The Centre of Explainable Artificial Intelligence, Technological University Dublin, D07 EWV4 Dublin, Ireland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1057\/palgrave.cep.6110002","article-title":"Measuring political deliberation: A discourse quality index","volume":"1","author":"Steenbergen","year":"2003","journal-title":"Comp. Eur. Politics"},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"810","DOI":"10.1177\/0165551519871828","article-title":"DelibAnalysis: Understanding the quality of online political discourse with machine learning","volume":"46","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Inf. Sci."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20597991211010416","DOI":"10.1177\/20597991211010416","article-title":"Big data and democratic speech: Predicting deliberative quality using machine learning techniques","volume":"14","author":"MacKenzie","year":"2021","journal-title":"Methodol. Innov."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.16997\/jdd.210","article-title":"Deliberative transformative moments: A new concept as amendment to the discourse quality index","volume":"10","author":"Jaramillo","year":"2014","journal-title":"J. Deliberative Democr."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.4018\/ijep.2014010104","article-title":"Measuring Online Deliberation in Local Politics: An Empirical Analysis of the 2011 Zurich City Debate","volume":"5","author":"Klinger","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int. J.-Politics"},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1896","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2010.02.031","article-title":"Assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: A case study of public deliberation on the ethics of surrogate consent for research","volume":"70","author":"Vries","year":"2010","journal-title":"Soc. Sci. Med."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kowalski, R.A., and Toni, F. (1997). Abstract argumentation. Logical Models of Legal Argumentation, Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-011-5668-4_4"},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","article-title":"On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games","volume":"77","author":"Dung","year":"1995","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ercan, S.A., Asenbaum, H., Curato, N., and Mendon\u00e7a, R.F. (2022). Researching Deliberative Democracy: Methods and Approaches. Research Methods in Deliberative Democracy, Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780192848925.001.0001"},{"key":"ref_10","unstructured":"Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns, Beacon Press."},{"key":"ref_11","unstructured":"Gutman, A., and Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and Disagreement, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"B\u00e4chtiger, A., and Parkinson, J. (2019). Mapping and Measuring Deliberation: Towards a New Deliberative Quality, Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780199672196.001.0001"},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"636","DOI":"10.1111\/spsr.12179","article-title":"A decline in the quality of debate? The evolution of cognitive complexity in Swiss parliamentary debates on immigration (1968\u20132014)","volume":"21","author":"Wyss","year":"2015","journal-title":"Swiss Political Sci. Rev."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1017\/S1755773911000300","article-title":"The politics of justification? Applying the \u2018Discourse Quality Index\u2019to the study of the European Parliament","volume":"5","author":"Lord","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur. Political Sci. Rev."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070555","article-title":"Deliberative democratic theory and empirical political science","volume":"11","author":"Thompson","year":"2008","journal-title":"Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1057\/s41295-021-00262-5","article-title":"Measuring the inclusiveness of deliberation: Structural inequality and the discourse quality index","volume":"20","author":"Mockler","year":"2022","journal-title":"Comp. Eur. Politics"},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"B\u00e4chtiger, A., Gerber, M., and Fournier-Tombs, E. (2022). Discourse Quality Index. Research Methods in Deliberative Democracy, Oxford University Press. Available online: https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/book\/44646\/chapter\/378695331.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780192848925.003.0006"},{"key":"ref_18","unstructured":"Behrendt, M., Wagner, S.S., Ziegele, M., Wilms, L., Stoll, A., Heinbach, D., and Harmeling, S. (2024). AQuA\u2013Combining Experts\u2019 and Non-Experts\u2019 Views To Assess Deliberation Quality in Online Discussions Using LLMs. arXiv."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1002\/poi3.95","article-title":"A systematic review of online deliberation research","volume":"7","author":"Friess","year":"2015","journal-title":"Policy Internet"},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"471","DOI":"10.1515\/commun-2015-0017","article-title":"The sociodemographics of political public deliberation: Measuring deliberative quality in different user groups","volume":"40","author":"Klinger","year":"2015","journal-title":"Communications"},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1017\/S0003055423000023","article-title":"How deliberation happens: Enabling deliberative reason","volume":"118","author":"Niemeyer","year":"2024","journal-title":"Am. Political Sci. Rev."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1177\/0261927X09351676","article-title":"The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods","volume":"29","author":"Tausczik","year":"2010","journal-title":"J. Lang. Soc. Psychol."},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"630","DOI":"10.1177\/14789299211020909","article-title":"Measuring epistemic deliberation on polarized issues: The case of abortion provision in Ireland","volume":"20","author":"Suiter","year":"2022","journal-title":"Politic. Stud. Rev."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1177\/20597991231180531","article-title":"Comparing and mapping difference indices of debate quality on Twitter","volume":"16","author":"Reveilhac","year":"2023","journal-title":"Methodol. Innov."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Duncan, S., Dwyer, L., Smith, H., Vallesi, D., Zeller, F., and Davis, C. (2024). Toward a computational mixed methods framework to measure online deliberative discourse. Commun. Public, 20570473241284759.","DOI":"10.1177\/20570473241284759"},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1207\/s15516709cog1104_4","article-title":"Defeasible reasoning","volume":"11","author":"Pollock","year":"1987","journal-title":"Cogn. Sci."},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bench-Capon, T., and Atkinson, K. (2009). Abstract argumentation and values. Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_3"},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1080\/19462160903564592","article-title":"An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments","volume":"1","author":"Prakken","year":"2010","journal-title":"Argum. Comput."},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106514","DOI":"10.1016\/j.knosys.2020.106514","article-title":"Examining the modelling capabilities of defeasible argumentation and non-monotonic fuzzy reasoning","volume":"211","author":"Longo","year":"2021","journal-title":"Knowl.-Based Syst."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Reiter, R. (1988). Nonmonotonic reasoning. Exploring Artificial Intelligence, Elsevier.","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-934613-67-5.50016-2"},{"key":"ref_31","unstructured":"Brewka, G., Dix, J., and Konolige, K. (1997). Nonmonotonic Reasoning: An Overview, CSLI Publications."},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1016\/S1574-6526(07)03006-4","article-title":"Nonmonotonic reasoning","volume":"3","author":"Brewka","year":"2008","journal-title":"Found. Artif. Intell."},{"key":"ref_33","first-page":"2707","article-title":"Rationality postulates: Applying argumentation theory for non-monotonic reasoning","volume":"4","author":"Caminada","year":"2017","journal-title":"J. Appl. Logics"},{"key":"ref_34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1109\/MIS.2009.104","article-title":"Using computational argumentation to support e-participation","volume":"24","author":"Cartwright","year":"2009","journal-title":"IEEE Intell. Syst."},{"key":"ref_35","first-page":"25","article-title":"Towards artificial argumentation","volume":"38","author":"Atkinson","year":"2017","journal-title":"AI Mag."},{"key":"ref_36","unstructured":"Rizzo, L., and Longo, L. (2018, January 6\u20137). A Qualitative Investigation of the Explainability of Defeasible Argumentation and Non-Monotonic Fuzzy Reasoning. Proceedings of the 26th AIAI Irish Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland."},{"key":"ref_37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Longo, L. (2012). Formalising human mental workload as non-monotonic concept for adaptive and personalised web-design. Proceedings of the International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-31454-4_38"},{"key":"ref_38","unstructured":"Rizzo, L., and Longo, L. (2018, January 20\u201323). Inferential Models of Mental Workload with Defeasible Argumentation and Non-monotonic Fuzzy Reasoning: A Comparative Study. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Advances In Argumentation In Artificial Intelligence, co-located with XVII International Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence, AI3@AI*IA 2018, Trento, Italy."},{"key":"ref_39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Longo, L., and Dondio, P. (2014, January 27\u201329). Defeasible reasoning and argument-based systems in medical fields: An informal overview. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 27th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, New York, NY, USA.","DOI":"10.1109\/CBMS.2014.126"},{"key":"ref_40","unstructured":"Matt, P.A., Morge, M., and Toni, F. (2010, January 10\u201314). Combining statistics and arguments to compute trust. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: Volume 1-Volume 1, Toronto, ON, Canada."},{"key":"ref_41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2013.869766","article-title":"The ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation: A tutorial","volume":"5","author":"Modgil","year":"2014","journal-title":"Argum. Comput."},{"key":"ref_42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Heyninck, J., and Stra\u00dfer, C. (2017, January 19\u201325). Revisiting Unrestricted Rebut and Preferences in Structured Argumentation. Proceedings of the IJCAI, Melbourne, Australia.","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2017\/151"},{"key":"ref_43","unstructured":"Pollock, J.L. (1974). Knowledge and Justification, Princeton University Press."},{"key":"ref_44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(96)00041-0","article-title":"Abstract argumentation systems","volume":"90","author":"Vreeswijk","year":"1997","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"ref_45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Longo, L., Kane, B., and Hederman, L. (2012, January 20\u201322). Argumentation theory in health care. Proceedings of the 2012 25th IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), Rome, Italy.","DOI":"10.1109\/CBMS.2012.6266323"},{"key":"ref_46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"582","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jal.2015.03.005","article-title":"Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks","volume":"13","author":"Arieli","year":"2015","journal-title":"J. Appl. Log."},{"key":"ref_47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-190476","article-title":"Logical theories and abstract argumentation: A survey of existing works","volume":"11","author":"Besnard","year":"2020","journal-title":"Argum. Comput."},{"key":"ref_48","unstructured":"Dunne, P.E., and Caminada, M. (October, January 28). Computational complexity of semi-stable semantics in abstract argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the European Workshop on Logics in Artificial Intelligence, Dresden, Germany."},{"key":"ref_49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2010.515036","article-title":"A labelling approach for ideal and stage semantics","volume":"2","author":"Caminada","year":"2011","journal-title":"Argum. Comput."},{"key":"ref_50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888911000166","article-title":"An introduction to argumentation semantics","volume":"26","author":"Baroni","year":"2011","journal-title":"Knowl. Eng. Rev."},{"key":"ref_51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Ben-Naim, J., Doder, D., and Vesic, S. (2017, January 19\u201325). Acceptability semantics for weighted argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2017), Melbourne, Australia.","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2017\/9"},{"key":"ref_52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1483","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1551-6709.2010.01123.x","article-title":"Behavioral experiments for assessing the abstract argumentation semantics of reinstatement","volume":"34","author":"Rahwan","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cogn. Sci."},{"key":"ref_53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Caminada, M. (2006, January 13\u201315). On the issue of reinstatement in argumentation. Proceedings of the European Workshop on Logics in Artificial Intelligence, Liverpool, UK.","DOI":"10.1007\/11853886_11"},{"key":"ref_54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., and Ben-Naim, J. (2013, January 16\u201318). Ranking-based semantics for argumentation frameworks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management, Washington, DC, USA.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-40381-1_11"},{"key":"ref_55","unstructured":"Bonzon, E., Delobelle, J., Konieczny, S., and Maudet, N. (November, January 29). Combining extension-based semantics and ranking-based semantics for abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Tempe, Arizona, USA."},{"key":"ref_56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bonzon, E., Delobelle, J., Konieczny, S., and Maudet, N. (2016, January 12\u201317). A comparative study of ranking-based semantics for abstract argumentation. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Phoenix, AZ, USA.","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v30i1.10116"},{"key":"ref_57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(01)00071-6","article-title":"A logic-based theory of deductive arguments","volume":"128","author":"Besnard","year":"2001","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"ref_58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Longo, L. (2016). Argumentation for knowledge representation, conflict resolution, defeasible inference and its integration with machine learning. Machine Learning for Health Informatics: State-of-the-Art and Future Challenges, Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-50478-0_9"},{"key":"ref_59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1002\/int.20191","article-title":"The eightfold way of deliberation dialogue","volume":"22","author":"McBurney","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int. J. Intell. Syst."},{"key":"ref_60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bench-Capon, T., Prakken, H., and Visser, W. (2011, January 6\u201310). Argument schemes for two-phase democratic deliberation. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.","DOI":"10.1145\/2018358.2018361"},{"key":"ref_61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prakken, H., and Vreeswijk, G. (2002). Logics for defeasible argumentation. Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-0456-4_3"},{"key":"ref_62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"758","DOI":"10.1080\/0144929X.2015.1015166","article-title":"A defeasible reasoning framework for human mental workload representation and assessment","volume":"34","author":"Longo","year":"2015","journal-title":"Behav. Inf. Technol."},{"key":"ref_63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"765","DOI":"10.1162\/coli_a_00364","article-title":"Argument mining: A survey","volume":"45","author":"Lawrence","year":"2020","journal-title":"Comput. Linguist."},{"key":"ref_64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1162\/COLI_a_00295","article-title":"Parsing argumentation structures in persuasive essays","volume":"43","author":"Stab","year":"2017","journal-title":"Comput. Linguist."},{"key":"ref_65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Steiner, J., B\u00e4chtiger, A., Sp\u00f6rndli, M., and Steenbergen, M.R. (2005). Appendix: Discourse Quality Index (DQI): Instructions for coders. Deliberative Politics in Action: Analyzing Parliamentary Discourse, Cambridge University Press. Theories of Institutional Design.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511491153"},{"key":"ref_66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2364","DOI":"10.1177\/08944393231156629","article-title":"Textual Indicators of Deliberative Dialogue: A Systematic Review of Methods for Studying the Quality of Online Dialogues","volume":"41","author":"Goddard","year":"2023","journal-title":"Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev."},{"key":"ref_67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1072","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2021.11.046","article-title":"Structured dialogical design as a problem structuring method illustrated in a Re-invent democracy project","volume":"301","author":"Laouris","year":"2022","journal-title":"Eur. J. Oper. Res."},{"key":"ref_68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2023.11.050","article-title":"A cascading model of stakeholder engagement for large-scale regional development using structured dialogical design","volume":"315","author":"Michaelides","year":"2024","journal-title":"Eur. J. Oper. Res."},{"key":"ref_69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1145\/58566.59297","article-title":"gIBIS: A hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion","volume":"6","author":"Conklin","year":"1988","journal-title":"Acm Trans. Inf. Syst. (TOIS)"},{"key":"ref_70","unstructured":"Sakai, A., Suzuki, S., Hadfi, R., and Ito, T. (2021, January 24\u201326). Extracting Issue-Based Information System Structures from Online Discussions for Automated Facilitation Agent. Proceedings of the 16TH International Conference on Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems, Bangkok, Thailand."},{"key":"ref_71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1002\/sres.2971","article-title":"Multi-stakeholder structured dialogues: Five generations of evolution of dialogic design","volume":"41","author":"Laouris","year":"2024","journal-title":"Syst. Res. Behav. Sci."}],"container-title":["Systems"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2079-8954\/13\/3\/204\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,9]],"date-time":"2025-10-09T16:54:34Z","timestamp":1760028874000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2079-8954\/13\/3\/204"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,16]]},"references-count":71,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,3]]}},"alternative-id":["systems13030204"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/systems13030204","relation":{},"ISSN":["2079-8954"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2079-8954"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,16]]}}}