{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,20]],"date-time":"2026-06-20T05:37:32Z","timestamp":1781933852509,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,12]],"date-time":"2025-11-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1762905600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004242","name":"Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["PNURSP2025R908"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["PNURSP2025R908"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004242","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Systems"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Standard operating procedures (SOPs) serve as critical control mechanisms in manufacturing systems, yet systematic approaches for quantifying procedural inefficiencies remain theoretically underdeveloped. Unlike traditional qualitative SOP analysis methods that rely on expert intuition and subjective assessment, current procedural optimization approaches lack the systematic rigor applied to physical process improvement. While lean manufacturing principles have demonstrated effectiveness in physical process optimization, their systematic application to procedural analysis represents an unexplored theoretical domain with significant potential for manufacturing systems improvement. This research addresses this gap by developing the Procedural Waste Index (PWI) framework, which establishes the first systematic theoretical integration of lean waste identification principles with procedural analysis. The framework extends the seven wastes of lean manufacturing to procedural analysis through systematic mapping to procedural elements identified via the extended Procedure Representation Language (e-PRL), creating a quantitative approach that enables the objective measurement of procedural efficiency where only subjective assessment methods previously existed. The PWI framework provides the following three key advantages over existing approaches: (1) systematic waste identification using proven lean principles rather than ad hoc improvement methods, (2) quantitative measurement capability enabling objective assessment and statistical process control, and (3) multi-perspective analytical framework through three complementary calculation methodologies (weighted aggregation, maximum constraint identification, and root mean square analysis) providing comprehensive analytical perspectives on procedural waste across discrete manufacturing contexts. The theoretical framework demonstrates practical applicability through a systematic analysis of a respirator fit testing procedure, revealing inventory waste as the primary inefficiency (70.0% waste score). This represents the first quantitative procedural waste assessment in the manufacturing literature, contributing to the foundational theory for systematic procedural optimization while establishing a methodology for future empirical validation studies.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/systems13111015","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,13]],"date-time":"2025-11-13T09:10:45Z","timestamp":1763025045000},"page":"1015","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Development of the Procedural Waste Index (PWI): A Framework for Quantifying Waste in Manufacturing Standard Operating Procedures"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"13","author":[{"given":"Jomana A.","family":"Bashatah","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, College of Engineering, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.4103\/2229-3485.76288","article-title":"Quality assurance: Importance of systems and standard operating procedures","volume":"2","author":"Manghani","year":"2011","journal-title":"Perspect. Clin. Res."},{"key":"ref_2","unstructured":"(2015). Quality Management Systems-Requirements (Standard No. ISO 9001:2015)."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"302","DOI":"10.1109\/3468.568739","article-title":"Procedures in complex systems: The airline cockpit","volume":"27","author":"Degani","year":"1997","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.-Part A Syst. Hum."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1875","DOI":"10.1016\/j.proeng.2014.12.341","article-title":"A Review on Lean Manufacturing Implementation Techniques","volume":"97","author":"Sundar","year":"2014","journal-title":"Procedia Eng."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1504\/EJIE.2018.089883","article-title":"Complexity in manufacturing systems and its measures: A literature review","volume":"12","author":"Alkan","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur. J. Ind. Eng."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"785","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jom.2007.01.019","article-title":"Defining and developing measures of lean production","volume":"25","author":"Shah","year":"2007","journal-title":"J. Oper. Manag."},{"key":"ref_7","unstructured":"Ohno, T. (1988). Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production, Productivity Press."},{"key":"ref_8","first-page":"68","article-title":"Seven Wastes Elimination Targeted by Lean Manufacturing Case Study \u201cGaza Strip Manufacturing Firms\u201d","volume":"1","author":"Elnamrouty","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int. J. Econ. Financ. Manag. Sci."},{"key":"ref_9","unstructured":"Womack, J.P., and Jones, D.T. (2010). Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation, Simon and Schuster."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1025","DOI":"10.1080\/0951192X.2015.1130245","article-title":"Manufacturing systems complexity analysis methods review","volume":"29","author":"Efthymiou","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijpe.2005.09.004","article-title":"Quantification in manufacturing strategy: A methodology and illustration","volume":"104","author":"Hallgren","year":"2006","journal-title":"Int. J. Prod. Econ."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1007\/s10845-006-0025-1","article-title":"Evaluation of techniques for manufacturing process analysis","volume":"17","author":"Hidalgo","year":"2006","journal-title":"J. Intell. Manuf."},{"key":"ref_13","unstructured":"Bashatah, J. (2025, May 07). A Method for Formal Analysis and Simulation of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) to Meet Safety Standards. Available online: https:\/\/drepo.sdl.edu.sa\/items\/341b4362-0502-4cad-b6fa-7911339e0e40."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.2307\/25148625","article-title":"Design Science in Information Systems Research","volume":"28","author":"Hevner","year":"2004","journal-title":"Manag. Inf. Syst. Q."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bashatah, J.A., and Sherry, L. (2021, January 20\u201322). A Model-Based Approach for the Qualification of Standard Operating Procedures. Proceedings of the 2021 Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS), Dulles, VA, USA.","DOI":"10.1109\/ICNS52807.2021.9441587"},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1037\/h0043158","article-title":"The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information","volume":"63","author":"Miller","year":"1956","journal-title":"Psychol. Rev."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1016\/S0079-7421(02)80005-6","article-title":"Multimedia learning","volume":"41","author":"Mayer","year":"2002","journal-title":"Psychol. Learn. Motiv."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Clark, R.C., and Mayer, R.E. (2011). e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning, John Wiley & Sons.","DOI":"10.1002\/9781118255971"},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1016\/0959-4752(94)90003-5","article-title":"Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design","volume":"4","author":"Sweller","year":"1994","journal-title":"Learn. Instr."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1207\/S15326985EP3801_1","article-title":"Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments","volume":"38","author":"Paas","year":"2003","journal-title":"Educ. Psychol."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paivio, A. (1990). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach, Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780195066661.001.0001"},{"key":"ref_22","unstructured":"Wickens, C., Lee, J., Gordon-Becker, S., and Liu, Y. (2013). Introduction to Human Factors Engineering, Pearson International. [2nd ed.]."},{"key":"ref_23","unstructured":"Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., and Tarantola, S. (2005). Tools for Composite Indicators Building, European Comission. Available online: https:\/\/publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu\/repository\/handle\/JRC31473."},{"key":"ref_24","unstructured":"OECD, European Union, and EC-JRC (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide, OECD Publishing."},{"key":"ref_25","unstructured":"Freudenberg, M. (2003). Composite Indicators of Country Performance: A Critical Assessment, OECD. No. 2003\/16, 2003."},{"key":"ref_26","unstructured":"Goldratt, E.M., and Cox, J. (1992). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement, North River Press Publishing."},{"key":"ref_27","unstructured":"(2025, October 01). Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) Version 2.0, OMG Document Number Formal\/2011-01-03, January 2011. Available online: https:\/\/www.omg.org\/spec\/BPMN\/2.0\/."},{"key":"ref_28","unstructured":"George, M.L., Maxey, J., Rowlands, D.T., and Upton, M. (2004). The Lean Six Sigma Pocket Toolbook: A Quick Reference Guide to Nearly 100 Tools for Improving Quality and Speed, McGraw Hill Publishing."},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kourdali, H.K., and Sherry, L. (2017, January 18\u201320). Simulation of Time-on-Procedure (ToP) for evaluating airline procedures. Proceedings of the 2017 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS), Herndon, VA, USA.","DOI":"10.1109\/ICNSURV.2017.8011958"},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1177\/1555343417727190","article-title":"Available Operational Time Window: A Method for Evaluating and Monitoring Airline Procedures","volume":"11","author":"Kourdali","year":"2017","journal-title":"J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Mak."}],"container-title":["Systems"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2079-8954\/13\/11\/1015\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,14]],"date-time":"2025-11-14T05:11:10Z","timestamp":1763097070000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2079-8954\/13\/11\/1015"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,12]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,11]]}},"alternative-id":["systems13111015"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/systems13111015","relation":{},"ISSN":["2079-8954"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2079-8954","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,12]]}}}