{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T05:18:01Z","timestamp":1789708681347,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]],"date-time":"2025-12-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1766966400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Animals"],"abstract":"<jats:p>The ethical and legal governance of Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAIs) remains conceptually and normatively fragmented. Although animals engaged in therapeutic, educational, and assistive activities make valuable contributions to human well-being, they continue to be defined by law as property or welfare objects, despite their meaningful yet limited forms of relational participation within structured human-controlled environments. This perspective obscures their context-dependent responsiveness and their institutional embeddedness. The present paper addresses this gap by adopting a normative and interdisciplinary approach grounded in relational legal theory and vulnerability scholarship. The concept is developed by drawing on Jennifer Nedelsky\u2019s notion of relational autonomy and Martha Fineman\u2019s theory of universal vulnerability. This results in the conceptualisation of AAI animals as correlated subjects: beings whose ethical and legal significance derives from the relationships and institutional contexts that shape their participation. The analysis identifies weaknesses in current medico-legal practices that frame veterinary certification and welfare assessment as static technical acts, ignoring their relational and systemic dimensions. The paper puts forward a relational ethical\u2013legal framework for Animal-Assisted Interventions, centred on relational vulnerability, context-sensitive oversight and continuous institutional accountability. A number of practical recommendations are put forward, including the introduction of renewable ethical licences, inter-institutional monitoring and the establishment of multidisciplinary oversight mechanisms. By redefining animals\u2019 normative status through relational ethics, in alignment with the interconnected human, animal, and environmental dimensions emphasized by the One Welfare principles, the study advances a shift from welfare-based protection toward a model of justice grounded in interspecies interdependence and institutional responsiveness.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/ani16010092","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]],"date-time":"2025-12-29T08:47:27Z","timestamp":1766998047000},"page":"92","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Correlated Subjects: Relational Ethics and Veterinary Legal Accountability in Animal-Assisted Interventions"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"16","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1626-7589","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Paola","family":"Fossati","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Environmental Science and Policy, Universit\u00e0 degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","unstructured":"Francione, G.L. (2000). Introduction to Animal Rights: Your Child or the Dog?, Temple University Press."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sunstein, C.R., and Nussbaum, M.C. (2004). Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions, Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780195305104.001.0001"},{"key":"ref_3","unstructured":"Bekoff, M., and Pierce, J. (2017). The Animals\u2019 Agenda: Freedom, Compassion, and Coexistence in the Human Age, Beacon Press."},{"key":"ref_4","unstructured":"Bovenkerk, B., and Meijboom, F.L.B. (2021). Animal Ethics in the Age of Humans: Blurring Boundaries in Human\u2013Animal Relationships, Springer."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nedelsky, J. (2011). Law\u2019s Relations: A Relational Theory of Self, Autonomy, and Law, Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780195147964.001.0001"},{"key":"ref_6","first-page":"1","article-title":"The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition","volume":"20","author":"Fineman","year":"2008","journal-title":"Yale J. Law Fem."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Deckha, M. (2020). Animals as Legal Beings: Contesting Anthropocentric Legal Orders, University of Toronto Press.","DOI":"10.3138\/9781487538248"},{"key":"ref_8","unstructured":"Stucki, S. (2020). One Rights: Human and Animal Rights in the Age of Biotechnology, Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"ref_9","unstructured":"Donaldson, S., and Kymlicka, W. (2011). Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights, Oxford University Press."},{"key":"ref_10","first-page":"341","article-title":"Vulnerability and social justice","volume":"53","author":"Fineman","year":"2019","journal-title":"Valp. Univ. Law Rev."},{"key":"ref_11","first-page":"521","article-title":"Rethinking animal ethics through relationality and vulnerability","volume":"17","author":"Palmer","year":"2022","journal-title":"BioSocieties"},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Blattner, C.E., Coulter, K., and Kymlicka, W. (2020). Animal Labour: A New Frontier of Interspecies Justice?, Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198846192.001.0001"},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1017\/S1358246122000078","article-title":"Membership Rights for Animals","volume":"91","author":"Kymlicka","year":"2022","journal-title":"R. Inst. Philos. Suppl."},{"key":"ref_14","first-page":"55","article-title":"Posthumanist care ethics for the legal protection of animals","volume":"26","author":"Deckha","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ethics Environ."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Winkle, M.Y., Johnson, A., and Mills, D.S. (2020). Dog Welfare, Well-Being and Behavior: Considerations for Selection, Evaluation and Suitability for Animal-Assisted Therapy. Animals, 10.","DOI":"10.3390\/ani10112188"},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Glenk, L.M. (2017). Current Perspectives on Therapy Dog Welfare in Animal-Assisted Interventions. Animals, 7.","DOI":"10.3390\/ani7020007"},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Peralta, J.M., and Fine, A.H. (2021). The Welfare of Animals in Animal-Assisted Interventions: Foundations and Best Practice Methods, Springer Nature.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-69587-3"},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Glenk, L.M., and Foltin, S. (2021). Therapy Dog Welfare Revisited: A Review of the Literature. Vet. Sci., 8.","DOI":"10.3390\/vetsci8100226"},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fine, A.H., and Beck, A.M. (2015). Understanding our kinship with animals: Input for health care professionals interested in the human\u2013animal bond. Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy, Academic Press. [4th ed.].","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-12-801292-5.00001-8"},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fine, A.H., Beck, A.M., and Ng, Z. (2019). The State of Animal-Assisted Interventions: Addressing the Contemporary Issues That Will Shape the Future. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16.","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph16203997"},{"key":"ref_21","first-page":"56","article-title":"Ethical challenges in animal-assisted interventions: Towards indicators of animal assent","volume":"32","author":"Froboese","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Vet. Behav."},{"key":"ref_22","unstructured":"ISAAT (2018). Positive List Species for Animal-Assisted Interventions, International Society for Animal Assisted Therapy."},{"key":"ref_23","unstructured":"IAHAIO (2014). The IAHAIO White Paper: Definitions and Guidelines for Animal-Assisted Intervention and Animal-Assisted Activity, IAHAIO."},{"key":"ref_24","unstructured":"Italian Ministry of Health (2025, October 03). National Guidelines for Animal-Assisted Interventions (Linee Guida Nazionali per Gli Interventi Assistiti Con Gli Animali). State\u2013Regions Agreement, 25 March 2015, Available online: https:\/\/www.salute.gov.it\/imgs\/C_17_opuscoliPoster_276_allegato.pdf."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajic.2007.09.005","article-title":"Guidelines for animal-assisted interventions in healthcare facilities","volume":"36","author":"Lefebvre","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am. J. Infect. Control"},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.1017\/ice.2015.15","article-title":"Animals in healthcare facilities: Recommendations to minimise potential risks","volume":"36","author":"Murthy","year":"2015","journal-title":"Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol."},{"key":"ref_27","first-page":"104977","article-title":"Current challenges to research on animal-assisted interventions","volume":"227","author":"Serpell","year":"2020","journal-title":"Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci."},{"key":"ref_28","unstructured":"Animal Therapies Ltd. (2024). Australian Code of Conduct for the Animal-Assisted Services Sector, Animal Therapies Ltd.. Available online: https:\/\/www.animaltherapies.org.au\/resources\/code-of-conduct\/."},{"key":"ref_29","first-page":"687","article-title":"Animal labour and the quest for legal recognition","volume":"40","author":"Blattner","year":"2020","journal-title":"Oxf. J. Leg. Stud."},{"key":"ref_30","unstructured":"France (2025, October 10). Code Civil, Article 515-14. Available online: https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000030250342."},{"key":"ref_31","unstructured":"Spain (2025, October 10). C\u00f3digo Civil, Ley 17\/2021, de 15 de Diciembre, Sobre el R\u00e9gimen Jur\u00eddico de Los Animales [Legal Status of Animals as Sentient Beings]. Bol. Of. Estado 2021, No. 298. Available online: https:\/\/www.boe.es\/eli\/es\/l\/2021\/12\/15\/17."},{"key":"ref_32","unstructured":"Rock, M.J., and Degeling, C. (2015). A One Health perspective on ethics and animal welfare. Front. Vet. Sci., 2."},{"key":"ref_33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zinsstag, J., Schelling, E., Waltner-Toews, D., Whittaker, M., and Tanner, M. (2020). One Health: The Theory and Practice of Integrated Health Approaches, CABI.","DOI":"10.1079\/9781789242577.0000"},{"key":"ref_34","unstructured":"Schlosberg, D. (2021). Defining Multispecies Justice in the Anthropocene, Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"ref_35","unstructured":"Probyn-Rapsey, F., Johnston, C., Chrulew, M., Gillespie, K., and Srinivasan, K. (2020). Animaladies: Gender, Species, and Madness, Bloomsbury Academic."},{"key":"ref_36","unstructured":"Coulter, K. (2024). Animal Labour in Practice: Interspecies Care and Policy, Routledge."},{"key":"ref_37","unstructured":"Kymlicka, W., and Donaldson, S. (2024). The Politics of Interspecies Justice, Oxford University Press."}],"container-title":["Animals"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2076-2615\/16\/1\/92\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]],"date-time":"2025-12-29T09:03:30Z","timestamp":1766999010000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2076-2615\/16\/1\/92"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]}},"alternative-id":["ani16010092"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ani16010092","relation":{},"ISSN":["2076-2615"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2076-2615","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]]}}}