{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]],"date-time":"2026-03-10T00:43:54Z","timestamp":1773103434154,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,7]],"date-time":"2026-03-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1772841600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"Internal Creative Agency of the University of Veterinary Sciences Brno","award":["2025ITA25"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2025ITA25"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Animals"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Animal welfare is a key component of sustainable poultry production and is routinely monitored through official veterinary inspections. The aim of this study was to determine the level of welfare compliance among different poultry species and production categories, to compare compliance levels across these groups, and to assess long-term trends using official inspection data. The study was based on the results of supervisory inspections conducted by veterinary inspectors in poultry farms in the Czech Republic between 2016 and 2024. Welfare compliance was evaluated in laying hens, broiler chickens, turkeys, ducks, and geese using a standardized system of welfare assessment checkpoints applied during official controls. Inspections were classified as compliant or non-compliant based on the presence or absence of deficiencies, and overall compliance levels were calculated as the proportion of animals kept in farms with compliant inspections. Across the entire study period, the proportion of poultry kept in farms with compliant inspections ranged from 82.8% to 98.4%, with the highest compliance level observed in turkeys, followed by ducks and broiler chickens, while the lowest compliance level was recorded in geese. Differences among poultry species and categories were statistically significant (p &lt; 0.05). Comparison of two time periods (2016\u20132018 and 2022\u20132024) revealed significant improvements in compliance for broiler chickens, ducks, and geese, whereas significant declines were observed for laying hens and turkeys (p &lt; 0.001). These results demonstrate clear differences in welfare compliance among poultry species and categories and indicate that compliance trends over time are not uniform across the poultry sector. Official veterinary inspection data provide a valuable tool for large-scale assessment of welfare compliance and for identifying poultry sectors that may benefit from targeted welfare improvement measures.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/ani16050834","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,9]],"date-time":"2026-03-09T13:27:18Z","timestamp":1773062838000},"page":"834","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Assessment of Compliance with Animal Welfare Requirements Across Poultry Species and Production Categories"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"16","author":[{"given":"Eva","family":"Justova","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Animal Protection and Welfare and Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, 61242 Brno, Czech Republic"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Vladimir","family":"Vecerek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Animal Protection and Welfare and Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, 61242 Brno, Czech Republic"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Zbynek","family":"Semerad","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Central Veterinary Administration of the State Veterinary Administration, 12000 Prague, Czech Republic"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3299-1107","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marijana","family":"Vucinic","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Animal Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4334-2487","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Eva","family":"Voslarova","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Animal Protection and Welfare and Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, 61242 Brno, Czech Republic"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1017\/S0043933918000028","article-title":"Impact of animal welfare on worldwide poultry production","volume":"74","author":"Bessei","year":"2018","journal-title":"Worlds Poult. Sci. J."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Papageorgiou, M., Goliomytis, M., Tzamaloukas, O., Miltiadou, D., and Simitzis, P. (2023). Positive welfare indicators and their association with sustainable management systems in poultry. Sustainability, 15.","DOI":"10.3390\/su151410890"},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Souillard, R., R\u00e9p\u00e9rant, J.-M., Experton, C., Huneau-Salaun, A., Coton, J., Balaine, L., and Le Bouquin, S. (2019). Husbandry practices, health, and welfare status of organic broilers in France. Animals, 9.","DOI":"10.3390\/ani9030097"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"944","DOI":"10.1071\/AN19664","article-title":"The impact of management, husbandry and stockperson decisions on the welfare of laying hens in Australia","volume":"61","author":"Edwards","year":"2021","journal-title":"Anim. Prod. Sci."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1235","DOI":"10.2478\/aoas-2021-0021","article-title":"The welfare status of hens in different housing systems\u2014A review","volume":"21","author":"Skomorucha","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ann. Anim. Sci."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Olejnik, K., Popiela, E., and Opali\u0144ski, S. (2022). Emerging precision management methods in poultry sector. Agriculture, 12.","DOI":"10.3390\/agriculture12050718"},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4493","DOI":"10.12681\/jhvms.27585","article-title":"The effect of different housing systems on the welfare and the parasitological conditions of laying hens","volume":"73","author":"Beckei","year":"2022","journal-title":"J. Hell. Vet. Med. Soc."},{"key":"ref_8","first-page":"1","article-title":"Compliance with animal welfare regulations: Drivers and consequences","volume":"15","author":"Berg","year":"2020","journal-title":"CAB Rev."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.7120\/09627286.26.3.311","article-title":"Implementation of the European legislation to protect farm animals: A case study on French inspections to find solutions to improve compliance","volume":"26","author":"Miele","year":"2017","journal-title":"Anim. Welf."},{"key":"ref_10","first-page":"183","article-title":"Effectiveness of control measures taken by the Veterinary Inspection in Poland","volume":"33","author":"Lisiowska","year":"2018","journal-title":"Pol. J. Nat. Sci."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.2754\/avb202493010045","article-title":"Analysis of the major deficiencies detected during welfare inspections of farm animals in the Czech Republic","volume":"93","author":"Svestkova","year":"2024","journal-title":"Acta Vet. Brno"},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.2754\/avb202493020239","article-title":"Deficiencies in livestock holdings with respect to animal welfare identified as part of cross-compliance checks completed in 2016\u20132020 in the Czech Republic","volume":"93","author":"Svestkova","year":"2024","journal-title":"Acta Vet. Brno"},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1237","DOI":"10.1017\/S1751731116002512","article-title":"An epidemiological analysis of equine welfare data from regulatory inspections by the official competent authorities","volume":"11","author":"Hitchens","year":"2017","journal-title":"Animal"},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.2754\/avb202291010099","article-title":"Health status of slaughtered animals as indicated by postmortem inspection at slaughterhouses","volume":"91","author":"Nincakova","year":"2022","journal-title":"Acta Vet. Brno"},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Appleby, M.C., Mench, J.A., and Hughes, B.O. (2004). Poultry Behaviour and Welfare, CABI Publishing.","DOI":"10.1079\/9780851996677.0000"},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"EFSA AHAW Panel, Nielsen, S.S., Alvarez, J., Bicout, D.J., Calistri, P., Canali, E., Drewe, J.A., Garin-Bastuji, B., Gonzales Rojas, J.L., and Schmidt, C.G. (2023). Scientific opinion on the welfare of ducks, geese and quail on farm. EFSA J., 21, 7992.","DOI":"10.2903\/j.efsa.2023.7992"},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104295","DOI":"10.1016\/j.psj.2024.104295","article-title":"Sustainable poultry farming practices: A critical review of current strategies and future prospects","volume":"103","author":"Bist","year":"2024","journal-title":"Poult. Sci."},{"key":"ref_18","unstructured":"Mench, J.A. (2018). Overview of commercial poultry production systems and their main welfare challenges. Advances in Poultry Welfare, Woodhead Publishing."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.2754\/avb201988020243","article-title":"Comparison of the welfare of laying hens, broiler chickens and turkeys in terms of bird health as surveyed during inspection in slaughterhouses","volume":"88","author":"Vecerkova","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Vet. Brno"},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11928","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-91347-4","article-title":"Longitudinal national-level monitoring of on-farm broiler welfare identifies consistently poorly performing farms","volume":"11","author":"Mullan","year":"2021","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105273","DOI":"10.1016\/j.applanim.2021.105273","article-title":"Behavioral traits of artificially and naturally hatched geese in intensive and free-range production systems","volume":"236","author":"Boz","year":"2021","journal-title":"Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15152","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-18070-6","article-title":"Validation of a behavior observation form for geese reared in agroforestry systems","volume":"12","author":"Mattioli","year":"2022","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"key":"ref_23","first-page":"2","article-title":"Poultry welfare: Future directions and challenges?","volume":"4","author":"Herwig","year":"2020","journal-title":"Meat Muscle Biol."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.3382\/ps\/peu077","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of three egg production systems: Housing characteristics and management practices","volume":"94","author":"Zhao","year":"2015","journal-title":"Poult. Sci."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5385","DOI":"10.3382\/ps\/pez364","article-title":"Comparison of the frequency of patho-anatomic findings in laying hens with findings in broiler chickens and turkeys detected during post-mortem veterinary inspection","volume":"98","author":"Vecerek","year":"2019","journal-title":"Poult. Sci."},{"key":"ref_26","first-page":"465","article-title":"Are there trade-offs between animal welfare and egg-producing farm efficiency?","volume":"70","author":"Hampel","year":"2024","journal-title":"Agric. Econ."},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Majewski, E., Potori, N., Sulewski, P., W\u0105s, A., M\u00f3rawska, M., G\u0119bska, M., Malak-Rawlikowska, A., Grontkowska, A., Szili, V., and Erd\u0151s, A. (2024). End of the cage age? A study on the impacts of the transition from cages on the EU laying hen sector. Agriculture, 14.","DOI":"10.3390\/agriculture14010111"}],"container-title":["Animals"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2076-2615\/16\/5\/834\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,9]],"date-time":"2026-03-09T13:44:10Z","timestamp":1773063850000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2076-2615\/16\/5\/834"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,7]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3]]}},"alternative-id":["ani16050834"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ani16050834","relation":{},"ISSN":["2076-2615"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2076-2615","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,7]]}}}