{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,11]],"date-time":"2026-08-11T11:32:05Z","timestamp":1786447925511,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":74,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"16","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,11]],"date-time":"2026-08-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1786406400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"JBS Southern Australia Pty Ltd."},{"name":"Integrity Ag Pty Ltd."}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Animals"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Globally, beef customers are seeking verified information regarding the carbon footprint (CF) of the products they buy. As a major supplier of premium grass-finished and natural grain beef supplying markets world-wide, JBS Southern Australia developed a certified Farm Assured (FA) program, launched in 2013, to provide quality beef from independently audited suppliers. This study conducted a life cycle assessment (LCA) with \u2018cradle to farm gate\u2019 and \u2018cradle to processor gate\u2019 boundaries, using two reference flows\u2014(i) one kilogram (kg) of liveweight (LW) at the farm gate, and (ii) one kg of boxed beef at the processor gate\u2014to assess the greenhouse gas (GHG) CF for beef produced in southern Australia. This study is the first to integrate individual animal carcass characteristics with brand level CF analysis at scale. This was achieved by developing a uniquely comprehensive dataset, with primary data supplied by 200 farms and individual animal data provided for 514,922 heads of cattle. The mean farm gate CF was 11.7 (standard deviation 0.4) kg carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) kg\u22121 LW, and the mean boxed beef CF was 24.1 kg CO2-e kg\u22121 boxed beef. The study\u2019s novel approach to data collection allowed for the CF to be stratified by region, carcass characteristics, farm of origin and product brand. Analysis revealed that the lowest farm-average and individual animal CFs were 29% and 48% lower than the supply chain average, respectively. These findings indicate that the CFs of beef produced from grass and natural grain-finished production systems in southern Australia were comparable or lower than the CFs of beef entering similar markets.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/ani16162498","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,11]],"date-time":"2026-08-11T10:32:16Z","timestamp":1786444336000},"page":"2498","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Multivariable Analysis of the Carbon Footprint of a Branded Beef Supply Chain Using Individual Animal Data and Carcass Characteristics"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"16","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0007-8528-4004","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Riley","family":"O\u2019Shannessy","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Integrity Ag Pty Ltd., 10 Neil Street, Toowoomba City, QLD 4350, Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stephen","family":"Wiedemann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Integrity Ag Pty Ltd., 10 Neil Street, Toowoomba City, QLD 4350, Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","unstructured":"(2022). Reality Sets in as Global Consumer Concerns over Climate Change and Food Shortages Escalate, Mintel. Available online: https:\/\/www.mintel.com\/press-centre\/mintel-consulting-2022-sustainability-barometer\/."},{"key":"ref_2","unstructured":"PwC Global (2024). Consumers Willing to Pay 9.7% Sustainability Premium, Even as Cost-of-Living and Inflationary Concerns Weigh: PwC 2024 Voice of the Consumer Survey, PwC Global. Available online: https:\/\/www.pwc.com\/gx\/en\/news-room\/press-releases\/2024\/pwc-2024-voice-of-consumer-survey.html."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3279","DOI":"10.3390\/su4123279","article-title":"Carbon Footprint of Beef Cattle","volume":"4","author":"Desjardins","year":"2012","journal-title":"Sustainability"},{"key":"ref_4","unstructured":"Corporate Value Associates (2024). Global Review of Livestock Traceability Systems, Meat & Livestock Australia. Available online: https:\/\/www.mla.com.au\/research-and-development\/reports\/2025\/v.isc.2407-global-review-of-livestock-traceability-systems."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shear, H.E., and Pendell, D.L. (2020). Economic Cost of Traceability in U.S. Beef Production. Front. Anim. Sci., 1.","DOI":"10.3389\/fanim.2020.552386"},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1672","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2017.10.113","article-title":"Distributions of Emissions Intensity for Individual Beef Cattle Reared on Pasture-Based Production Systems","volume":"171","author":"McAuliffe","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Clean. Prod."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4670","DOI":"10.3168\/jds.2023-24106","article-title":"Environmental Impact of Holstein Friesian and 3-Breed Crossbred Dairy Cows Using a Life Cycle Assessment Approach Applied to Individual Animals","volume":"107","author":"Gallo","year":"2024","journal-title":"J. Dairy Sci."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McNicol, L.C., Perkins, L.S., Gibbons, J., Scollan, N.D., Nugent, A.P., Thomas, E.M., Swancott, E.L., McRoberts, C., White, A., and Chambers, S. (2024). The Nutritional Value of Meat Should Be Considered When Comparing the Carbon Footprint of Lambs Produced on Different Finishing Diets. Front. Sustain. Food Syst., 8.","DOI":"10.3389\/fsufs.2024.1321288"},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"787","DOI":"10.1038\/s43016-024-01031-9","article-title":"Greenhouse Gas Emissions in US Beef Production Can Be Reduced by up to 30% with the Adoption of Selected Mitigation Measures","volume":"5","author":"Pelton","year":"2024","journal-title":"Nat. Food"},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128705","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2021.128705","article-title":"The Italian Meat Production and Consumption System Assessed Combining Material Flow Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment","volume":"321","author":"Ferronato","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Clean. Prod."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mogensen, L., Hermansen, J.E., and Trolle, E. (2020). The Climate and Nutritional Impact of Beef in Different Dietary Patterns in Denmark. Foods, 9.","DOI":"10.3390\/foods9091176"},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"882","DOI":"10.1071\/AN14687","article-title":"Resource Use and Environmental Impacts from Beef Production in Eastern Australia Investigated Using Life Cycle Assessment","volume":"56","author":"Wiedemann","year":"2016","journal-title":"Anim. Prod. Sci."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1016\/j.livsci.2015.06.020","article-title":"Comparing Environmental Impacts of Beef Production Systems: A Review of Life Cycle Assessments","volume":"178","year":"2015","journal-title":"Livest. Sci."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1017\/S1751731117001847","article-title":"Invited Review: A Position on the Global Livestock Environmental Assessment Model (GLEAM)","volume":"12","author":"MacLeod","year":"2018","journal-title":"Animal"},{"key":"ref_15","unstructured":"Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) (2026). Forest, Land and Agriculture Science-Based Target-Setting Guidance, Version 1.2, Science Based Targets initiative. Available online: https:\/\/files.sciencebasedtargets.org\/production\/files\/SBTiFLAGGuidance.pdf."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"380","DOI":"10.1016\/j.agsy.2010.03.009","article-title":"Comparative Life Cycle Environmental Impacts of Three Beef Production Strategies in the Upper Midwestern United States","volume":"103","author":"Pelletier","year":"2010","journal-title":"Agric. Syst."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1149","DOI":"10.1071\/AN15454","article-title":"Resource Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Grain-Finishing Beef Cattle in Seven Australian Feedlots: A Life Cycle Assessment","volume":"57","author":"Wiedemann","year":"2017","journal-title":"Anim. Prod. Sci."},{"key":"ref_18","unstructured":"JBS Australia (2019). JBS Farm Assurance Controlled Bovine\u2014Beef, Natural Grain Standard, Section 1\u20135, Rev. 2, JBS Australia."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"667","DOI":"10.1071\/AN11030","article-title":"On-Farm Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Water Use: Case Studies in the Queensland Beef Industry","volume":"51","author":"Eady","year":"2011","journal-title":"Anim. Prod. Sci."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1327","DOI":"10.1021\/es901131e","article-title":"Red Meat Production in Australia: Life Cycle Assessment and Comparison with Overseas Studies","volume":"44","author":"Peters","year":"2010","journal-title":"Environ. Sci. Technol."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2443","DOI":"10.3390\/su3122443","article-title":"Comparing Carbon and Water Footprints for Beef Cattle Production in Southern Australia","volume":"3","author":"Ridoutt","year":"2011","journal-title":"Sustainability"},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"AN23111","DOI":"10.1071\/AN23111","article-title":"Net Greenhouse-Gas Emissions and Reduction Opportunities in the Western Australian Beef Industry","volume":"64","author":"Wiedemann","year":"2024","journal-title":"Anim. Prod. Sci."},{"key":"ref_23","unstructured":"(2018). Greenhouse Gases\u2014Carbon Footprint of Products\u2014Requirements and Guidelines for Quantification (Standard No. ISO 14067:2018)."},{"key":"ref_24","unstructured":"(2006). Environmental Management\u2014Life Cycle Assessment\u2014Principles and Framework (Standard No. ISO 14040:2006)."},{"key":"ref_25","unstructured":"(2006). Environmental Management\u2014Life Cycle Assessment\u2014Requirements and Guidelines (Standard No. ISO 14044:2006)."},{"key":"ref_26","unstructured":"FAO (2016). Environmental Performance of Large Ruminant Supply Chains: Guidelines for Assessment, Food and Agriculture Organization."},{"key":"ref_27","unstructured":"Commonwealth of Australia (2026, June 04). National Inventory Report 2022\u2014Volume 1, Available online: https:\/\/www.dcceew.gov.au\/climate-change\/publications\/national-inventory-report-2022."},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1071\/AN15365","article-title":"A Universal Equation to Predict Methane Production of Forage-Fed Cattle in Australia","volume":"56","author":"Charmley","year":"2016","journal-title":"Anim. Prod. Sci."},{"key":"ref_29","unstructured":"IPCC (2019). 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use, Chapter 10: Emissions from Livestock and Manure Management, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Available online: https:\/\/www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp\/public\/2019rf\/vol4.html."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Loza, C., Verma, S., Wolffram, S., Susenbeth, A., Blank, R., Taube, F., Loges, R., Hasler, M., Klu\u00df, C., and Malisch, C.S. (2021). Assessing the Potential of Diverse Forage Mixtures to Reduce Enteric Methane Emissions In Vitro. Animals, 11.","DOI":"10.3390\/ani11041126"},{"key":"ref_31","first-page":"167","article-title":"Methanogenesis from Forages Fed to Sheep","volume":"64","author":"Waghorn","year":"2002","journal-title":"Proc. N. Z. Grassl. Assoc."},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1071\/AN15486","article-title":"In Vitro Fermentability and Methane Production of Some Alternative Forages in Australia","volume":"56","author":"Durmic","year":"2016","journal-title":"Anim. Prod. Sci."},{"key":"ref_33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1071\/AN15287","article-title":"Supplementation with Crushed Rapeseed Causes Reduction of Methane Emissions from Lactating Dairy Cows on Pasture","volume":"57","author":"Storlien","year":"2015","journal-title":"Anim. Prod. Sci."},{"key":"ref_34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1071\/AN15516","article-title":"Forage Brassica: A Feed to Mitigate Enteric Methane Emissions?","volume":"56","author":"Sun","year":"2016","journal-title":"Anim. Prod. Sci."},{"key":"ref_35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9041","DOI":"10.3168\/jds.2018-14456","article-title":"Short Communication: Antimethanogenic Effects of 3-Nitrooxypropanol Depend on Supplementation Dose, Dietary Fiber Content, and Cattle Type","volume":"101","author":"Dijkstra","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Dairy Sci."},{"key":"ref_36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.5187\/jast.2020.62.1.31","article-title":"The Effects of Dietary Supplementation with 3-Nitrooxypropanol on Enteric Methane Emissions, Rumen Fermentation, and Production Performance in Ruminants: A Meta-Analysis","volume":"62","author":"Kim","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Anim. Sci. Technol."},{"key":"ref_37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wasson, D.E., Yarish, C., and Hristov, A.N. (2022). Enteric Methane Mitigation through Asparagopsis taxiformis Supplementation and Potential Algal Alternatives. Front. Anim. Sci., 3.","DOI":"10.3389\/fanim.2022.999338"},{"key":"ref_38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"txae116","DOI":"10.1093\/tas\/txae116","article-title":"Effect of SEAFEED, a Canola Oil Infused with Asparagopsis armata, on Methane Emissions, Animal Health, Performance, and Carcass Characteristics of Angus Feedlot Cattle","volume":"8","author":"George","year":"2024","journal-title":"Transl. Anim. Sci."},{"key":"ref_39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.agsy.2019.05.009","article-title":"Pathways to Carbon-Neutrality for the Australian Red Meat Sector","volume":"175","author":"Mayberry","year":"2019","journal-title":"Agric. Syst."},{"key":"ref_40","unstructured":"IPCC (2021). AR6 Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Available online: https:\/\/www.ipcc.ch\/."},{"key":"ref_41","unstructured":"Pr\u00e9-Consultants (2025). SimaPro\u2122 10.2 Software, Version 10.2, Pr\u00e9-Consultants."},{"key":"ref_42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2015.01.073","article-title":"Environmental Impacts and Resource Use of Australian Beef and Lamb Exported to the USA Determined Using Life Cycle Assessment","volume":"94","author":"Wiedemann","year":"2015","journal-title":"J. Clean. Prod."},{"key":"ref_43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1016\/j.agsy.2014.11.002","article-title":"Resource Use and Greenhouse Gas Intensity of Australian Beef Production: 1981\u20132010","volume":"133","author":"Wiedemann","year":"2015","journal-title":"Agric. Syst."},{"key":"ref_44","unstructured":"ALCAS AusLCI\u2014Australian Life Cycle Inventory Database; Australian Life Cycle Assessment Society (ALCAS), Australia, 2017, Available online: http:\/\/auslci.com.au\/."},{"key":"ref_45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1218","DOI":"10.1007\/s11367-016-1087-8","article-title":"The ecoinvent Database Version 3 (Part I): Overview and Methodology","volume":"21","author":"Wernet","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int. J. Life Cycle Assess."},{"key":"ref_46","unstructured":"Wiedemann, S.G., Biggs, L., Watson, K., Gould, N., and McGahan, E.J. (2019). Australian Beef Industry 35-Year Environmental Impact Trends Analysis, Meat & Livestock Australia. Available online: https:\/\/www.mla.com.au\/globalassets\/mla-corporate\/research-and-development\/final-reports\/2021\/b.cch.2109--project-overview.pdf."},{"key":"ref_47","unstructured":"Wiedemann, S., and Yan, M. (2014, January 8\u201310). Livestock Meat Processing: Inventory Data and Methods for Handling Co-Production for Major Livestock Species and Meat Products. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector (LCA Food 2014), San Francisco, CA, USA."},{"key":"ref_48","unstructured":"Meat & Livestock Australia (MLA) (2021). Cattle Assessment Manual, Market Information Services, Meat & Livestock Australia. Available online: https:\/\/www.mla.com.au\/globalassets\/mla-corporate\/extensions-training-and-tools\/documents\/assessmentmanual-cattle.pdf."},{"key":"ref_49","unstructured":"Johnson, T., Avery, A., Lamb, K., and Speirs, J. (2002). The Level of Pasture Utilisation in Southern Australia: A Producer View, Meat & Livestock Australia. Project Code BFGEN 110.5."},{"key":"ref_50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2486.2005.001043.x","article-title":"Critical Analysis of Root:Shoot Ratios in Terrestrial Biomes","volume":"12","author":"Mokany","year":"2006","journal-title":"Glob. Change Biol."},{"key":"ref_51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"785","DOI":"10.1029\/93GB02042","article-title":"Observations and Modeling of Biomass and Soil Organic Matter Dynamics for the Grassland Biome Worldwide","volume":"7","author":"Parton","year":"1993","journal-title":"Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles"},{"key":"ref_52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.5194\/bg-15-693-2018","article-title":"Variations and Determinants of Carbon Content in Plants: A Global Synthesis","volume":"15","author":"Ma","year":"2018","journal-title":"Biogeosciences"},{"key":"ref_53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1016\/0165-022X(91)90024-Q","article-title":"Determination of Protein Concentration by Total Organic Carbon Analysis","volume":"22","author":"Rouwenhorst","year":"1991","journal-title":"J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods"},{"key":"ref_54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bray, G.A., and Bouchard, C. (2003). Handbook of Obesity: Etiology and Pathophysiology, CRC Press. [2nd ed.].","DOI":"10.3109\/9780203913376"},{"key":"ref_55","unstructured":"Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (2026, July 21). Title 210\u2014National Engineering Handbook, Part 651\u2014Agricultural Waste Management Field Handbook: Subpart D\u2014Agricultural Waste Characteristics, Available online: https:\/\/directives.nrcs.usda.gov\/sites\/default\/files2\/1757087018\/Subpart%20D%20%E2%80%93%20Agricultural%20Waste%20Characteristics.pdf."},{"key":"ref_56","unstructured":"Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., and Tanabe, K. (2006). 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use, Chapter 6: Grassland, IPCC\/IGES. Available online: https:\/\/www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp\/public\/2006gl\/pdf\/4_Volume4\/V4_06_Ch6_Grassland.pdf."},{"key":"ref_57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1065\/lca2004.10.181.1","article-title":"The ecoinvent Database: Overview and Methodological Framework","volume":"10","author":"Frischknecht","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int. J. Life Cycle Assess."},{"key":"ref_58","unstructured":"Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency (DCCEE) (2010). National Greenhouse Accounts Factors."},{"key":"ref_59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1071\/AR9960489","article-title":"Predictions of Food Intake in Ruminants from Analyses of Food Composition","volume":"47","author":"Poppi","year":"1996","journal-title":"Aust. J. Agric. Res."},{"key":"ref_60","unstructured":"Commonwealth of Australia (2026, July 21). National Inventory Report 2015\u2014Volume 1, Available online: https:\/\/www.dcceew.gov.au\/climate-change\/publications\/national-inventory-report-2015."},{"key":"ref_61","unstructured":"Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., and Tanabe, K. (2006). N2O Emissions from Managed Soils, and CO2 Emissions from Lime and Urea Application. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use, Chapter 11, IPCC\/IGES."},{"key":"ref_62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.3382\/ps.2011-01634","article-title":"Predicting the Environmental Impacts of Chicken Systems in the United Kingdom through a Life Cycle Assessment: Broiler Production Systems","volume":"91","author":"Leinonen","year":"2012","journal-title":"Poult. Sci."},{"key":"ref_63","unstructured":"Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES) (2026, July 17). Australian Agricultural and Grazing Industries Survey (AAGIS): Farm Definitions and Methods, Available online: https:\/\/www.agriculture.gov.au\/abares\/research-topics\/surveys\/farm-definitions-methods#regions."},{"key":"ref_64","unstructured":"Wiedemann, S.G., Neale, L., and O\u2019Shannessy, R. (2023). Beef Industry Trends Analysis\u20142020, Meat & Livestock Australia. Available online: https:\/\/www.mla.com.au\/contentassets\/c469ed3b077647c2998f789f01405c34\/e.sub.0010---trends-analysis-of-the-australian-beef-industry-2020-final.pdf."},{"key":"ref_65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3138","DOI":"10.2527\/1993.71113138x","article-title":"Factors That Alter the Growth and Development of Ruminants","volume":"71","author":"Owens","year":"1993","journal-title":"J. Anim. Sci."},{"key":"ref_66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1071\/CP22299","article-title":"Reducing Enteric Methane of Ruminants in Australian Grazing Systems\u2014A Review of the Role for Temperate Legumes and Herbs","volume":"74","author":"Badgery","year":"2023","journal-title":"Crop Pasture Sci."},{"key":"ref_67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.1071\/AN10163","article-title":"Ruminant Enteric Methane Mitigation: A Review","volume":"51","author":"Cottle","year":"2011","journal-title":"Anim. Prod. Sci."},{"key":"ref_68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1007\/s11367-018-1464-6","article-title":"A Life Cycle Assessment of the Environmental Impacts of a Beef System in the USA","volume":"24","author":"Battagliese","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int. J. Life Cycle Assess."},{"key":"ref_69","unstructured":"Commonwealth of Australia (2026, July 21). National Greenhouse Gas Accounts\u2014Grassland Soils (Sector 4.C.1.ii), Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (AR5), Available online: https:\/\/greenhouseaccounts.climatechange.gov.au."},{"key":"ref_70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104168","DOI":"10.1016\/j.agsy.2024.104168","article-title":"Advancing Quantification of Australia\u2019s Beef Cattle and Sheep Emissions Accounts\u2014Carbon Sinks and Emissions Hot Spots Battle It out En Route to Net Zero","volume":"222","author":"Butchart","year":"2025","journal-title":"Agric. Syst."},{"key":"ref_71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1016\/j.agsy.2018.02.003","article-title":"Impacts of Soil Carbon Sequestration on Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Midwestern USA Beef Finishing Systems","volume":"162","author":"Stanley","year":"2018","journal-title":"Agric. Syst."},{"key":"ref_72","unstructured":"AMPC (2025). Sustainability Reporting Uplift Project Final Report, Australian Meat Processor Corporation. Available online: https:\/\/ampc.com.au\/media\/z3ibdmri\/ampc-awi-sustainability-uplift-report.pdf."},{"key":"ref_73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100219","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vas.2021.100219","article-title":"Main Regulatory Factors of Marbling Level in Beef Cattle","volume":"14","author":"Nguyen","year":"2021","journal-title":"Vet. Anim. Sci."},{"key":"ref_74","first-page":"705","article-title":"Growth, Development and Nutritional Manipulation of Marbling in Cattle: A Review","volume":"44","author":"Pethick","year":"2004","journal-title":"Aust. J. Exp. Agric."}],"container-title":["Animals"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2076-2615\/16\/16\/2498\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,11]],"date-time":"2026-08-11T10:49:30Z","timestamp":1786445370000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2076-2615\/16\/16\/2498"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,11]]},"references-count":74,"journal-issue":{"issue":"16","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]}},"alternative-id":["ani16162498"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ani16162498","relation":{},"ISSN":["2076-2615"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2076-2615","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,11]]}}}