{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,12]],"date-time":"2025-10-12T02:57:27Z","timestamp":1760237847489,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,4]],"date-time":"2022-06-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1654300800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Brain Sciences"],"abstract":"<jats:p>To further understand how consciousness emerges, certain paradigms inducing distractor-induced perceptual impairments are promising. Neuro-computational models explain the inhibition of conscious perception of targets with suppression of distractor information when the target and distractor share the same features. Because these gating mechanisms are controlled by the prefrontal cortex, transcranial direct current stimulation of this specific region is expected to alter distractor-induced effects depending on the presence and number of distractors. To this end, participants were asked to perform an auditory variant of the distractor-induced blindness paradigm under frontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Results show the expected distractor-induced deafness effects in a reduction of target detection depending on the number of distractors. While tDCS had no significant effects on target detection per se, error rates due to missed cues are increased under stimulation. Thus, while our variant led to successful replication of behavioral deafness effects, the results under tDCS stimulation indicate that the chosen paradigm may have difficulty too low to respond to stimulation. That the error rates nevertheless led to a tDCS effect may be due to the divided attention between the visual cue and the auditory target.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/brainsci12060738","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,4]],"date-time":"2022-06-04T09:42:32Z","timestamp":1654335752000},"page":"738","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Error Rates in the Distractor-Induced Deafness Paradigm"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"12","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4873-5789","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lars","family":"Michael","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychology, Medical School Berlin, 14197 Berlin, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ana","family":"B\u00f6ke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychology, Medical School Berlin, 14197 Berlin, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Henry","family":"Ipczynski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychology, Medical School Berlin, 14197 Berlin, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1613","DOI":"10.1016\/S0042-6989(01)00065-7","article-title":"Attention induced motion blindness","volume":"41","author":"Sahraie","year":"2001","journal-title":"Vis. Res."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1781","DOI":"10.1016\/j.visres.2011.06.007","article-title":"Distractor-induced blindness for orientation changes and coherent motion","volume":"51","author":"Michael","year":"2011","journal-title":"Vis. Res."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1882","DOI":"10.1111\/psyp.12974","article-title":"Adaptability and specificity of inhibition processes in distractor-induced blindness","volume":"54","author":"Winther","year":"2017","journal-title":"Psychophysiology"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1048","DOI":"10.1016\/j.visres.2005.10.007","article-title":"Specifying the distractor inhibition account of attention-induced motion blindness","volume":"46","author":"Hesselmann","year":"2006","journal-title":"Vis. Res."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cortex.2020.10.015","article-title":"Distractor-induced deafness: The effect of multiple auditory distractors on conscious target processing","volume":"134","author":"Kern","year":"2021","journal-title":"Cortex"},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1294","DOI":"10.1162\/jocn_a_00177","article-title":"Closing the Gates to Consciousness: Distractors Activate a Central Inhibition Process","volume":"24","author":"Niedeggen","year":"2012","journal-title":"J. Cogn. Neurosci."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1016\/j.concog.2015.02.002","article-title":"The state of a central inhibition system predicts access to visual targets: An ERP study on distractor-induced blindness (DIB)","volume":"35","author":"Niedeggen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Conscious Cogn."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1016\/j.concog.2015.02.007","article-title":"Open and closed cortico-subcortical loops: A neuro-computational account of access to consciousness in the distractor-induced blindness paradigm","volume":"35","author":"Ebner","year":"2015","journal-title":"Conscious Cogn."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1031","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinph.2015.11.012","article-title":"A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools","volume":"127","author":"Woods","year":"2016","journal-title":"Clin. Neurophysiol."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1097\/YCT.0000000000000510","article-title":"Physiology of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation","volume":"34","author":"Stagg","year":"2018","journal-title":"J ECT"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1007\/s00221-011-2879-5","article-title":"Excitability changes induced in the human auditory cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: Direct electrophysiological evidence","volume":"215","author":"Zaehle","year":"2011","journal-title":"Exp. Brain Res."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1130","DOI":"10.1016\/j.brs.2015.07.031","article-title":"Inter- and Intra-individual Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) at Varying Current Intensities","volume":"8","author":"Chew","year":"2015","journal-title":"Brain Stimul."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103241","DOI":"10.1016\/j.concog.2021.103241","article-title":"ERP signatures of auditory awareness in cross-modal distractor-induced deafness","volume":"96","author":"Kern","year":"2021","journal-title":"Conscious Cogn."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.3758\/BF03193146","article-title":"G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences","volume":"39","author":"Faul","year":"2007","journal-title":"Behav. Res. Methods"},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1774","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinph.2017.06.001","article-title":"Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines","volume":"128","author":"Antal","year":"2017","journal-title":"Clin. Neurophysiol."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.5709\/acp-0103-3","article-title":"The influence of distracter and target features on distracter induced blindness","volume":"8","author":"Michael","year":"2012","journal-title":"Adv. Cogn. Psychol."},{"key":"ref_17","first-page":"3","article-title":"The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"52","author":"Klem","year":"1999","journal-title":"Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. Suppl."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1691","DOI":"10.1007\/s00429-020-02081-y","article-title":"Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of left and right inferior frontal gyrus on creative divergent thinking are moderated by changes in inhibition control [published correction appears in Brain Struct Funct. 2020 Sep;225,2299]","volume":"225","author":"Khalil","year":"2020","journal-title":"Brain Struct. Funct."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyt.2012.00083","article-title":"Finite-Element Model Predicts Current Density Distribution for Clinical Applications of tDCS and tACS","volume":"3","author":"Neuling","year":"2012","journal-title":"Front. Psychiatry"},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102959","DOI":"10.1016\/j.concog.2020.102959","article-title":"Effects of 1 mA and 2 mA transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory performance in healthy participants","volume":"83","author":"Papazova","year":"2020","journal-title":"Conscious Cogn."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2348","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neurobiolaging.2015.04.016","article-title":"Effects of noninvasive brain stimulation on cognitive function in healthy aging and Alzheimer\u2019s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"36","author":"Hsu","year":"2015","journal-title":"Neurobiol. Aging"},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyt.2012.00081","article-title":"Parietal contributions to visual working memory depend on task difficulty","volume":"3","author":"Jones","year":"2012","journal-title":"Front. Psychiatry"},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.037","article-title":"The implications of state-dependent tDCS effects in aging: Behavioural response is determined by baseline performance","volume":"74","author":"Learmonth","year":"2015","journal-title":"Neuropsychologia"},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jns.2006.05.062","article-title":"Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory in patients with Parkinson\u2019s disease","volume":"249","author":"Boggio","year":"2006","journal-title":"J. Neurol. Sci."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1016\/j.brs.2014.11.011","article-title":"Transcranial direct current stimulation based metaplasticity protocols in working memory","volume":"8","author":"Carvalho","year":"2015","journal-title":"Brain Stimul."},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s00221-011-2891-9","article-title":"tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: A meta-analytical review","volume":"216","author":"Jacobson","year":"2012","journal-title":"Exp. Brain Res."},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1177\/1550059412444975","article-title":"Effects of transcranial electrical stimulation on cognition","volume":"43","author":"Kuo","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin. EEG Neurosci."},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1007\/s00221-005-2334-6","article-title":"Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory","volume":"166","author":"Fregni","year":"2005","journal-title":"Exp. Brain Res."},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1002\/hbm.20127","article-title":"Involvement of the inferior frontal junction in cognitive control: Meta-analyses of switching and Stroop studies","volume":"25","author":"Derrfuss","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum. Brain Mapp."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"507","DOI":"10.1038\/nn.2509","article-title":"A central role for the lateral prefrontal cortex in goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention","volume":"13","author":"Asplund","year":"2010","journal-title":"Nat. Neurosci."},{"key":"ref_31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3447","DOI":"10.1007\/s00221-021-06212-7","article-title":"Enhancement of task-switching performance with transcranial direct current stimulation over the right lateral prefrontal cortex","volume":"239","author":"Prehn","year":"2021","journal-title":"Exp. Brain Res."},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3261","DOI":"10.1111\/ejn.14403","article-title":"Blinding is compromised for transcranial direct current stimulation at 1 mA for 20 min in young healthy adults","volume":"50","author":"Turi","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur. J. Neurosci."},{"key":"ref_33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3380","DOI":"10.1111\/ejn.14497","article-title":"The time course of ineffective sham-blinding during low-intensity (1 mA) transcranial direct current stimulation","volume":"50","author":"Greinacher","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur. J. Neurosci."},{"key":"ref_34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stankovi\u0107, M., \u017divanovi\u0107, M., Bjeki\u0107, J., and Filipovi\u0107, S.R. (2021). Blinding in tDCS Studies: Correct End-of-Study Guess Does Not Moderate the Effects on Associative and Working Memory. Brain Sci., 12.","DOI":"10.3390\/brainsci12010058"}],"container-title":["Brain Sciences"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2076-3425\/12\/6\/738\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]],"date-time":"2025-10-10T23:24:34Z","timestamp":1760138674000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2076-3425\/12\/6\/738"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,4]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,6]]}},"alternative-id":["brainsci12060738"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/brainsci12060738","relation":{},"ISSN":["2076-3425"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2076-3425"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,4]]}}}