{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,26]],"date-time":"2026-06-26T23:05:36Z","timestamp":1782515136177,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"13","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,26]],"date-time":"2023-06-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1687737600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"Open Access Publication Fund of the University of T\u00fcbingen"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Cancers"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Background: Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) is a relatively new surgical technique for low rectal cancers, enabling a more radical approach than conventional abdominoperineal excision (APE) with a potentially better oncological outcome. To date, no standard exists for reconstruction after extended or extralevator approaches of abdominoperineal (ELAPE) resection for lower gastrointestinal cancer or inflammatory tumors. In the recent literature, techniques with myocutaneous flaps, such as the VY gluteal flap, the pedicled gracilis flap, or the pedicled rectus abdominis flaps (VRAM) are primarily described. We propose a tailored concept with the use of bilateral adipo-fasciocutaneous inferior gluteal artery perforator (IGAP) advancement flaps in VY fashion after ELAPE surgery procedures. This retrospective cohort study analyzes the feasibility of this concept and is, to our knowledge, one of the largest published series of IGAP flaps in the context of primary closure after ELAPE procedures. Methods: In a retrospective cohort analysis, we evaluated all the consecutive patients with rectal resections from Jan 2017 to Sep 2021. All the patients with abdominoperineal resection were included in the study evaluation. The primary endpoint of the study was the proportion of plastic reconstruction and inpatient discharge. Results: Out of a total of 560 patients with rectal resections, 101 consecutive patients with ELAPE met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study evaluation. The primary direct defect closure was performed in 72 patients (71.3%). In 29 patients (28.7%), the defect was closed with primary unilateral or bilateral IGAP flaps in VY fashion. The patients\u2019 mean age was 59.4 years with a range of 25\u201385 years. In 84 patients, the indication of the operation was lower rectal cancer or anal cancer recurrence, and non-oncological resections were performed in 17 patients. Surgery was performed in a minimally invasive abdominal approach in combination with open perineal extralevatoric abdominoperineal resection (ELAPE) and immediate IGAP flap reconstruction. The rate of perineal early complications after plastic reconstruction was 19.0%, which needed local revision due to local infection. All these interventions were conducted under general anesthesia (Clavien\u2013Dindo IIIb). The mean length of the hospital stay was 14.4 days after ELAPE, ranging from 3 to 53 days. Conclusions: Since radical resection with a broad margin is the standard choice in primary, sphincter-infiltrating rectal cancer and recurrent anal cancer surgery in combination with ELAPE, the choice technique for pelvic floor reconstruction is under debate and there is no consensus. Using IGAP flaps is a reliable, technical, easy, and safe option, especially in wider defects on the pelvic floor with minimal donor site morbidity and an acceptable complication (no flap necrosis) rate. The data for hernia incidence in the long term are not known.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers15133345","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,26]],"date-time":"2023-06-26T03:14:56Z","timestamp":1687749296000},"page":"3345","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Feasibility of Perineal Defect Reconstruction with Simplified Fasciocutaneous Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator (IGAP) Flaps after Tumor Resection of the Lower Rectum: Incidence and Outcome in an Interdisciplinary Approach"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"15","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0261-8352","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"J. T.","family":"Thiel","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Hand, Plastic, Reconstructive and Burn Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Tuebingen, University of Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"H. L.","family":"Welskopf","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Eberhard-Karl-Universit\u00e4t, University Hospital T\u00fcbingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9720-8243","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"C.","family":"Yurttas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Eberhard-Karl-Universit\u00e4t, University Hospital T\u00fcbingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"F.","family":"Farzaliyev","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Hand, Plastic, Reconstructive and Burn Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Tuebingen, University of Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Daigeler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Hand, Plastic, Reconstructive and Burn Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Tuebingen, University of Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"R.","family":"Bachmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Eberhard-Karl-Universit\u00e4t, University Hospital T\u00fcbingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1555","DOI":"10.1002\/onco.13824","article-title":"Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) versus Standard Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","volume":"26","author":"Liu","year":"2021","journal-title":"Oncologist"},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9257","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2005.02.9231","article-title":"Low rectal cancer: A call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection","volume":"23","author":"Nagtegaal","year":"2005","journal-title":"J. Clin. Oncol."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2671","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.15809","article-title":"A nationwide comparison of short-term outcomes after transanal, open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted total mesorectal excision","volume":"23","author":"Ose","year":"2021","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2018.11.010","article-title":"Systematic review analysis of robotic and transanal approaches in TME surgery- A systematic review of the current literature in regard to challenges in rectal cancer surgery","volume":"45","author":"Grass","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur. J. Surg. Oncol."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3517","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2007.14.5961","article-title":"Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer","volume":"26","author":"West","year":"2008","journal-title":"J. Clin. Oncol."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000006341","article-title":"Bilobed Gracilis Flap: A Novel Alternative for Pelvic and Perineal Reconstruction","volume":"145","author":"Weinstein","year":"2020","journal-title":"Plast. Reconstr. Surg."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpra.2022.06.002","article-title":"Analysis of clinical and patient-reported outcomes in post-ELAPE perineal reconstruction with IGAP flap\u2014A 5-year review","volume":"34","author":"Pai","year":"2022","journal-title":"JPRAS Open"},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"668","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2020.00668","article-title":"Reconstruction of Perineal Defects: A Comparison of the Myocutaneous Gracilis and the Gluteal Fold Flap in Interdisciplinary Anorectal Tumor Resection","volume":"10","author":"Thiele","year":"2020","journal-title":"Front. Oncol."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2290","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-021-06044-0","article-title":"Outcomes Following Immediate Vertical Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous (VRAM) Flap-Based Perineal Reconstruction Following Resectional Surgery For Pelvic Malignancies","volume":"45","author":"Harries","year":"2021","journal-title":"World J. Surg."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2020.10.100","article-title":"Vertical rectus abdominis flap (VRAM) for perineal reconstruction following pelvic surgery: A systematic review","volume":"74","author":"Radwan","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"565","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2018.12.044","article-title":"Surgical outcomes of VRAM versus gracilis flaps for the reconstruction of pelvic defects following oncologic resection\u2730","volume":"72","author":"Stein","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1357","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-018-6363-3","article-title":"Vertical Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap Repair Improves Perineal Wound Healing after Abdominoperineal Resection for Irradiated Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer","volume":"25","author":"Spasojevic","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ann. Surg. Oncol."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-020-05788-5","article-title":"Donor Site Morbidity of Patients Receiving Vertical Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap for Perineal, Vaginal or Inguinal Reconstruction","volume":"45","author":"Schellerer","year":"2021","journal-title":"World J. Surg."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"812","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2013.02.010","article-title":"The gluteal fold flap: A versatile option for perineal reconstruction following anorectal cancer resection","volume":"66","author":"Pantelides","year":"2013","journal-title":"J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.7822","article-title":"Perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision using inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps","volume":"99","author":"Hainsworth","year":"2012","journal-title":"Br. J. Surg."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1123","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-021-02496-7","article-title":"A comparative multicentre study evaluating gluteal turnover flap for wound closure after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer","volume":"25","author":"Sharabiany","year":"2021","journal-title":"Tech. Coloproctol."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"751","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-019-02055-1","article-title":"Feasibility of a subcutaneous gluteal turnover flap without donor site scar for perineal closure after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer","volume":"23","author":"Blok","year":"2019","journal-title":"Tech. Coloproctol."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1094","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.14715","article-title":"Gluteal turnover flap for perineal reconstruction following abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer\u2014A video vignette","volume":"21","author":"Blok","year":"2019","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2018.04.023","article-title":"Perineal Closure after Abdominoperineal Resection Using a Pedicled Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap: A Safe Alternative to Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap","volume":"227","author":"Lakkis","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Am. Coll. Surg."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1602","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000002107","article-title":"Primary versus Flap Closure of Perineal Defects following Oncologic Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","volume":"137","author":"Devulapalli","year":"2016","journal-title":"Plast. Reconstr. Surg."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.25270\/owm.2018.2.4548","article-title":"Reconstruction of a Sacral Pressure Ulcer With an Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap After Failed Reconstruction Using Bilateral V-Y Advancement Flaps","volume":"64","author":"Wang","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ostomy Wound Manag."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1158","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2021.11.002","article-title":"Abdominal and perineal hernia rates following vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap reconstruction\u2014A supraregional experience","volume":"75","author":"Kim","year":"2022","journal-title":"J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg."},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"626","DOI":"10.1007\/s00595-003-2531-5","article-title":"Modified gluteus maximus V-Y advancement flap for reconstruction of perineal defects after resection of intrapelvic recurrent rectal cancer: Report of a case","volume":"33","author":"Goi","year":"2003","journal-title":"Surg. Today"},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"232","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.5489","article-title":"Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer","volume":"94","author":"Holm","year":"2007","journal-title":"Br. J. Surg."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"751","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.12663","article-title":"The success of rectus and gracilis muscle flaps in the treatment of chronic pelvic sepsis and persistent perineal sinus: A systematic review","volume":"16","author":"Wilson","year":"2014","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis."},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1486","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.1990.01410230080014","article-title":"Management of perineal wounds following abdominoperineal resection with inferior gluteal flaps","volume":"125","author":"Baird","year":"1990","journal-title":"Arch. Surg."},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1016\/0007-1226(89)90075-1","article-title":"Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle","volume":"42","author":"Koshima","year":"1989","journal-title":"Br. J. Plast. Surg."},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.14348","article-title":"Closure of the perineal defect after abdominoperineal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma\u2014ACPGBI Position Statement","volume":"20","author":"Foster","year":"2018","journal-title":"Color. Dis."}],"container-title":["Cancers"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2072-6694\/15\/13\/3345\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]],"date-time":"2025-10-10T20:00:43Z","timestamp":1760126443000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2072-6694\/15\/13\/3345"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,26]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"13","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,7]]}},"alternative-id":["cancers15133345"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/cancers15133345","relation":{},"ISSN":["2072-6694"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2072-6694","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,26]]}}}