{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,28]],"date-time":"2026-09-28T15:53:19Z","timestamp":1790610799266,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"20","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,10]],"date-time":"2023-10-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1696896000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Cancers"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Introduction and Aims: The optimal approach for nephroureterectomy in patients with suspected UTUC remains a point of debate. In this review, we compare the oncological outcomes of robotic nephroureterectomy (RNU) with open (ONU) or laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU). Methods: All randomized trials and observational studies comparing RNU with ONU and\/or LNU for suspected non-metastatic UTUC are included in this review. The systematic review was performed in accordance with the Cochrane Guidelines and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The primary outcome measures were overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and intravesical recurrence-free survival (IV-RFS). The secondary outcome measures were the lymph node dissection (LND) rates, positive margin rates, and the proportion of patients receiving bladder intravesical chemotherapy. Results: We identified 8172 references through our electronic searches and 8 studies through manual searching. A total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. The total number of patients in the review was 18,964. RNU had superior OS compared to LNU (HR: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.93), p-0.002 (very low certainty)). RNU and ONU had similar OS (HR: 0.83 (95% CI: 0.52, 1.34), p-0.44 (very low certainty)). One study reported an independent association of RNU as a worse predictor of IV-RFS when compared to ONU (HR-1.73 (95% CI: 1.22, 2.45)). The LND rates were higher in the RNU cohort when compared to the LNU cohort (RR 1.24 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.51), p-0.03 (low certainty)). The positive margin rate was lower in the RNU cohort when compared to the ONU cohort (RR 0.29 (95% CI: 0.08, 0.86), p-0.03 (low certainty)). Conclusion: RNU offers comparable oncological efficacy to ONU, except for intravesical recurrence-free survival (IV-RFS). RNU has fewer positive surgical margin rates compared to ONU in well-balanced studies. RNU appears to outperform LNU for certain oncological parameters, such as OS and the proportion of patients who receive lymph node dissections. The quality of evidence comparing surgical techniques for UTUC has remained poor in the last decade.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers15204926","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,11]],"date-time":"2023-10-11T02:11:01Z","timestamp":1696990261000},"page":"4926","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["Oncological Efficacy of Robotic Nephroureterectomy vs. Open and Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy for Suspected Non-Metastatic UTUC\u2014A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"Karthik","family":"Rajan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle NE7 7PJ, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1376-5697","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ahmad","family":"Khalifa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle NE7 7PJ, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Robert","family":"Geraghty","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle NE7 7PJ, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kalpesh","family":"Parmar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle NE7 7PJ, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gokul","family":"KandaSwamy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Morriston Hospital, Swansea SA6 6NL, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0556-3035","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Juan","family":"G\u00f3mez Rivas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Hospital Cl\u00ednico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6248-6478","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bhaskar","family":"Somani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bhavan Prasad","family":"Rai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle NE7 7PJ, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2023.03.013","article-title":"European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2023 Update","volume":"84","author":"Seisen","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur. Urol."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1426","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2012.11341.x","article-title":"Surgical management for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma (UUT-TCC): A systematic review","volume":"110","author":"Rai","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJU Int."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2009.06.013","article-title":"Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy: Perioperative and oncologic outcomes from a randomised prospective study","volume":"56","author":"Simone","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur. Urol."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1122","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2014.11.035","article-title":"A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinicopathologic Factors Linked to Intravesical Recurrence After Radical Nephroureterectomy to Treat Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma","volume":"67","author":"Seisen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur. Urol."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"845","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-019-03020-1","article-title":"Robotic versus other nephroureterectomy techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis of over 87,000 cases","volume":"38","author":"Veccia","year":"2020","journal-title":"World J. Urol."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"b2535","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.b2535","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement","volume":"339","author":"Moher","year":"2009","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Higgins, J.P.T., and Green, S. (2008). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Wiley-Blackwell. 2012 reprint. ed.","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470712184"},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Higgins, J.P.T., and Cochrane (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Cochrane. Version 6 ed.","DOI":"10.1002\/9781119536604"},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"924","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39489.470347.AD","article-title":"GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations","volume":"336","author":"Guyatt","year":"2008","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wan, X., Wang, W., Liu, J., and Tong, T. (2014). Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and\/or interquartile range. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 14.","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-14-135"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1785","DOI":"10.1177\/0962280216669183","article-title":"Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and\/or mid-quartile range","volume":"27","author":"Luo","year":"2018","journal-title":"Stat. Methods Med. Res."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hozo, S.P., Djulbegovic, B., and Hozo, I. (2005). Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 5.","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-5-13"},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2013.07.079","article-title":"Matched Comparison of Robotic vs Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy: An Initial Experience","volume":"83","author":"Ambani","year":"2014","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hu, C.Y., Yang, C.K., Huang, C.Y., Ou, Y.C., Hung, S.F., Chung, S.D., and Pu, Y.S. (2015). Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy versus Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Matched Comparison Study. Biomed. Res. Int., 2015.","DOI":"10.1155\/2015\/918486"},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2015.07.070","article-title":"Comparison of Single-docking Robotic-assisted and Traditional Laparoscopy for Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection During Nephroureterectomy With Bladder Cuff Excision for Upper-tract Urothelial Carcinoma","volume":"87","author":"Melquist","year":"2016","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2017.0086","article-title":"Utilization and Outcomes of Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma by Surgical Approach","volume":"31","author":"Rodriguez","year":"2017","journal-title":"J. Endourol."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lee, H., Kim, H.J., Lee, S.E., Hong, S.K., and Byun, S.S. (2019). Comparison of oncological and perioperative outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic nephroureterectomy approaches in patients with non-metastatic upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. PLoS ONE, 14.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0210401"},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lenis, A.T., Donin, N.M., Faiena, I., Salmasi, A., Johnson, D.C., Drakaki, A., Gollapudi, K., Blumberg, J., Belldegrun, A., and Pantuck, A. (2018). Role of surgical approach on lymph node dissection yield and survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol. Oncol., 36.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2017.09.001"},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"978","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asjsur.2019.11.009","article-title":"Single-docking robotic-assisted nephroureterectomy and extravesical bladder cuff excision without intraoperative repositioning: The technique and oncological outcomes","volume":"43","author":"Ye","year":"2020","journal-title":"Asian J. Surg.\/Asian Surg. Assoc."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"312","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2020.0496","article-title":"Robotic Nephroureterectomy vs Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy: Increased Utilization, Rates of Lymphadenectomy, Decreased Morbidity Robotically","volume":"35","author":"Kenigsberg","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Endourol."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"731460","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2021.731460","article-title":"Comparing Oncological Outcomes and Surgical Complications of Hand-Assisted, Laparoscopic and Robotic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma","volume":"11","author":"Li","year":"2021","journal-title":"Front. Oncol."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"408","DOI":"10.4081\/aiua.2021.4.408","article-title":"Is robotic radical nephroureterectomy a safe alternative to open approach: The first prospective analysis","volume":"93","author":"Mourmouris","year":"2021","journal-title":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia"},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101607","DOI":"10.1016\/j.suronc.2021.101607","article-title":"Robot-assisted versus open radical nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: A retrospective cohort study across ten years","volume":"38","author":"Zeuschner","year":"2021","journal-title":"Surg. Oncol."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"752","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2021.0587","article-title":"Robotic vs Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Propensity-Score Matched Pair \u201cTetrafecta\u201d Analysis (ROBUUST Collaborative Group)","volume":"36","author":"Veccia","year":"2022","journal-title":"J. Endourol."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bae, H., Chung, J.H., Song, W., Kang, M., Jeon, H.G., Jeong, B.C., Seo, S.I., Jeon, S.S., Lee, H.M., and Sung, H.H. (2022). Robotic Radical Nephroureterectomy with Bladder Cuff Excision for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Trend Analysis of Utilization and a Comparative Study. Cancers, 14.","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers14102497"},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grossmann, N.C., Soria, F., Juvet, T., Potretzke, A.M., Djaladat, H., Ghoreifi, A., Kikuchi, E., Mari, A., Khene, Z.E., and Fujita, K. (2023). Comparing Oncological and Perioperative Outcomes of Open versus Laparoscopic versus Robotic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Multinational, Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Cancers, 15.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0302-2838(23)00562-6"},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2022.0154","article-title":"Is Robotic Superior to Laparoscopic Approach for Radical Nephroureterectomy with Bladder Cuff Excision in Treating Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma?","volume":"37","author":"Huang","year":"2023","journal-title":"J. Endourol."},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1268","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(20)30415-3","article-title":"Adjuvant chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (the POUT trial): A phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial","volume":"395","author":"Birtle","year":"2020","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"635","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2020.07.003","article-title":"Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A 2020 Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, and Future Perspectives on Systemic Therapy","volume":"79","author":"Leow","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur. Urol."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2017.09.015","article-title":"Potential Benefit of Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review by the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer","volume":"5","author":"Peyronnet","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur. Urol. Focus"},{"key":"ref_31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"686","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2020.9151","article-title":"Immortal Time Bias in Observational Studies","volume":"325","author":"Yadav","year":"2021","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"ref_32","first-page":"CD011903","article-title":"Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults","volume":"4","author":"Rai","year":"2019","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst. Rev."}],"container-title":["Cancers"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2072-6694\/15\/20\/4926\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]],"date-time":"2025-10-10T21:04:33Z","timestamp":1760130273000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2072-6694\/15\/20\/4926"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,10]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"20","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,10]]}},"alternative-id":["cancers15204926"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/cancers15204926","relation":{},"ISSN":["2072-6694"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2072-6694","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,10]]}}}