{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]],"date-time":"2026-07-30T12:27:59Z","timestamp":1785414479472,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]],"date-time":"2026-04-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1777420800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004869","name":"University of M\u00fcnster","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004869","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]},{"id":[{"id":"https:\/\/ror.org\/00pd74e08","id-type":"ROR","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Cancers"],"abstract":"<jats:p>(1) Background: Megaprosthetic reconstruction of the knee is frequently required in limb salvage surgery for oncologic indications and in complex revision arthroplasty. The Modular Universal Tumor and Revision System (MUTARS) Total Knee prosthesis is widely used in these situations. The aim of this study was to evaluate revision-free implant survival following MUTARS Total Knee implantation and to compare outcomes between primary implantation and use as a conversion procedure after failure of a previous knee prosthesis. (2) Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed including 36 patients who underwent MUTARS Total Knee implantation at a single institution. Patients were stratified into primary implantation (n = 24) and conversion after failed prosthesis (n = 12). The primary endpoint was time to first revision. (3) Results: Overall revision-free survival was 51.6% at 2 years and 29.3% at 5 years. No significant difference in revision-free survival was observed between primary implantation and conversion procedures (log-rank p = 0.67). When mechanical failure (Henderson type III) was considered as the sole endpoint, implant survival was substantially higher, with 88.3% survival at 2 years and 57.2% at 5 years. Infection-related implant survival was 72.0% at both 2 and 5 years. Secondary amputation was required in 7 of 36 patients (19.4%), with a higher proportion observed in the primary implantation group (25.0% vs. 8.3%). Most amputations occurred within the early postoperative period. (4) Conclusions: MUTARS Total Knee implantation is associated with a substantial revision burden; however, conversion after failed prosthesis did not result in inferior revision-free survival compared with primary implantation. Endpoint-specific analyses demonstrate that biological complications, particularly infection, represent the dominant drivers of early failure.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers18091408","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]],"date-time":"2026-04-29T09:46:11Z","timestamp":1777455971000},"page":"1408","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Revision-Free Survival After MUTARS Total Knee Reconstruction in Limb Salvage Surgery: Primary Implantation Versus Conversion"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"18","author":[{"given":"Fabian","family":"Hille","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedics and Tumororthopedics, University Hospital M\u00fcnster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jan Christoph","family":"Theil","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedics and Tumororthopedics, University Hospital M\u00fcnster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Georg","family":"Gosheger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedics and Tumororthopedics, University Hospital M\u00fcnster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tymoteusz","family":"Budny","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedics and Tumororthopedics, University Hospital M\u00fcnster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marieke de","family":"Vaal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedics and Tumororthopedics, University Hospital M\u00fcnster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anna Maria","family":"Rachbauer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedics and Tumororthopedics, University Hospital M\u00fcnster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5186-2060","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Niklas","family":"Deventer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedics and Tumororthopedics, University Hospital M\u00fcnster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"418","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.J.00834","article-title":"Failure mode classification for tumor endoprostheses: Retrospective review of five institutions and a literature review","volume":"93","author":"Henderson","year":"2011","journal-title":"J. Bone Jt. Surg."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"899","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-021-06474-2","article-title":"Revision TKA with a distal femoral replacement is at high risk of reinfection after two-stage exchange for periprosthetic knee joint infection","volume":"30","author":"Theil","year":"2022","journal-title":"Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Theil, C., Schwarze, J., Gosheger, G., Moellenbeck, B., Schneider, K.N., Deventer, N., Klingebiel, S., Grammatopoulos, G., Boettner, F., and Schmidt-Braekling, T. (2022). Implant survival, clinical outcome and complications of megaprosthetic reconstructions following sarcoma resection. Cancers, 14.","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers14020351"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.11.005","article-title":"Survival, failure modes and function of combined distal femur and proximal tibia reconstruction following tumor resection","volume":"43","author":"Sevelda","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur. J. Surg. Oncol."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10732748221099219","DOI":"10.1177\/10732748221099219","article-title":"Application and development of megaprostheses in limb salvage for bone tumors around the knee joint","volume":"29","author":"Zhang","year":"2022","journal-title":"Cancer Control"},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1097\/01.blo.0000223978.36831.39","article-title":"Endoprosthetic reconstruction in 250 patients with sarcoma","volume":"450","author":"Gosheger","year":"2006","journal-title":"Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1265","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.F.01324","article-title":"Endoprosthetic reconstruction for the treatment of musculoskeletal tumors of the appendicular skeleton and pelvis","volume":"90","author":"Jeys","year":"2008","journal-title":"J. Bone Jt. Surg."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.98B6.37417","article-title":"Very long-term outcomes after endoprosthetic replacement","volume":"98","author":"Grimer","year":"2016","journal-title":"Bone Jt. J."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1285","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200606000-00016","article-title":"Survival of total knee replacement with a megaprosthesis after bone tumor resection","volume":"88","author":"Biau","year":"2006","journal-title":"J. Bone Jt. Surg."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"384","DOI":"10.2174\/1874325001408010384","article-title":"Use of megaprostheses for reconstruction of large skeletal defects","volume":"8","author":"Gkavardina","year":"2014","journal-title":"Open Orthop. J."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1757-7861.2011.00161.x","article-title":"Prosthesis reconstruction techniques in malignant tumors around the knee","volume":"4","author":"Hu","year":"2012","journal-title":"Orthop. Surg."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e743","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-D-20-01052","article-title":"Megaprostheses in Nononcologic Hip and Knee Revision Arthroplasty","volume":"29","author":"Melnic","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1177\/107327481101800303","article-title":"Advances in segmental endoprosthetic reconstruction","volume":"18","author":"Palumbo","year":"2011","journal-title":"Cancer Control"},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S371","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2022.02.103","article-title":"Comparison of Different Strategies in Revision Arthroplasty of the Knee with Severe Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes","volume":"37","author":"Byttebier","year":"2022","journal-title":"J. Arthroplast."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1073","DOI":"10.1302\/2058-5241.6.210007","article-title":"Management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: Therapeutic options and results","volume":"6","year":"2021","journal-title":"EFORT Open Rev."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"780","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200704000-00012","article-title":"Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030","volume":"89","author":"Kurtz","year":"2007","journal-title":"J. Bone Jt. Surg."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.96B11.34380","article-title":"The multiply-operated total knee replacement patient: Salvage options","volume":"96","author":"Haidukewych","year":"2014","journal-title":"Bone Jt. J."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1688","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.23.01196","article-title":"3D-Printed Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties: Excellent Survivorship of 740 Cones at 5 Years","volume":"106","author":"Carender","year":"2024","journal-title":"J. Bone Jt. Surg."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1425","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.95B10.31740","article-title":"Endoprosthetic replacement after extra-articular resection of bone and soft-tissue tumours around the knee","volume":"95","author":"Hardes","year":"2013","journal-title":"Bone Jt. J."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e70647","DOI":"10.1002\/jeo2.70647","article-title":"Limb salvage in multiple revision total knee arthroplasty using customised implants: When sleeves and cones are no longer an option","volume":"13","author":"Donner","year":"2026","journal-title":"J. Exp. Orthop."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"891","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-014-3699-2","article-title":"Survival of modern knee tumor megaprostheses","volume":"473","author":"Pala","year":"2015","journal-title":"Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res."},{"key":"ref_22","first-page":"141","article-title":"Management of Bone Loss in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: An International Consensus Symposium","volume":"20","author":"Sculco","year":"2024","journal-title":"HSS J. Musculoskelet. J. Hosp. Spec. Surg."},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"522","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.101B5.BJJ-2018-1106.R1","article-title":"Mechanisms of failure and survival of total femoral endoprosthetic replacements","volume":"101","author":"Medellin","year":"2019","journal-title":"Bone Jt. J."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Toepfer, A., Harrasser, N., Schwarz, P.R., Pohlig, F., Lenze, U., M\u00fchlhofer, H.M.L., Gerdesmeyer, L., von Eisenhart-Rothe, R., and Suren, C. (2017). Distal femoral replacement with the MML system: A single center experience with an average follow-up of 86 months. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 18.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-017-1570-9"},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"812","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-014-3655-1","article-title":"What are the functional outcomes of endoprosthestic reconstructions after tumor resection?","volume":"473","author":"Bernthal","year":"2015","journal-title":"Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res."},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1089\/sur.2014.085","article-title":"Infected Prostheses after Lower-Extremity Bone Tumor Resection: Clinical Outcomes of 100 Patients","volume":"16","author":"Mavrogenis","year":"2015","journal-title":"Surg. Infect."},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1275","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2017.10.051","article-title":"Implant Survival and Complication Profiles of Endoprostheses for Treating Tumor Around the Knee in Adults: A Systematic Review of the Literature Over the Past 30 Years","volume":"33","author":"Haijie","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Arthroplast."},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1632","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.89B12.19481","article-title":"The long-term results of endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia for bone tumours","volume":"89","author":"Myers","year":"2007","journal-title":"J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. Vol."},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14232","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-024-64573-9","article-title":"Cox proportional hazards regression in small studies","volume":"14","author":"Nguyen","year":"2024","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1186\/s12933-024-02302-2","article-title":"Limitations of using COX proportional hazards model in cardiovascular research","volume":"23","author":"Jiang","year":"2024","journal-title":"Cardiovasc. Diabetol."}],"container-title":["Cancers"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2072-6694\/18\/9\/1408\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,1]],"date-time":"2026-05-01T04:15:17Z","timestamp":1777608917000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2072-6694\/18\/9\/1408"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]}},"alternative-id":["cancers18091408"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/cancers18091408","relation":{},"ISSN":["2072-6694"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2072-6694","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]]}}}