{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]],"date-time":"2026-07-30T09:15:15Z","timestamp":1785402915474,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]],"date-time":"2026-07-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1785369600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Children"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Background\/Objectives: To determine user-reported comfort, function, and overall satisfaction among pediatric lower limb amputees with conventional prosthetic devices and to identify possible factors associated with overall satisfaction. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted at three tertiary orthotic and prosthetic centers in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Caregiver\u2013child dyads completed a structured questionnaire evaluating perceived prosthetic comfort, functionality, and satisfaction. There were fifty-two unilateral pediatric lower limb amputees aged 4\u201317 years who had used conventional prosthetic appliances for at least one year. Questionnaire responses were summarized using descriptive statistics. Spearman\u2019s rank correlation and non-parametric tests were used to examine associations among study variables. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors independently associated with overall satisfaction. Results: Mean comfort was 3.54 (SD = 0.87), functionality satisfaction was 3.42 (SD = 0.78), and overall satisfaction was 2.73 (SD = 0.79). Comfort had strong correlations with functionality (\u03c1 = 0.63, p &lt; 0.001) and overall satisfaction (\u03c1 = 0.69, p &lt; 0.001). The satisfaction difference between congenital and acquired amputations was statistically significant (p = 0.006), with those with congenital amputation reporting substantially greater satisfaction than those with acquired amputation. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that perceived prosthetic functionality (\u03b2 = 0.383, p &lt; 0.001) and comfort (\u03b2 = \u22120.535, p &lt; 0.001) were independently associated with overall satisfaction. Conclusions: Perceived comfort and prosthetic functionality were independently associated with overall satisfaction among pediatric users of conventional prosthetic devices. These findings support patient-centered prosthetic design and rehabilitation strategies that prioritize socket comfort and functional performance to improve children\u2019s overall satisfaction with their prosthetic devices.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/children13081013","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]],"date-time":"2026-07-30T08:09:42Z","timestamp":1785398982000},"page":"1013","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["User-Reported Comfort, Functionality, and Satisfaction Among Pediatric Lower Limb Amputees Using Conventional Prosthetic Devices: A Multi-Center Cross-Sectional Study"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"13","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0007-4670-7019","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Siphosethu","family":"Mgwili-Qikani","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha 5100, South Africa"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6485-2059","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Guillermo Alfredo Pulido","family":"Estrada","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha 5100, South Africa"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3295-2933","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Constance Rufaro","family":"Sewani-Rusike","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha 5100, South Africa"},{"name":"School of Human Biology, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha 5100, South Africa"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","unstructured":"Seymour, R. (2002). Prosthetics and Orthotics: Lower Limb and Spinal, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins."},{"key":"ref_2","first-page":"27536351251384354","article-title":"Impact of physical growth and development on paediatric lower-limb prosthetic provision: Prosthetist Perspectives and Clinical Casefile Analysis from Cambodia","volume":"14","author":"Ghidini","year":"2025","journal-title":"Adv. Rehabil. Sci. Pract."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"168","DOI":"10.55275\/JPOSNA-2020-168","article-title":"Essentials of pediatric prosthetics","volume":"2","author":"Hall","year":"2020","journal-title":"JPOSNA"},{"key":"ref_4","unstructured":"World Health Organization (2017). Standards for Prosthetics and Orthotics, World Health Organization. Available online: https:\/\/www.who.int\/publications\/i\/item\/9789241512480."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"723","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2003.06.002","article-title":"Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and related services","volume":"85","author":"Pezzin","year":"2004","journal-title":"Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"977","DOI":"10.1097\/PHM.0b013e3181587f6c","article-title":"Upper-limb prosthetics: Critical factors in device abandonment","volume":"86","author":"Biddiss","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Edgar, C.E., Ghidini, C., Heang, T., Favier, C.D., Gerrand, C., Furtado, S., Mayhew, E., Kheng, S., Abu-Sittah, G., and Bull, A.M.J. (2024). Listening to children with lower limb loss: Rationale, design, and protocol for delivery of a novel globally applicable research toolkit\u2014Prosthetic user needs, quality of life, pain, and physical function. PLoS ONE, 19.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0310848"},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"422","DOI":"10.1097\/PXR.0000000000000285","article-title":"Prosthetic device and service satisfaction, quality of life, and functional performance in lower limb prosthesis users","volume":"48","author":"DadeMatthews","year":"2023","journal-title":"Prosthet. Orthot. Int."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Magnusson, L., and Ahlstr\u00f6m, G. (2017). Patients\u2019 satisfaction with prosthetic and orthotic devices and service delivery in Sierra Leone and Malawi. BMC Health Serv. Res., 17.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-017-2044-3"},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.21300\/18.2-3.2016.115","article-title":"Interventions to manage residual limb ulceration due to prosthetic use in individuals with lower extremity amputation: A systematic review of the literature","volume":"18","author":"Highsmith","year":"2016","journal-title":"Technol. Innov."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"384","DOI":"10.1177\/0309364620969226","article-title":"Lower limb prosthetic interfaces: Clinical and technological advancement and potential future direction","volume":"44","author":"Safari","year":"2020","journal-title":"Prosthet. Orthot. Int."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vila, C.B., Stella, G.M., Pauciulo, F., Tofani, M., Delia, C., Canzano, L., Luttazi, P., Cerretani, C., and Bella, G.D. (2025). Prosthetic devices for adaptive sport in pediatrics: A narrative review. Appl. Sci., 15.","DOI":"10.3390\/app15179652"},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Roy, S., Mathew-Steiner, S.S., and Sen, C.K. (2019). Residual limb health and prosthetics. Prosthesis, IntechOpen.","DOI":"10.5772\/intechopen.83819"},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1343","DOI":"10.1017\/pds.2021.134","article-title":"Eliciting children\u2019s expectations for hand prostheses through generative design tools","volume":"Volume 1","author":"Dursun","year":"2021","journal-title":"Proceedings of the Design Society"},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"320","DOI":"10.1097\/PXR.0000000000000308","article-title":"Lived experience of children with lower-limb loss who used a prosthesis: A qualitative study","volume":"48","author":"Chami","year":"2023","journal-title":"Prosthet. Orthot. Int."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1186\/s12984-022-01097-1","article-title":"A review of user needs to drive the development of lower limb prostheses","volume":"19","author":"Manz","year":"2022","journal-title":"J. Neuroeng. Rehabil."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.3109\/03093649909071640","article-title":"A survey of function in children with lower limb deficiencies","volume":"23","author":"Vannah","year":"1999","journal-title":"Prosthet. Orthot. Int."},{"key":"ref_18","first-page":"V1","article-title":"Evaluation of human factors for the user-centred design of powered robotic transfemoral prostheses: A Survey of Transfemoral Amputee Experience and Priorities","volume":"2","author":"Fanciullacci","year":"2020","journal-title":"Res. Sq."},{"key":"ref_19","first-page":"147","article-title":"Clinical outcomes measurement in pediatric lower limb prosthetics: A scoping review","volume":"17","author":"Koenig","year":"2024","journal-title":"J. Pediatr. Rehabil. Med."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"166","DOI":"10.3109\/03093640903584993","article-title":"Age at first prosthetic fitting and later functional outcome in Children and Young Adults with Unilateral Congenital Below-Elbow Deficiency","volume":"34","author":"Huizing","year":"2010","journal-title":"Prosthet. Orthot. Int."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.1080\/03093640008726548","article-title":"Positive meaning in amputation and thoughts about the amputated limb","volume":"24","author":"Gallagher","year":"2000","journal-title":"Prosthet. Orthot. Int."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"747","DOI":"10.1016\/S0003-9993(02)04932-8","article-title":"Epidemiology of limb loss and congenital limb deficiency: A review of the literature","volume":"84","author":"Ephraim","year":"2003","journal-title":"Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil."},{"key":"ref_23","unstructured":"Esquenazi, A., and Yoo, S.K. (2026, April 07). Lower Limb Amputations: Epidemiology and Assessment. PM&R KnowledgeNow 2016. Available online: https:\/\/now.aapmr.org."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1080\/03093640500199703","article-title":"Demography and function of children with limb loss","volume":"29","author":"Bayar","year":"2005","journal-title":"Prosthet. Orthot. Int."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.21300\/18.2-3.2016.99","article-title":"Gait training interventions for lower extremity amputees: A systematic literature review","volume":"18","author":"Highsmith","year":"2016","journal-title":"Technol. Innov."},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2005.07.310","article-title":"The effects of prosthetic foot design on physiologic measurements, self-selected walking velocity, and physical activity in people with transtibial amputation","volume":"87","author":"Hsu","year":"2006","journal-title":"Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil."},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14203","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-020-70828-y","article-title":"Perceptual correlates of successful body\u2013prosthesis interaction in lower-limb amputees: Psychometric characterisation and development of the Prosthesis Embodiment Scale","volume":"10","year":"2020","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.1177\/0309364617736089","article-title":"Mobility analysis of amputees","volume":"42","author":"Wurdeman","year":"2018","journal-title":"Prosthet. Orthot. Int."},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1017\/S0266462317000836","article-title":"Participatory design of paediatric upper limb prostheses: Qualitative methods and prototyping","volume":"33","author":"Sims","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care"},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ostler, C., Dickinson, A., Metcalf, C., and Donovan-Hall, M. (2024). Development of the ECLIPSE model of meaningful outcome domains following lower limb amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation, through systematic review and best fit framework synthesis. PLoS ONE, 19.","DOI":"10.1101\/2024.01.28.24301892"},{"key":"ref_31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2085","DOI":"10.3109\/09638288.2012.671885","article-title":"Developing consensus on important factors associated with lower limb prosthetic prescription and use","volume":"34","author":"Schaffalitzky","year":"2012","journal-title":"Disabil. Rehabil."}],"container-title":["Children"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2227-9067\/13\/8\/1013\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]],"date-time":"2026-07-30T08:45:51Z","timestamp":1785401151000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2227-9067\/13\/8\/1013"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]}},"alternative-id":["children13081013"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/children13081013","relation":{},"ISSN":["2227-9067"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2227-9067","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,30]]}}}