{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T01:46:19Z","timestamp":1760147179766,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,11]],"date-time":"2023-01-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1673395200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Diagnostics"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Backgrounds: To compare keratometry (Ks and Kf), astigmatism (Ast.), and the astigmatism axes (Ax.) of the posterior surface of the cornea; the total, central cornea thickness (CCT); and the thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) measured using two different measurement methods. Methods: Patients qualified for cataract surgery at the Chair and Clinical Department of Ophthalmology, Division of Medical Science in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland, were included in the study and monitored with the following two devices: OCT-CASIA2 and Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer GalileiG6. Our work was a randomized, prospective study in which compliance with the agreement of measurements between the devices was evaluated using the Bland\u2013Altman method. Results: A total of 110 patients (62 females and 48 males) were examined. Overall, 100 eyes of patients that qualified for cataract surgery were enrolled in the study. No statistically significant difference was observed for Total-Ks and Total-Kf. A significant difference was observable for the following parameters: total Ks-ax, total Kf-ax, the total power of astigmatism, and in all parameters of the part of the cornea and corneal thickness (CCT and TCT). Conclusions: The measurements obtained using Casia2 and the Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer GalileiG6 were significantly different and not interchangeable except for total Ks and Kf.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics13020267","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,11]],"date-time":"2023-01-11T02:59:54Z","timestamp":1673405994000},"page":"267","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Comparative Analysis of Corneal Parameters Performed with GalileiG6 and OCT Casia 2"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"13","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0400-7261","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Robert","family":"Mazur","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Chair and Clinical Department of Ophthalmology, Division of Medical Science in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7295-4936","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Adam","family":"Wyl\u0119ga\u0142a","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Pathophysiology Department, School of Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6707-5790","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Edward","family":"Wyl\u0119ga\u0142a","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Chair and Clinical Department of Ophthalmology, Division of Medical Science in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8768-1691","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Dariusz","family":"Dobrowolski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Chair and Clinical Department of Ophthalmology, Division of Medical Science in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1245","DOI":"10.1080\/17434440.2021.2012448","article-title":"Comparative analysis of measurements of the anterior segment and the axial length parameters of the eyeball obtained with optical and ultrasound technique","volume":"18","author":"Mazur","year":"2021","journal-title":"Expert Rev. Med. Devices"},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"777443","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2022.777443","article-title":"Agreement of Anterior Segment Parameter Measurements with CASIA 2 and IOLMaster 700","volume":"9","author":"Ruan","year":"2022","journal-title":"Front. Med."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"419","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2005.12.139","article-title":"Prediction of the effective postoperative (intraocular lens) anterior chamber depth","volume":"32","author":"Olsen","year":"2006","journal-title":"J. Cataract. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"472","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-3768.2007.00879.x","article-title":"Calculation of intraocular lens power: A review","volume":"85","author":"Olsen","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol. Scand."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3602","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-07696-1","article-title":"Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GalileiG6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION","volume":"12","author":"Wanichwecharungruang","year":"2022","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1516395","DOI":"10.1155\/2017\/1516395","article-title":"Comparison of Repeatability and Agreement between Swept-Source Optical Biometry and Dual-Scheimpflug Topography","volume":"2017","author":"Jung","year":"2017","journal-title":"J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14440","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-020-71192-7","article-title":"Repeatability, reproducibility, and comparison of ocular biometry using a new optical coherence tomography-based system and another device","volume":"10","author":"Bolek","year":"2020","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7630","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.13-13135","article-title":"Comparisons of Choroidal Thickness of Normal Eyes Obtained by Two Different Spectral-Domain OCT Instruments and One Swept-Source OCT Instrument","volume":"54","author":"Matsuo","year":"2013","journal-title":"Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"502","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20101210-02","article-title":"Comparison of Corneal Tomography Measurements Using Galilei, Orbscan II, and Placido Disk\u2013based Topographer Systems","volume":"27","author":"Karimian","year":"2011","journal-title":"J. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0000000000000799","article-title":"Comparison of Two Optical Biometers","volume":"93","author":"Shin","year":"2016","journal-title":"Optom. Vis. Sci."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"774640","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2021.774640","article-title":"Lens Biometry in Congenital Lens Deformities: A Swept-Source Anterior Segment OCT Analysis","volume":"8","author":"Chen","year":"2021","journal-title":"Front. Med."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1244","DOI":"10.18240\/ijo.2020.08.10","article-title":"Agreement of corneal curvature and central corneal thickness obtained from a swept-source OCT and Pentacam in ectopia lentis patients","volume":"13","author":"Jin","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wyl\u0119ga\u0142a, A., Mazur, R., Bolek, B., and Wyl\u0119ga\u0142a, E. (2020). Reproducibility, and repeatability of corneal topography measured by Revo NX, GalileiG6 and Casia 2 in normal eyes. PLoS ONE, 15.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0230589"},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.21037\/atm-20-187","article-title":"Comparison of a new anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Oculus Pentacam for measurement of anterior chamber depth and corneal thickness","volume":"8","author":"Li","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ann. Transl. Med."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1177\/096228029900800205","article-title":"Modelling method comparison data","volume":"8","author":"Dunn","year":"1999","journal-title":"Stat. Methods Med. Res."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1186\/s40662-020-00197-0","article-title":"The precision and agreement of corneal thickness and keratometry measurements with SS-OCT versus Scheimpflug imaging","volume":"7","author":"Zhao","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eye Vis."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2011.10.027","article-title":"Reliability and repeatability of swept-source Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus","volume":"38","author":"Szalai","year":"2012","journal-title":"J. Cataract. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"866","DOI":"10.1080\/02713683.2018.1461910","article-title":"Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Standard Ultrasound Pachymetry, Corneal Topography, Tono-Pachymetry and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography","volume":"43","year":"2018","journal-title":"Curr. Eye Res."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e488","DOI":"10.1111\/aos.12622","article-title":"Comparative analysis of corneal measurements obtained from a Scheimpflug camera and an integrated Placido-optical coherence tomography device in normal and keratoconic eyes","volume":"93","author":"Viswanathan","year":"2015","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"310","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.08.038","article-title":"Pachymetric measurements with a new Scheimpflug photography\u2013based system","volume":"37","author":"Milla","year":"2011","journal-title":"J. Cataract. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20100121-08","article-title":"Central Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber Depth, and Pupil Diameter Measurements Using Visante OCT, Orbscan, and Pentacam","volume":"26","author":"Yazici","year":"2010","journal-title":"J. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"937","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2006.01.063","article-title":"Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements by Rotating Scheimpflug Camera, Ultrasonic Pachymetry, and Scanning-Slit Corneal Topography","volume":"113","author":"Amano","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1018","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2014.08.040","article-title":"Comparison of dual rotating Scheimpflug\u2013Placido, swept-source optical coherence tomography, and Placido\u2013scanning-slit systems","volume":"41","author":"Lee","year":"2015","journal-title":"J. Cataract. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2013.01.029","article-title":"Comparison and Repeatability of Keratometric and Corneal Power Measurements Obtained by Orbscan II, Pentacam, and Galilei Corneal Tomography Systems","volume":"156","author":"Crawford","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2016.12.003","article-title":"Repeatability and Agreement of Orbscan II, Pentacam HR, and Galilei Tomography Systems in Corneas with Keratoconus","volume":"175","author":"JMeyer","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2387","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2015.05.028","article-title":"Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients","volume":"41","author":"Goebels","year":"2015","journal-title":"J. Cataract. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"749","DOI":"10.1111\/ceo.13760","article-title":"Total keratometry in intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with previous laser refractive surgery","volume":"48","author":"Lawless","year":"2020","journal-title":"Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1097\/00055735-200302000-00008","article-title":"Cataract surgery in patients with prior refractive surgery","volume":"14","author":"Hamilton","year":"2003","journal-title":"Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sjopt.2011.11.002","article-title":"Axial length measurement techniques in pediatric eyes with cataract","volume":"26","author":"Wilson","year":"2012","journal-title":"Saudi J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oh, R., Oh, J.Y., Choi, H.J., Kim, M.K., and Yoon, C.H. (2021). Comparison of ocular biometric measurements in patients with cataract using three swept-source optical coherence tomography devices. BMC Ophthalmol., 21.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-021-01826-5"},{"key":"ref_31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1196","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0000000000001785","article-title":"Agreement and Repeatability of Corneal Thickness and Radius among Three Different Corneal Measurement Devices","volume":"98","author":"Biswas","year":"2021","journal-title":"Optom. Vis. Sci."},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e486","DOI":"10.1111\/aos.13298","article-title":"Comparison of corneal measurements in keratoconus using swept-source optical coherence tomography and combined Placido-Scheimpflug imaging","volume":"95","author":"Chan","year":"2017","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_33","first-page":"1092","article-title":"Reliabilit\u00e4t der Hornhauttomographie nach Implantation von intrakornealen Ringsegmenten bei Keratokonus","volume":"117","author":"Matar","year":"2020","journal-title":"Der Ophthalmol."}],"container-title":["Diagnostics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2075-4418\/13\/2\/267\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]],"date-time":"2025-10-10T18:06:37Z","timestamp":1760119597000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2075-4418\/13\/2\/267"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,11]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,1]]}},"alternative-id":["diagnostics13020267"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/diagnostics13020267","relation":{},"ISSN":["2075-4418"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2075-4418"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,11]]}}}