{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T05:19:30Z","timestamp":1791350370313,"version":"4.3.1"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"20","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,17]],"date-time":"2024-10-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1729123200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"Key Clinical Innovation Program of Peking University Third Hospital","award":["Y65495-05"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["Y65495-05"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Diagnostics"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a novel shape index, the Pentacam Random Forest Index (PRFI), in detecting keratoconus (KC), specifically subclinical keratoconus, in Chinese refractive surgery candidates. Methods: This prospective cohort study included 856 participants who were divided into four groups based on their tomographic outcomes: the KC group (n = 137), the very asymmetric ectasia (VAE) group (n = 73), the normal cornea group (n = 363) and the tomographically suspected KC (TSK) group (n = 283). The diagnostic performance of PRFI and other widely used indices, including the shape index BAD-D and the combined index TBI, was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and compared using DeLong\u2019s test. The area under the curve (AUC), best cutoff values, and Youden index for each parameter are reported. Additionally, the false-positive rates of BAD-D and PRFI were calculated and compared in \u201cnormal corneas\u201d. Results: All shape and biomechanical parameters collected in this study were found to be significantly different among the four groups (KC, VAE, TSK, and normal groups; p = 0.000). The AUC of PRFI was the highest in detecting any form of KC (including clinical KC eyes and VAE-NT eyes) in Chinese refractive surgery candidates, outperforming the widely used shape index BAD-D (0.919 vs. 0.890, p &lt; 0.001). There was no significant difference in performance between the PRFI and the combined TBI index (0.919 vs. 0.916, p &gt; 0.05). For detecting subclinical KC eyes (i.e., VAE-NT), the AUC of PRFI was 0.774, which was statistically comparable to TBI (0.774 vs. 0.776, p &gt; 0.05), while outperforming BAD-D (0.774 vs. 0.684, p &lt; 0.001). The best cutoff values of PRFI for detecting any KC and VAE-NT eyes were determined to be 0.37 and 0.27, respectively. Additionally, PRFI demonstrated a lower false-positive rate than BAD-D (13.8% vs. 43.8%, p &lt; 0.001). Notably, the relatively high false-positive rate of BAD-D observed in this study might be attributed to the smaller horizontal corneal diameter in tomographically suspected eyes. Conclusions: The PRFI proved to be a superior shape index compared to BAD-D in detecting any form of keratoconus, including subclinical cases, in Chinese refractive surgery candidates. This finding may be attributed to the relatively small corneas commonly observed in Asians.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics14202304","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,17]],"date-time":"2024-10-17T03:49:34Z","timestamp":1729136974000},"page":"2304","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["The Role of Pentacam Random Forest Index in Detecting Subclinical Keratoconus in a Chinese Cohort"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"14","author":[{"given":"Yan","family":"Liu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China"},{"name":"Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yu","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China"},{"name":"Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yuexin","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China"},{"name":"Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ruilan","family":"Dong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China"},{"name":"Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2720-7135","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yueguo","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China"},{"name":"Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0000000000002781","article-title":"Keratoconus: Diagnosis and Staging","volume":"41","author":"Belin","year":"2022","journal-title":"Cornea"},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1016\/j.optom.2019.11.001","article-title":"A review of corneal imaging methods for the early diagnosis of pre-clinical Keratoconus","volume":"13","author":"Masiwa","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Optom."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1080\/02713683.2022.2041042","article-title":"Biomechanics in Keratoconus Diagnosis","volume":"48","author":"Esporcatte","year":"2022","journal-title":"Curr. Eye Res."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101559","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clae.2021.101559","article-title":"Keratoconus: An updated review","volume":"45","author":"Carracedo","year":"2022","journal-title":"Contact Lens Anterior Eye"},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2021.01.012","article-title":"Analysis of OPD-Scan and Pentacam Parameters for Early Keratoconus Detection","volume":"226","author":"Donoso","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2831","DOI":"10.4103\/ijo.IJO_2078_20","article-title":"ABCD: A new classification for keratoconus","volume":"68","author":"Belin","year":"2020","journal-title":"Indian J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1016\/j.zemedi.2015.11.001","article-title":"Detection of ectatic corneal diseases based on pentacam","volume":"26","author":"Lopes","year":"2016","journal-title":"Z. Med. Phys."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2017.06.031","article-title":"Keratoconus screening indices and their Diagnostic ability to Distinguish Normal from Ectatic Corneas","volume":"181","author":"Shetty","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joco.2016.01.009","article-title":"Pentacam top indices for diagnosing subclinical and definite keratoconus","volume":"28","author":"Hashemi","year":"2016","journal-title":"J. Curr. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1177\/1120672118760146","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas","volume":"28","author":"Huseynli","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-021-01806-9","article-title":"The possible causes for tomography suspect Keratoconus in a Chinese cohort","volume":"21","author":"Feng","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMC Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_12","first-page":"761","article-title":"The influence of different corneal diameters on Belin\/Ambr\u00f3sio enhanced ectasia display of Pentacam corneal topography","volume":"56","author":"Cao","year":"2020","journal-title":"Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi"},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2532","DOI":"10.1177\/11206721221081467","article-title":"The false positive rates for detecting keratoconus and potential ectatic corneal conditions when evaluating astigmatic eyes with Scheimpflug Technology","volume":"32","author":"Henriquez","year":"2022","journal-title":"Eur. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1080\/09286586.2020.1741010","article-title":"Topometric and Tomographic Evaluation of Subclinical Keratoconus","volume":"27","author":"Koc","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Epidemiol."},{"key":"ref_15","first-page":"177","article-title":"Pentacam\u00ae Corneal Tomography for Screening of Refractive Surgery Candidates: A Review of the Literature, Part I","volume":"8","author":"Motlagh","year":"2019","journal-title":"Med. Hypothesis Discov. Innov. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2018.08.005","article-title":"Enhanced Tomographic Assessment to Detect Corneal Ectasia Based on Artificial Intelligence","volume":"195","author":"Lopes","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_17","first-page":"81","article-title":"The rapid development and changes of corneal refractive surgery in China","volume":"56","author":"Wang","year":"2020","journal-title":"Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi"},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"288","DOI":"10.1097\/ICU.0000000000000662","article-title":"Risk factors for postlaser refractive surgery corneal ectasia","volume":"31","author":"Jin","year":"2020","journal-title":"Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"400","DOI":"10.3928\/1081-597X-19891101-10","article-title":"Computer assisted corneal topography in keratoconus","volume":"5","author":"Rabinowitz","year":"1989","journal-title":"Refract. Corneal Surg."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-021-02102-2","article-title":"Application of a scheimpflug-based biomechanical analyser and tomography in the early detection of subclinical keratoconus in chinese patients","volume":"21","author":"Liu","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMC Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"434","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20170426-02","article-title":"Integration of Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Assessments for Enhancing Ectasia Detection","volume":"33","author":"Lopes","year":"2017","journal-title":"J. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1097\/ICU.0000000000000383","article-title":"Risk profiles of ectasia after keratorefractive surgery","volume":"28","author":"Giri","year":"2017","journal-title":"Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1523","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2019.07.037","article-title":"Posterior elevation as a risk factor for corneal ectasia after small-incision lenticule extraction","volume":"45","author":"Kymionis","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Cataract Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0000000000000408","article-title":"Global consensus on keratoconus and ectatic diseases","volume":"34","author":"Gomes","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cornea"},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20190417-01","article-title":"Detection of Subclinical Corneal Ectasia Using Corneal Tomographic and Biomechanical Assessments in a Japanese Population","volume":"35","author":"Koh","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Salom\u00e3o, M.Q., Hofling-Lima, A.L., Gomes Esporcatte, L.P., Lopes, B., Vinciguerra, R., Vinciguerra, P., B\u00fchren, J., Sena, N., Luz Hilgert, G.S., and Ambr\u00f3sio, R. (2020). The Role of Corneal Biomechanics for the Evaluation of Ectasia Patients. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph17062113"},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1168","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000946","article-title":"Novel artificial intelligence index based on Scheimpflug corneal tomography to distinguish subclinical keratoconus from healthy corneas","volume":"48","author":"Guido","year":"2022","journal-title":"J. Cataract Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"374","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20220414-02","article-title":"Combining Spectral-Domain OCT and Air-Puff Tonometry Analysis to Diagnose Keratoconus","volume":"38","author":"Lu","year":"2022","journal-title":"J. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.18240\/ijo.2021.02.08","article-title":"Evaluation of corneal topographic, tomographic and biomechanical indices for detecting clinical and subclinical keratoconus: A comprehensive three-device study","volume":"14","author":"Heidari","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"671","DOI":"10.1080\/08820538.2021.1896752","article-title":"Comparison of the morphological and biomechanical characteristics of keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and normal corneas","volume":"36","author":"Guo","year":"2021","journal-title":"Semin. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"616","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20180705-02","article-title":"Comparison of Corneal Tomography and a New Combined Tomographic Biomechanical Index in Subclinical Keratoconus","volume":"34","author":"Chan","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1080\/08820538.2018.1539183","article-title":"Incidence and Clinical Characteristics of Post LASIK Ectasia: A Review of over 30,000 LASIK Cases","volume":"33","author":"Bohac","year":"2018","journal-title":"Semin. Ophthalmol."}],"container-title":["Diagnostics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2075-4418\/14\/20\/2304\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]],"date-time":"2025-10-10T16:14:51Z","timestamp":1760112891000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2075-4418\/14\/20\/2304"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,17]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"20","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,10]]}},"alternative-id":["diagnostics14202304"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/diagnostics14202304","relation":{},"ISSN":["2075-4418"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2075-4418","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,17]]}}}