{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,2]],"date-time":"2026-01-02T17:24:00Z","timestamp":1767374640201,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":46,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"20","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,21]],"date-time":"2025-10-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1761004800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005866","name":"Far Eastern Memorial Hospital","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["FEMH-2025-C-053"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["FEMH-2025-C-053"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005866","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Diagnostics"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Background\/Objectives: When transitioning from an older surgical technique to a newer one, we expect improved treatment outcomes and fewer complications. However, direct comparative studies to confirm these advantages are often lacking. Tubular minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MISTLIF) has been widely used, but limitations in visualization and endplate preparation may compromise fusion quality. Biportal endoscopic TLIF (BETLIF), a more recent alternative, offers enhanced magnification and superior hemostasis. Still, CT-based comparative data on fusion integrity remain limited. To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes following a chronological transition from MISTLIF to BETLIF, using thin-slice CT to assess fusion integrity. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 179 patients treated by a single surgeon between January 2018 and May 2021. The first 90 cases underwent MISTLIF, followed by 89 BETLIF procedures. Clinical outcomes included Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores. Radiological assessments at one year postoperatively (X-ray and thin-slice CT) included disc height, segmental lordosis, Bridwell fusion grade, cage subsidence, and subchondral osteolysis. Results: BETLIF was associated with significantly shorter hospital stays (5.7 vs. 7.4 days) and fewer transfusions (0% vs. 14.7%). BETLIF showed significantly better ODI (12.7 vs. 23.5), JOA scores (26.4 vs. 20.6), and comparable VAS improvement. Radiologically, BETLIF had significantly higher fusion rates (93.3% vs. 82.4%), greater disc height restoration, and lower rates of cage subsidence (5.0% vs. 13.7%) and osteolysis (13.3% vs. 52.9%). Conclusions: BETLIF demonstrated superior clinical and radiological outcomes, likely due to enhanced endoscopic visualization and precise endplate preparation.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics15202652","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,21]],"date-time":"2025-10-21T14:24:02Z","timestamp":1761056642000},"page":"2652","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Improved Clinical and Radiological Outcomes with Double-Cage Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparative CT-Based Study"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"15","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2626-1044","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yu-Hao","family":"Huang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 22060, Taiwan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2000-5146","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jwo-Luen","family":"Pao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 22060, Taiwan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"479","DOI":"10.14245\/ns.2244122.061","article-title":"History and Evolution of the Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion","volume":"19","author":"Prabhu","year":"2022","journal-title":"Neurospine"},{"key":"ref_2","first-page":"499","article-title":"Advances in minimally invasive spine surgery","volume":"49","author":"Foley","year":"2002","journal-title":"Clin. Neurosurg."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"151S","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568219882346","article-title":"Defining the MIS-TLIF: A Systematic Review of Techniques and Technologies Used by Surgeons Worldwide","volume":"10","author":"Lener","year":"2020","journal-title":"Global Spine J."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1137","DOI":"10.1007\/s00701-017-3078-3","article-title":"Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A technical description and review of the literature","volume":"159","author":"Vazan","year":"2017","journal-title":"Acta Neurochir."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-D-15-00756","article-title":"Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Traditional Open Versus Minimally Invasive Techniques","volume":"26","author":"Lee","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"446","DOI":"10.3340\/jkns.2024.0197","article-title":"Assessment of Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Inclinatory Foraminotomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study","volume":"68","author":"Song","year":"2025","journal-title":"J. Korean Neurosurg. Soc."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.31616\/asj.2024.0171","article-title":"Endoscopic surgery for multilevel spinal stenosis: A comprehensive meta-analysis and subgroup analysis of uniportal and biportal approaches","volume":"19","year":"2025","journal-title":"Asian Spine J."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2637","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-023-07701-9","article-title":"Clinical outcomes and complications after biportal endoscopic spine surgery: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of 3673 cases","volume":"32","author":"Park","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur. Spine J."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"438","DOI":"10.21037\/jss.2020.03.08","article-title":"Unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis","volume":"6","author":"Pao","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Spine Surg."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.14245\/ns.2346036.018","article-title":"Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Double Cages: Surgical Techniques and Treatment Outcomes","volume":"20","author":"Pao","year":"2023","journal-title":"Neurospine"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2066","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.06.013","article-title":"Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique","volume":"21","author":"Kang","year":"2021","journal-title":"Spine J."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"396","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2020.10.033","article-title":"Clinical Results and Complications of Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Meta-Analysis","volume":"145","author":"Heo","year":"2021","journal-title":"World Neurosurg."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"V15","DOI":"10.3171\/2024.1.FOCVID23231","article-title":"Biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a large cage for degenerative spondylolisthesis with stenosis","volume":"10","author":"Heo","year":"2024","journal-title":"Neurosurg. Focus Video"},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.14245\/ns.2346116.058","article-title":"The Use of Dual Direction Expandable Titanium Cage with Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Consideration with Preliminary Results","volume":"20","author":"Park","year":"2023","journal-title":"Neurospine"},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"753","DOI":"10.1007\/s10143-019-01114-3","article-title":"Clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) compared with conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): 1-year follow-up","volume":"42","author":"Park","year":"2019","journal-title":"Neurosurg. Rev."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E18","DOI":"10.3171\/2019.1.FOCUS18695","article-title":"Clinical results of percutaneous biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion with application of enhanced recovery after surgery","volume":"46","author":"Heo","year":"2019","journal-title":"Neurosurg. Focus"},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yang, H., Cheng, F., Hai, Y., Liu, Y., and Pan, A. (2022). Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion enhanced the recovery of patients with the lumbar degenerative disease compared with the conventional posterior procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Neurol., 13.","DOI":"10.3389\/fneur.2022.1089981"},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nec.2019.08.002","article-title":"Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion","volume":"31","author":"Brusko","year":"2020","journal-title":"Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"624","DOI":"10.4184\/asj.2016.10.4.624","article-title":"Learning Curve Associated with Complications in Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery: Challenges and Strategies","volume":"10","author":"Choi","year":"2016","journal-title":"Asian Spine J."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1007","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.197","article-title":"Learning Curve for Lumbar Decompressive Laminectomy in Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery Using the Cumulative Summation Test for Learning Curve","volume":"122","author":"Park","year":"2019","journal-title":"World Neurosurg."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1719","DOI":"10.1007\/s00234-022-02992-z","article-title":"Successful fusion versus pseudarthrosis after spinal instrumentation: A comprehensive imaging review","volume":"64","author":"Benson","year":"2022","journal-title":"Neuroradiology"},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.4.SPINE14267","article-title":"Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 4: Radiographic assessment of fusion status","volume":"21","author":"Choudhri","year":"2014","journal-title":"J. Neurosurg. Spine"},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e23.00065","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.RVW.23.00065","article-title":"Radiologic Assessment of Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review on the Use, Reliability, and Accuracy of Current Fusion Criteria","volume":"12","author":"Duits","year":"2024","journal-title":"JBJS Rev."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1103","DOI":"10.14444\/8363","article-title":"Subsidence of Spinal Fusion Cages: A Systematic Review","volume":"16","author":"Parisien","year":"2022","journal-title":"Int. J. Spine Surg."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E1197","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31825d26d7","article-title":"Does the formation of vertebral endplate cysts predict nonunion after lumbar interbody fusion?","volume":"37","author":"Fujibayashi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"170","DOI":"10.14245\/ns.2040498.249","article-title":"Vertebral Endplate Cyst Formation in Relation to Properties of Interbody Cages","volume":"18","author":"Sasaki","year":"2021","journal-title":"Neurospine"},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"649","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000003354","article-title":"Severity of Preoperative Myelopathy Symptoms Affects Patient-reported Outcomes, Satisfaction, and Return to Work After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy","volume":"45","author":"Goh","year":"2020","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.12.SPINE10472","article-title":"Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis","volume":"14","author":"Parker","year":"2011","journal-title":"J. Neurosurg. Spine"},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.31616\/asj.2018.0128","article-title":"Sagittal Balance Correction Following Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison of the Three Approaches","volume":"13","author":"Champagne","year":"2019","journal-title":"Asian Spine J."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2017","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2022.08.002","article-title":"Vertebral bone quality score independently predicts cage subsidence following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"22","author":"Soliman","year":"2022","journal-title":"Spine J."},{"key":"ref_31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ackfeld, T., Schmutz, T., Guechi, Y., and Le Terrier, C. (2022). Blood Transfusion Reactions-A Comprehensive Review of the Literature including a Swiss Perspective. J. Clin. Med., 11.","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm11102859"},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S129","DOI":"10.14245\/ns.2040178.089","article-title":"Technique of biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"17","author":"Heo","year":"2020","journal-title":"Neurospine"},{"key":"ref_33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-014-3708-x","article-title":"In vitro comparison of endplate preparation between four mini-open interbody fusion approaches","volume":"24","author":"Tatsumi","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur. Spine J."},{"key":"ref_34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1097\/CORR.0000000000001915","article-title":"Poor Bone Quality, Multilevel Surgery, and Narrow and Tall Cages Are Associated with Intraoperative Endplate Injuries and Late-onset Cage Subsidence in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review","volume":"480","author":"Wu","year":"2022","journal-title":"Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res."},{"key":"ref_35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E1279","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000003557","article-title":"Risk Factors of Cage Subsidence in Patients Received Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion","volume":"45","author":"Yao","year":"2020","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"ref_36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.3171\/2024.4.SPINE231007","article-title":"Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion subsidence: Computed tomography analysis of incidence, associated risk factors, and impact on outcomes","volume":"41","author":"Levy","year":"2024","journal-title":"J. Neurosurg. Spine"},{"key":"ref_37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhao, L., Xie, T., Wang, X., Yang, Z., Pu, X., Lu, Y., and Zeng, J. (2022). Clinical and radiological evaluation of cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral fixation. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 23.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-022-05165-4"},{"key":"ref_38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Han, Z., Ma, C., Li, B., Ren, B., Liu, J., Huang, Y., Qiao, L., and Mao, K. (2022). Biomechanical studies of different numbers and positions of cage implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: A finite element analysis. Front. Surg., 9.","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2022.1011808"},{"key":"ref_39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-022-03091-8","article-title":"Influence of the geometric and material properties of lumbar endplate on lumbar interbody fusion failure: A systematic review","volume":"17","author":"Yu","year":"2022","journal-title":"J. Orthop. Surg. Res."},{"key":"ref_40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000003194","article-title":"Does Lumbar Interbody Cage Size Influence Subsidence? A Biomechanical Study","volume":"45","author":"Yuan","year":"2020","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"ref_41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"796","DOI":"10.3171\/2020.5.SPINE20360","article-title":"Impact of sufficient contact between the autograft and endplate soon after surgery to prevent nonunion at 12 months following posterior lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"33","author":"Ushirozako","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Neurosurg. Spine"},{"key":"ref_42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0041-1726107","article-title":"\u201cPin Method\u201d for Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion","volume":"83","author":"Huang","year":"2022","journal-title":"J. Neurol. Surg. Cent. Eur. Neurosurg."},{"key":"ref_43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e311","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2022.04.093","article-title":"The Impact of Surgical Approach on Sagittal Plane Alignment in Patients Undergoing One- or Two-Level Fusions for Degenerative Pathology: A Multicenter Radiographic Evaluation 6 Months Following Surgery","volume":"164","author":"Leveque","year":"2022","journal-title":"World Neurosurg."},{"key":"ref_44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hu, Y.H., Niu, C.C., Hsieh, M.K., Tsai, T.T., Chen, W.J., and Lai, P.L. (2019). Cage positioning as a risk factor for posterior cage migration following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion\u2014An analysis of 953 cases. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 20.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-019-2630-0"},{"key":"ref_45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2588","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-015-3899-9","article-title":"Restoration of lumbopelvic sagittal alignment and its maintenance following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): Comparison between straight type versus curvilinear type cage","volume":"24","author":"Kim","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur. Spine J."},{"key":"ref_46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1327","DOI":"10.1111\/os.14071","article-title":"Effects of Cage Implantation Depth on Sagittal Parameters and Functional Outcomes in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of L4\u2013L5 Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis","volume":"16","author":"Deng","year":"2024","journal-title":"Orthop. Surg."}],"container-title":["Diagnostics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2075-4418\/15\/20\/2652\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,21]],"date-time":"2025-10-21T14:38:36Z","timestamp":1761057516000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2075-4418\/15\/20\/2652"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,21]]},"references-count":46,"journal-issue":{"issue":"20","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,10]]}},"alternative-id":["diagnostics15202652"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/diagnostics15202652","relation":{},"ISSN":["2075-4418"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2075-4418","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,21]]}}}