{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]],"date-time":"2026-05-26T12:06:05Z","timestamp":1779797165588,"version":"3.53.1"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]],"date-time":"2026-05-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1779753600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Diagnostics"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Background\/Objectives: Lumbar spondylosis is a degenerative disorder that may require decompression and stabilization surgery. Rigid titanium rods provide strong fixation, whereas polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods have been proposed to offer a more flexible load distribution profile. This study compared the radiological outcomes after PEEK versus rigid rod stabilization and evaluated whether the preoperative degenerative findings contributed independently to the postoperative adjacent segment radiological status. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 106 patients undergoing lumbar decompression and posterior stabilization (2020\u20132025) was analyzed. Rod allocation followed routine clinical practice rather than randomization. Radiological parameters (foraminal area, canal diameter, disc height, and facet volume) were measured preoperatively and at one year postoperatively. Baseline-adjusted ANCOVA models with HC3 robust inference compared PEEK and rigid rods across the two-, three-, and four-segment constructs. Additional models assessed the independent effects of preoperative facet effusion and Modic changes. Results: PEEK rods were associated with the statistically reliable preservation of spinal canal diameter, foraminal area, disc height (particularly in the three- and four-segment constructs), and reduced facet joint volume increase compared with rigid rods after multiple-comparison correction. The findings for the two-segment constructs were less consistent and partly influence-sensitive. Preoperative facet effusion and Modic changes showed no statistically reliable independent association with postoperative radiological outcomes after adjustment. Conclusions: PEEK rod systems were associated with favorable baseline-adjusted radiological preservation patterns, especially in long-segment stabilization. These findings should be interpreted as radiological associations rather than proof of clinical superiority or causal reduction in adjacent segment disease, because rod allocation was nonrandom and clinical, and fusion-related outcomes were not assessed.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics16111625","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]],"date-time":"2026-05-26T11:02:51Z","timestamp":1779793371000},"page":"1625","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Radiological Outcomes of PEEK Versus Rigid Rod Stabilization in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery: The Role of Preoperative and Postoperative Findings in Adjacent Segment Disease"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"16","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3475-6474","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Merih Can","family":"Yilmaz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, VM Medical Park Hospital, 55200 Samsun, Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0579-9432","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ozgur","family":"Ozaydin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Economics, Ondokuz May\u0131s University, 55270 Samsun, Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Keramettin","family":"Aydin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, VM Medical Park Hospital, 55200 Samsun, Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","first-page":"1750","article-title":"Lumbar spondylosis","volume":"72","author":"Seichi","year":"2014","journal-title":"Nihon Rinsho"},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Talinga, A.A., Onofrei, R.R., Codreanu, A.-M., Mederle, A.L., Romanescu, V.A., Rezumes, M.-Z., Suciu, O., Korodi, D.-A., and Borza, C. (2026). Neurofunctional Assessments in Lumbar Spondylosis: Outcomes After Rehabilitation Treatment. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol., 11.","DOI":"10.3390\/jfmk11010114"},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cheng, H., Luo, G., Xu, D., Li, Y., Yang, H., Cao, S., and Sun, T. (2024). Decompression alone or fusion in single-level lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis? A systematic review and meta analysis. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 25.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-024-07641-5"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4281","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-024-08495-0","article-title":"Fusion versus decompression alone for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis: A target trial emulation with index trial benchmarking","volume":"33","author":"Unterfrauner","year":"2024","journal-title":"Eur. Spine J."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"705","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-1160.R2","article-title":"Decompression alone or decompression with fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: Five-year clinical results from a randomized clinical trial","volume":"106","author":"Karlsson","year":"2024","journal-title":"Bone Jt. J."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1054","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-022-07507-1","article-title":"Decompression alone versus decompression with fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"32","author":"Gadjradj","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur. Spine J."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vieweg, U., and Grochulla, F. (2023). Manual of Spine Surgery, Springer Nature.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-662-64062-3"},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E7","DOI":"10.3171\/2019.2.FOCUS18726","article-title":"Lumbar canal stenosis: Analyzing the role of stabilization and the futility of decompression as treatment","volume":"46","author":"Goel","year":"2019","journal-title":"Neurosurg. Focus"},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1007\/s10143-016-0763-2","article-title":"Clinical and biomechanical researches of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods for semi-rigid lumbar fusion: A systematic review","volume":"41","author":"Li","year":"2018","journal-title":"Neurosurg. Rev."},{"key":"ref_10","first-page":"676","article-title":"Application of polyetheretherketone rod semi-rigid pedicle screw internal fixation in lumbar non-fusion surgery","volume":"37","author":"Liu","year":"2024","journal-title":"Zhongguo Gu Shang China J. Orthop. Traumatol."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jiang, G., Wang, S., Xu, L., Li, Z., Feng, N., Qiu, Z., Yang, Y., and Yu, X. (2025). Biomechanical effects of screw loosening after lumbar PEEK rod and titanium rod fixation: A finite element analysis. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 13.","DOI":"10.3389\/fbioe.2025.1533088"},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"350","DOI":"10.4103\/jcvjs.jcvjs_63_22","article-title":"Comparison of clinical and radiological results of dynamic and rigid instrumentation in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"13","author":"Varol","year":"2022","journal-title":"J. Craniovertebral Junction Spine"},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-023-03817-2","article-title":"Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods versus titanium rods for posterior lumbar fusion surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"18","author":"Li","year":"2023","journal-title":"J. Orthop. Surg. Res."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Anghel, A.G., Garthmann, J., and Alkahawagi, B. (2025). A PEEK-Based Pedicle Screw System for One-Level Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: An Appraisal at a Five-Year Follow Up. J. Clin. Med., 14.","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm14124252"},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ceddia, M., Lamberti, L., and Trentadue, B. (2025). A Finite Element Study of Simulated Fusion in an L4-L5 Model: Influence of the Combination of Materials in the Screw-and-Rod Fixation System on Reproducing Natural Bone Behavior. Biomimetics, 10.","DOI":"10.3390\/biomimetics10020072"},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nikkhoo, M., Lu, M.-L., Chen, W.-C., Fu, C.-J., Niu, C.-C., Lin, Y.-H., and Cheng, C.-H. (2021). Biomechanical investigation between rigid and semirigid posterolateral fixation during daily activities: Geometrically parametric poroelastic finite element analyses. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 9.","DOI":"10.3389\/fbioe.2021.646079"},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Li, Y.-A., Shih, S.-L., and Chen, H.-C. (2024). A M-PEEK rod system to stabilize spinal motion after graded facetectomy: A finite element study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 25.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-024-07949-2"},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhao, Y., Xu, B., Qi, L., Li, C., Yue, L., Yu, Z., Wang, S., and Sun, H. (2022). Hybrid surgery with PEEK rods for lumbar degenerative diseases: A 2-year follow-up study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 23.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-021-04895-1"},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Huang, W., Wang, W., Xu, X., Wang, L., Wang, J., and Yu, X. (2023). Radiological outcomes of PEEK rods in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases: A minimum 5-year follow-up. Front. Surg., 10.","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2023.1146893"},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.14444\/8034","article-title":"Do PEEK rods for posterior instrumented fusion in the lumbar spine reduce the risk of adjacent segment disease","volume":"15","author":"Hirt","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int. J. Spine Surg."},{"key":"ref_21","first-page":"e85080","article-title":"Rates of Adjacent Segment Disease in Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Rods After Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","volume":"17","author":"Goff","year":"2025","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e6","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2020.09.075","article-title":"Assessment of rod material types in spine surgery outcomes: A systematic review","volume":"146","author":"Mao","year":"2021","journal-title":"World Neurosurg."}],"container-title":["Diagnostics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2075-4418\/16\/11\/1625\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]],"date-time":"2026-05-26T11:20:48Z","timestamp":1779794448000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2075-4418\/16\/11\/1625"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6]]}},"alternative-id":["diagnostics16111625"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/diagnostics16111625","relation":{},"ISSN":["2075-4418"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2075-4418","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]]}}}