{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,19]],"date-time":"2026-08-19T08:27:52Z","timestamp":1787128072445,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"16","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,19]],"date-time":"2026-08-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1787097600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Diagnostics"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Background: Digital intraoral scanners (IOSs) represent one of the key tools in contemporary digital dentistry and are widely applied in prosthodontics, orthodontics, implantology, and treatment monitoring. The aim of this study was to critically analyze the factors affecting the accuracy of intraoral scanning and to evaluate their clinical significance. Methods: This study was designed as a narrative literature review conducted using a structured literature search. The analysis was based on publications retrieved from the PubMed and ScienceDirect databases and published between 2016 and 2026 using keywords related to intraoral scanners, digital impressions, trueness, precision, scanning strategy, operator experience, scanner type, restorative materials, and clinical conditions. Results: Twenty publications selected according to the review scope and eligibility criteria were included. Based on the analysis, four major groups of factors influencing IOS accuracy were identified: scanning strategy, operator experience, scanner type and restorative material, and clinical\/environmental conditions. The available evidence most consistently associated scan quality with the scanner type and the applied scanning strategy, although the effectiveness of individual protocols depended on the specific IOS system used. The influence of operator experience remained inconclusive and appeared to be less significant in modern devices equipped with advanced image reconstruction algorithms. Clinical factors such as lighting conditions, arch morphology, subgingival preparation margins, maneuverability restrictions, and material-related optical properties also played an important role, whereas humidity and moisture control should be interpreted as possible clinical confounders rather than experimentally verified independent factors in the included primary studies. Conclusions: The findings indicate that intraoral scanning accuracy is a multifactorial phenomenon requiring individualized adaptation of the scanning procedure to clinical conditions and the type of IOS system used. Because the included evidence was heterogeneous and did not allow for formal ranking of effect magnitude, conclusions regarding the relative importance of individual factors should be interpreted with caution.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics16162625","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,19]],"date-time":"2026-08-19T07:58:23Z","timestamp":1787126303000},"page":"2625","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Optimizing Digital Impressions: A Review of Factors Affecting Intraoral Scanner Accuracy"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"16","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0000-1347-8538","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gabriela","family":"Czerepak","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Student Research Group at the Digital Dentistry Laboratory, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0007-9146-6357","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Aleksandra","family":"J\u0119dras","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Student Research Group at the Digital Dentistry Laboratory, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0007-6199-4159","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Katarzyna","family":"Bednarz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Student Research Group at the Digital Dentistry Laboratory, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0005-6745-4853","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Weronika","family":"Pociask","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Student Research Group at the Digital Dentistry Laboratory, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0005-6463-3776","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Katarzyna","family":"Gliwa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Student Research Group at the Digital Dentistry Laboratory, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0004-5797-7311","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Weronika","family":"Czajkowska","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Student Research Group at the Digital Dentistry Laboratory, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0008-1500-9020","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Wiktoria","family":"Zowczak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Student Research Group at the Digital Dentistry Laboratory, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1688-4982","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Leszek","family":"Szalewski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Digital Dentistry Laboratory, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mangano, F., Gandolfi, A., Luongo, G., and Logozzo, S. (2017). Intraoral scanners in dentistry: A review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health, 17.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-017-0442-x"},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1349","DOI":"10.1177\/00220345241271937","article-title":"Recent advances in intraoral scanners","volume":"103","author":"Eggmann","year":"2024","journal-title":"J. Dent. Res."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Christopoulou, I., Kaklamanos, E.G., Makrygiannakis, M.A., Bitsanis, I., Perlea, P., and Tsolakis, A.I. (2022). Intraoral scanners in orthodontics: A critical review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph19031407"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1186\/s40729-024-00543-0","article-title":"A systematic review of factors impacting intraoral scanning accuracy in implant dentistry with emphasis on scan bodies","volume":"10","author":"Gehrke","year":"2024","journal-title":"Int. J. Implant Dent."},{"key":"ref_5","first-page":"101","article-title":"Accuracy of intraoral scanners: A systematic review of influencing factors","volume":"26","author":"Abduo","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur. J. Prosthodont. Restor. Dent."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alkadi, L. (2023). A comprehensive review of factors that influence the accuracy of intraoral scanners. Diagnostics, 13.","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics13213291"},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1111\/jerd.12985","article-title":"A guide for maximizing the accuracy of intraoral digital scans. Part 1: Operator factors","volume":"35","author":"Kois","year":"2023","journal-title":"J. Esthet. Restor. Dent."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fratila, A.M., Saceleanu, A., Arcas, V.C., Fratila, N., and Earar, K. (2025). Enhancing intraoral scanning accuracy: From the influencing factors to a procedural guideline. J. Clin. Med., 14.","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm14103562"},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Giuliodori, G., Rappelli, G., and Aquilanti, L. (2023). Intraoral scans of full dental arches: An in vitro measurement study of the accuracy of different intraoral scanners. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 20.","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph20064776"},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105433","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2024.105433","article-title":"Evaluation of the accuracy of digital impressions with different scanning strategies: An in vitro study","volume":"151","author":"Ortensi","year":"2024","journal-title":"J. Dent."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105782","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2025.105782","article-title":"Effect of implant scan body type, intraoral scanner and scan strategy on the accuracy and scanning time of maxillary complete-arch implant scans: An in vitro study","volume":"159","author":"Grande","year":"2025","journal-title":"J. Dent."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R\u0103u\u021b\u0103, S.-A., Vasilescu, V.G., Ciocan, L.T., Popa, A., \u021a\u00e2ncu, A.-M.C., Froimovici, F.O., Dimitriu, B., Pi\u021buru, S.-M., and Imre, M. (2026). In vitro accuracy analysis of intraoral scanning strategies: A comparison of two contemporary IOS systems. Dent. J., 14.","DOI":"10.3390\/dj14010052"},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"466","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jds.2023.09.009","article-title":"Accuracy comparison of scan segmental sequential ranges with two intraoral scanners for maxilla and mandible","volume":"19","author":"Liu","year":"2024","journal-title":"J. Dent. Sci."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"747","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jds.2022.12.006","article-title":"Accuracy of intraoral scanning methods for maxillary Kennedy class I arch","volume":"18","author":"Chang","year":"2023","journal-title":"J. Dent. Sci."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"462","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2025.03.022","article-title":"Impact of operator experience, scanning pattern, and arch location on the time and trueness of complete denture digitization using an intraoral scanner","volume":"134","author":"Sawangsri","year":"2025","journal-title":"J. Prosthet. Dent."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.4274\/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0220","article-title":"Influence of operator experience on scanning time and accuracy with two different intraoral scanners: A prospective clinical trial","volume":"36","author":"Thomas","year":"2023","journal-title":"Turk. J. Orthod."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"620","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jds.2024.11.009","article-title":"Influence of operator experience on the complete-arch accuracy and time-based efficiency of three intraoral scanners","volume":"20","author":"Lin","year":"2025","journal-title":"J. Dent. Sci."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1839","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-020-03486-z","article-title":"Accuracy of intraoral scanning in completely and partially edentulous maxillary and mandibular jaws: An in vitro analysis","volume":"25","author":"Schimmel","year":"2021","journal-title":"Clin. Oral Investig."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.10.026","article-title":"Influence of intraoral scanner and finish line location on the fabrication trueness and margin quality of additively manufactured laminate veneers fabricated with a completely digital workflow","volume":"131","author":"Chebaro","year":"2024","journal-title":"J. Prosthet. Dent."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104431","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2023.104431","article-title":"The effect of different tooth preparation finishing procedures and immediate dentin sealing on the scanning accuracy of different intraoral scanners","volume":"130","author":"Barmak","year":"2023","journal-title":"J. Dent."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.4103\/jips.jips_190_25","article-title":"Material-dependent trueness of intraoral scanners: A comparative analysis of three scanning technologies for different crowns\u2014An in vitro study","volume":"26","author":"Budati","year":"2026","journal-title":"J. Indian Prosthodont. Soc."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yu, C.M., Lin, W.C., Peng, C.Y., Lee, C.C., and Lin, C.C. (2026). Impact of maneuverability constraints on intraoral scanner performance. Diagnostics, 16.","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics16030501"},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compbiomed.2018.06.035","article-title":"Conformity, reliability and validity of digital dental models created by clinical intraoral scanning and extraoral plaster model digitization workflows","volume":"100","author":"Kirschneck","year":"2018","journal-title":"Comput. Biol. Med."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jds.2023.08.006","article-title":"Trueness of intraoral scanning for different tooth-size arch-length deficiencies","volume":"19","author":"Lin","year":"2024","journal-title":"J. Dent. Sci."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e40477","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heliyon.2024.e40477","article-title":"Accuracy of digital tooth preparations recorded using the plaster model scanning technique and two silicone impression scanning techniques","volume":"10","author":"Shen","year":"2024","journal-title":"Heliyon"},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.10.001","article-title":"Effect of tooth color on the accuracy of intraoral complete arch scanning under different light conditions using a zirconia restoration model","volume":"131","author":"Zhou","year":"2024","journal-title":"J. Prosthet. Dent."},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Guo, Y., Ma, Y., Wang, Z., and Yu, H. (2025). Effects of ambient lighting conditions on the scanning accuracy and shade matching capability of intraoral scanners: An in vitro study. BMC Oral Health, 25.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-025-06446-9"},{"key":"ref_28","first-page":"100046","article-title":"Alignment methods to improve the trueness of digital mandibular models: A clinical study","volume":"2","author":"Reis","year":"2025","journal-title":"Digit. Dent. J."},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cjab027","article-title":"Patient-reported experiences and preferences with intraoral scanners: A systematic review","volume":"44","author":"Christopoulou","year":"2022","journal-title":"Eur. J. Orthod."},{"key":"ref_30","first-page":"217","article-title":"Patients\u2019 perspective on the inclusion of intraoral scanners in routine oral examination: A clinical perception study","volume":"28","year":"2025","journal-title":"Int. J. Comput. Dent."},{"key":"ref_31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cortes, A.R.G., Agius, A.-M., and No-Cortes, J. (2022). Factors Affecting Trueness of Intraoral Scans: An Update. Appl. Sci., 12.","DOI":"10.3390\/app12136675"}],"container-title":["Diagnostics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2075-4418\/16\/16\/2625\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,19]],"date-time":"2026-08-19T08:11:57Z","timestamp":1787127117000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2075-4418\/16\/16\/2625"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,19]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"16","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]}},"alternative-id":["diagnostics16162625"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/diagnostics16162625","relation":{},"ISSN":["2075-4418"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2075-4418","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,19]]}}}