{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,5]],"date-time":"2026-05-05T17:56:57Z","timestamp":1778003817591,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":47,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,3]],"date-time":"2022-01-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1641168000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004442","name":"National Science Centre","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["UMO-2017\/25\/B\/NZ7\/01276"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["UMO-2017\/25\/B\/NZ7\/01276"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004442","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["IJERPH"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Systematic reviews\/meta-analyses (SR\/MAs) are considered a reliable source of information in healthcare. We aimed to explore the association of several characteristics of SR\/MAs addressing nutrition in cancer prevention and their quality\/risk of bias (using assessments from AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS tools). The analysis included 101 SR\/MAs identified in a systematic survey. Associations of each specified characteristic (e.g., information about the protocol, publication year, reported use of GRADE, or other methods for assessing overall certainty of evidence) with the number of AMSTAR-2 not met (\u2018No\u2019 responses) and the number of ROBIS items met (\u2018Probably Yes\u2019 or \u201cYes\u2019 responses) were examined. Poisson regression was used to identify predictors of the number of \u2018No\u2019 answers (indicating lower quality) for all AMSTAR-2 items and the number of \u2018Yes\u2019 or \u2018Probably Yes\u2019 answers (indicating higher quality\/lower concern for bias) for all ROBIS items. Logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with at least one domain assessed as \u2018low concern for bias\u2019 in the ROBIS tool. In multivariable analysis, SR\/MAs not reporting use of any quality\/risk of bias assessment instrument for primary studies were associated with a higher number of \u2018No\u2019 answers for all AMSTAR-2 items (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09\u20131.45), and a lower number of \u2018Yes\u2019 or \u2018Probably Yes\u2019 answers for all ROBIS items (IRR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66\u20130.87). Providing information about the protocol and search for unpublished studies was associated with a lower number of \u2018No\u2019 answers (IRR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56\u20130.97 and IRR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59\u20130.95, respectively) and a higher number of \u2018Yes\u2019 or \u2018Probably Yes\u2019 answers (IRR 1.43, 95% CI 1.17\u20131.74 and IRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.07\u20131.52, respectively). Not using at least one quality\/risk of bias assessment tool for primary studies within an SR\/MA was associated with lower odds that a study would be assessed as \u2018low concern for bias\u2019 in at least one ROBIS domain (odds ratio 0.061, 95% CI 0.007\u20130.527). Adherence to methodological standards in the development of SR\/MAs was associated with a higher overall quality of SR\/MAs addressing nutrition for cancer prevention.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph19010506","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,6]],"date-time":"2022-01-06T03:41:32Z","timestamp":1641440492000},"page":"506","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Predictors of Higher Quality of Systematic Reviews Addressing Nutrition and Cancer Prevention"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"19","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6643-1389","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Dawid","family":"Storman","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Hygiene and Dietetics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-034 Krakow, Poland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Magdalena","family":"Koperny","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-034 Krakow, Poland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7503-5847","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Joanna","family":"Zaj\u0105c","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Hygiene and Dietetics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-034 Krakow, Poland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1290-8692","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maciej","family":"Polak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Epidemiology and Population Studies, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-034 Krakow, Poland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2126-6265","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Paulina","family":"Weglarz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Hygiene and Dietetics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-034 Krakow, Poland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Justyna","family":"Bochenek-Cibor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiation Oncology, St Lukas Hospital, 33-100 Tarn\u00f3w, Poland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5269-664X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mateusz J.","family":"Swierz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Hygiene and Dietetics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-034 Krakow, Poland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Wojciech","family":"Staskiewicz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Students\u2019 Scientific Research Group of Systematic Reviews, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-034 Krakow, Poland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Magdalena","family":"Gorecka","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Students\u2019 Scientific Research Group of Systematic Reviews, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-034 Krakow, Poland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anna","family":"Skuza","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Students\u2019 Scientific Research Group of Systematic Reviews, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-034 Krakow, Poland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Adam A.","family":"Wach","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Students\u2019 Scientific Research Group of Systematic Reviews, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-034 Krakow, Poland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Klaudia","family":"Kaluzinska","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Students\u2019 Scientific Research Group of Systematic Reviews, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-034 Krakow, Poland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1978-7264","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ma\u0142gorzata M.","family":"Ba\u0142a","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Hygiene and Dietetics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-034 Krakow, Poland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-0009.12210","article-title":"The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analyses","volume":"94","author":"Ioannidis","year":"2016","journal-title":"Milbank Q."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-017-0468-4","article-title":"What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences","volume":"18","author":"Munn","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMC Med. Res. Methodol."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1590\/1982-0275201936e180144","article-title":"Guidelines for conducting and publishing systematic reviews in Psychology","volume":"36","author":"Carvalho","year":"2019","journal-title":"Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"413","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.13130273","article-title":"Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: Have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement?","volume":"269","author":"Tunis","year":"2013","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2824","DOI":"10.1080\/21645515.2019.1631567","article-title":"Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage using AMSTAR and ROBIS checklists","volume":"15","author":"Jaca","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hum. Vaccines Immunother."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1111\/jgh.13591","article-title":"Quality of meta-analyses in major leading gastroenterology and hepatology journals: A systematic review","volume":"32","author":"Liu","year":"2017","journal-title":"J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2017.08.009","article-title":"Quality of meta-analyses in major leading orthopedics journals: A systematic review","volume":"103","author":"Zhi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"852","DOI":"10.1177\/1753193417712660","article-title":"Methodological quality and reporting of systematic reviews in hand and wrist pathology","volume":"42","author":"Wasiak","year":"2017","journal-title":"J. Hand Surg. Eur. Vol."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-017-0527-2","article-title":"Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality","volume":"6","author":"Pussegoda","year":"2017","journal-title":"Syst. Rev."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-017-0507-6","article-title":"Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: A descriptive study","volume":"6","author":"Pussegoda","year":"2017","journal-title":"Syst. Rev."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1111\/jebm.12141","article-title":"The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: A systematic review","volume":"8","author":"Zeng","year":"2015","journal-title":"J. Evid. Based. Med."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1578","DOI":"10.1093\/ajcn\/nqab002","article-title":"Characteristics and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational nutritional epidemiology: A cross-sectional study","volume":"113","author":"Zeraatkar","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am. J. Clin. Nutr."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shea, B.J., Grimshaw, J.M., Wells, G.A., Boers, M., Andersson, N., Hamel, C., Porter, A.C., Tugwell, P., Moher, D., and Bouter, L.M. (2007). Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 7.","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-7-10"},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"j4008","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.j4008","article-title":"AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both","volume":"358","author":"Shea","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005","article-title":"ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed","volume":"69","author":"Whiting","year":"2016","journal-title":"J. Clin. Epidemiol."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.2147\/JMDH.S155103","article-title":"Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years?\u2014A systematic review of reviews: An update","volume":"11","author":"Jin","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Multidiscip. Healthc."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zajac, J., Storman, D., Swierz, M.J., Koperny, M., Weglarz, P., Staskiewicz, W., Gorecka, M., Skuza, A., Wach, A., and Kaluzinska, K. (2021). Are systematic reviews addressing nutrition for cancer prevention trustworthy? A systematic survey of quality and risk of bias. Nutr. Rev., nuab093.","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph19010506"},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1530\/EJE-16-0172","article-title":"Epidemiological characteristics and methodological quality of meta-analyses on diabetes mellitus treatment: A systematic review","volume":"175","author":"Wu","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur. J. Endocrinol."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e77","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.L.00597","article-title":"Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature","volume":"95","author":"Gagnier","year":"2013","journal-title":"J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14102","DOI":"10.1038\/npjpcrm.2014.102","article-title":"Methodological quality of metaanalyses on treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A cross-sectional study using the AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) tool","volume":"25","author":"Ho","year":"2015","journal-title":"NPJ Prim. Care Respir. Med."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Xu, C., Cheng, L.L., Liu, Y., Jia, P.L., Gao, M.Y., and Zhang, C. (2019). Protocol registration or development may benefit the design, conduct and reporting of dose-response meta-analysis: Empirical evidence from a literature survey. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 19.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-019-0715-y"},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"544","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cjaa074","article-title":"Methodological quality and risk of bias in orthodontic systematic reviews using AMSTAR and ROBIS","volume":"43","author":"Hooper","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur. J. Orthod."},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e12994","DOI":"10.1111\/obr.12994","article-title":"The quality of systematic reviews\/meta-analyses published in the field of bariatrics: A cross-sectional systematic survey using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS","volume":"21","author":"Storman","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obes. Rev."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1111\/jnu.12462","article-title":"Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions in patients with Alzheimer\u2019s disease: General implications of the findings","volume":"51","author":"Sun","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Nurs. Scholarsh."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ge, L., Wang, J.C., Li, J.L., Liang, L., An, N., Shi, X.T., Liu, Y.C., and Tian, J.H. (2014). The assessment of the quality of reporting of systematic reviews\/meta-analyses in diagnostic tests published by authors in China. PLoS ONE, 9.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0085908"},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2018.01.003","article-title":"Registration in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) of systematic review protocols was associated with increased review quality","volume":"100","author":"Sideri","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Clin. Epidemiol."},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-020-01094-9","article-title":"Protocol registration issues of systematic review and meta-analysis studies: A survey of global researchers","volume":"20","author":"Tawfik","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMC Med. Res. Methodol."},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1007\/s00432-019-02869-4","article-title":"An overview on the methodological and reporting quality of dose\u2013response meta-analysis on cancer prevention","volume":"145","author":"Xu","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol."},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e036349","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2019-036349","article-title":"Methodological quality of meta-analyses indexed in PsycINFO: Leads for enhancements: A meta-epidemiological study","volume":"10","author":"Leclercq","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1633","DOI":"10.1111\/bjd.15380","article-title":"Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on psoriasis: Role of funding sources, conflict of interest and bibliometric indices as predictors of methodological quality","volume":"176","author":"Ruano","year":"2017","journal-title":"Br. J. Dermatol."},{"key":"ref_31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3868057","DOI":"10.1155\/2020\/3868057","article-title":"A methodological and reporting quality assessment of systematic reviews\/meta-analyses about Chinese medical treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease","volume":"2020","author":"Lyu","year":"2020","journal-title":"Gastroenterol. Res. Pract."},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"754","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2014.01.002","article-title":"Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality","volume":"67","author":"Fleming","year":"2014","journal-title":"J. Clin. Epidemiol."},{"key":"ref_33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101434","DOI":"10.1016\/j.smrv.2021.101434","article-title":"Methodological issues of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the field of sleep medicine: A meta-epidemiological study","volume":"57","author":"Xu","year":"2021","journal-title":"Sleep Med. Rev."},{"key":"ref_34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.2147\/CLEP.S78879","article-title":"Systematic reviews with language restrictions and no author contact have lower overall credibility: A methodology study","volume":"7","author":"Wang","year":"2015","journal-title":"Clin. Epidemiol."},{"key":"ref_35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1678","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vaccine.2014.01.060","article-title":"Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination","volume":"32","author":"Remschmidt","year":"2014","journal-title":"Vaccine"},{"key":"ref_36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"h4962","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h4962","article-title":"The scientific report guiding the US dietary guidelines: Is it scientific?","volume":"351","author":"Teicholz","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref_37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Johnston, B.C., Alonso-Coello, P., Bala, M.M., Zeraatkar, D., Rabassa, M., Valli, C., Marshall, C., El Dib, R., Vernooij, R.W.M., and Vandvik, P.O. (2018). Methods for trustworthy nutritional recommendations NutriRECS (Nutritional Recommendations and accessible Evidence summaries Composed of Systematic reviews): A protocol. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 18.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-018-0621-8"},{"key":"ref_38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-nutr-082018-124610","article-title":"Evidence collection and evaluation for the development of dietary guidelines and public policy on nutrition","volume":"39","author":"Zeraatkar","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ann. Rev. Nutr."},{"key":"ref_39","first-page":"1","article-title":"Food-based dietary guidelines in Spain: An assessment of their methodological quality","volume":"1","author":"Rabassa","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur. J. Clin. Nutr."},{"key":"ref_40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2018.11.007","article-title":"The methodological quality of dose-response meta-analyses needed substantial improvement: A cross-sectional survey and proposed recommendations","volume":"107","author":"Xu","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Clin. Epidemiol."},{"key":"ref_41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e04776","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heliyon.2020.e04776","article-title":"The methodological quality of systematic reviews on the treatment of adult major depression needs improvement according to AMSTAR 2: A cross-sectional study","volume":"6","author":"Matthias","year":"2020","journal-title":"Heliyon"},{"key":"ref_42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Liu, D., Jin, J., Tian, J., and Yang, K. (2015). Quality assessment and factor analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of endoscopic ultrasound diagnosis. PLoS ONE, 10.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0120911"},{"key":"ref_43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1017\/S2045796017000208","article-title":"Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: A cross-sectional study","volume":"27","author":"Chung","year":"2018","journal-title":"Epidemiol. Psychiatr. Sci."},{"key":"ref_44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2016.12.004","article-title":"The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar","volume":"85","author":"Tian","year":"2017","journal-title":"J. Clin. Epidemiol."},{"key":"ref_45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/2046-4053-3-58","article-title":"Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in \u201cevidence-based\u201d Chinese journals","volume":"3","author":"Li","year":"2014","journal-title":"Syst. Rev."},{"key":"ref_46","first-page":"925","article-title":"The quality of evidence on nutrition intervention published in Chinese journals: An assessment of meta-analyses on vitamin interventions","volume":"27","author":"Ning","year":"2018","journal-title":"Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr."},{"key":"ref_47","unstructured":"Bala, M., Storman, D., Koperny, M., Zajac, J., Tobola, P., and Swierz, M. (2021, October 08). Characteristics, Methodological Quality and Risk of Bias in Studies Published as Systematic Reviews or Meta-Analyses on the Effects of Nutritional\/Dietary Interventions in Cancer Prevention\u2014A Systematic Methodological Survey. Available online: https:\/\/www.crd.york.ac.uk\/prospero\/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019121116."}],"container-title":["International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1660-4601\/19\/1\/506\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,13]],"date-time":"2025-10-13T13:26:50Z","timestamp":1760362010000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1660-4601\/19\/1\/506"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,3]]},"references-count":47,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]}},"alternative-id":["ijerph19010506"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ijerph19010506","relation":{},"ISSN":["1660-4601"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1660-4601","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,3]]}}}