{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T00:29:28Z","timestamp":1790728168684,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,29]],"date-time":"2024-03-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1711670400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["IJERPH"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Social surveys are conducted to determine how annoyed people are in a certain noise situation. The results are typically presented as exposure\u2013response curves showing the percentage of the area population that are highly annoyed as a function of the noise exposure level. It is a well-known fact that the survey results are not only dependent on the accumulated noise exposure, DNL, DENL, or similar, but also on various other factors such as maximum levels, exposure patterns, noise spectra, etc. A re-analysis of previously reported surveys shows that the results are also, to a large extent, dependent on survey-specific factors like the wording of the annoyance questions, how the questionnaires are presented, response scales, methods of scoring highly annoyed, etc. This paper discusses and quantifies the influence of such factors and suggests ways of comparing results from surveys that have been conducted according to different protocols and different analysis methods.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph21040420","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,31]],"date-time":"2024-03-31T13:42:30Z","timestamp":1711892550000},"page":"420","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Measuring Community Response to Noise\u2014Factors Affecting the Results of Annoyance Surveys"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"21","author":[{"given":"Truls","family":"Gjestland","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"SINTEF Digital, N-7465 Trondheim, Norway"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","unstructured":"Koelega, H.S. (1987, January 15\u201318). Environmental annoyance: Characterization, measurement, and control. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Environmental Annoyance, Woudschoten, The Netherlands."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1121\/1.382013","article-title":"Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance","volume":"64","author":"Schultz","year":"1978","journal-title":"J. Acoust. Soc. Am."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1243","DOI":"10.1121\/1.388333","article-title":"Comments on K. D. Kryter\u2019s paper, \u201cCommunity annoyance from aircraft and ground vehicle noise\u201d","volume":"72","author":"Schultz","year":"1982","journal-title":"J. Acoust. Soc. Am."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1006\/jsvi.2000.3384","article-title":"Standardized noise-reaction questions for community noise surveys: Research and a recommendation","volume":"242","author":"Fields","year":"2001","journal-title":"J. Sound Vib."},{"key":"ref_5","unstructured":"US Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON) (1992). Federal Agency Review of Selected Airport Noise Analysis Issues, US Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON)."},{"key":"ref_6","unstructured":"WHO Europe (2024, February 01). Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region, Available online: https:\/\/iris.who.int\/bitstream\/handle\/10665\/279952\/9789289053563-eng.pdf?sequence=1."},{"key":"ref_7","unstructured":"(2021). Acoustics\u2014Assessment of Noise Annoyance by Means of Social and Socio-Acoustic Surveys (Standard No. ISO\/TS 15666)."},{"key":"ref_8","unstructured":"Yokoshima, S., Yano, T., Kawai, K., Morinaga, M., and Ota, A. (2011, January 4\u20137). Establishment of the socio-acoustic survey data archive at INCE\/J. Proceedings of the INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, Osaka, Japan."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"791","DOI":"10.1121\/1.3605673","article-title":"A first principles model for estimating the prevalence of annoyance with aircraft noise exposure","volume":"130","author":"Fidell","year":"2011","journal-title":"J. Acoust. Soc. Am."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.3813\/AAA.919029","article-title":"On the stability of Community Tolerance to aircraft noise","volume":"13","author":"Gelderblom","year":"2017","journal-title":"Acta Acust. United Acust."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"511","DOI":"10.1121\/10.0001643","article-title":"Recent World Health Organization regulatory recommendations not supported by existing evidence","volume":"148","author":"Gjestland","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Acoust. Soc. Am."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2772","DOI":"10.1121\/1.3688762","article-title":"Role of community tolerance level (CTL) in predicting the prevalence of annoyance from road and rail noise","volume":"131","author":"Schomer","year":"2012","journal-title":"J. Acoust. Soc. Am."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gjestland, T. (2020). On the temporal stability of people\u2019s annoyance with road traffic noise. Int. J. Environ. Res. Pubic Health, 17.","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph17041374"},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1121\/1.400504","article-title":"Updating a dosage-effect relationship for the prevalence of annoyance due to general transportation noise","volume":"89","author":"Fidell","year":"1991","journal-title":"J. Acoust. Soc. Am."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1016\/j.envint.2019.01.043","article-title":"A survey on exposure-response relationships for road, rail, and aircraft noise annoyance. Differences between continuous and intermittent noise","volume":"125","author":"Brink","year":"2019","journal-title":"Environ. Int."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yokoshima, S., Morinaga, M., Tsujimura, S., Shimoyama, K., and Morihara, T. (2021). Representative exposure-annoyance relationships due to transportation noises in Japan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health., 18.","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph182010935"},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3432","DOI":"10.1121\/1.423927","article-title":"Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise","volume":"194","author":"Miedema","year":"1998","journal-title":"J. Acoust. Soc. Am."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Guski, R., Schreckenberg, D., and Sch\u00fcmer, R. (2017). WHO environmental noise guidelines for the European region: A systematic review on environmental noise and annoyance. Int. J. Environ. Res. Pubic Health, 14.","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph14121539"},{"key":"ref_19","unstructured":"(2016). Acoustics\u2014Description, Measurement, and Assessment of Environmental Noise (Standard No. ISO DIS 1996-1)."},{"key":"ref_20","unstructured":"(2021). Quantities and Procedures for Description and Measurement of Environmental Noise, Part 4 (Standard No. ANSI. S12.9-2021)."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.3813\/AAA.919030","article-title":"Prevalence of Noise Induced Annoyance and Its Dependency on Number of Aircraft Movements","volume":"103","author":"Gjestland","year":"2017","journal-title":"Acta Acust. United Acust."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2856","DOI":"10.1121\/10.0010354","article-title":"Effect of alternate definitions of \u201chigh\u201d annoyance on exposure-response functions","volume":"151","author":"Gjestland","year":"2022","journal-title":"J. Acoust. Soc. Am."},{"key":"ref_23","unstructured":"Miller, N., Czech, J., Hellauer, K., Nicholas, B., Lohr, S., Jodts, E., Broene, P., Morganstein, D., Kali, J., and Zhu, X. (2023, December 01). Analysis of the Neighborhood Environmental Survey, Available online: https:\/\/www.airporttech.tc.faa.gov\/Products\/Airport-Safety-Papers-Publications\/Airport-Safety-Detail\/tc-21-4-analysis-of-nes."},{"key":"ref_24","unstructured":"Brink, M. (2014, January 1\u20135). A review of explained variance in exposure-annoyance relationships in noise annoyance surveys. Proceedings of the ICBEN, Nara, Japan."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cantuaria, M.L., and Blanes-Vidal, V. (2019). Self-reported data in environmental health studies: Mail vs. web-based surveys. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 19.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-019-0882-x"},{"key":"ref_26","unstructured":"National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2014). Research Methods for Understanding Aircraft Noise Annoyance and Sleep Disturbance, The National Academies Press."},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3681","DOI":"10.1121\/10.0016591","article-title":"An alternate approach to regulatory analyses of the findings of a 20-airport social survey","volume":"152","author":"Fidell","year":"2022","journal-title":"J. Acoust. Soc. Am."},{"key":"ref_28","unstructured":"Stansfeld, S.A., Berglund, B., Kephalopoulos, S., and Paviotti, M. (2015). Evidence Review on Aircraft Noise and Health, Directorate General Joint Research Center and Directorate General for Environment, European Union."},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1169","DOI":"10.1016\/j.envint.2009.07.012","article-title":"Annoyance due to aircraft noise has increased over the years\u2014Results of the HYENA study","volume":"35","author":"Babisch","year":"2009","journal-title":"Environ. Int."},{"key":"ref_30","unstructured":"Civil Aviation Authority (2018). Aircraft Noise and Annoyance: Recent Findings, CAA. Available online: www.caa.co.uk."},{"key":"ref_31","unstructured":"Eggers, S., Popp, C., Legarth, S.V., Pedersen, T.H., Volk, C.P., Bendtsen, H., and Gjestland, T. Factors moderating people\u2019s subjective reactions to noise\u2014Guidebook on how to reduce noise annoyance. Proceedings of the European Directors of Roads, Copenhagen, Denmark."},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1289\/ehp.01109409","article-title":"Annoyance from transportation noise: Relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals","volume":"109","author":"Miedema","year":"2001","journal-title":"Environ. Health Perspect."},{"key":"ref_33","unstructured":"Yokoshima, S., and Tamura, A. (2002, January 17\u201320). Community response to road traffic noise in living environments. Proceedings of the Forum Acusticum, Sevilla, Spain."},{"key":"ref_34","unstructured":"Gelderblom, F.B., Gjestland, T., Gran\u00f8ien, I.L.N., and Taraldsen, G. (2014, January 16\u201319). The impact of civil versus military aircraft noise on noise annoyance. Proceedings of the INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, Melbourne, VIC, Australia."}],"container-title":["International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1660-4601\/21\/4\/420\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]],"date-time":"2025-10-10T14:21:12Z","timestamp":1760106072000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1660-4601\/21\/4\/420"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,29]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,4]]}},"alternative-id":["ijerph21040420"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ijerph21040420","relation":{},"ISSN":["1660-4601"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1660-4601","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,29]]}}}