{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,12]],"date-time":"2025-10-12T02:21:42Z","timestamp":1760235702086,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"19","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,23]],"date-time":"2021-09-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1632355200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JCM"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Screening programs may be useful to reduce the rate of undetected glaucoma. Compass (CMP, CenterVue, Padova, Italy) Standard Suprathreshold strategy (SST) analyses the visual function at 52 retinal locations. A new Quick Suprathreshold strategy (QST) reduces the number of tested locations to 24. With both tests, the CMP also provides an image of the central retina and a detail of the optic nerve head. The aim of this paper is to measure the performances of SST and QST compared with clinical diagnosis. 63 consecutive healthy subjects and 60 consecutive patients with perimetric defects from glaucoma in both eyes were recruited. They received one test per eye (SST or QST in randomized order); results were classified into normal, suspect and abnormal according to a global index provided in the report and called SupraThreshold Response (STR). Agreement between clinical diagnosis and test output were calculated, and test time was also measured. The agreement with the clinical diagnosis was 95.7% for SST and 95.1% for QST. When two suspect tests were excluded, agreement for QST increased to 96.7%. Test duration was 164 \u00b1 82 s for SST and 71 \u00b1 41 s for QST (p &lt; 0.0001). Such a difference was similar in both glaucoma patients (respectively 231 \u00b1 65 s vs. 105 \u00b1 33 s, p &lt; 0.0001) and normal subjects (98 \u00b1 17 and 39 \u00b1 9 s, p &lt; 0.0001). In conclusion, SST and QST showed similar, high agreement with clinical judgement. Morphological analysis is potentially helpful in further improving the clinical usefulness of suprathreshold tests. QST is characterized by a strong time saving compared with SST.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm10194330","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,23]],"date-time":"2021-09-23T09:59:15Z","timestamp":1632391155000},"page":"4330","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Comparison of Compass Suprathreshold Screening Strategies"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"10","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8183-5365","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Paolo","family":"Fogagnolo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Eye Clinic, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Universit\u00e0 degli Studi, 20143 Milan, Italy"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dario","family":"Romano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Eye Clinic, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Universit\u00e0 degli Studi, 20143 Milan, Italy"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Giovanni","family":"Montesano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Optometry and Visual Sciences, University of London, London EC1 0HB, UK"},{"name":"NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London EC1 0HB, UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Valentino","family":"De Ruvo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Eye Clinic, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Universit\u00e0 degli Studi, 20143 Milan, Italy"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Luca Mario","family":"Rossetti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Eye Clinic, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Universit\u00e0 degli Studi, 20143 Milan, Italy"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.2005.081224","article-title":"The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020","volume":"90","author":"Quigley","year":"2006","journal-title":"Br. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1541","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2013.01.043","article-title":"Prevalence and severity of undetected manifest glaucoma: Results from the early manifest glaucoma trial screening","volume":"120","author":"Heijl","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1245","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.2005.067355","article-title":"Direct costs of glaucoma and severity of the disease: A multinational long term study of resource utilisation in Europe","volume":"89","author":"Traverso","year":"2005","journal-title":"Br. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rossetti, L., Digiuni, M., Giovanni, M., Centofanti, M., Fea, A.M., Iester, M., Frezzotti, P., Figus, M., Ferreras, A., and Oddone, F. (2015). Blindness and Glaucoma: A Multicenter Data Review from 7 Academic Eye Clinics. PLoS ONE, 10.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0136632"},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"627","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0420.2002.800613.x","article-title":"A comparison of glaucoma patients identified through mass screening and in routine clinical practice","volume":"80","author":"Heijl","year":"2002","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol. Scand."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"717","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2009.09.026","article-title":"Clinical assessment of stereoscopic optic disc photographs for glaucoma: The European Optic Disc Assessment Trial","volume":"117","author":"Reus","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"iii-190","DOI":"10.3310\/hta11410","article-title":"The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for open angle glaucoma: A systematic review and economic evaluation","volume":"11","author":"Burr","year":"2007","journal-title":"Health Technol. Assess."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1111\/ceo.13138","article-title":"Evolution of optic nerve photography for glaucoma screening: A review","volume":"46","author":"Myers","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000000822","article-title":"Use of Optical Coherence Tomography by Nonexpert Personnel as a Screening Approach for Glaucoma","volume":"27","author":"Liu","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Glaucoma"},{"key":"ref_10","unstructured":"(2021). European Glaucoma Society Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, Publicomm Editors. [5th ed.]."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"436","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0b013e31815f531d","article-title":"Learning effect of humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry in patients with ocular hypertension","volume":"17","author":"Centofanti","year":"2008","journal-title":"J. Glaucoma"},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1177\/112067210501500205","article-title":"Evaluation of two Humphrey perimetry programs: Full threshold and SITA standard testing strategy for learning effect","volume":"15","author":"Yenice","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e833","DOI":"10.1111\/aos.14069","article-title":"Does eye examination order for standard automated perimetry matter?","volume":"97","author":"Kelly","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.5301\/ejo.5000821","article-title":"Comparison of Compass and Humphrey perimeters in detecting glaucomatous defects","volume":"26","author":"Fogagnolo","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-018-0870-7","article-title":"Evidence for alterations in fixational eye movements in glaucoma","volume":"18","author":"Montesano","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMC Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010","article-title":"A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer","volume":"126","author":"Montesano","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"ref_17","first-page":"1710","article-title":"Effect of fundus tracking on structure-function relationship in glaucoma","volume":"104","author":"Montesano","year":"2020","journal-title":"Br. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rossetti, L., Digiuni, M., Rosso, A., Riva, R., Barbaro, G., Smolek, M.K., Orzalesi, N., De Cilla\u2019, S., Autelitano, A., and Fogagnolo, P. (2015). Compass: Clinical evaluation of a new instrument for the diagnosis of glaucoma. PLoS ONE, 10.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0122157"},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Montesano, G., McKendrick, A.M., Turpin, A., Brusini, P., Oddone, F., Fogagnolo, P., Perdicchi, A., Johnson, C.A., Lanzetta, P., and Rossetti, L.M. (2021). Do Additional Testing Locations Improve the Detection of Macular Perimetric Defects in Glaucoma?. Ophthalmology.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2021.06.012"},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e285","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000001844","article-title":"Agreement Between 10-2 and 24-2C Visual Field Test Protocols for Detecting Glaucomatous Central Visual Field Defects","volume":"30","author":"Chakravarti","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Glaucoma"},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ijg.0000184833.85912.2a","article-title":"Detecting glaucoma with frequency-doubling technology perimetry: A comparison between N-30 and C-20 screening programs","volume":"14","author":"Fogagnolo","year":"2005","journal-title":"J. Glaucoma"},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kim, M.J., Lee, J.H., Park, J.I., Choi, J.Y., Sohn, J., Hwang, H.S., and Hwang, D.D.-J. (2021). Novel utilisation of ultrawide-field fundus photography for detecting retinal nerve fibre layer defects in glaucomatous eyes. Br. J. Ophthalmol.","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2020-318559"},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000001187","article-title":"Screening Glaucoma With Red-free Fundus Photography Using Deep Learning Classifier and Polar Transformation","volume":"28","author":"Lee","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Glaucoma"}],"container-title":["Journal of Clinical Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/10\/19\/4330\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T07:03:50Z","timestamp":1760166230000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/10\/19\/4330"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,23]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"19","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,10]]}},"alternative-id":["jcm10194330"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm10194330","relation":{},"ISSN":["2077-0383"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2077-0383"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,23]]}}}