{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]],"date-time":"2026-10-23T07:35:38Z","timestamp":1792740938667,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,25]],"date-time":"2022-02-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1645747200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JCM"],"abstract":"<jats:p>As most congenital uterine abnormalities are asymptomatic, the majority of them are detected incidentally. While most women with uterine anomalies have a normal reproductive outcome, some may experience adverse reproductive outcomes. Accurate diagnosis and correct classification help in the appropriate counselling of women about their potential reproductive prognosis and risks and for planning any intervention. Evaluation of the internal and external contours of the uterus is the key in making a diagnosis and correctly classifying a uterine anomaly. Considering this, the gold standard test has been the combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy historically, albeit invasive. However, 3D ultrasound has now become the diagnostic modality of choice for uterine anomalies due to its high degree of diagnostic accuracy, less invasive nature and it being comparatively less expensive. While 2D ultrasound and HSG are adequate for screening for uterine anomalies, MRI and combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy are reserved for diagnosing complex Mullerian anomalies. Imaging for renal anomalies is recommended if a uterine anomaly is diagnosed.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm11051251","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,27]],"date-time":"2022-02-27T20:47:17Z","timestamp":1645994837000},"page":"1251","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":50,"title":["Diagnosis of Congenital Uterine Abnormalities: Practical Considerations"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"11","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1466-9376","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kanna","family":"Jayaprakasan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Derby Fertility Unit, Royal Derby Hospital, University of Nottingham, Derby DE22 3DT, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kamal","family":"Ojha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"St. George\u2019s Hospital, London SW17 0QT, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"761","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmr028","article-title":"The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: A systematic review","volume":"17","author":"Chan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod. Update"},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmn018","article-title":"Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: A critical appraisal","volume":"14","author":"Saravelos","year":"2008","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod. Update"},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"899","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(02)03368-X","article-title":"Female genital anomalies affecting reproduction","volume":"78","author":"Lin","year":"2002","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"ref_4","unstructured":"Sadler, T.W. (2012). Langman\u2019s Medical Embryology, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. [12th ed.]."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"(1988). The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil. Steril., 49, 944\u2013955.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)59942-7"},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2032","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det098","article-title":"The ESHRE\/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies","volume":"28","author":"Grimbizis","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1238","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.09.025","article-title":"ASRM mullerian anomalies classification 2021","volume":"116","author":"Pfeifer","year":"2021","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu344","article-title":"Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of Mullerian duct anomalies in everyday practice","volume":"30","author":"Ludwin","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.18923","article-title":"Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME): Better criteria for distinguishing between normal\/arcuate and septate uterus?","volume":"51","author":"Ludwin","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"756","DOI":"10.1007\/s00261-010-9681-x","article-title":"Mullerian duct anomalies: MR imaging","volume":"36","author":"Marcal","year":"2011","journal-title":"Abdom. Imaging"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"727","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8968","article-title":"Prevalence of uterine anomalies and their impact on early pregnancy in women conceiving after assisted reproduction treatment","volume":"37","author":"Jayaprakasan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_12","first-page":"443","article-title":"Congenital uterine anomalies and their impact on fertility","volume":"6","author":"Hassan","year":"2010","journal-title":"Womens Health"},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2008-1076141","article-title":"Congenital malformations of the uterus: The role of ultrasound","volume":"26","author":"Puscheck","year":"2008","journal-title":"Semin. Reprod. Med."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.127","article-title":"Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies","volume":"21","author":"Salim","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"600","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey043","article-title":"ESHRE\/ESGE female genital tract anomalies classification system-the potential impact of discarding arcuate uterus on clinical practice","volume":"33","author":"Knez","year":"2018","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15968","article-title":"Reproductive Implications and Management of Congenital Uterine Anomalies: Scientific Impact Paper No. 62 November 2019","volume":"127","author":"Akhtar","year":"2020","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref_17","first-page":"188","article-title":"Assessment of the uterus with three-dimensional ultrasound in women undergoing ART","volume":"23","author":"Saravelos","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod. Update"},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dev264","article-title":"The Thessaloniki ESHRE\/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies","volume":"31","author":"Grimbizis","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"ref_19","unstructured":"(2016). Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Uterine septum: A guideline. Fertil. Steril., 106, 530\u2013540."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E233","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.326125515","article-title":"Imaging of mullerian duct anomalies","volume":"32","author":"Behr","year":"2012","journal-title":"Radiographics"},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"815","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20845","article-title":"Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME): Diagnostic criteria for T-shaped uterus","volume":"55","author":"Ludwin","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"366","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.23108","article-title":"Definition, prevalence, clinical relevance and treatment of T-shaped uterus: Systematic review","volume":"57","author":"Ludwin","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.09.009","article-title":"Distribution of female genital tract anomalies in two classifications","volume":"206","author":"Heinonen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol."}],"container-title":["Journal of Clinical Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/11\/5\/1251\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]],"date-time":"2025-10-10T22:27:19Z","timestamp":1760135239000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/11\/5\/1251"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,25]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]}},"alternative-id":["jcm11051251"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm11051251","relation":{},"ISSN":["2077-0383"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2077-0383","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,25]]}}}