{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,14]],"date-time":"2026-10-14T14:06:53Z","timestamp":1791986813317,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"22","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,15]],"date-time":"2023-11-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1700006400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005626","name":"University of Regensburg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["not known"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["not known"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005626","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JCM"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Objective: Tinnitus assessment and outcome measurement are complex, as tinnitus is a purely subjective phenomenon. Instruments used for the outcome measurement of tinnitus in the context of clinical trials include self-report questionnaires, visual analogue or numeric rating scales and psychoacoustic measurements of tinnitus loudness. For the evaluation of therapeutic interventions, it is critical to know which changes in outcome measurement instruments can be considered as clinically relevant. For this purpose, the concept of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) has been introduced. Study design: Here we performed a literature research in PubMed in order to identify for which tinnitus outcome measurements MCID criteria have been estimated and which of these estimates fulfil the current methodological standards and can thus be considered as established. Results: For most, but not all tinnitus outcome instruments, MCID calculations have been performed. The MCIDs for the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) and visual analogue scales (VAS) vary considerably across studies. Psychoacoustic assessments of tinnitus such as loudness matching have not shown sufficient reliability and validity for the use as an outcome measurement. Conclusion: Future research should aim at the confirmation of the available estimates in large samples involving various therapeutic interventions and under the consideration of time intervals and baseline values. As a rule of thumb, an improvement of about 15% can be considered clinically meaningful, analogous to what has been seen in other entirely subjective pathologies like chronic pain.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm12227117","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,15]],"date-time":"2023-11-15T10:57:46Z","timestamp":1700045866000},"page":"7117","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":44,"title":["Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Tinnitus Outcome Measurement Instruments\u2014A Scoping Review"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"12","author":[{"given":"Berthold","family":"Langguth","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Bezirksklinikum, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dirk","family":"De Ridder","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/bs.pbr.2020.12.002","article-title":"Tinnitus and tinnitus disorder: Theoretical and operational definitions (an international multidisciplinary proposal)","volume":"260","author":"Schlee","year":"2021","journal-title":"Prog. Brain Res."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"270","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-016-1399-9","article-title":"Systematic review of outcome domains and instruments used in clinical trials of tinnitus treatments in adults","volume":"17","author":"Hall","year":"2016","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"525","DOI":"10.1016\/S0079-6123(07)66050-6","article-title":"Consensus for tinnitus patient assessment and treatment outcome measurement: Tinnitus Research Initiative meeting, Regensburg, July 2006","volume":"166","author":"Langguth","year":"2007","journal-title":"Prog. Brain Res."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-021-01659-9","article-title":"Questionnaires in otology: A systematic mapping review","volume":"10","author":"Viergever","year":"2021","journal-title":"Syst. Rev."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1159\/000494021","article-title":"Visual Analogue Scales as a Tool for Initial Assessment of Tinnitus Severity: Psychometric Evaluation in a Clinical Population","volume":"23","author":"Gos","year":"2018","journal-title":"Audiol. Neurotol."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1044\/1059-0889(2012\/12-0010)","article-title":"Psychometric evaluation of Visual Analog Scale for the assessment of chronic tinnitus","volume":"21","author":"Adamchic","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am. J. Audiol."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2018.05.007","article-title":"Minimum clinically important differences in chronic pain vary considerably by baseline pain and methodological factors: Systematic review of empirical studies","volume":"101","author":"Olsen","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Clin. Epidemiol."},{"key":"ref_8","first-page":"4S","article-title":"Defining a clinically meaningful effect for the design and interpretation of randomized controlled trials","volume":"10","author":"Keefe","year":"2013","journal-title":"Innov. Clin. Neurosci."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"887","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008996223999","article-title":"Recommendations on health-related quality of life research to support labeling and promotional claims in the United States","volume":"9","author":"Revicki","year":"2000","journal-title":"Qual. Life Res."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1016\/0021-9681(87)90069-5","article-title":"Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments","volume":"40","author":"Guyatt","year":"1987","journal-title":"J. Chronic Dis."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.4065\/77.4.371","article-title":"Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures","volume":"77","author":"Guyatt","year":"2002","journal-title":"Mayo Clin. Proc."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-020-01344-w","article-title":"How is the minimal clinically important difference established in health-related quality of life instruments? Review of anchors and methods","volume":"18","author":"Mouelhi","year":"2020","journal-title":"Health Qual. Life Outcomes"},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-004-0705-2","article-title":"Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes","volume":"14","author":"Wyrwich","year":"2005","journal-title":"Qual. Life Res."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7525-4-70","article-title":"Responsiveness and minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes","volume":"4","author":"Revicki","year":"2006","journal-title":"Health Qual. Life Outcomes"},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1016\/S0895-4356(03)00044-1","article-title":"Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life","volume":"56","author":"Crosby","year":"2003","journal-title":"J. Clin. Epidemiol."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.3171\/2020.11.SPINE201431","article-title":"Defining minimal clinically important differences in pain and disability outcomes of patients with chronic pain treated with spinal cord stimulation","volume":"35","author":"Sabourin","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Neurosurg. Spine"},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2009.08.010","article-title":"Mind the MIC: Large variation among populations and methods","volume":"63","author":"Terwee","year":"2010","journal-title":"J. Clin. Epidemiol."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012","article-title":"Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes","volume":"61","author":"Revicki","year":"2008","journal-title":"J. Clin. Epidemiol."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rdc.2018.01.011","article-title":"Minimal Clinically Important Difference: A Review of Outcome Measure Score Interpretation","volume":"44","author":"Engel","year":"2018","journal-title":"Rheum. Dis. Clin. N. Am."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"De Vet, H.C.W., Terwee, C.B., Mokkink, L.B., and Knol, D.L. (2011). Measurements in Medicine, Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511996214"},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1186\/s13075-015-0658-6","article-title":"Approaches for estimating minimal clinically important differences in systemic lupus erythematosus","volume":"17","author":"Rai","year":"2015","journal-title":"Arthritis Res. Ther."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"582","DOI":"10.1097\/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C","article-title":"Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation","volume":"41","author":"Norman","year":"2003","journal-title":"Med. Care"},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1179\/2042618612Y.0000000001","article-title":"Clinimetrics corner: A closer look at the minimal clinically important difference (MCID)","volume":"20","author":"Wright","year":"2012","journal-title":"J. Man. Manip. Ther."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2009.01.024","article-title":"The minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference","volume":"63","author":"Turner","year":"2010","journal-title":"J. Clin. Epidemiol."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"804","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2009.12.015","article-title":"The minimal detectable change should not replace the minimal important difference","volume":"63","author":"Terwee","year":"2010","journal-title":"J. Clin. Epidemiol."},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7525-4-54","article-title":"Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: Distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change","volume":"4","author":"Terwee","year":"2006","journal-title":"Health Qual. Life Outcomes"},{"key":"ref_27","first-page":"153","article-title":"Psychometric adequacy of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) for evaluating treatment outcome","volume":"9","author":"Newman","year":"1998","journal-title":"J. Am. Acad. Audiol."},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"282","DOI":"10.1177\/0194599811403882","article-title":"Tinnitus Handicap Inventory for Evaluating Treatment Effects: Which Changes Are Clinically Relevant?","volume":"145","author":"Zeman","year":"2011","journal-title":"Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg."},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7525-10-79","article-title":"Linking the Tinnitus Questionnaire and the subjective Clinical Global Impression: Which differences are clinically important?","volume":"10","author":"Adamchic","year":"2012","journal-title":"Health Qual. Life Outcomes"},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"553","DOI":"10.1080\/14992027.2018.1442591","article-title":"Interpreting the Tinnitus Questionnaire (German version): What individual differences are clinically important?","volume":"57","author":"Hall","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int. J. Audiol."},{"key":"ref_31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1097\/AUD.0b013e31822f67c0","article-title":"The tinnitus functional index: Development of a new clinical measure for chronic, intrusive tinnitus","volume":"32","author":"Meikle","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ear Hear."},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heares.2015.09.009","article-title":"Psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI): Assessment in a UK research volunteer population","volume":"335","author":"Fackrell","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hear. Res."},{"key":"ref_33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.3766\/jaaa.16171","article-title":"Psychometric Validity, Reliability, and Responsiveness of the Tinnitus Functional Index","volume":"29","author":"Chandra","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Am. Acad. Audiol."},{"key":"ref_34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-018-1037-1","article-title":"Clinically important change in tinnitus sensation after stapedotomy","volume":"16","author":"Skarzynski","year":"2018","journal-title":"Health Qual. Life Outcomes"},{"key":"ref_35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fackrell, K., Hall, D.A., Barry, J., and Hoare, D.J. (2022). Integrating Distribution-Based and Anchor-Based Techniques to Identify Minimal Important Change for the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) Questionnaire. Brain Sci., 12.","DOI":"10.3390\/brainsci12060726"},{"key":"ref_36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1044\/2017_AJA-16-0129","article-title":"How to Choose Between Measures of Tinnitus Loudness for Clinical Research? A Report on the Reliability and Validity of an Investigator-Administered Test and a Patient-Reported Measure Using Baseline Data Collected in a Phase IIa Drug Trial","volume":"26","author":"Hall","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am. J. Audiol."},{"key":"ref_37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(86)90837-8","article-title":"Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement","volume":"1","author":"Bland","year":"1986","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"ref_38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-022-02072-z","article-title":"Minimal clinically important difference for the Mandarin version of the Tinnitus Questionnaire determined via anchor-based and distribution-based methods","volume":"20","author":"Gu","year":"2022","journal-title":"Health Qual. Life Outcomes"},{"key":"ref_39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"232","DOI":"10.1044\/2022_AJA-22-00140","article-title":"Tinnitus Screener: Short-Term Test-Retest Reliability","volume":"32","author":"Thielman","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am. J. Audiol."},{"key":"ref_40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.11613\/BM.2012.031","article-title":"Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic","volume":"22","author":"McHugh","year":"2012","journal-title":"Biochem. Med."},{"key":"ref_41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-013-2876-3","article-title":"Changes over time of psychoacoustic outcome measurements are not a substitute for subjective outcome measurements in acute tinnitus","volume":"272","author":"Rabau","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol."},{"key":"ref_42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Boecking, B., Brueggemann, P., Kleinjung, T., and Mazurek, B. (2021). All for One and One for All?\u2014Examining Convergent Validity and Responsiveness of the German Versions of the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), and Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI). Front. Psychol., 12.","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2021.596037"},{"key":"ref_43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1016\/0378-5955(87)90054-2","article-title":"The analogy between tinnitus and pain: A suggestion for a physiological basis of chronic tinnitus","volume":"28","author":"Tonndorf","year":"1987","journal-title":"Hear. Res."},{"key":"ref_44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0042-1748038","article-title":"Similarities between severe tinnitus and chronic pain","volume":"11","author":"Moller","year":"2000","journal-title":"J. Am. Acad. Audiol."}],"container-title":["Journal of Clinical Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/12\/22\/7117\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]],"date-time":"2025-10-10T21:23:35Z","timestamp":1760131415000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/12\/22\/7117"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,15]]},"references-count":44,"journal-issue":{"issue":"22","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,11]]}},"alternative-id":["jcm12227117"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm12227117","relation":{},"ISSN":["2077-0383"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2077-0383","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,15]]}}}