{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,31]],"date-time":"2026-07-31T03:45:21Z","timestamp":1785469521372,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"16","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,8]],"date-time":"2024-08-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1723075200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JCM"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Objectives: This study aims to verify the accuracy of a new calculation formula, Barrett true axial length formula (T-AL), and the optimized lens factor (LF) for predicting postoperative refraction after cataract surgery. Methods: We included 156 Japanese patients who underwent cataract surgery using Clareon monofocal intraocular lenses at our clinic between January 2022 and June 2023. Postoperative spherical equivalent was calculated using subjective refraction values obtained 1 month post-surgery. The LFs were optimized so that the mean prediction error (PE) of each calculation formula was zero (zero optimization). We calculated the mean absolute PE (MAE) to assess accuracy and used a Friedman test for statistical comparisons. The accuracy of T-AL and the optimized LFs was compared with that of the conventional Barrett Universal II formula for ARGOS (AR-B) and OA-2000 (OA-B) with equivalent refractive index. Results: For T-AL, AR-B, and OA-B, the MAEs \u00b1 standard deviations were 0.225 \u00b1 0.179, 0.219 \u00b1 0.168, and 0.242 \u00b1 0.206 D, respectively. The Friedman test showed no statistically significant differences among the three groups. The device-optimized LFs were 2.248\u20132.289 (T-AL), 2.236\u20132.246 (AR-B), and 2.07\u20132.08 (OA-B); the corresponding zero-optimized LFs were 2.262\u20132.287 (T-AL), 2.287\u20132.303 (AR-B), and 2.160\u20132.170 (OA-B). Conclusion: There were no significant differences in prediction accuracy among the formulas. However, the accuracy of LF optimization varied by device, with T-AL being closest to the value under zero optimization. This suggests that T-AL is clinically useful for predicting an accurate postoperative refraction without zero optimization.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm13164639","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,8]],"date-time":"2024-08-08T07:01:25Z","timestamp":1723100485000},"page":"4639","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Accuracy Validation of the New Barrett True Axial Length Formula and the Optimized Lens Factor Using Sum-of-Segment Biometry"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"13","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4538-8523","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sumitaka","family":"Miyamoto","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Aira Miyamoto Eye Clinic, Kagoshima 899-5213, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kazutaka","family":"Kamiya","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Visual Physiology, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Kanagawa 252-0373, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1113","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000958","article-title":"Accuracy of newer intraocular lens power formulas in short and long eyes using sum-of-segments biometry","volume":"48","author":"Shammas","year":"2022","journal-title":"J. Cataract. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"810","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000001466","article-title":"Accuracy of new intraocular lens power calculation formula for short and long eyes using segmental refractive indices","volume":"50","author":"Kato","year":"2024","journal-title":"J. Cataract. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3525","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S430535","article-title":"Refractive predictability of a swept source optical coherence tomography biometer in long and short eyes implanted with extended depth of focus intraocular lenses","volume":"17","author":"Blehm","year":"2023","journal-title":"Clin. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1439","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S408685","article-title":"Refractive predictability and biometry agreement of a combined swept source optical coherence and reflectometry biometer compared to an optical low coherence reflectometry biometer and an SS-OCT Biometer","volume":"17","author":"Gjerdrum","year":"2023","journal-title":"Clin. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1159\/000496690","article-title":"Clinical evaluation of a new swept-source optical coherence biometer that uses individual refractive indices to measure axial length in cataract patients","volume":"62","author":"Tamaoki","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Res."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Higashiyama, T., Mori, H., Nakajima, F., and Ohji, M. (2018). Comparison of a new biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a conventional biometer using partial coherence interferometry. PLoS ONE, 13.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0196401"},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Omoto, M.K., Torii, H., Masui, S., Ayaki, M., Tsubota, K., and Negishi, K. (2019). Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices. Sci. Rep., 9.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-019-42968-3"},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yang, C.M., Lim, D.H., Kim, H.J., and Chung, T.Y. (2019). Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers and a partial coherence interferometer. PLoS ONE, 14.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0223114"},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2125","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S421504","article-title":"Comparing predictive accuracy of a swept source optical coherence tomography biometer and an optical low coherence reflectometry biometer","volume":"17","author":"Blehm","year":"2023","journal-title":"Clin. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"713","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(13)80339-2","article-title":"An improved universal theoretical formula for intraocular lens power prediction","volume":"19","author":"Barrett","year":"1993","journal-title":"J. Cataract. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"802","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000551","article-title":"Ocular biometry with swept-source optical coherence tomography","volume":"47","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Cataract. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20190109-01","article-title":"Comprehensive Comparison of Axial Length Measurement With Three Swept-Source OCT-Based Biometers and Partial Coherence Interferometry","volume":"35","author":"Huang","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(13)80705-5","article-title":"Development of the SRK\/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula","volume":"16","author":"Retzlaff","year":"1990","journal-title":"J. Cataract. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2015.05.029","article-title":"Protocols for studies of intraocular lens formula accuracy","volume":"160","author":"Hoffer","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Xu, J., Zhang, L., Mo, E., Zhu, K., Zhu, Y., Feng, K., Wu, Z., Zheng, Y., Huang, F., and Gong, X. (2024). The effect of corneal power on the accuracy of 14 IOL power formulas. BMC Ophthalmol., 24.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-024-03395-9"},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2881","DOI":"10.1007\/s40123-023-00799-6","article-title":"Intraocular lens power calculation formulas\u2014A systematic review","volume":"12","author":"Stopyra","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ophthalmol. Ther."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2643","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S417865","article-title":"Comparing the accuracy of the Kane, Barrett universal II, hill-radial basis function, emmetropia verifying optical, and Ladas super formula intraocular lens power calculation formulas","volume":"17","author":"Moshirfar","year":"2023","journal-title":"Clin. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2491","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S371555","article-title":"Evaluation of refractive accuracy of ORA and the factors impacting residual astigmatism in patients implanted with trifocal IOLs during cataract surgery: A retrospective observational study","volume":"16","author":"Watanabe","year":"2022","journal-title":"Clin. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3593","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S322523","article-title":"Clinical outcomes of monofocal toric IOLs using digital tracking and intraoperative aberrometry","volume":"15","author":"Blaylock","year":"2021","journal-title":"Clin. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"De Bernardo, M., Cione, F., Capasso, L., Coppola, A., and Rosa, N. (2022). A formula to improve the reliability of optical axial length measurement in IOL power calculation. Sci. Rep., 12.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-23665-0"},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1511","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S256851","article-title":"Effects on IOL power calculation and expected clinical outcomes of axial length measurements based on multiple vs single refractive indices","volume":"14","author":"Shammas","year":"2020","journal-title":"Clin. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"542","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000791","article-title":"Predictive accuracy of an intraoperative aberrometry device for a new monofocal intraocular lens","volume":"48","author":"Spekreijse","year":"2022","journal-title":"J. Cataract. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"An, Y., Kang, E.-K., Kim, H., Kang, M.-J., Byun, Y.-S., and Joo, C.-K. (2019). Accuracy of swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometry for intraocular lens power calculation: A retrospective cross-sectional study. BMC Ophthalmol., 19.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-019-1036-y"}],"container-title":["Journal of Clinical Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/13\/16\/4639\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]],"date-time":"2025-10-10T15:31:55Z","timestamp":1760110315000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/13\/16\/4639"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,8]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"16","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,8]]}},"alternative-id":["jcm13164639"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm13164639","relation":{},"ISSN":["2077-0383"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2077-0383","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,8]]}}}