{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T01:29:17Z","timestamp":1760146157229,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"19","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,4]],"date-time":"2024-10-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1728000000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JCM"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Background: Stem revisions in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) with proximal bone stock loss may be dealt with utilizing modular, uncemented conical stems. During stem extraction, surgeons may resort to extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO). However, ETO is associated with extensive blood loss and infections. This study compared the clinical outcomes, radiographic results and complications in THA revisions utilizing conical modular stem with and without ETO. Methods: Patients who underwent revision THA with or without ETO were assessed retrospectively. The minimal follow-up was 3 years. The functional evaluation included Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Short Form 36 (SF-36) as well as Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and Numerical Rating Scale for pain assessment. The radiographic evaluation comprised bone defect assessment, osteotomy healing, stem migration and position, presence of radiolucent lines and stress shielding. Results: In total, 73 patients (80 hips) were included in the final analysis. The ETO group comprised 48 hips, and the no-ETO group comprised 32 hips. In the ETO group, pre-operative WOMAC scores were lower than in the no-ETO group (p = 0.012). No significant differences were found in terms of post-operative HHS, WOMAC, and NRS scores between groups, except worse results were found in the case of claw plate implantation. Patients in the no-ETO group exhibited better results in SF-36 than in the ETO-group. Osteotomy non-union was observed in four hips (9.5%). Stam varus\/valgus position was within \u00b11.5 degrees (85.9%). Conclusions: ETO does not adversely impact outcomes in patients undergoing femoral stem revisions with modular conical stems. The invasive nature of these procedures prompts careful consideration in each case individually.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm13195921","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,4]],"date-time":"2024-10-04T04:49:02Z","timestamp":1728017342000},"page":"5921","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy Does Not Compromise Functional and Radiographic Outcomes of Femoral Stem Revisions with the Use of an Uncemented Modular Conical Stem"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"13","author":[{"given":"Tomasz","family":"Jopek","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of General Orthopedics, Muskuloskeletal Oncology and Trauma Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, ul. 28 Czerwca 1956 r 135\/147, 60-545 Pozna\u0144, Poland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7203-4670","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Pawe\u0142","family":"Chod\u00f3r","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of General Orthopedics, Muskuloskeletal Oncology and Trauma Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, ul. 28 Czerwca 1956 r 135\/147, 60-545 Pozna\u0144, Poland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"\u0141ukasz","family":"\u0141apaj","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of General Orthopedics, Muskuloskeletal Oncology and Trauma Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, ul. 28 Czerwca 1956 r 135\/147, 60-545 Pozna\u0144, Poland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Waldemar","family":"Wo\u017aniak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of General Orthopedics, Muskuloskeletal Oncology and Trauma Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, ul. 28 Czerwca 1956 r 135\/147, 60-545 Pozna\u0144, Poland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"S\u0142awomir","family":"Michalak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of General Orthopedics, Muskuloskeletal Oncology and Trauma Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, ul. 28 Czerwca 1956 r 135\/147, 60-545 Pozna\u0144, Poland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jacek","family":"Kruczy\u0144ski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of General Orthopedics, Muskuloskeletal Oncology and Trauma Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, ul. 28 Czerwca 1956 r 135\/147, 60-545 Pozna\u0144, Poland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Weber, M., Renkawitz, T., Voellner, F., Craiovan, B., Greimel, F.., and Worlicek, M. (2018). Revision Surgery in Total Joint Replacement Is Cost-Intensive. BioMed Res. Int., 2018.","DOI":"10.1155\/2018\/8987104"},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.1302\/2058-5241.5.190063","article-title":"Trochanteric osteotomy in revision total hip arthroplasty","volume":"5","author":"Sundaram","year":"2020","journal-title":"EFORT Open Rev."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.5435\/00124635-200305000-00003","article-title":"Trochanteric Osteotomy and Fixation During Total Hip Arthroplasty","volume":"11","author":"Archibeck","year":"2003","journal-title":"J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.20.00215","article-title":"Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Contemporary Outcomes of 612 Hips","volume":"103","author":"Abdel","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Bone Jt. Surg."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"993","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2007.03.017","article-title":"Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Fluted and Tapered Modular Distal Fixation Stem With and Without Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy","volume":"22","author":"Park","year":"2007","journal-title":"J. Arthroplast."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1409","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2011.06.021","article-title":"Patterns of Osseointegration and Remodeling in Femoral Revision With Bone Loss Using Modular, Tapered, Fluted, Titanium Stems","volume":"26","author":"Rodriguez","year":"2011","journal-title":"J. Arthroplast."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-200403000-00021","article-title":"The Use of Tapered Stems for Femoral Revision Surgery","volume":"420","author":"Bischel","year":"2004","journal-title":"Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1320","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.93B10.25927","article-title":"Femoral revision with the Wagner tapered stem: A ten- to 15-year follow-up study","volume":"93-B","author":"Regis","year":"2011","journal-title":"J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. Vol."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"230949902094899","DOI":"10.1177\/2309499020948991","article-title":"Primary stability of a cementless modular revision hip stem in relation with the femoral defect size: A biomechanical study","volume":"28","author":"Ellenrieder","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Orthop. Surg."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.18.00442","article-title":"Femoral Bone Remodeling in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Use of Modular Compared with Monoblock Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems: The Role of Stem Length and Stiffness","volume":"101","author":"Huang","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Bone Jt. Surg."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1067","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2011.03.001","article-title":"Is Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy Safe for Use in 2-Stage Revision of Periprosthetic Hip Infection?","volume":"26","author":"Lim","year":"2011","journal-title":"J. Arthroplast."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2013.10.019","article-title":"Predictive outcomes of revision total hip replacement\u2014A consecutive series of 1176 patients with a minimum 10-year follow-up","volume":"77","author":"Philpott","year":"2014","journal-title":"Maturitas"},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1446","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.89B11.19617","article-title":"Predictors of quality of life outcomes after revision total hip replacement","volume":"89-B","author":"Biring","year":"2007","journal-title":"J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. Vol."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200300004-00001","article-title":"Classification and an algorithmic approach to the reconstruction of femoral deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty","volume":"85","author":"Paprosky","year":"2003","journal-title":"J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. Vol."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-014-3689-4","article-title":"What is the Survivorship of Fully Coated Femoral Components in Revision Hip Arthroplasty?","volume":"473","author":"Lachiewicz","year":"2015","journal-title":"Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.5301\/hipint.5000584","article-title":"Patient-reported quality of life and hip function after 2-stage revision of chronic periprosthetic hip joint infection: A cross-sectional study","volume":"28","author":"Poulsen","year":"2018","journal-title":"HIP Int."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.5301\/hipint.5000416","article-title":"Quality of Life after Staged Revision for Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review","volume":"26","author":"Rietbergen","year":"2016","journal-title":"HIP Int."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.3109\/17453674.2014.887951","article-title":"A simple visual analog scale for pain is as responsive as the WOMAC, the SF-36, and the EQ-5D in measuring outcomes of revision hip arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study of 45 patients followed for 2 years","volume":"85","author":"Zampelis","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Orthop."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1007\/s12570-012-0100-3","article-title":"The validation of the visual analogue scale for patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty","volume":"3","author":"Brokelman","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur. Orthop. Traumatol."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1709","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-015-2699-5","article-title":"Outcome of a modular tapered uncemented titanium femoral stem in revision hip arthroplasty","volume":"39","author":"Hoberg","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int. Orthop. (SICOT)"},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1111\/papr.12169","article-title":"Measuring Pain Intensity in Patients with Neck Pain: Does It Matter How You Do It?","volume":"15","author":"Kamper","year":"2015","journal-title":"Pain Pract."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Study Group (2013). A Comparison of Modular Tapered Versus Modular Cylindrical Stems for Complex Femoral Revisions. J. Arthroplast., 28, 71\u201373.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2013.04.052"},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2007.01.002","article-title":"Extensively Porous-Coated Stems for Femoral Revision","volume":"22","author":"Hamilton","year":"2007","journal-title":"J. Arthroplast."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.3233\/THC-2008-16407","article-title":"Revision of total hip arthroplasty: Clinical outcome of extended trochanteric osteotomy and intraoperative femoral fracture","volume":"16","author":"Lerch","year":"2008","journal-title":"THC"},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"471","DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-017-2064-z","article-title":"Extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) fixation for femoral stem revision in periprosthetic fractures: Dall\u2013Miles plate versus cables","volume":"28","author":"Sheridan","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur. J. Orthop Surg. Traumatol."},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bischel, O.E., Suda, A.J., B\u00f6hm, P.M., Bormann, T., J\u00e4ger, S., and Seeger, J.B. (2023). Breakage of Tapered Junctions of Modular Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty\u2014High Incidence in a Consecutive Series of a Single Institution. Bioengineering, 10.","DOI":"10.3390\/bioengineering10030341"},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"312","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.97B3.34684","article-title":"Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with extensive proximal femoral bone loss using a fluted tapered modular femoral component","volume":"97-B","author":"Amanatullah","year":"2015","journal-title":"Bone Jt. J"},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2005.08.022","article-title":"Femoral revision with a fluted, tapered, modular stem seventy patients followed for a mean of 3.9 years","volume":"21","author":"McInnis","year":"2006","journal-title":"J. Arthroplast."}],"container-title":["Journal of Clinical Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/13\/19\/5921\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]],"date-time":"2025-10-10T16:10:24Z","timestamp":1760112624000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/13\/19\/5921"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,4]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"19","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,10]]}},"alternative-id":["jcm13195921"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm13195921","relation":{},"ISSN":["2077-0383"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2077-0383"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,4]]}}}