{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,22]],"date-time":"2025-11-22T11:40:00Z","timestamp":1763811600331,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":69,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,8]],"date-time":"2025-02-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738972800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JCM"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Background\/Objectives: Surgical repair of apical prolapse most commonly includes hysterectomy. However, nowadays, the number of women who seek uterine preserving surgical treatment is increasing. Our objective is to review the current evidence on laparoscopic hysteropexy techniques, outcomes and appropriate patient selection. Methods: A literature search was carried out in MEDLINE\/PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. The search was restricted to humans, female patients and currently used surgical procedures. Results: Laparoscopic hysteropexy was found to be associated with good anatomic outcomes, symptom improvement and low complication or reoperation rates. Conclusions: Laparoscopic hysteropexy appears to be a good alternative option for women who undergo surgical treatment for apical prolapse and desire preservation of the uterus. However, further prospective comparative studies, as well as longer follow-up periods, are necessary for evaluating long-term safety and efficacy outcomes of the method.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm14041080","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,10]],"date-time":"2025-02-10T03:39:47Z","timestamp":1739158787000},"page":"1080","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Laparoscopic Hysteropexy: How, When and for Whom Is It an Alternative Option? A Narrative Review of the Literature"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"14","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-5363-3522","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anna","family":"Pitsillidi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of OB\/GYN, Rheinland Klinikum Dormagen, Dr.-Geldmacher-Stra\u00dfe 20, 41540 Dormagen, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"G\u00fcnter Karl","family":"No\u00e9","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of OB\/GYN, Rheinland Klinikum Dormagen, Dr.-Geldmacher-Stra\u00dfe 20, 41540 Dormagen, Germany"},{"name":"Department of OB\/GYN, University of Witten Herdecke, Dr.-Geldmacher-Stra\u00dfe 20, 41540 Dormagen, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2932-1","article-title":"An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)\/International Continence Society (ICS) Joint Report on the Terminology for Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)","volume":"27","author":"Haylen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1590\/s1677-5538.ibju.2018.0581","article-title":"Narrative Review of the Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Pathophysiology of Pelvic Organ Prolapse","volume":"46","author":"Weintraub","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int. Braz. J. Urol."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1934.tb08799.x","article-title":"The Principles That Should Underlie All Operations for Prolapse","volume":"41","author":"Bonney","year":"1934","journal-title":"BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"key":"ref_4","first-page":"679","article-title":"True Incidence of Vaginal Vault Prolapse. Thirteen Years of Experience","volume":"44","author":"Marchionni","year":"1999","journal-title":"J. Reprod. Med."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2209-5","article-title":"Laparoscopic Hysteropexy: 1- to 4-Year Follow-Up of Women Postoperatively","volume":"25","author":"Rahmanou","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e31827d8667","article-title":"Attitudes Toward Hysterectomy in Women Undergoing Evaluation for Uterovaginal Prolapse","volume":"19","author":"Frick","year":"2013","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med. Reconstr. Surg."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"470.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.003","article-title":"Patient Preferences for Uterine Preservation and Hysterectomy in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse","volume":"209","author":"Korbly","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02396.x","article-title":"Laparoscopic Hysteropexy: The Initial Results of a Uterine Suspension Procedure for Uterovaginal Prolapse","volume":"117","author":"Price","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"802","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.07.035","article-title":"Does Prolapse Equal Hysterectomy? The Role of Uterine Conservation in Women with Uterovaginal Prolapse","volume":"213","author":"Ridgeway","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000307","article-title":"Does the Uterus Need to Be Removed to Correct Uterovaginal Prolapse?","volume":"28","author":"Gutman","year":"2016","journal-title":"Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1007\/s11934-013-0336-7","article-title":"Management Options for Women with Uterine Prolapse Interested in Uterine Preservation","volume":"14","author":"Kow","year":"2013","journal-title":"Curr. Urol. Rep."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"719","DOI":"10.5468\/ogs.19075","article-title":"Correlation Between Obesity and Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Korean Women","volume":"63","author":"Kim","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol. Sci."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"671","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-14-1128","article-title":"Population Distribution of Lifetime Risk of Ovarian Cancer in the United States","volume":"24","author":"Pearce","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"507.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.01.077","article-title":"Risk of Unanticipated Abnormal Gynecologic Pathology at the Time of Hysterectomy for Uterovaginal Prolapse","volume":"202","author":"Frick","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1186\/s13053-024-00278-4","article-title":"Information Needs of Lynch Syndrome and BRCA 1\/2 Mutation Carriers Considering Risk-Reducing Gynecological Surgery: A Qualitative Study of the Decision-Making Process","volume":"22","author":"Zhao","year":"2024","journal-title":"Hered. Cancer Clin. Pract."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"350","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0042-104288","article-title":"Indications and Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Diseases. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3 Level, AWMF Registry No.\u2009015\/070, April 2015)","volume":"76","author":"Neis","year":"2016","journal-title":"Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd"},{"key":"ref_17","first-page":"249","article-title":"Risk Factors for Failure of Transvaginal Sacrospinous Uterine Suspension in the Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse","volume":"104","author":"Lin","year":"2005","journal-title":"J. Formos. Med. Assoc."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1617","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3433-1","article-title":"Hysteropreservation Versus Hysterectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Uterine Prolapse: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","volume":"28","author":"Fonseca","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"505","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-019-03876-2","article-title":"Uterine-Preserving Surgeries for the Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Clinical Practice Guidelines","volume":"30","author":"Meriwether","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"956","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00696.x","article-title":"The Association of Hysterectomy and Menopause: A Prospective Cohort Study","volume":"112","author":"Farquhar","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100027","DOI":"10.1016\/j.glmedi.2023.100027","article-title":"Menopausal Symptoms Among Women with and Without Hysterectomy","volume":"1","author":"Chaudhary","year":"2023","journal-title":"J. Med. Surg. Public Health"},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1803","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2171-2","article-title":"Uterine-Preserving POP Surgery","volume":"24","author":"Gutman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.5468\/ogs.22003","article-title":"How and on Whom to Perform Uterine-Preserving Surgery for Uterine Prolapse","volume":"65","author":"Oh","year":"2022","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol. Sci."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1058","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2018.0474","article-title":"Laparoscopic Bilateral Cervicosacropexy and Vaginosacropexy: New Surgical Treatment Option in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Urinary Incontinence","volume":"32","author":"Rexhepi","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Endourol."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2129-4","article-title":"Laparoscopic Hysteropexy: A Novel Technique for Uterine Preservation Surgery","volume":"25","author":"Rahmanou","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1241","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-016-3257-4","article-title":"Laparoscopic Hysteropexy: 10 Years\u2019 Experience","volume":"28","author":"Jefferis","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2217","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-023-05534-0","article-title":"Comparison of Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy with Concomitant Supracervical Hysterectomy or Uterine Preservation","volume":"34","author":"Sato","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04865-0","article-title":"Laparoscopic Sacral Hysteropexy Versus Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy plus Supracervical Hysterectomy in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse","volume":"33","author":"Campagna","year":"2022","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2775-9","article-title":"Laparoscopic Sacral Hysteropexy Versus Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy with Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse","volume":"27","author":"Pan","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"456","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.15891","article-title":"Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy with Concurrent Hysterectomy or Uterine Preservation: A Metanalysis and Systematic Review","volume":"168","author":"Tius","year":"2025","journal-title":"Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet."},{"key":"ref_31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1889","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-016-3054-0","article-title":"Laparoscopic Wrap Round Mesh Sacrohysteropexy for the Management of Apical Prolapse","volume":"27","author":"Kupelian","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"526","DOI":"10.1590\/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.04.12","article-title":"Laparoscopic Sacral Uteropexy with Cravat Technique\u2014Experience and Results","volume":"40","author":"Api","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int. Braz. J. Urol."},{"key":"ref_33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2012.07.025","article-title":"Uterine Preservation in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy: Quality of Life and Technique","volume":"165","author":"Mourik","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol."},{"key":"ref_34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"654","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.22641","article-title":"Comparison between Laparoscopic Sacral Hysteropexy and Subtotal Hysterectomy plus Cervicopexy in Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Pilot Study","volume":"34","author":"Gracia","year":"2015","journal-title":"Neurourol. Urodyn."},{"key":"ref_35","first-page":"1010","article-title":"Laparoscopic Suture Hysteropexy for Uterine Prolapse","volume":"97","author":"Maher","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-006-0285-1","article-title":"Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligaments Plication for the Treatment of Uterine Prolapse","volume":"276","author":"Uccella","year":"2007","journal-title":"Arch. Gynecol. Obstet."},{"key":"ref_37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"472","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2006.04.009","article-title":"Laparoscopic Uterosacral Uterine Suspension: A Minimally Invasive Technique for Treating Pelvic Organ Prolapse","volume":"13","author":"Medina","year":"2006","journal-title":"J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2012.10.014","article-title":"Effect of Uterine Preservation on Outcome of Laparoscopic Uterosacral Suspension","volume":"20","author":"Bedford","year":"2013","journal-title":"J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2019.02.012","article-title":"Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs. Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction","volume":"27","author":"Chill","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.11.019","article-title":"Clinical Outcomes in Women Undergoing Laparoscopic Hysteropexy: A Systematic Review","volume":"208","author":"Nair","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol."},{"key":"ref_41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1089\/gyn.1998.14.153","article-title":"Laparoscopic Iliac Colpo-Uterine Suspension for the Treatment of Genital Prolapse Using Two Meshes: A New Operative Laparoscopic Approach","volume":"14","author":"Dubuisson","year":"1998","journal-title":"J. Gynecol. Surg."},{"key":"ref_42","first-page":"321","article-title":"Treatment of Urogenital Prolapse by Colpo-Isthmo-Cystopexy with Transverse Strip and Crossed, Multiple Layer, Ligamento-Peritoneal Douglasorrhaphy","volume":"21","author":"Kapandji","year":"1967","journal-title":"Ann. Chir."},{"key":"ref_43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2007.11.003","article-title":"Treatment of Genital Prolapse by Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension Using Mesh: A Series of 73 Patients","volume":"15","author":"Dubuisson","year":"2008","journal-title":"J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aksin, \u015e., and Andan, C. (2023). Postoperative Results of Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension Operation: A Clinical Trials Study. Front. Surg., 10.","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2023.1069110"},{"key":"ref_45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.15459","article-title":"Uterine-Sparing Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse","volume":"49","author":"Kumbasar","year":"2023","journal-title":"J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res."},{"key":"ref_46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.03.042","article-title":"A Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Study Comparing Uterine Preserving Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension with Mesh Versus Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy in the Treatment of Uterine Prolapse","volume":"297","author":"Yassa","year":"2024","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol."},{"key":"ref_47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"631","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-010-1687-7","article-title":"Laparoscopic Pectopexy: A New Technique of Prolapse Surgery for Obese Patients","volume":"284","author":"Banerjee","year":"2011","journal-title":"Arch. Gynecol. Obstet."},{"key":"ref_48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.10.022","article-title":"Prospective International Multicenter Pectopexy Trial: Interim Results and Findings Post Surgery","volume":"244","author":"Schiermeier","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol."},{"key":"ref_49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"No\u00e9, G.K., Barnard, A., Schiermeier, S., and Anapolski, M. (2021). Current Role of Hysterectomy in Pelvic Floor Surgery: Time for Reappraisal? A Review of Current Literature and Expert Discussion. BioMed Res. Int., 2021.","DOI":"10.1155\/2021\/9934486"},{"key":"ref_50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.23736\/S2724-606X.23.05236-3","article-title":"Comparison of Laparoscopic Hysteropectopexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse","volume":"76","author":"Lee","year":"2024","journal-title":"Minerva Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2005.12.002","article-title":"The Manchester Operation for Uterine Prolapse","volume":"92","author":"Ayhan","year":"2006","journal-title":"Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet."},{"key":"ref_52","first-page":"299","article-title":"Manchester Procedure vs. Vaginal Hysterectomy for Uterine Prolapse. A Comparison","volume":"40","author":"Thomas","year":"1995","journal-title":"J. Reprod. Med."},{"key":"ref_53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"967","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(66)90547-3","article-title":"Surgical Treatment for Uterine Prolapse in Young Women","volume":"95","author":"Williams","year":"1966","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"852","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1970.tb04413.x","article-title":"Uterine Disease after the Manchester Repair Operation","volume":"77","author":"Tipton","year":"1970","journal-title":"BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"key":"ref_55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"626","DOI":"10.1038\/nrurol.2010.164","article-title":"Uterus Preservation in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery","volume":"7","author":"Zucchi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Nat. Rev. Urol."},{"key":"ref_56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1313","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-0945-3","article-title":"The Effectiveness of Surgical Correction of Uterine Prolapse: Cervical Amputation with Uterosacral Ligament Plication (Modified Manchester) Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy with High Uterosacral Ligament Plication","volume":"20","author":"Milani","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"key":"ref_57","unstructured":"Karram, M.M., and Walters, M.D. (1993). Clinical Urogynecology, Mosby Inc."},{"key":"ref_58","first-page":"CD004014","article-title":"Surgical Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women","volume":"30","author":"Maher","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst. Rev."},{"key":"ref_59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.75","article-title":"Sacrospinous Cervicocolpopexy with Uterine Conservation for Uterovaginal Prolapse in Elderly Women: An Evolving Concept","volume":"188","author":"Hefni","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"350","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-003-1084-x","article-title":"Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Compared to Vaginal Hysterectomy as Primary Surgical Treatment for a Descensus Uteri: Effects on Urinary Symptoms","volume":"14","author":"Aalders","year":"2003","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"key":"ref_61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05185-7","article-title":"Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy Versus Vaginal Sacrospinous Hysteropexy as Treatment for Uterine Descent: Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes","volume":"34","author":"Coolen","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"key":"ref_62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1284","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16242","article-title":"Hysteropexy in the Treatment of Uterine Prolapse Stage 2 or Higher: Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy Versus Sacrospinous Hysteropexy\u2014A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial (LAVA Trial)","volume":"127","author":"Veen","year":"2020","journal-title":"BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"key":"ref_63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"755.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.02.017","article-title":"Prolapse and Continence Surgery in Countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in 2012","volume":"212","author":"Haya","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zalewski, M., Ko\u0142ody\u0144ska, G., Mucha, A., Be\u0142za, \u0141., Nowak, K., and Andrzejewski, W. (2020). The Assessment of Quality of Life and Satisfaction with Life of Patients Before and After Surgery of an Isolated Apical Defect Using Synthetic Materials. BMC Urol., 20.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12894-020-00666-7"},{"key":"ref_65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1803","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2748-z","article-title":"Utero-Vaginal Suspension Using Bilateral Vaginal Anterior Sacrospinous Fixation with Mesh: Intermediate Results of a Cohort Study","volume":"26","author":"Letouzey","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"key":"ref_66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.08.035","article-title":"Vaginal and Laparoscopic Mesh Hysteropexy for Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Parallel Cohort Study","volume":"216","author":"Gutman","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e215","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000001188","article-title":"Long-Term Outcomes After Vaginal and Laparoscopic Mesh Hysteropexy for Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Parallel Cohort Study (EVAULT)","volume":"28","author":"Fitzgerald","year":"2022","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med. Reconstr. Surg."},{"key":"ref_68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1016\/S1074-3804(05)60045-X","article-title":"Laparoscopic Treatment of Pelvic Floor Defects in Women of Reproductive Age","volume":"11","author":"Seracchioli","year":"2004","journal-title":"J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc."},{"key":"ref_69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1186\/s10397-017-1017-1","article-title":"Pregnancy Following Laparoscopic Hysteropexy\u2014A Case Series","volume":"14","author":"Jefferis","year":"2017","journal-title":"Gynecol. Surg."}],"container-title":["Journal of Clinical Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/14\/4\/1080\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,9]],"date-time":"2025-10-09T16:29:15Z","timestamp":1760027355000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/14\/4\/1080"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,8]]},"references-count":69,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,2]]}},"alternative-id":["jcm14041080"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm14041080","relation":{},"ISSN":["2077-0383"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2077-0383"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,8]]}}}