{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,16]],"date-time":"2026-10-16T19:33:39Z","timestamp":1792179219124,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"23","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,24]],"date-time":"2025-11-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1763942400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JCM"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Background\/Objectives: Lumbar degenerative disease drives numerous elective spine surgeries, and anesthetic choice significantly influences airway risk, hemodynamics, analgesia, mobilization, and recovery. Interest in awake lumbar surgery, typically using spinal anesthesia (SA) with light sedation, has grown as comparative studies suggest comparable safety to general anesthesia (GA) with potential reductions in opioid use, nausea, time to ambulation, and efficiency metrics. However, these benefits may be context-dependent under standardized perioperative care. Therefore, the aim of this umbrella review is to synthesize previously published meta-analyses that compare postoperative outcomes between SA and GA in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Methods: A systematic literature search was executed with defined criteria across PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Data analysis was performed using the metaumbrella R package to report equivalent Hedges\u2019 g values. Each meta-analysis was evaluated with the AMSTAR2 tool, and the credibility of the evidence was determined with Ioannidis criteria. Results: Seven meta-analyses were included. Pooled data showed that SA was associated with shorter operative time, reduced length of stay, and lower intraoperative blood loss, supported by class III credibility for operative time and length of stay and class IV for blood loss in the setting of high between study heterogeneity. SA was also associated with lower odds of postoperative nausea and vomiting and reduced postoperative analgesic requirements, both graded as class IV with prediction intervals that encompassed the null. Intraoperative hypotension and bradycardia did not differ significantly between SA and GA, and postoperative pain scores and overall complication rates were similarly neutral. Conclusions: This umbrella review identifies potential advantages of SA in lumbar spine surgery, including shorter operative time, reduced length of stay, lower intraoperative blood loss, and lower postoperative nausea and analgesic requirements, while finding no consistent differences in hemodynamic events or overall complications. These findings suggest SA as an alternative pathway to general anesthesia for selected lumbar procedures but highlight substantial heterogeneity and low-to-intermediate credibility for several endpoints, underscoring the need for additional high-quality, protocolized comparative studies to refine effect sizes and define optimal patient and procedural selection.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm14238335","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,25]],"date-time":"2025-11-25T17:31:34Z","timestamp":1764091894000},"page":"8335","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Reconsidering Anesthesia in Lumbar Surgery: An Umbrella Review of Awake Versus General Anesthesia"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"14","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0004-7548-0261","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Favour C.","family":"Ononogbu-Uche","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0009-6204-7385","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Carl","family":"Tchoumi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"College of Osteopathic Medicine, Rocky Vista University, Ivins, UT 84738, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nolan M.","family":"Stubbs","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Arnav","family":"Sharma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4230-4411","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Raymond J.","family":"Gardocki","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alok","family":"Sharan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Spine and Performance Institute, Edison, NJ 08820, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7151-2861","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Muhammad M.","family":"Abd-El-Barr","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5574-9903","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ernest E.","family":"Braxton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Vail Summit Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, Vail, CO 81657, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"name":"Awake Spine Research Group","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104280","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bas.2025.104280","article-title":"Systematic review and meta-analysis of spinal versus general anesthesia in decompressive surgeries of the lumbar spine","volume":"5","author":"Weber","year":"2025","journal-title":"Brain Spine"},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E7","DOI":"10.3171\/2021.9.FOCUS21464","article-title":"Spinal anesthesia in awake surgical procedures of the lumbar spine: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 3709 patients","volume":"51","author":"Govindarajan","year":"2021","journal-title":"Neurosurg. Focus"},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"666","DOI":"10.1016\/S0952-8180(98)00112-3","article-title":"Spinal anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery","volume":"10","author":"Tetzlaff","year":"1998","journal-title":"J. Clin. Anesth."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108840","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clineuro.2025.108840","article-title":"Comparative perioperative narcotic use in tlif patients: Spinal versus general anesthesia in a retrospective cohort study of 180 cases in hospital and ambulatory settings","volume":"251","author":"Gold","year":"2025","journal-title":"Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg."},{"key":"ref_5","first-page":"5","article-title":"Microdiscectomy: Spinal anesthesia offers optimal results in general patient population","volume":"16","author":"McLain","year":"2007","journal-title":"J. Surg. Orthop. Adv."},{"key":"ref_6","first-page":"524","article-title":"Spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery: A randomized clinical trial","volume":"16","author":"Attari","year":"2011","journal-title":"J. Res. Med. Sci. Off. J. Isfahan Univ. Med. Sci."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1136\/rapm-2022-104098","article-title":"Comparative effectiveness of anesthetic technique on outcomes after lumbar spine surgery: A retrospective propensity score-matched analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, 2009\u20132019","volume":"48","author":"Amoroso","year":"2023","journal-title":"Reg. Anesth. Pain Med."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"729","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.01.001","article-title":"Consensus statement for perioperative care in lumbar spinal fusion: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS\u00ae) Society recommendations","volume":"21","author":"Debono","year":"2021","journal-title":"Spine J. Off. J. North. Am. Spine Soc."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1097\/XEB.0000000000000055","article-title":"Summarizing systematic reviews: Methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach","volume":"13","author":"Aromataris","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int. J. Evid. Based Healthc."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.12997\/jla.2023.12.1.3","article-title":"Introduction to Umbrella Reviews as a Useful Evidence-Based Practice","volume":"12","author":"Choi","year":"2023","journal-title":"J. Lipid Atheroscler."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.13702","article-title":"Impact of spinal anaesthesia vs. general anaesthesia on peri-operative outcome in lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials","volume":"72","author":"Meng","year":"2017","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e198","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2023.09.023","article-title":"The Current Status of Awake Endoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","volume":"180","author":"Jadczak","year":"2023","journal-title":"World Neurosurg."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"De Cassai, A., Geraldini, F., Boscolo, A., Pasin, L., Pettenuzzo, T., Persona, P., Munari, M., and Navalesi, P. (2020). General Anesthesia Compared to Spinal Anesthesia for Patients Undergoing Lumbar Vertebral Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J. Clin. Med., 10.","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm10010102"},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"985","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-023-08071-y","article-title":"Comparative outcomes of awake spine surgery under spinal versus general anesthesia: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"33","author":"Rajjoub","year":"2024","journal-title":"Eur. Spine J."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000001374","article-title":"Impact of Spinal\/Epidural Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia on Perioperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","volume":"36","author":"Shui","year":"2023","journal-title":"Clin. Spine Surg."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000005219","article-title":"The Benefits of Awake Spinal Surgery on Minimizing Positioning-related Complications: A Narrative Review","volume":"50","author":"Assis","year":"2025","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wilson, J.P., Bonin, B., Quinones, C., Kumbhare, D., Guthikonda, B., and Hoang, S. (2024). Spinal Anesthesia for Awake Spine Surgery: A Paradigm Shift for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery. J. Clin. Med., 13.","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm13175326"},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-199602000-00019","article-title":"Inotropic effects of propofol, thiopental, midazolam, etomidate, and ketamine on isolated human atrial muscle","volume":"84","author":"Gelissen","year":"1996","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"659","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/88.5.659","article-title":"Volatile anaesthetics may be the main cause of early but not delayed postoperative vomiting: A randomized controlled trial of factorial design","volume":"88","author":"Apfel","year":"2002","journal-title":"Br. J. Anaesth."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E2","DOI":"10.3171\/2021.9.FOCUS21433","article-title":"Awake spinal surgery: Simplifying the learning curve with a patient selection algorithm","volume":"51","author":"Letchuman","year":"2021","journal-title":"Neurosurg. Focus"},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.5312\/wjo.v5.i4.425","article-title":"Positioning patients for spine surgery: Avoiding uncommon position-related complications","volume":"5","author":"Kamel","year":"2014","journal-title":"World J. Orthop."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1511","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0b013e3181f71234","article-title":"Neuraxial blockade in patients with preexisting spinal stenosis, lumbar disk disease, or prior spine surgery: Efficacy and neurologic complications","volume":"111","author":"Hebl","year":"2010","journal-title":"Anesth. Analg."},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1186\/s13017-023-00525-4","article-title":"Early management of adult traumatic spinal cord injury in patients with polytrauma: A consensus and clinical recommendations jointly developed by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) & the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS)","volume":"19","author":"Picetti","year":"2024","journal-title":"World J. Emerg. Surg."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"749","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcot.2020.06.003","article-title":"Awake spinal fusion","volume":"11","author":"Garg","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Clin. Orthop. Trauma."}],"container-title":["Journal of Clinical Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/14\/23\/8335\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,25]],"date-time":"2025-11-25T17:33:42Z","timestamp":1764092022000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/14\/23\/8335"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,24]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"23","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["jcm14238335"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm14238335","relation":{},"ISSN":["2077-0383"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2077-0383","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,24]]}}}