{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,25]],"date-time":"2026-08-25T18:46:17Z","timestamp":1787683577087,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,4]],"date-time":"2026-01-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1767484800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JCM"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Background: Active-fluidics phacoemulsification can maintain anterior chamber stability at lower intraoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) levels. However, whether reducing IOP alone\u2014without additional stabilizing technologies such as the Active Sentry handpiece\u2014can decrease surgical invasiveness during Eight-Chop phacoemulsification remains unclear. Methods: In this prospective fellow-eye comparative study, 56 non-diabetic patients (112 eyes) underwent Eight-Chop technique phacoemulsification using the Centurion Vision System with active fluidics. One eye was randomly assigned to a standard-IOP setting (55 mmHg; high-IOP group) and the fellow eye to a reduced-IOP setting (28 mmHg; low-IOP group). Intraoperative parameters\u2014including operative time, phaco time, aspiration time, cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), and irrigation volume\u2014were recorded. Postoperative outcomes included aqueous flare (laser flare photometry), corneal endothelial cell density (CECD) and CECD loss, corneal morphology (central corneal thickness [CCT], coefficient of variation [CV], percentage of hexagonal cells [PHC]), and IOP. Linear mixed-effects models with patient ID as a random effect were used for all paired-eye comparisons. Results: Lowering the intraoperative IOP did not reduce surgical invasiveness. Phaco time was significantly longer in the low-IOP group (16.2 \u00b1 5.22 s vs. 13.9 \u00b1 4.40 s; p = 0.001), and aspiration time was also longer (75.0 \u00b1 18.3 s vs. 69.0 \u00b1 17.9 s; p = 0.033). No significant differences were found in operative time (5.08 \u00b1 1.10 min vs. 4.82 \u00b1 1.13 min; p = 0.082), CDE (5.93 \u00b1 1.87 vs. 5.56 \u00b1 1.90; p = 0.099), or irrigation volume (26.6 \u00b1 7.71 mL vs. 25.2 \u00b1 7.35 mL; p = 0.214). Postoperative outcomes were similarly comparable. Aqueous flare showed no significant differences at any time point (e.g., day 1: 14.8 \u00b1 5.10 vs. 14.5 \u00b1 4.76 ph\/ms; p = 0.655). Mean CECD loss remained small in both groups and did not differ significantly (7 weeks: \u22120.82 \u00b1 1.05% vs. \u22120.98 \u00b1 1.16%, p = 0.460; 19 weeks: \u22120.93 \u00b1 1.38% vs. \u22121.28 \u00b1 1.69%, p = 0.239). Corneal morphological parameters (CCT, CV, PHC) and postoperative IOP also showed no significant differences between settings. Conclusions: In this fellow-eye comparative study, lowering intraoperative intraocular pressure from conventional to near-physiologic levels under active-fluidics control did not reduce surgical invasiveness during Eight-chop phacoemulsification. No additional benefits were observed in terms of endothelial cell preservation, postoperative inflammation, or overall surgical performance. These findings indicate that, when chamber stability is already ensured by a low-invasive fragmentation strategy, further reduction in intraoperative IOP alone does not confer measurable short-term clinical advantages.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm15010366","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,5]],"date-time":"2026-01-05T10:53:50Z","timestamp":1767610430000},"page":"366","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Does Further Lowering Intraoperative Intraocular Pressure Reduce Surgical Invasiveness in Active-Fluidics Eight-Chop Phacoemulsification? A Fellow-Eye Comparative Study"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"15","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6255-8745","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tsuyoshi","family":"Sato","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, Sato Eye Clinic, Nemoto 3-3, Matsudo-shi 271-0077, Chiba-ken, Japan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9394(67)93340-5","article-title":"Phaco-emulsification and aspiration. A new technique of cataract removal. A preliminary report","volume":"64","author":"Kelman","year":"1967","journal-title":"Am. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"868","DOI":"10.1016\/j.survophthal.2019.06.007","article-title":"Phacoemulsification in review: Optimization of cataract removal in an in vitro setting","volume":"64","author":"Boulter","year":"2019","journal-title":"Surv. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"534","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20140711-06","article-title":"Real-time dynamic intraocular pressure fluctuations during microcoaxial phacoemulsification using different aspiration flow rates and their impact on early postoperative outcomes: A randomized clinical trial","volume":"30","author":"Vasavada","year":"2014","journal-title":"J. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"542","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2016.01.037","article-title":"Clinical study using a new phacoemulsification system with surgical intraocular pressure control","volume":"42","author":"Solomon","year":"2016","journal-title":"J. Cataract. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"822","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000001457","article-title":"Phacoemulsification using an active fluidics system at physiologic vs high intraocular pressure: Impact on anterior and posterior segment physiology","volume":"50","author":"Rauen","year":"2024","journal-title":"J. Cataract. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1977","DOI":"10.1080\/07853890.2022.2098375","article-title":"A prospective randomized clinical trial of active-fluidics versus gravity-fluidics system in phacoemulsification for age-related cataract (AGSPC)","volume":"54","author":"Luo","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ann. Med."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000001581","article-title":"Efficiency of phacoemulsification handpieces with high and low intraocular pressure settings","volume":"51","author":"Spaulding","year":"2025","journal-title":"J. Cataract. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"479","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000001141","article-title":"Efficacy and safety of the eight-chop technique in phacoemulsification for patients with cataract","volume":"49","author":"Sato","year":"2023","journal-title":"J. Cataract. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_9","unstructured":"Emery, J.M., and Little, J.H. (1979). Patient selection. Phacoemulsification and Aspiration of Cataracts: Surgical Techniques, Complications, and Results, CV Mosby."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Liu, Y., Hong, J., and Chen, X. (2023). Comparisons of the clinical outcomes of Centurion\u00ae active fluidics system with a low IOP setting and gravity fluidics system with a normal IOP setting for cataract patients with low corneal endothelial cell density. Front. Med., 10.","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2023.1294808"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0b013e31815892da","article-title":"Review of corneal endothelial specular microscopy for FDA clinical trials of refractive procedures, surgical devices, and new intraocular drugs and solutions","volume":"27","author":"McCarey","year":"2008","journal-title":"Cornea"},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3573","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S542284","article-title":"Comparison of Post-Operative Outcomes between IOP-20 and IOP-50 in Phacoemulsification with Active Fluidics System: Randomized Single Blinded Trial","volume":"19","author":"Wavikar","year":"2025","journal-title":"Clin. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Liu, Y., and Chen, X. (2025). Surgical outcomes of phacoemulsification with different fluidics systems (centurion with active sentry vs. centurion gravity) in cataract patients with eye axial length above 26 mm. Front. Med., 12.","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2025.1554832"},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"392","DOI":"10.3341\/kjo.2025.0072","article-title":"Unraveling Active Surge Mitigation (ASM) Actuation: Optimizing Phacoemulsification with Active Sentry Handpiece","volume":"39","author":"Biljana","year":"2025","journal-title":"Korean J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"882","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2009.12.035","article-title":"The risk of capsular breakage from phacoemulsification needle contact with the lens capsule: A laboratory study","volume":"149","author":"Meyer","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2014","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2009.05.057","article-title":"Effect of bottle height on the corneal endothelium during phacoemulsification","volume":"35","author":"Suzuki","year":"2009","journal-title":"J. Cataract. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e155","DOI":"10.1111\/aos.14235","article-title":"Effects of ultrasound energy on the porcine corneal endothelium\u2014Establishment of a phacoemulsification damage model","volume":"98","author":"Kunzmann","year":"2020","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1016\/j.aopr.2024.08.002","article-title":"Research progress on the impact of cataract surgery on corneal endothelial cells","volume":"4","author":"Yang","year":"2024","journal-title":"Adv. Ophthalmol. Pract. Res."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.3341\/kjo.2010.24.1.10","article-title":"Risk factors for endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification: Comparison in different anterior chamber depth groups","volume":"24","author":"Cho","year":"2010","journal-title":"Korean J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Luo, Y., Xu, G., Li, H., Ma, T., Ye, Z., and Li, Z. (2023). Application of the Active-Fluidics System in Phacoemulsification: A Review. J. Clin. Med., 12.","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm12020611"},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wang, S., Tao, J., Yu, X., Diao, W., Bai, H., and Yao, L. (2024). Safety and prognosis of phacoemulsification using active sentry and active fluidics with different IOP settings\u2014A randomized, controlled study. BMC Ophthalmol., 24.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-024-03626-z"},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e304","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20240314-02","article-title":"Intraoperative Performance and Early Postoperative Outcomes Following Phacoemulsification with Three Fluidic Systems: A Randomized Trial","volume":"40","author":"Vasavada","year":"2024","journal-title":"J. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"813","DOI":"10.1007\/s10384-025-01220-4","article-title":"Quantitative evaluation of inflammation after phacoemulsification surgery: Anterior chamber flare and choroidal vascular index","volume":"69","author":"Simsek","year":"2025","journal-title":"Jpn. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_24","first-page":"25158414231204111","article-title":"Factors influencing aqueous flare after cataract surgery and its evaluation with laser flare photometry","volume":"15","author":"Way","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ther. Adv. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chen, W., Chen, H., Mi, L., Li, J., Lin, H., and Chen, W. (2022). Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery for Age-Related Cataracts. Front. Med., 9.","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2022.826042"},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Opala, A., Ko\u0142odziejski, \u0141., and Grabska-Liberek, I. (2025). Impact of Well-Controlled Type 2 Diabetes on Corneal Endothelium Following Cataract Surgery: A Prospective Longitudinal Analysis. J. Clin. Med., 14.","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm14103603"},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"794","DOI":"10.4103\/ijo.IJO_2172_21","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of modified crater (endonucleation) chop and conventional crater chop techniques during phacoemulsification of hard nuclear cataracts: A randomized study","volume":"70","author":"Upadhyay","year":"2022","journal-title":"Indian J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sato, T. (2025). Minimizing Endothelial Cell Loss in Hard Nucleus Cataract Surgery: Efficacy of the Eight-Chop Technique. J. Clin. Med., 14.","DOI":"10.20944\/preprints202410.0036.v2"},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1946","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2009.05.061","article-title":"Intraocular pressure reduction after phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes: Evaluation of a causal relationship between the natural lens and open-angle glaucoma","volume":"35","author":"Poley","year":"2009","journal-title":"J. Cataract. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_30","first-page":"1374","article-title":"Effect of phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure in patients with primary open angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma","volume":"10","author":"Turati","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_31","first-page":"e75260","article-title":"Comparative Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Manual Small-Incision Cataract Surgery Versus Phacoemulsification for Brown Cataracts","volume":"16","author":"Goel","year":"2024","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000001657","article-title":"Modern cataract surgery with simplified technology: New trend?","volume":"51","author":"Werner","year":"2025","journal-title":"J. Cataract. Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ianchulev, S., Yeu, E., Hu, E.H., Kamthan, G., Pantanelli, S., Singh, P., and Tyson, F. (2025). Micro-interventional pre-treatment for nucleus disassembly in the setting of non-cavitating sonic lensectomy: Real-world evidence study in 512 cases. BMC Ophthalmol., 25.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-025-04150-4"},{"key":"ref_34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2281","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S522334","article-title":"A Prospective Single-Center Clinical Trial Comparing Short-Term Outcomes of a Novel Non-Cavitating Handheld Lensectomy Device versus Phacoemulsification","volume":"19","author":"Cannon","year":"2025","journal-title":"Clin. Ophthalmol."}],"container-title":["Journal of Clinical Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/15\/1\/366\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,5]],"date-time":"2026-01-05T11:13:20Z","timestamp":1767611600000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/15\/1\/366"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,4]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]}},"alternative-id":["jcm15010366"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm15010366","relation":{},"ISSN":["2077-0383"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2077-0383","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,4]]}}}