{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,8]],"date-time":"2026-01-08T18:03:52Z","timestamp":1767895432192,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,8]],"date-time":"2026-01-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1767830400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JCM"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Background: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is the most frequently performed keratoplasty procedure in many countries. One of the most common early complications is an elevation of intraocular pressure (IOP). The aim of this study was to characterize early postoperative IOP behavior following DMEK performed with 10% sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tamponade and to determine the frequency and timing of required IOP-lowering interventions within the first 48 h. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed postoperative outcomes of 116 consecutive DMEK procedures between May and December 2024 at the University Medical Center in Mainz, Germany. No specific exclusion criteria were applied. All surgeries included a surgical iridectomy at the 6 o\u2019clock position, 10% (SF6) tamponade, and maintaining a mid-normal IOP at the end of surgery. Postoperative assessments included IOP measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry, the percentage of gas fill in the anterior chamber evaluated at the slit lamp, and the need for IOP-lowering interventions as determined by the on-call resident at 3, 24, and 48 h after surgery. IOP-lowering interventions consisted of venting in cases of elevated IOP, gas fill &gt; 90%, and\/or suspected angle closure or pupillary block, as well as intravenous or oral acetazolamide in cases of moderate IOP elevation with a lower gas fill and a patent iridectomy. If a single intervention was insufficient, a combined approach was used. Results: A total of 116 eyes from 98 patients (62 female, mean age 73.0 \u00b1 9.8 years) were analyzed. DMEK was combined with cataract surgery in 41 eyes, and 4 eyes underwent phakic DMEK. Postoperatively, all iridectomies remained patent, and no cases of pupillary block occurred. Mean IOP and gas fill were within normal limits and declined steadily during the first 48 h. IOP-lowering procedures were performed in 11 eyes (9.5%), including venting (n = 3), acetazolamide administration (n = 7), and a combination of both (n = 1). There was no difference between DMEK and triple-DMEK regarding postoperative gas fill, IOP, or the need for IOP-lowering interventions. Mean postoperative IOP was significantly higher, and IOP-lowering interventions were more frequent in glaucoma vs. non-glaucoma patients. Re-bubbling was performed in 12 eyes (10.3%). Two cases of primary graft failure (1.7%) were recorded. Conclusions: In our patient cohort, a standardized surgical approach incorporating a surgical iridectomy at the 6 o\u2019clock position, 10% SF6 tamponade, and maintaining a mid-normal IOP at the end of surgery effectively prevented pupillary block. We recommend early postoperative assessment of IOP and percent gas fill to promptly identify and manage impending IOP elevation, which is particularly important in patients with glaucoma.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm15020521","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,8]],"date-time":"2026-01-08T12:56:55Z","timestamp":1767877015000},"page":"521","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Avoiding Post-DMEK IOP Elevation: Insights from a Standardized Surgical Approach"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"Stephanie D.","family":"Grabitz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anna L.","family":"Engel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mohammad","family":"Al Hariri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3506-8465","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Adrian","family":"Gericke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Norbert","family":"Pfeiffer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7025-8280","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Joanna","family":"Wasielica-Poslednik","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"222","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2007.09.021","article-title":"Preliminary clinical results of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty","volume":"145","author":"Melles","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"646","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo-2022-323162","article-title":"Descemet\u2019s membrane endothelial keratoplasty is predominant keratoplasty procedure in Germany since 2016: A report of the DOG-section cornea and its keratoplasty registry","volume":"108","author":"Flockerzi","year":"2024","journal-title":"Br. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0000000000002778","article-title":"Impact of Early Intraocular Pressure Elevation on Postoperative Outcomes After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Non-glaucoma Patients","volume":"41","author":"Lentzsch","year":"2021","journal-title":"Cornea"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0000000000000669","article-title":"Immediate Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes After Anterior Chamber Air Fill in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty","volume":"35","author":"Stanzel","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cornea"},{"key":"ref_5","first-page":"25158414221083359","article-title":"Early intraocular pressure changes following different keratoplasty techniques and association with cornea parameters and anterior chamber depth","volume":"14","author":"Gumus","year":"2022","journal-title":"Ther. Adv. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"671","DOI":"10.1016\/S0014-4835(03)00055-1","article-title":"Corneal thickness and endothelial cell density measured by non-contact specular microscopy and pachymetry in Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) with laser-induced ocular hypertension","volume":"76","author":"Ollivier","year":"2003","journal-title":"Exp. Eye Res."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Xie, Z.J., Wu, Q.Y., Qu, J.H., Lin, J.Y., and Hong, J. (2024). Impact of postoperative intraocular pressure elevation on graft endothelial cells in non-preexisting glaucoma eyes undergoing descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: A cohort study. BMC Ophthalmol., 24.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-024-03728-8"},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1035","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0000000000000901","article-title":"Air bubble-induced high intraocular pressure after Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty","volume":"35","author":"Yoeruek","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cornea"},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3492","DOI":"10.1038\/s41433-023-02542-8","article-title":"Safety and clinical outcomes of omitting same and next day review after DMEK performed with an inferior peripheral iridotomy","volume":"37","author":"Roberts","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eye"},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1007\/s00417-022-05813-4","article-title":"Graft failure rate and complications after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma","volume":"261","author":"Maier","year":"2023","journal-title":"Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1757","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2015.05.013","article-title":"Comparison of Sulfur Hexafluoride 20% versus Air Tamponade in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty","volume":"122","author":"Morral","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"902","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2016-309653","article-title":"One-year outcome after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) comparing sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) 20% versus 100% air for anterior chamber tamponade","volume":"101","author":"Schaub","year":"2017","journal-title":"Br. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103979","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jfo.2023.06.010","article-title":"Comparison of efficacy of three gases for anterior chamber tamponade in Descemet\u2019s membrane endothelial keratoplasty","volume":"47","author":"Karaca","year":"2024","journal-title":"J. Fran\u00e7ais D Ophtalmol."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sch\u00f6n, F., Gericke, A., Bu, J.B., Apel, M., Poplawski, A., Schuster, A.K., Pfeiffer, N., and Wasielica-Poslednik, J. (2021). How to Predict the Suitability for Corneal Donorship?. J. Clin. Med., 10.","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm10153426"},{"key":"ref_15","first-page":"7813482","article-title":"How to Avoid an Upside-Down Orientation of the Graft during Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty?","volume":"2019","author":"Schuster","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1049","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2020-316705","article-title":"Corneal graft failure: An update","volume":"105","author":"Alio","year":"2021","journal-title":"Br. J. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1391","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0000000000001015","article-title":"Prevention and Management of Pupil Block After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty","volume":"35","author":"Gonzalez","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cornea"},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2017.08.015","article-title":"Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Safety and Outcomes. A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology","volume":"125","author":"Deng","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"871","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2011.11.038","article-title":"Outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in phakic eyes","volume":"38","author":"Parker","year":"2012","journal-title":"J. Cataract Refract. Surg."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1947","DOI":"10.1007\/s00417-014-2757-5","article-title":"Intraocular pressure elevation and post-DMEK glaucoma following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty","volume":"252","author":"Maier","year":"2014","journal-title":"Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0000000000002363","article-title":"Long-term Results of Intraocular Pressure Elevation and Post-DMEK Glaucoma After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty","volume":"40","author":"Maier","year":"2021","journal-title":"Cornea"},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"174","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0000000000003810","article-title":"Nd:YAG Laser Iridotomy Versus Surgical Iridectomy in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Comparison of Postoperative Outcome and Incidence of Ocular Hypertension","volume":"45","author":"Steindor","year":"2025","journal-title":"Cornea"},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27179","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-025-02736-y","article-title":"Multivariate relationships between graft detachment after DMEK and twelve pre\/perioperative factors","volume":"15","author":"Metz","year":"2025","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."}],"container-title":["Journal of Clinical Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/15\/2\/521\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,8]],"date-time":"2026-01-08T13:10:43Z","timestamp":1767877843000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/15\/2\/521"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,8]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]}},"alternative-id":["jcm15020521"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm15020521","relation":{},"ISSN":["2077-0383"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2077-0383","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,8]]}}}