{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,24]],"date-time":"2026-07-24T08:05:55Z","timestamp":1784880355337,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"15","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,24]],"date-time":"2026-07-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1784851200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J. Clin. Med.","JCM"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Background\/Objectives: Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IOM) is commonly used in instrumented spine surgery; however, its utility is often debated. We sought to determine if IOM changes were independently associated with specific postoperative outcomes in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent MIS-TLIF with IOM at a single institution. Collected data included demographics, comorbidities, surgical history, operative indications, operative spinal levels, IOM findings, and postoperative outcomes. Single and multivariate logarithmic regression analyses were performed to assess the correlation of each preoperative variable with IOM alerts, as well as the association between IOM alerts and postoperative outcomes. Results: A total of 439 patients were identified, 21 of whom experienced an IOM alert. No preoperative variables were significantly associated with IOM alerts. However, the presence of an IOM alert significantly increased the log odds of postoperative foot drop (1.93\u20136.55, p &lt; 0.001), for which there was also a high specificity (95.9%) and negative predictive value (99.8%). However, likely due to low event rates, IOM had a low negative predictive value (16.7%). Further multivariate analysis also identified an IOM alert as a significant predictor of postoperative neurological deficits and chronic complications, although these pooled categories included foot drop. When IOM subtypes were investigated, both the SSEP and MEP significantly increased the log odds of postoperative foot drop (p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: An IOM alert during MIS-TLIF may be associated with chronic complications and postoperative neurological deficits, particularly foot drop. These findings highlight IOM\u2019s potential use as an effective intraoperative screening tool to rule out iatrogenic foot drop but also its limited value to independently predict rare postoperative complications.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm15155795","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,24]],"date-time":"2026-07-24T07:36:13Z","timestamp":1784878573000},"page":"5795","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Changes During MIS-TLIF Associated with Postoperative Foot Drop"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"15","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0004-3215-4706","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Michael C.","family":"Oblich","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0005-8313-5246","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"James G.","family":"Lyman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"James M.","family":"Mossner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tyler","family":"Koski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5242-1646","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Najib","family":"El Tecle","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nader","family":"Dahdaleh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kevin","family":"Swong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ncl.2021.11.006","article-title":"Intraoperative Monitoring for Spinal Surgery","volume":"40","author":"Agarwal","year":"2022","journal-title":"Neurol. Clin."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1950","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000593","article-title":"Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Single-Level Spinal Procedures: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Analysis in a National Longitudinal Database","volume":"39","author":"Cole","year":"2014","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S26","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000076895.52418.5E","article-title":"Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion","volume":"28","author":"Foley","year":"2003","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1093\/ons\/opy061","article-title":"The Efficacy of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring to Detect Postoperative Neurological Deficits in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery","volume":"16","author":"Kim","year":"2019","journal-title":"Oper. Neurosurg."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E470","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002900","article-title":"Alert Timing and Corresponding Intervention With Intraoperative Spinal Cord Monitoring for High-Risk Spinal Surgery","volume":"44","author":"Yoshida","year":"2019","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S37","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181d8338e","article-title":"The Evidence for Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spine Surgery: Does It Make a Difference?","volume":"35","author":"Fehlings","year":"2010","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2151","DOI":"10.1212\/WNL.0000000000002076","article-title":"Does Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring Matter in Noncomplex Spine Surgeries?","volume":"85","author":"Ney","year":"2015","journal-title":"Neurology"},{"key":"ref_8","first-page":"57","article-title":"Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring for Minimally Invasive 1- and 2-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Does It Improve Patient Outcome?","volume":"14","author":"Garces","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ochsner J."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1097\/WNP.0b013e3182933d8f","article-title":"Cost-Benefit Analysis: Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spinal Surgeries","volume":"30","author":"Ney","year":"2013","journal-title":"J. Clin. Neurophysiol."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.3171\/jns.2002.96.2.0255","article-title":"The Impact of Neurophysiological Intraoperative Monitoring on Surgical Decisions: A Critical Analysis of 423 Cases","volume":"96","author":"Wiedemayer","year":"2002","journal-title":"J. Neurosurg."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"599","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-018-5861-0","article-title":"The Impact and Value of Uni- and Multimodal Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring (IONM) on Neurological Complications during Spine Surgery: A Prospective Study of 2728 Patients","volume":"28","author":"Sutter","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur. Spine J."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.01.010","article-title":"What Is the Predictive Value of Intraoperative Somatosensory Evoked Potential Monitoring for Postoperative Neurological Deficit in Cervical Spine Surgery?-A Meta-Analysis","volume":"21","author":"Reddy","year":"2021","journal-title":"Spine J. Off. J. North Am. Spine Soc."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Liu, T., Yan, L., Qi, H., Luo, Z., Liu, X., Yuan, T., Dong, B., Zhao, Y., Zhao, S., and Li, H. (2022). Diagnostic Value of Multimodal Intraoperative Neuromonitoring by Combining Somatosensory-With Motor-Evoked Potential in Posterior Decompression Surgery for Thoracic Spinal Stenosis. Front. Neurosci., 16.","DOI":"10.3389\/fnins.2022.879435"},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2557","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-022-07223-w","article-title":"One-Level Open vs. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Advanced Meta-Analytic Assessment of Prospective Studies with at Least Two Years Follow-Up","volume":"31","author":"Kunadt","year":"2022","journal-title":"Eur. Spine J."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2049","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182a8212d","article-title":"Five-Year Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Matched-Pair Comparison Study","volume":"38","author":"Seng","year":"2013","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2019.08.116","article-title":"Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for One-Level Lumbar Discectomies Is Low Yield and Cost-Ineffective","volume":"71","author":"Krause","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Clin. Neurosci."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1095","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004603","article-title":"The Utilization of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring for Lumbar Decompression and Fusion Surgery in New York State","volume":"48","author":"Dodo","year":"2023","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1154","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002575","article-title":"Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","volume":"43","author":"Daniel","year":"2018","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"ref_19","first-page":"100206","article-title":"Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Spine Surgery: Large Database Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness","volume":"14","author":"Ament","year":"2023","journal-title":"North Am. Spine Soc. J."},{"key":"ref_20","first-page":"1","article-title":"Sample Size for Survey Research: Review and Recommendations","volume":"4","author":"Memon","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Appl. Struct. Equ. Model."}],"container-title":["Journal of Clinical Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/15\/15\/5795\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,24]],"date-time":"2026-07-24T07:57:29Z","timestamp":1784879849000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/15\/15\/5795"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,24]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"15","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]}},"alternative-id":["jcm15155795"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm15155795","relation":{},"ISSN":["2077-0383"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2077-0383","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,24]]}}}