{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T17:27:44Z","timestamp":1786123664968,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"16","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1786060800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"Department of Oncology, Wroclaw Medical University","award":["SUBZ.C280.26.041"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["SUBZ.C280.26.041"]}]},{"award":["SUBZ.C280.26.041"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["SUBZ.C280.26.041"]}],"id":[{"id":"https:\/\/ror.org\/01qpw1b93","id-type":"ROR","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J. Clin. Med.","JCM"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Background: Objective breast assessment is relevant in aesthetic, reconstructive, and oncoplastic breast surgery. Smartphones and tablets are widely available devices that may offer an accessible means for three-dimensional (3D) breast surface imaging, with potential relevance for preoperative assessment, surgical planning, and outcome evaluation. However, the available evidence is heterogeneous, and the validity of different devices, applications, and workflows remains unclear. This narrative review aimed to summarize the evidence on smartphone-based 3D surface imaging. Methods: A structured literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and EBSCOhost. Only original studies that used smartphone- or tablet-based breast assessment were included. Data extraction included devices, software, population\/material, outcomes, comparators, validation metrics, and limitations. Reporting completeness was assessed using an adapted GRRAS-based appraisal. Results: A total of 9 studies representing approximately 7 independent datasets were included. Only two studies assessed volumetry as one of the primary aims. The evidence base was small and heterogeneous. Most studies were patient-based, while the remaining studies used phantom or model-based designs. Feasibility was demonstrated for selected device\u2013application\u2013workflow combinations, predominantly involving iPhones and the 3D Scanner App, but these findings were not generalizable to smartphone-based 3D breast imaging as a whole. Evidence was more favorable for selected linear anthropometric measurements than for volumetry. Key limitations included breast ptosis, inframammary fold (IMF) geometry, posterior boundary definition, software, and operator dependence. Three of the included reports had potentially overlapping cohorts. Due to substantial heterogeneity in devices, applications, comparators, outcomes, and validation metrics, meta-analysis was not performed. Conclusions: Current evidence is limited to a small number of heterogeneous, predominantly single-center datasets and supports only workflow-specific feasibility for selected anthropometric and surface-based measurements. These findings should not be generalized across smartphone devices, applications, or reconstruction workflows. Breast volumetry remains insufficiently validated and is supported by only two non-comparable studies. Future studies should provide more detailed reporting that focuses on objective characteristics of the workflow and outcomes, including predefined analyses of agreement and measurement error.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm15166154","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T16:00:43Z","timestamp":1786118443000},"page":"6154","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Smartphone-Based 3D Surface Imaging for Breast Anthropometry, Symmetry Assessment, and Volumetry: A Structured Narrative Review"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"15","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0008-0066-6087","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mateusz","family":"Mazurek","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Clinical and Dissecting Anatomy Students\u2019 Scientific Club, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroc\u0142aw, Poland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2317-1932","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Zygmunt","family":"Domaga\u0142a","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Anatomy, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroc\u0142aw, Poland"},{"name":"Walbrzych Branch, Wroclaw Medical University, 58-300 Wroc\u0142aw, Poland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1705-5097","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rafa\u0142","family":"Matkowski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Oncology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroc\u0142aw, Poland"},{"name":"Lower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center, 53-413 Wroc\u0142aw, Poland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2015.03.011","article-title":"Review of three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging for oncoplastic, reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery","volume":"24","author":"Stevens","year":"2015","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1116","DOI":"10.1007\/s00266-014-0412-5","article-title":"Objective Breast Volume, Shape and Surface Area Assessment: A Systematic Review of Breast Measurement Methods","volume":"38","author":"Xi","year":"2014","journal-title":"Aesthetic Plast. Surg."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2016.05.010","article-title":"The accuracy of breast volume measurement methods: A systematic review","volume":"28","author":"Choppin","year":"2016","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1350","DOI":"10.1093\/asj\/sjae170","article-title":"Expanding Access to 3D Technology in Plastic Surgery of the Breast: Validation of the iPhone Against the Vectra H2","volume":"44","author":"Rudy","year":"2024","journal-title":"Aesthet. Surg. J."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"NP99","DOI":"10.1093\/asj\/sjae251","article-title":"3D Breast Scanning in Plastic Surgery Utilizing Free iPhone LiDAR Application: Evaluation, Potential, and Limitations","volume":"45","author":"Kyriazidis","year":"2025","journal-title":"Aesthet. Surg. J."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1183E","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000010405","article-title":"Development of Three-Dimensional Breast Scan and Measurement Application Using Laser Imaging Detection and Ranging Sensor on iPhone","volume":"152","author":"Han","year":"2023","journal-title":"Plast. Reconstr. Surg."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hartmann, R., Chrobot, N., Festbaum, C., Alfertshofer, M., Obermeier, K.T., Smolka, W., Ettl, T., Prantl, L., and Br\u00e9bant, V. (2025). Symmetry After Breast Reconstruction Surgery: A Comparison of Immediate vs. Delayed-Immediate Breast Reconstruction Using Smartphone-Based 3D Surface Imaging. J. Clin. Med., 14.","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm14217622"},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Botti, E., Jansen, B., Ballen-Moreno, F., Kapila, A., and Brahimetaj, R. (2025). Evaluating the Accuracy and Repeatability of Mobile 3D Imaging Applications for Breast Phantom Reconstruction. Sensors, 25.","DOI":"10.3390\/s25154596"},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(86)90837-8","article-title":"Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement","volume":"327","author":"Altman","year":"1986","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002","article-title":"Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed","volume":"64","author":"Kottner","year":"2011","journal-title":"J. Clin. Epidemiol."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"166","DOI":"10.1007\/s12282-024-01647-6","article-title":"Comparative assessment of breast volume using a smartphone device versus MRI","volume":"32","author":"Behrens","year":"2025","journal-title":"Breast Cancer"},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"398","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2025.03.039","article-title":"Advancing digital anthropometry in plastic surgery: Comparing smartphone 3D surface imaging to Vectra H2 in breast reconstruction","volume":"104","author":"Chrobot","year":"2025","journal-title":"J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chrobot, N., Unbehaun, P., Frank, K., Alfertshofer, M., Smolka, W., Ettl, T., Anker, A., Prantl, L., Br\u00e9bant, V., and Hartmann, R. (2025). Smartphone-Based 3D Surface Imaging: A New Frontier in Digital Breast Assessment? Smartphone-Based Breast Assessment. J. Clin. Med., 14.","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm14176233"},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dijkman, B.A.M., Liberton, N.P.T.J., te Slaa, S., Smit, J.M., Wiepjes, C.M., Dreijerink, K.M.A., den Heijer, M., Verdaasdonk, R.M., and de Blok, C.J.M. (2024). A comparative study of 3D measuring methods for monitoring breast volume changes. PLoS ONE, 19.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0305059"},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1186\/s41073-019-0064-8","article-title":"SANRA\u2014A scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles","volume":"4","author":"Baethge","year":"2019","journal-title":"Res. Integr. Peer Rev."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"n71","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2026.02.046","article-title":"Advancing nipple volume measurement using Gaussian splatting: Achieving comparable accuracy to current standards","volume":"115","author":"Kim","year":"2026","journal-title":"J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg."}],"container-title":["Journal of Clinical Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/15\/16\/6154\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T16:09:05Z","timestamp":1786118945000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/15\/16\/6154"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"16","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]}},"alternative-id":["jcm15166154"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm15166154","relation":{},"ISSN":["2077-0383"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2077-0383","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]]}}}