{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T13:24:29Z","timestamp":1786973069290,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"16","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,16]],"date-time":"2026-08-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1786838400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J. Clin. Med.","JCM"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Background: Outpatient hysteroscopy is the reference standard for the diagnosis and treatment of benign intrauterine pathology. Although several pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies have been proposed to reduce procedural pain, the clinical and procedural factors primarily determining patient tolerability in a standardized vaginoscopic setting remain incompletely understood. This prospective study aimed to identify the main predictors of pain, procedural tolerability, successful completion, and patient acceptance during outpatient hysteroscopy. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted between February and June 2026 at a second-level referral hospital. Consecutive women undergoing outpatient hysteroscopy were enrolled. All procedures were performed according to a standardized vaginoscopic \u201cno-touch\u201d protocol using a 15-Fr Bettocchi hysteroscope. Patients completed structured questionnaires before and after the procedure, while physicians recorded procedural findings immediately afterward. Clinical characteristics, psychological variables, procedural factors, pain scores, procedural tolerability, successful completion, and future patient preference were prospectively analyzed. Results: A total of 105 women were included. Diagnostic hysteroscopy was successfully completed in 94 patients (89.5%), and a see-and-treat procedure was performed in 57 (54.3%). Difficult cervical access occurred in 37 cases (35.2%) and emerged as the strongest determinant of poor procedural tolerability. These patients experienced significantly higher maximum pain scores (7.35 \u00b1 2.81 vs. 4.04 \u00b1 2.51; p &lt; 0.001), a higher prevalence of severe pain (67.6% vs. 20.6%; p &lt; 0.001), poorer procedural tolerability, greater preference for future hysteroscopy under anesthesia, and a higher risk of incomplete diagnostic examination. All incomplete hysteroscopies occurred in patients with difficult cervical access. Expected procedural pain was significantly associated with maximum pain (p = 0.0016), whereas pre-procedural anxiety was not. More than half of the patients identified cervical passage as the most painful procedural step. Patients undergoing successful see-and-treat procedures reported the lowest pain scores, suggesting that the operative phase itself was not the principal determinant of procedural discomfort. Conclusions: In a standardized vaginoscopic setting, procedural tolerability during outpatient hysteroscopy appears to depend primarily on difficult cervical access rather than on the operative intervention itself. Pain expectation may influence the hysteroscopic experience more than pre-procedural anxiety, whereas successful see-and-treat procedures remain well tolerated once uncomplicated access to the uterine cavity has been achieved. Early identification of patients at increased risk of difficult cervical access may improve patient counseling, optimize procedural completion, and preserve the benefits of outpatient hysteroscopy.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm15166335","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T12:01:26Z","timestamp":1786968086000},"page":"6335","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Clinical Factors Associated with Pain During Outpatient Hysteroscopy in a Standardized Vaginoscopic Setting: A Prospective Observational Study"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"15","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0005-3701-4662","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Francesco Pio","family":"Toscano","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy"},{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Ospedaliera San Giuseppe Moscati, 83100 Avellino, Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maria","family":"D\u2019Angelo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy"},{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Ospedaliera San Giuseppe Moscati, 83100 Avellino, Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Luigi","family":"Riello","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy"},{"name":"Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Villa del Sole, 81100 Caserta, Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mario","family":"Ardovino","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Ospedaliera San Giuseppe Moscati, 83100 Avellino, Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Antonio","family":"Mollo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Medicine, Salerno Medical School, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","first-page":"115","article-title":"Outpatient hysteroscopy","volume":"10","author":"Campo","year":"2018","journal-title":"Facts Views Vis. ObGyn"},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"847","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2018.08.013","article-title":"Alternative Treatment Utilization Before Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Conditions at a Large Integrated Health System","volume":"26","author":"Nguyen","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_3","first-page":"e86","article-title":"Outpatient Hysteroscopy (Green-top Guideline no. 59)","volume":"131","author":"Smith","year":"2024","journal-title":"BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"930","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2018.10.002","article-title":"Effectiveness of Outpatient Versus Operating Room Hysteroscopy for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Uterine Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","volume":"41","author":"Bennett","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1007\/s10397-015-0895-3","article-title":"Anxiety at outpatient hysteroscopy","volume":"12","author":"Gambadauro","year":"2015","journal-title":"Gynecol. Surg."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"360","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2012.01.017","article-title":"Waiting Time and Pain During Office Hysteroscopy","volume":"19","author":"Carta","year":"2012","journal-title":"J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcma.2014.07.004","article-title":"Impact of preprocedural anxiety levels on pain perception in patients undergoing office hysteroscopy","volume":"77","author":"Kokanali","year":"2014","journal-title":"J. Chin. Med. Assoc."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"999","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05885-9","article-title":"Impact of anxiety levels on the perception of pain in patients undergoing office hysteroscopy","volume":"303","author":"Sorrentino","year":"2021","journal-title":"Arch. Gynecol. Obstet."},{"key":"ref_9","first-page":"CD007710","article-title":"Pain relief for outpatient hysteroscopy","volume":"2017","author":"Ahmad","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst. Rev."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e20272","DOI":"10.7717\/peerj.20272","article-title":"Patient satisfaction after outpatient hysteroscopy: A retrospective descriptive study","volume":"13","author":"Carbonell","year":"2025","journal-title":"PeerJ"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8879788","DOI":"10.1155\/prm\/8879788","article-title":"Association Between Menstrual Pain and Procedural Pain During Office Hysteroscopy: A 10-Year Cohort Study","volume":"2026","author":"Anggraeni","year":"2026","journal-title":"Pain Res. Manag."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.10.045","article-title":"Pain during diagnostic hysteroscopy: What is the role of the cervical canal? A pilot study","volume":"183","author":"Mazzon","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e16","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.01.030","article-title":"Challenging the cervix: Strategies to overcome the anatomic impediments to hysteroscopy: Analysis of 31,052 office hysteroscopies","volume":"105","author":"Bettocchi","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101976","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101976","article-title":"Pain management for in-office hysteroscopy. A practical decalogue for the operator","volume":"50","author":"Vitale","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1699","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2021.05.018","article-title":"Pain and Operative Technologies Used in Office Hysteroscopy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials","volume":"28","author":"Stevenson","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"703","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2010.07.003","article-title":"Hysteroscopy without Anesthesia: Review of Recent Literature","volume":"17","author":"Cicinelli","year":"2010","journal-title":"J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0043-1764361","article-title":"Predictive Factors of Tolerance in Office Hysteroscopy\u2014A 3-Year Analysis from a Tertiary Center","volume":"45","author":"Coimbra","year":"2023","journal-title":"Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obs."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"586","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.12.118","article-title":"Identifying Predictors of Unacceptable Pain at Office Hysteroscopy","volume":"21","author":"Sessa","year":"2014","journal-title":"J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0000000000000614","article-title":"Overcoming the Challenging Cervix: Identification and Techniques to Access the Uterine Cavity","volume":"73","author":"Wood","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol. Surv."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"532","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02503.x","article-title":"Vaginoscopic approach to outpatient hysteroscopy: A systematic review of the effect on pain","volume":"117","author":"Cooper","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1292","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03046.x","article-title":"Does cervical preparation before outpatient hysteroscopy reduce women\u2019s pain experience? A systematic review: Cervical preparation for outpatient hysteroscopy","volume":"118","author":"Cooper","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"c1130","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c1130","article-title":"Local anaesthesia for pain control during outpatient hysteroscopy: Systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"340","author":"Cooper","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1016\/S1074-3804(97)80019-9","article-title":"A vaginoscopic approach to reduce the pain of office hysteroscopy","volume":"4","author":"Bettocchi","year":"1997","journal-title":"J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1422","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(03)00363-7","article-title":"Suppression of pelvic pain during hysteroscopy with a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation device","volume":"79","author":"Perrone","year":"2003","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2688466","DOI":"10.1080\/07853890.2026.2688466","article-title":"Paracervical block in office hysteroscopy with vaginoscopic approach to reduce patients\u2019 pain perception: A propensity score matching analysis","volume":"58","author":"Gentile","year":"2026","journal-title":"Ann. Med."},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Abd-ElGawad, M., Abdelsattar, N.K., Kamel, M.A., Sabri, Y.A., Fathy, E.M., El-Moez, N.A., Abdellatif, Y.S., and Metwally, A.A. (2023). The effect of music intervention in decreasing pain and anxiety during outpatient hysteroscopy procedure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. BMC Women\u2019s Health, 23.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12905-023-02489-8"},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"329","DOI":"10.5114\/wiitm.2019.89378","article-title":"Use of video-based multimedia information to reduce anxiety before office hysteroscopy","volume":"15","author":"Akca","year":"2019","journal-title":"Videosurgery Other Miniinvasive Tech."},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2025.01.004","article-title":"Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for pain control in outpatient hysteroscopy: A systematic review","volume":"306","author":"Bracken","year":"2025","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol."},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"963","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00425.x","article-title":"Outpatient hysteroscopy: Traditional versus the \u2018no-touch\u2019 technique","volume":"112","author":"Sharma","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1975","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-025-85185-x","article-title":"The effect of cervical length on procedure time and VAS pain score in office hysteroscopy","volume":"15","author":"Soysal","year":"2025","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"key":"ref_31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vicentin, R.T.I., Haddad, R.F., De Figueiredo, J.S., Katsuyama, E., Callado, G.Y., J\u00fanior, E.A., and De Albuquerque Maranh\u00e3o, D.D. (2025). Factors Associated with Pain Levels During Office Hysteroscopy: A Cross-Sectional Study. Women, 5.","DOI":"10.3390\/women5030032"},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"755","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-023-07126-1","article-title":"Uterine cervical stenosis: From classification to advances in management. Overcoming the obstacles to access the uterine cavity","volume":"309","author":"Vitale","year":"2023","journal-title":"Arch. Gynecol. Obstet."},{"key":"ref_33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1418","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.15219","article-title":"Diagnostic office hysteroscopy; why is it still painful procedure despite the surgical experience and mini-hysteroscope?","volume":"48","author":"Guraslan","year":"2022","journal-title":"J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res."}],"container-title":["Journal of Clinical Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/15\/16\/6335\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T12:27:48Z","timestamp":1786969668000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/15\/16\/6335"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,16]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"16","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]}},"alternative-id":["jcm15166335"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm15166335","relation":{},"ISSN":["2077-0383"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2077-0383","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,16]]}}}