{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]],"date-time":"2026-09-16T10:05:44Z","timestamp":1789553144632,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"18","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]],"date-time":"2026-09-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1789516800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J. Clin. Med.","JCM"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Background: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) involves highly modulated dose distributions and steep dose gradients, increasing the importance of patient-specific quality assurance (QA). Gamma index analysis is widely used for comparing measured and treatment planning system (TPS)-calculated dose distributions; however, its sensitivity to small systematic mechanical errors remains controversial, particularly across different detector systems and normalization methods. This study aimed to investigate the sensitivity of various gamma index criteria to intentional linear accelerator-based mechanical errors, including multileaf collimator (MLC) positional deviations and collimator rotation errors, using four dosimetric systems. Additionally, global and local gamma analyses were compared to evaluate their ability to detect clinically relevant geometric deviations in SBRT VMAT. Methods: Twenty-five lung SBRT VMAT plans were retrospectively selected. For each patient, six additional plans containing systematic MLC aperture widening errors (0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2 mm) and collimator rotation errors (0.5\u00b0 and 2\u00b0) were generated, resulting in 175 treatment plans. Each plan was delivered to five different patient-specific QA dosimetric systems, resulting in a total of 875 QA measurements. Patient-specific QA measurements were performed using EPID-based EPIQA, ArcCHECK (SNCPATIENT\/3DVH), COMPASS (Matrixx Evolution), and Octavius 4D systems. Gamma analyses were conducted using 3%\/3 mm, 3%\/2 mm, 2%\/2 mm, 2%\/1 mm, 1%\/2 mm, and 1%\/1 mm criteria with a 10% dose threshold. Pearson correlation analysis assessed relationships between global and local gamma results. Linear regression slopes quantified sensitivity to MLC aperture widening errors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated to evaluate error detectability. Results: Gamma sensitivity varied considerably depending on the characteristics of the dosimetric system (including detector resolution, reconstruction algorithm, and evaluation method) as well as the selected gamma criteria. The 2%\/1 mm criterion consistently demonstrated high sensitivity across all systems, providing strong discrimination of \u22650.5 mm MLC errors and near-perfect AUC values for \u22651 mm deviations. The 1%\/1 mm criterion yielded the steepest regression slopes but produced unstable passing rates, including in error-free plans, particularly in lower-resolution systems. Conventional 3%\/3 mm and 3%\/2 mm criteria frequently failed to detect clinically relevant submillimeter MLC deviations. EPID-based EPIQA showed the highest overall sensitivity and AUC performance for small errors, whereas ArcCHECK and Octavius 4D exhibited reduced responsiveness to subtle deviations. Conclusions: Gamma index performance in SBRT VMAT QA is strongly dependent on detector characteristics and gamma configuration. Among the evaluated criteria, 2%\/1 mm provided the most balanced combination of sensitivity and clinical stability. Widely used 3%\/3 mm thresholds were insufficient for detecting submillimeter geometric deviations. Detector-specific and technique-specific gamma protocols should be implemented to ensure reliable identification of clinically relevant mechanical errors in high-precision radiotherapy.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm15187183","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]],"date-time":"2026-09-16T09:06:37Z","timestamp":1789549597000},"page":"7183","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Assessing Gamma Index Sensitivity to Selected Linear Accelerator Mechanical Errors Using Various Dosimetric Systems"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"Hande Bas","family":"Ayata","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Kocaeli University, 41001 Kocaeli, Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4235-9276","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gokhan","family":"Aydin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiation Oncology, Ac\u0131badem Maslak Hospital, 34457 Istanbul, Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"},{"role":"conceptualization","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"supervision","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"resources","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"investigation","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"validation","vocabulary":"credit"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3966-4184","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Emrah Gokay","family":"Ozgur","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Biostatistics, Marmara University Hospital, 34899 Istanbul, Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"},{"role":"formal-analysis","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"methodology","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"validation","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"writing-review-editing","vocabulary":"credit"}]},{"given":"Zeynep","family":"Ozen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiation Oncology, Ac\u0131badem Antunizade Hospital, 34662 Istanbul, Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"},{"role":"investigation","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"resources","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"validation","vocabulary":"credit"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0033-2454","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Talip","family":"Celik","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Kocaeli University, 41001 Kocaeli, Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"},{"role":"software","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"validation","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"writing-review-editing","vocabulary":"credit"}]},{"given":"Ozcan","family":"Gundogdu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Kocaeli University, 41001 Kocaeli, Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"},{"role":"supervision","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"methodology","vocabulary":"credit"},{"role":"writing-review-editing","vocabulary":"credit"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2759","DOI":"10.1118\/1.2739807","article-title":"IMAT-SIM: A new method for the clinical dosimetry of intensity modulated arc therapy (IMAT)","volume":"34","author":"Iori","year":"2007","journal-title":"Med. Phys."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"031716","DOI":"10.1118\/1.4788645","article-title":"Patient QA systems for rotational radiation therapy: A comparative experimental study with intentional errors","volume":"40","author":"Fredh","year":"2013","journal-title":"Med. Phys."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"031702","DOI":"10.1118\/1.4789580","article-title":"On the sensitivity of common gamma- index evaluation methods to MLC misalignments in Rapidarc quality assurance","volume":"40","author":"Heilemann","year":"2013","journal-title":"Med. Phys."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"370","DOI":"10.1016\/j.radonc.2013.08.048","article-title":"A comparison of the gamma index analysis in various commercial IMRT\/VMAT QA systems","volume":"109","author":"Hussein","year":"2013","journal-title":"Radiother. Oncol."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"071718","DOI":"10.1118\/1.4810969","article-title":"Impact of plan parameters on the dosimetric accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy","volume":"40","author":"Masi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Med. Phys."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1118\/1.3528214","article-title":"On the impact of dose rate variation upon RapidArc implementation of volumetric modulated are therapy","volume":"38","author":"Nicolini","year":"2011","journal-title":"Med. Phys."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"656","DOI":"10.1118\/1.598248","article-title":"A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions","volume":"25","author":"Low","year":"1998","journal-title":"Med. Phys."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejmp.2017.03.001","article-title":"Challenges in calculation of the gamma index in radiotherapy\u2013towards good practice","volume":"36","author":"Hussein","year":"2017","journal-title":"Phys. Med."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6945","DOI":"10.1118\/1.4935199","article-title":"Validation of a method for in vivo 3D dose recon- struction for IMRT and VMAT treatments using on-treatment EPID images and a model-based forward-calculation algorithm","volume":"42","author":"McCowan","year":"2015","journal-title":"Med. Phys."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2455","DOI":"10.1118\/1.1598711","article-title":"Evaluation of the gamma dose distribution comparison method","volume":"30","author":"Low","year":"2003","journal-title":"Med. Phys."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1016\/0360-3016(93)90206-B","article-title":"Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers","volume":"26","author":"Barnett","year":"1993","journal-title":"Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2089","DOI":"10.1118\/1.1591194","article-title":"Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: Report of the IMRT subcommittee of the AAPM radiation therapy committee","volume":"30","author":"Ezzell","year":"2003","journal-title":"Med. Phys."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20140577","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20140577","article-title":"Correlation between gamma index passing rate and clinical dosimetric difference for pre-treatment 2D and 3D volumetric modulated arc therapy dosimetric verification","volume":"88","author":"Jin","year":"2015","journal-title":"Br. J. Radiol."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"396","DOI":"10.1016\/j.radonc.2014.03.021","article-title":"In vivo portal dosimetry for head-and-neck VMAT and lung IMRT: Linking gamma- analysis with differences in dose-volume histograms of the PTV","volume":"112","author":"Rozendaal","year":"2014","journal-title":"Radiother. Oncol."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1186\/1748-717X-9-167","article-title":"The sensitivity of gamma- index method to the positioning errors of high-definition MLC in patient- specific VMAT QA for SBRT","volume":"9","author":"Kim","year":"2014","journal-title":"Radiat. Oncol."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1016\/j.meddos.2014.04.004","article-title":"Initial experience of ArcCHECK and 3DVH software for RapidArc treatment plan verification","volume":"39","author":"Infusino","year":"2014","journal-title":"Med. Dosim."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1186\/1748-717X-3-24","article-title":"The GLAaS algorithm for portal dosimetry and quality assurance of RapidArc, an intensity-modulated rotational therapy","volume":"3","author":"Nicolini","year":"2008","journal-title":"Radiat. Oncol."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4228","DOI":"10.1118\/1.4729709","article-title":"VMAT QA: Measurement-guided 4D dose reconstruction on a patient","volume":"39","author":"Nelms","year":"2012","journal-title":"Med. Phys."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5619","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/55\/19\/001","article-title":"Experimental validation of a commercial 3D dose verification system for intensity-modulated arc therapies","volume":"55","author":"Boggula","year":"2010","journal-title":"Phys. Med. Biol."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"071731","DOI":"10.1118\/1.4812415","article-title":"Characterization of a novel 2D array dosimeter for patient-specific quality assurance with volumetric arc therapy","volume":"40","author":"Stathakis","year":"2013","journal-title":"Med. Phys."},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5359","DOI":"10.1118\/1.3238104","article-title":"IMRT commissioning: Multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119","volume":"36","author":"Ezzell","year":"2009","journal-title":"Med. Phys."},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e53","DOI":"10.1002\/mp.12810","article-title":"Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based QA: Recommendations of AAPM Task Group 218","volume":"45","author":"Miften","year":"2018","journal-title":"Med. Phys."},{"key":"ref_23","first-page":"e30885","article-title":"Gamma index analysis as a patient-specific quality assurance tool for high-precision radiotherapy: A clinical perspective of single institute experience","volume":"14","author":"Das","year":"2022","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"ref_24","first-page":"521","article-title":"Effect of dose grid resolution on the results of patient specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy","volume":"18","author":"Chun","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int. J. Radiat. Res."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1002\/acm2.12285","article-title":"A study on the effect of detector resolution on gamma index passing rate for VMAT and IMRT QA","volume":"19","author":"Woon","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys."},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1016\/j.radonc.2003.10.014","article-title":"Evaluation of a 2D diode array for IMRT quality assurance","volume":"70","author":"Gulam","year":"2004","journal-title":"Radiother. Oncol."},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3361","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/50\/14\/012","article-title":"Characterization of a 2D ion chamber array for the verification of radiotherapy treatments","volume":"50","author":"Spezi","year":"2005","journal-title":"Phys. Med. Biol."},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1016\/j.meddos.2010.12.013","article-title":"Characterization of responses of 2d array seven29 detector and its combined use with octavius phantom for the patient-specific quality assurance in rapidarc treatment delivery","volume":"37","author":"Syamkumar","year":"2012","journal-title":"Med. Dosim."},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.1120\/jacmp.v10i1.2915","article-title":"On the sensitivity of patient-specific IMRT QA to MLC","volume":"10","author":"Yan","year":"2009","journal-title":"J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1007\/s13246-020-00968-y","article-title":"Comparison of global and local gamma evaluation results using isodose levels","volume":"44","author":"Yu","year":"2021","journal-title":"Phys. Eng. Sci. Med."},{"key":"ref_31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"720","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejmp.2015.05.016","article-title":"Gamma index comparison of three VMAT QA systems and evaluation of their sensitivity to delivery errors","volume":"31","author":"Vieillevigne","year":"2015","journal-title":"Phys. Med."},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21TR01","DOI":"10.1088\/1361-6560\/acf43a","article-title":"Patient specific quality assurance in SBRT: A systematic review of measurement-based methods","volume":"68","author":"Malatesta","year":"2023","journal-title":"Phys. Med. Biol."},{"key":"ref_33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1118\/1.3544657","article-title":"Per-beam, planar IMRT QA passing rates do not predict clinically relevant patient dose errors","volume":"38","author":"Nelms","year":"2011","journal-title":"Med. Phys."},{"key":"ref_34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e70167","DOI":"10.1002\/acm2.70167","article-title":"Classification performances of two diode arrays for patient-specific quality assurance of stereotactic body radiation therapy treatments based on absolute dose measurements in phantom","volume":"26","author":"Linsalata","year":"2025","journal-title":"J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys."}],"container-title":["Journal of Clinical Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/15\/18\/7183\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]],"date-time":"2026-09-16T09:31:46Z","timestamp":1789551106000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2077-0383\/15\/18\/7183"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"18","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]}},"alternative-id":["jcm15187183"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm15187183","relation":{},"ISSN":["2077-0383"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2077-0383","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]]}}}