{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,9]],"date-time":"2026-06-09T07:18:14Z","timestamp":1780989494568,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,19]],"date-time":"2026-01-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1768780800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000780","name":"European Commission","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["101176367\u2013EPF\u2013EU4H\u20132024-OG"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["101176367\u2013EPF\u2013EU4H\u20132024-OG"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000780","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]},{"name":"Scientific Office at OPEN Health"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JMAHP"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Objectives: This study explores the feasibility and value of integrating structured patient input into the PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Study design) scoping process for Joint Clinical Assessments under the EU Health Technology Assessment Regulation. Methods: A modified Delphi panel, led by a steering committee composed of two clinicians, one patient expert, and one policy expert, engaged 12 individuals representing patient organizations across 12 European Member States to reach consensus on PICOS elements for CAR-T therapy in pediatric spinal muscular atrophy. Results: The Delphi process effectively facilitated PICOS consolidation and consensus among the 12 patient experts representing diverse EU contexts. Through 3 iterative rounds integrating quantitative rankings and qualitative feedback, the panel achieved strong agreement on key outcomes, intervention delivery, and study design elements, with population eligibility and comparator selection showing heterogeneity. Patient engagement was central: participants emphasized inclusive eligibility criteria, shared decision-making, and the inclusion of caregiver perspectives. The integration of qualitative insights allowed nuanced interpretation of dissent, distinguishing between genuine disagreement and framing effects, thereby enhancing transparency and scientific validity. Importantly, the process revealed patient priorities for outcomes, treatment burden, and evidence trade-offs, informing both PICOS refinement and future health technology assessment (HTA) strategies. This structured, participatory approach demonstrates the feasibility and value of incorporating patient voices systematically into early-stage EU HTA, fostering robust, credible, and context-sensitive consensus on complex rare-disease interventions. Conclusions: The study demonstrates the potential of consensus-building methodologies to enhance transparency, reduce heterogeneity, and support patient-centered evidence generation and decision-making in HTA.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/jmahp14010006","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,19]],"date-time":"2026-01-19T14:58:54Z","timestamp":1768834734000},"page":"6","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Enhancing Patient-Centered Health Technology Assessment: A Modified Delphi Panel for PICOS Scoping in Spinal Muscular Atrophy"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"14","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6729-9997","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Emanuele","family":"Arc\u00e0","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Strategic Market Access, OPEN Health, 3068 AV Rotterdam, The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Adele","family":"Barlassina","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Patient-Centered Outcomes, OPEN Health, 3068 AV Rotterdam, The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0008-7262-3836","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Adaeze","family":"Eze","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Strategic Market Access, OPEN Health, 3068 AV Rotterdam, The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Valentina","family":"Strammiello","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"European Patients\u2019 Forum, 1040 Brussels, Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","unstructured":"European Union (2025, May 19). Health Technology Assessment\u2014Summary of Regulation (EU) 2021\/2282 2024. Available online: https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/EN\/TXT\/?uri=legissum:4572723."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Arc\u00e0, E., Barlassina, A., Eze, A., and Strammiello, V. (2025). Enhancing patient engagement in HTA: Using consensus research to overcome PICO scoping challenges under the EU HTAR. J. Mark. Access Health Policy, 13.","DOI":"10.3390\/jmahp13020027"},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1016\/0143-6228(95)91062-3","article-title":"Exploring complex policy questions using the policy Delphi: A multi-round, interactive survey method","volume":"15","year":"1995","journal-title":"Appl. Geogr."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1008","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x","article-title":"Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique","volume":"32","author":"Hasson","year":"2000","journal-title":"J. Adv. Nurs."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1038\/s41572-022-00380-8","article-title":"Spinal muscular atrophy","volume":"8","author":"Mercuri","year":"2022","journal-title":"Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers"},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1038\/gim.2015.42","article-title":"Translating rare-disease therapies into improved care for patients and families: What are the right outcomes, designs, and engagement approaches in health-systems research?","volume":"18","author":"Potter","year":"2016","journal-title":"Genet. Med."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1186\/s13023-019-1002-z","article-title":"The patient\u2019s view on rare disease trial design\u2014A qualitative study","volume":"14","author":"Gaasterland","year":"2019","journal-title":"Orphanet J. Rare Dis."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1186\/s13023-020-01400-0","article-title":"To what degree are orphan drugs patient-centered? A review of the current state of clinical research in rare diseases","volume":"15","author":"Lanar","year":"2020","journal-title":"Orphanet J. Rare Dis."},{"key":"ref_9","unstructured":"Armstrong, J.S. (2001). Expert opinions in forecasting: The role of the Delphi technique. Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners, Springer."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"855","DOI":"10.1164\/rccm.201403-0593CC","article-title":"Seeking worldwide professional consensus on the principles of end-of-life care for the critically ill. The Consensus for Worldwide End-of-Life Practice for Patients in Intensive Care Units (WELPICUS) study","volume":"190","author":"Sprung","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"684","DOI":"10.1177\/0269216317690685","article-title":"Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic review","volume":"31","author":"Junger","year":"2017","journal-title":"Palliat. Med."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e815","DOI":"10.3399\/BJGP.2021.0265","article-title":"Recommendations for the recognition, diagnosis, and management of long COVID: A Delphi study","volume":"71","author":"Nurek","year":"2021","journal-title":"Br. J. Gen. Pract."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2573","DOI":"10.1038\/s41366-018-0313-9","article-title":"A Delphi study to build consensus on the definition and use of big data in obesity research","volume":"43","author":"Vogel","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int. J. Obes."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gattrell, W.T., Logullo, P., van Zuuren, E.J., Price, A., Hughes, E.L., Blazey, P., Winchester, C.C., Tovey, D., Goldman, K., and Hungin, A.P. (2024). ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document): A reporting guideline for consensus methods in biomedicine developed via a modified Delphi. PLoS Med., 21.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004326"},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1203","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-017-1344-2","article-title":"A Bayesian perspective on Likert scales and central tendency","volume":"25","author":"Douven","year":"2018","journal-title":"Psychon. Bull. Rev."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Westland, J.C. (2022). Information loss and bias in Likert survey responses. PLoS ONE, 17.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0271949"}],"container-title":["Journal of Market Access &amp; Health Policy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2001-6689\/14\/1\/6\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,21]],"date-time":"2026-01-21T05:11:21Z","timestamp":1768972281000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2001-6689\/14\/1\/6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,19]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3]]}},"alternative-id":["jmahp14010006"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jmahp14010006","relation":{},"ISSN":["2001-6689"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2001-6689","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,19]]}}}