{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T01:59:54Z","timestamp":1760147994610,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,22]],"date-time":"2023-03-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1679443200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JPM"],"abstract":"<jats:p>(1) Background: The clinical benefits and procedural efficiencies of performing minimally invasive fusion procedures, such as transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), in the ambulatory surgery center (ASC) are becoming increasingly well established. Currently, Medicare does not provide reimbursement for its beneficiaries eligible for TLIF in the ASC due to a lack of evidence regarding procedural safety. However, the initiation of the Hospital Without Walls program allowed for traditional hospital procedures to be relocated to other facilities such as ASCs, providing a unique opportunity to evaluate the utility of TLIF in the ASC in Medicare-age patients. (2) Methods: This single-center, retrospective study compared baseline characteristics, intraoperative variables, and 30-day postoperative safety outcomes between 48 Medicare-age patients undergoing TLIF in the ASC and 48 patients having the same procedure as hospital in-patients. All patients had a one-level TLIF using the VariLift\u00ae-LX expandable lumbar interbody fusion device. (3) Results: There were similar patient characteristics, procedural efficiency, and occurrence of clinical 30-day safety events between the two study groups. However, there was a marked and statistically significant difference in the median length of stay favoring TLIF patients treated in the ASC (23.9 h vs. 1.6 h, p = 0.001). All ASC-treated patients were discharged on the day of surgery. Postoperative visits to address adverse events were rare in either group. (4) Conclusions: These findings provide evidence that minimally invasive TLIF can be performed safely and efficiently in the ASC in Medicare-age patients. With same-day discharge, fusion procedures performed in the ASC offer a similar safety and more attractive cost\u2013benefit profile for older patients than the same surgery undertaken in the traditional hospital setting. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services should strongly consider extending the appropriate reimbursement codes (CPT \u00ae 22630, 22633) for minimally invasive TLIF and PLIF to the ASC Covered Procedure List so that Medicare-age patients can realize the clinical benefits of surgeries performed in this setting.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/jpm13030566","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,22]],"date-time":"2023-03-22T07:09:31Z","timestamp":1679468971000},"page":"566","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Surgery Center and Traditional Hospital Settings, Part 2: Assessment of Surgical Safety in Medicare Beneficiaries"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"13","author":[{"given":"Scott M.","family":"Schlesinger","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Legacy Spine & Neurological Specialists, 8201 Cantrell Rd., Ste. 265, Little Rock, AR 72227, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dominic","family":"Maggio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Legacy Spine & Neurological Specialists, 8201 Cantrell Rd., Ste. 265, Little Rock, AR 72227, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Morgan P.","family":"Lorio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Advanced Orthopedics, 499 E. Central Pkwy., Ste. 130, Altamonte Springs, FL 32701, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7842-2914","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kai-Uwe","family":"Lewandrowski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Center for Advanced Spine Care of Southern Arizona, 4787 E., Camp Lowell Drive, Tucson, AZ 85712, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9954-8938","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jon E.","family":"Block","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Independent Consultant, 2210 Jackson Street, Ste. 401, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"694","DOI":"10.31616\/asj.2020.0384","article-title":"Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: Techniques, Technologies, and Indications","volume":"14","author":"Park","year":"2020","journal-title":"Asian Spine J."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S2","DOI":"10.21037\/jss.2019.05.02","article-title":"Current state of minimally invasive spine surgery","volume":"5","author":"Vaishnav","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Spine Surg."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"753","DOI":"10.3171\/2021.10.SPINE211128","article-title":"Minimally invasive versus open lumbar spinal fusion: A matched study investigating patient-reported and surgical outcomes","volume":"36","author":"Mooney","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Neurosurg. Spine"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2049","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.07.006","article-title":"Long-term clinical outcome of minimally invasive versus open single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: A meta-analysis","volume":"21","author":"Heemskerk","year":"2021","journal-title":"Spine J."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"945","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.01.018","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF): A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"21","author":"Droeghaag","year":"2021","journal-title":"Spine J."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1037","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.10.207","article-title":"Analysis of Cost and 30-Day Outcomes in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Less Invasive, Stand-Alone Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion","volume":"122","author":"Hartman","year":"2019","journal-title":"World Neurosurg."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1039","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.22.00125","article-title":"What\u2019s new in spine surgery?","volume":"104","author":"Helgeson","year":"2022","journal-title":"J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am."},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1559","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002664","article-title":"Outpatient Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Population-Based Analysis of Trends and Complication Rates","volume":"43","author":"Arshi","year":"2018","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S174","DOI":"10.21037\/jss.2019.04.14","article-title":"Lumbar spinal fusion in the outpatient setting: An update on management, surgical approaches and planning","volume":"5","author":"Basques","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Spine Surg."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1188","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.11.011","article-title":"Outpatient elective posterior lumbar fusions appear to be safely considered for appropriately selected patients","volume":"18","author":"Bovonratwet","year":"2018","journal-title":"Spine J."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E36","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000604","article-title":"Feasibility and patient-reported outcomes after outpatient single-level instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion in a surgery center: Preliminary results in 16 patients","volume":"40","author":"Chin","year":"2015","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"686","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001285","article-title":"Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Ambulatory Surgery Centers: Patient Selection and Outcome Measures Compared With an Inhospital Cohort","volume":"41","author":"Chin","year":"2016","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1806","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-013-3366-z","article-title":"Same-day discharge after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A series of 808 cases","volume":"472","author":"Eckman","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1218","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20160721-04","article-title":"Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Outpatient Setting","volume":"39","author":"Emami","year":"2016","journal-title":"Orthopedics"},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568217694144","article-title":"Thirty-Day Readmission Risk Factors Following Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) for 4992 Patients From the ACS-NSQIP Database","volume":"7","author":"Garcia","year":"2017","journal-title":"Glob. Spine J."},{"key":"ref_16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"432","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002850","article-title":"Approach-based Comparative and Predictor Analysis of 30-day Readmission, Reoperation, and Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the ACS-NSQIP Dataset","volume":"44","author":"Katz","year":"2019","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"970","DOI":"10.14444\/7146","article-title":"Outpatient Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Using Multimodal Analgesic Management in the Ambulatory Surgery Setting","volume":"14","author":"Parrish","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int. J. Spine Surg."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1137","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004380","article-title":"Factors Causing Delay in Discharge in Patients Eligible for Ambulatory Lumbar Fusion Surgery","volume":"47","author":"Shahi","year":"2022","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"ref_19","first-page":"e10197","article-title":"Thirty-Day Outcomes From Standalone Minimally Invasive Surgery-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Patients in an Ambulatory Surgery Center vs. Hospital Setting","volume":"12","author":"Schlesinger","year":"2020","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"ref_20","first-page":"178","article-title":"Wound Center Without Walls: The New Model of Providing Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic","volume":"32","author":"Rogers","year":"2020","journal-title":"Wounds"},{"key":"ref_21","first-page":"219","article-title":"The VariLift((R)) Interbody Fusion System: Expandable, standalone interbody fusion","volume":"8","author":"Emstad","year":"2015","journal-title":"Med. Devices"},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S108","DOI":"10.1227\/NEU.0000000000000941","article-title":"Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery in the Elderly: Does It Make Sense?","volume":"77","author":"Shamji","year":"2015","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.21037\/jss.2017.02.05","article-title":"One and two level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using an expandable, stand-alone, interbody fusion device: A VariLift((R)) case series","volume":"3","author":"Block","year":"2017","journal-title":"J. Spine Surg."},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1186\/s12938-019-0684-8","article-title":"Is there any advantage of using stand-alone cages? A numerical approach","volume":"18","author":"Cegonino","year":"2019","journal-title":"BioMed. Eng. Online"},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.14444\/3015","article-title":"Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Degeneration with the VariLift-L Interbody Fusion System: Retrospective Review of 470 Cases","volume":"10","author":"Neely","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int. J. Spine Surg."},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E10","DOI":"10.3171\/2011.7.FOCUS1134","article-title":"Complications related to instrumentation in spine surgery: A prospective analysis","volume":"31","author":"Campbell","year":"2011","journal-title":"Neurosurg. Focus"},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1519","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199911000-00003","article-title":"Complications associated with pedicle screws","volume":"81","author":"Lonstein","year":"1999","journal-title":"J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am."},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dai, Z., Feng, D.P., Wu, K.L., Zhu, J.Y., and Li, Z.W. (2022). Hidden blood loss of minimally invasive hybrid lumbar interbody fusion: An analysis of influencing factors. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 23.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-022-06079-x"},{"key":"ref_29","first-page":"130","article-title":"Minimally Invasive Versus Open Lumbar Fusion: A Comparison of Blood Loss, Surgical Complications, and Hospital Course","volume":"35","author":"Patel","year":"2015","journal-title":"Iowa Orthop. J."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1111\/os.12397","article-title":"Surgical and Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion Surgery in an Unselected Patient Cohort of a Spinal Care Unit","volume":"10","author":"Senker","year":"2018","journal-title":"Orthop. Surg."},{"key":"ref_31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-020-01971-5","article-title":"Hidden blood loss and its possible risk factors in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"15","author":"Zhou","year":"2020","journal-title":"J. Orthop. Surg. Res."},{"key":"ref_32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-019-1266-y","article-title":"Open versus minimally invasive TLIF: Literature review and meta-analysis","volume":"14","author":"Hammad","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Orthop. Surg. Res."},{"key":"ref_33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1491","DOI":"10.1111\/1475-6773.12278","article-title":"Ambulatory Surgery Centers and Their Intended Effects on Outpatient Surgery","volume":"50","author":"Hollenbeck","year":"2015","journal-title":"Health Serv. Res."},{"key":"ref_34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000001331","article-title":"MIS-TLIF Procedure is Improving With Experience: Systematic Review of the Learning Curve Over the Last Decade","volume":"35","author":"Shuman","year":"2022","journal-title":"Clin. Spine Surg."},{"key":"ref_35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E11","DOI":"10.3171\/2018.2.FOCUS17790","article-title":"Outpatient spine surgery: Defining the outcomes, value, and barriers to implementation","volume":"44","author":"Pendharkar","year":"2018","journal-title":"Neurosurg. Focus"},{"key":"ref_36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1093\/neuros\/nyy057","article-title":"Spine Surgery in the Ambulatory Surgery Center Setting: Value-Based Advancement or Safety Liability?","volume":"83","author":"Sivaganesan","year":"2018","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"}],"container-title":["Journal of Personalized Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2075-4426\/13\/3\/566\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]],"date-time":"2025-10-10T19:00:15Z","timestamp":1760122815000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2075-4426\/13\/3\/566"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,22]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,3]]}},"alternative-id":["jpm13030566"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jpm13030566","relation":{},"ISSN":["2075-4426"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2075-4426"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,22]]}}}