{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,5]],"date-time":"2026-05-05T12:46:16Z","timestamp":1777985176619,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,6]],"date-time":"2019-09-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1567728000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Medicina"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Background and Objectives: In 2004, Lithuania started the Nationwide Cervical Cancer Screening Programme. However, screening is more opportunistic than population-wide and the programme\u2019s coverage is insufficient. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of systematic personal invitation on coverage of cervical cancer (CC) screening in urban and rural regions of Lithuania. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in an urban primary healthcare centre (PHCC) and in a rural PHCC, where prevailing CC screening practice was highly opportunistic. Over the first year, all women aged 25\u201360 who had not received a Pap smear test within the last three years in urban (n = 1591) and rural (n = 1843) PHCCs received a personal invitation letter to participate in the screening. Over the second year, the reminder letter was sent to the non-attendees (n = 1042 in urban and n = 929 in rural PHCCs). A random sample of women (n = 93), who did not attend for screening after two letters, was contacted by phone in order to identify the barriers of non-attendance. Results: Before the study, only 9.6% of the target population in urban and 14.7% in rural PHCCs participated in CC screening. After the first invitation letter, the participation in CC screening increased up to 24.6% in urban and 30.8% in rural areas (p &lt; 0.001). After the reminder letter, the attendance was 16.4% in urban and 22.2% in rural PHCCs (p &lt; 0.001). The most common barriers for the non-attendance were lack of time, long waiting time for family doctor\u2019s appointment, worries that a Pap test might be unpleasant and preventive gynaecological examination outside of the screening program. Conclusions: A systematic personal invitation with one reminder letter significantly increased the coverage of CC screening and was more effective in rural regions than in urban regions. The assessed barriers for non-attendance can be used to improve the coverage of screening.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/medicina55090570","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,9]],"date-time":"2019-09-09T03:14:41Z","timestamp":1567998881000},"page":"570","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":19,"title":["Organised Versus Opportunistic Cervical Cancer Screening in Urban and Rural Regions of Lithuania"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"55","author":[{"given":"Justina","family":"Paulauskiene","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Public Health, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT 47181 Kaunas, Lithuania"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rugile","family":"Ivanauskiene","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Public Health, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT 47181 Kaunas, Lithuania"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0413-6808","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Erika","family":"Skrodeniene","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Janina","family":"Petkeviciene","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Public Health, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT 47181 Kaunas, Lithuania"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"394","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21492","article-title":"Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries","volume":"68","author":"Bray","year":"2018","journal-title":"CA A Cancer J. Clin."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"356","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2018.07.005","article-title":"Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018","volume":"103","author":"Ferlay","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur. J. Cancer"},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2640","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2009.07.018","article-title":"Trends of cervical cancer mortality in the member states of the European Union","volume":"45","author":"Arbyn","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur. J. Cancer"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"448","DOI":"10.1093\/annonc\/mdp471","article-title":"European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. Second edition\u2014Summary document","volume":"21","author":"Arbyn","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ann. Oncol."},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"474","DOI":"10.1097\/IGC.0000000000000374","article-title":"Cervical carcinoma in the European Union: An update on disease burden, screening program state of activation, and coverage as of March 2014","volume":"25","author":"Altobelli","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer"},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"587","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2012.10.007","article-title":"How to increase uptake in oncologic screening: A systematic review of studies comparing population-based screening programs and spontaneous access","volume":"55","author":"Ferroni","year":"2012","journal-title":"Prev. Med."},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.28646","article-title":"Divergent coverage, frequency and costs of organised and opportunistic Pap testing in Finland","volume":"135","author":"Salo","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int. J. Cancer"},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2015.01.034","article-title":"Changes in cervical cancer incidence following the introduction of organized screening in Italy","volume":"75","author":"Serraino","year":"2015","journal-title":"Prev. Med."},{"key":"ref_9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1080\/01674820701504619","article-title":"Reasons for non-attendance at cervical screening as reported by non-attendees in Sweden","volume":"29","author":"Oscarsson","year":"2008","journal-title":"J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1258\/jms.2009.009073","article-title":"Barriers to cervical cancer screening attendance in England: A population-based survey","volume":"16","author":"Waller","year":"2009","journal-title":"J. Med Screen."},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2014.04.011","article-title":"Reasons for non-attendance to cervical screening and preferences for HPV self-sampling in Dutch women","volume":"64","author":"Bosgraaf","year":"2014","journal-title":"Prev. Med."},{"key":"ref_12","unstructured":"(2019, June 25). The Order of the Lithuanian Minister of Health No V-482. Available online: https:\/\/www.e-tar.lt\/portal\/en\/legalActEditions\/TAR.8FD6BCF64FD4."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2685","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2009.07.017","article-title":"Description of the national situation of cervical cancer screening in the member states of the European Union","volume":"45","author":"Anttila","year":"2009","journal-title":"Eur. J. Cancer"},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2114","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.287.16.2114","article-title":"Forum Group Members; Bethesda 2001 Workshop. The 2001 Bethesda System: Terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology","volume":"287","author":"Solomon","year":"2002","journal-title":"Jama"},{"key":"ref_15","first-page":"CD002834","article-title":"Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening","volume":"5","author":"Everett","year":"2011","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst. Rev."},{"key":"ref_16","first-page":"180","article-title":"Increasing attendance in a cervical cancer screening programme by personal invitation: Experience of a Lithuanian primary health care centre","volume":"23","author":"Lipunova","year":"2016","journal-title":"Acta Med. Litu."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.346.13.3","article-title":"A large population-based randomized controlled trial to increase attendance at screening for cervical cancer","volume":"13","author":"Eaker","year":"2004","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Camilloni, L., Ferroni, E., Cendales, B.J., Pezzarossi, A., Furnari, G., Borgia, P., Guasticchi, G., Giorgi Rossi, P., and Methods to increase participation Working Group (2013). Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 13.","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2458-13-464"},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E677","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.29176","article-title":"Improving cervical cancer screening attendance in Finland","volume":"136","author":"Virtanen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int. J. Cancer"},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.27985","article-title":"Increasing participation in cervical cancer screening: Telephone contact with long-term non-attendees in Sweden. Results from RACOMIP, a randomized controlled trial","volume":"133","author":"Broberg","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int. J. Cancer"},{"key":"ref_21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2187","DOI":"10.1038\/bjc.2014.510","article-title":"Vaginal self-sampling is a cost-effective way to increase participation in a cervical cancer screening programme: A randomised trial","volume":"111","author":"Haguenoer","year":"2014","journal-title":"Br. J. Cancer"},{"key":"ref_22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1258\/jms.2011.010086","article-title":"Narrowing the Equity Gap: The Impact of Organized versus Opportunistic Cancer Screening in Catalonia (Spain)","volume":"18","author":"Espinas","year":"2011","journal-title":"J. Med Screen."},{"key":"ref_23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1018","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.30146","article-title":"Invitation to cervical cancer screening does increase participation in Germany: Results from the MARZY study","volume":"139","author":"Radde","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int. J. Cancer"},{"key":"ref_24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1258\/jms.2010.010017","article-title":"A Fall-off in Cervical Screening Coverage of Younger Women in Developed Countries","volume":"17","author":"Lancucki","year":"2010","journal-title":"J. Med. Screen."},{"key":"ref_25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.3109\/0284186X.2013.869618","article-title":"Interventions to improve cervical cancer screening uptake amongst young women: A systematic review","volume":"53","author":"Albrow","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Oncol."},{"key":"ref_26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1960","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-11-0307","article-title":"Self-sample HPV Tests as an Intervention for Nonattendees of Cervical Cancer Screening in Finland: A Randomized Trial","volume":"20","author":"Virtanen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev."},{"key":"ref_27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1016\/j.puhe.2017.12.014","article-title":"Sociodemographic and lifestyle determinants of non-attendance for cervical cancer screening in Lithuania, 2006\u20132014","volume":"156","author":"Petkeviciene","year":"2018","journal-title":"Public Health"},{"key":"ref_28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hansen, B.T., Hukkelberg, S.S., Haldorsen, T., Eriksen, T., Skare, G.B., and Nyg\u00e5rd, M. (2011). Factors associated with non-attendance, opportunistic attendance and reminded attendance to cervical screening in an organized screening program: A cross-sectional study of 12,058 Norwegian women. BMC Public Health, 11.","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2458-11-264"},{"key":"ref_29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2014.09.019","article-title":"Self-sampling experiences among non-attendees to cervical screening","volume":"135","author":"Virtanen","year":"2014","journal-title":"Gynecol. Oncol."},{"key":"ref_30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1016\/j.canep.2018.10.008","article-title":"Trends in cervical cancer mortality rates in Lithuania, 1987\u20132016","volume":"57","author":"Everatt","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol."}],"container-title":["Medicina"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1648-9144\/55\/9\/570\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T13:17:33Z","timestamp":1760188653000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1648-9144\/55\/9\/570"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,6]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,9]]}},"alternative-id":["medicina55090570"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/medicina55090570","relation":{},"ISSN":["1648-9144"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1648-9144","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,6]]}}}