{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]],"date-time":"2026-08-01T19:53:01Z","timestamp":1785613981397,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,12]],"date-time":"2026-03-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1773273600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Medicina"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Background and Objectives: Spinal (SA) and general anesthesia (GA) are both available for lumbar disc hernia (LDH) surgery. Patient satisfaction with anesthesia service is under-investigated and may help identify areas requiring improvement, leading to better care. Materials and Methods: A prospective, non-randomized, survey-based study was performed in patients who underwent LDH surgeries under SA or GA. Patients rated perioperative pain (preoperative and postoperative days (PODs) 0, 1, and 2) and satisfaction with perioperative care (10 questions) on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10, and an overall satisfaction score (OSS) was calculated; a patient discomfort questionnaire was also used. Study outcomes were pain scores, satisfaction with care, and discomfort reported by SA and GA patients. Results: In total, 209 completed questionnaires in the GA and SA groups (114 vs. 95) were available for final analysis. Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups. The proportion of patients with severe pain decreased from &gt;80% preoperatively to 6% on POD2, and pain scores did not differ significantly between groups. Mean overall satisfaction scores (OSSs) were high: 9.71 (maximum OSS: 57% of cases) in the GA group, and 9.75 (maximum OSS: 53.7% of cases) in the SA group (p = 0.95). The ceiling effect of the patient satisfaction questionnaire had to be addressed. There was no association between the type of anesthesia and OSS. Sources of discomfort were similar between groups, except for oropharyngeal discomfort being more prevalent in the GA group (p &lt; 0.05). Postoperative pain was reported as a source of discomfort by &gt;50% of patients in both the SA and GA groups. Regression analysis identified anxiety and nude body exposure as preoperative factors associated with decreased satisfaction with anesthesia. Postoperative factors associated with submaximal satisfaction were PONV, cold, mouth dryness, and pain. Pain on POD 0 did not influence overall patient satisfaction. An association was only found when pain persisted on POD 1 and POD 2. Conclusions: No significant differences between the two anesthesia methods were found. Patient information, anxiety management, and privacy protection are important for patient satisfaction. In the postoperative period, pain and PONV management must be equally addressed, irrespective of the anesthesia method used. Further efforts to develop optimal tools for patient satisfaction assessment are necessary.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3390\/medicina62030524","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,12]],"date-time":"2026-03-12T13:12:24Z","timestamp":1773321144000},"page":"524","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/mdpi_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Lumbar Discectomy: Patient-Centered Analysis of Satisfaction with Anesthesia Service"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"62","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2642-4800","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marius","family":"Rimaitis","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-44307 Kaunas, Lithuania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0001-3975-1309","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Diana","family":"Bilskien\u0117","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-44307 Kaunas, Lithuania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2678-0565","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"K\u0119stutis","family":"Rimaitis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-44307 Kaunas, Lithuania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Indr\u0117","family":"Cirkel\u0117","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Nursing, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-44307 Kaunas, Lithuania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4048-3065","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Andrius","family":"Macas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-44307 Kaunas, Lithuania"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1213\/00000539-199609000-00021","article-title":"A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Short-and Intermediate-Term Perioperative Outcome Variables After Spinal or General Anesthesia for lumbar Disk and Laminectomy Surgery","volume":"83","author":"Jellish","year":"1996","journal-title":"Anesth. Analg."},{"key":"ref_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.3171\/spi.2005.2.1.0017","article-title":"Comparison of spinal and general anesthesia in lumbar laminectomy surgery: A case-controlled analysis of 400 patients","volume":"2","author":"McLain","year":"2005","journal-title":"J. Neurosurg. Spine"},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568218795867","article-title":"An Analysis of the Cost-Effectiveness of Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Lumbar Spine Surgery in Various Hospital Settings","volume":"9","author":"Morris","year":"2019","journal-title":"Glob. Spine J."},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E7","DOI":"10.3171\/2021.9.FOCUS21464","article-title":"Spinal anesthesia in awake surgical procedures of the lumbar spine: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 3709 patients","volume":"51","author":"Govindarajan","year":"2021","journal-title":"Neurosurg. Focus"},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clineuro.2014.01.016","article-title":"Regional anesthesia versus general anesthesia for surgery on the lumbar spine: A review of the modern literature","volume":"119","author":"Syre","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg."},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcot.2020.12.032","article-title":"Efficacy, safety, and reliability of surgery on the lumbar spine under general versus spinal anesthesia\u2014An analysis of 64 cases","volume":"16","author":"Jonayed","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Clin. Orthop. Trauma"},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcot.2021.04.026","article-title":"Lumbar spine instrumented fusion surgery under spinal anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia\u2014A retrospective study of 239 cases","volume":"18","author":"Sarkar","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Clin. Orthop. Trauma"},{"key":"ref_8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.3171\/2018.7.SPINE18460","article-title":"Implications of anesthetic approach, spinal versus general, for the treatment of spinal disc herniation","volume":"30","author":"Sharma","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Neurosurg. Spine"},{"key":"ref_9","first-page":"524","article-title":"Spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery: A randomized clinical trial","volume":"16","author":"Attari","year":"2011","journal-title":"J. Res. Med. Sci."},{"key":"ref_10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"452","DOI":"10.1097\/ACO.0000000000001270","article-title":"Patient satisfaction in anesthesiology: A narrative review","volume":"36","author":"Bello","year":"2023","journal-title":"Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol."},{"key":"ref_11","unstructured":"Schwarze, J. (1993). Grundlagen der Statistik, Neue Wirtschaftsbriefe. [5th ed.]."},{"key":"ref_12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"735","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-6576.2005.00738.x","article-title":"Emotional and interpersonal factors are most important for patient satisfaction with anaesthesia","volume":"49","author":"Capuzzo","year":"2005","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand."},{"key":"ref_13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ane.0000270208.99982.88","article-title":"Factors predictive of patient satisfaction with anesthesia","volume":"105","author":"Capuzzo","year":"2007","journal-title":"Anesth. Analg."},{"key":"ref_14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3755","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-022-07301-y","article-title":"Fulfilment of patients\u2019 mandatory expectations are crucial for satisfaction: A study amongst 352 patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA)","volume":"31","author":"Beyer","year":"2023","journal-title":"Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc."},{"key":"ref_15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1165","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.12347","article-title":"Patient satisfaction with anaesthesia\u2014Part 1: Satisfaction as part of outcome\u2014And what satisfies patients","volume":"68","author":"Heidegger","year":"2013","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"ref_16","first-page":"380","article-title":"Comparison of patient satisfaction and cost in spinal and general anesthesia for lumbar disc surgery","volume":"24","author":"Vural","year":"2014","journal-title":"Turk. Neurosurg."},{"key":"ref_17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1097\/00008506-200307000-00005","article-title":"A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Perioperative Outcome Variables After Epidural or General Anesthesia for Lumbar Disc Surgery","volume":"15","author":"Demirel","year":"2003","journal-title":"J. Neurosurg. Anesthesiol."},{"key":"ref_18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1186\/s40001-018-0339-4","article-title":"Evaluation of preoperative anxiety and fear of anesthesia using APAIS score","volume":"23","author":"Celik","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur. J. Med. Res."},{"key":"ref_19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2018.01.004","article-title":"Spinal versus general anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery in high-risk patients: Perioperative hemodynamic stability, complications and costs","volume":"46","author":"Finsterwald","year":"2018","journal-title":"J. Clin. Anesth."},{"key":"ref_20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rimaitis, M., Bilskien\u0117, D., Rimaitis, K., Cirkel\u0117, I., and Macas, A. (2025). Spinal versus general anesthesia for lumbar discectomy. Patient-centered analysis of satisfaction with anesthesia service. Res. Sq.","DOI":"10.21203\/rs.3.rs-7554000\/v1"}],"container-title":["Medicina"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1648-9144\/62\/3\/524\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,12]],"date-time":"2026-03-12T14:43:56Z","timestamp":1773326636000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/1648-9144\/62\/3\/524"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,12]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3]]}},"alternative-id":["medicina62030524"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/medicina62030524","relation":{},"ISSN":["1648-9144"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1648-9144","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,12]]}}}